Prawo KOBIETY do ABORCJI znowu ZWYCIEZYLO Dodaj do ulubionych

  • drzewko
  • od najstarszego
  • od najnowszego
  • drzewko odwrotne
    Precz z ciemnogrodem!!!

    U.S. Judge Rules Against Partial-Birth Abortion Ban

    45 minutes ago Add Top Stories - Reuters to My Yahoo!

    By Jim Christie

    SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A controversial ban on late-term abortions signed
    into law by President Bush (news - web sites) last year was ruled
    unconstitutional on Tuesday by a judge making the first court decision on the

    San Francisco-based U.S. District Court Judge Phyllis Hamilton said the law
    was unconstitutional because it was vague and posed an "undue burden" on
    abortion rights. Hamilton also ruled against the law because it lacked an
    exemption to protect a mother's health.

    Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, a Tennessee Republican and a key backer of
    the ban, said he was disappointed by the ruling and predicted it would
    eventually be overturned.

    "I'm very disappointed in the decision today," he told reporters, calling the
    procedure of allowing late term abortions "shameful."

    Judge Hamilton sided with Planned Parenthood (news - web sites) in its
    lawsuit against the federal government, which had defended the Partial-Birth
    Abortion Ban Act of 2003. The law also faces separate challenges this month
    in federal courts in New York and Nebraska.

    In her ruling, Judge Hamilton barred U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft
    (news - web sites) from enforcing the law at Planned Parenthood's more than
    900 clinics nationwide.

    Planned Parenthood doctors also may continue performing the procedure at
    clinics and hospitals not affiliated with organization, said Beth Parker, an
    attorney representing the organization.

    "She very much reaffirms a woman's right to choose," Parker said of
    Hamilton's decision.

    The U.S. Attorney General's office for Northern California was not
    immediately available for comment, although legal experts expected that it
    would move quickly to appeal the decision and get the injunction lifted.

    The National Abortion Federation (news - web sites), the Center for
    Reproductive Rights, and the American Civil Liberties Union (news - web
    sites) praised Hamilton's ruling, saying they were "pleased that the court in
    San Francisco recognized that this ban is a broad attack on abortion
    beginning as early as 13 weeks in pregnancy."

    Dr. LeRoy Carhart, the lead plaintiff in the Nebraska challenge to the
    federal law, said, "The court in San Francisco recognized this federal ban
    for what it is: a threat to women's health. The court understood that the
    government has no business trying to come between doctors and their patients
    and telling doctors that they can't put their patients' health and safety

Zaloguj się

Nie pamiętasz hasła lub loginu ?

Nie masz jeszcze konta? Zarejestruj się


  • Kategorie tematyczne
  • Najnowsze wątki
  • Więcej forów
  • Więcej wątków na ten temat
  • Tagi
Agora S.A. - wydawca portalu nie ponosi odpowiedzialności za treść wypowiedzi zamieszczanych przez użytkowników Forum. Osoby zamieszczające wypowiedzi naruszające prawo lub prawem chronione dobra osób trzecich mogą ponieść z tego tytułu odpowiedzialność karną lub cywilną. Regulamin.