stasi1 napisał:
> na symulatorach był przebieg tego lotu robiony, po awarii
> każdy pilot który ,,leciał " wylądował na lotnisku(tak pisali w wyborczej z poniedziałku).
A tak napisala komisja:
The NTSB notes that a direct return to LGA [La Guardia] would have required crossing Manhattan, a highly populated area, and putting people on the ground at risk.
Simulation flights were run to determine whether the accident flight could have landed successfully at LGA or TEB [Teterboro] following the bird strike. The simulations demonstrated that, to accomplish a successful flight to either airport, the airplane would have to have been turned toward the airport immediately after the bird strike. The immediate turn did not reflect or account for real-world considerations, such as the time delay required to recognize the extent of the engine thrust loss and decide on a course of action. The one simulator flight that took into account real-world considerations (a return to LGA runway 13 was attempted after a 35-second delay) was not successful. Therefore, the NTSB concludes that the captain’s decision to ditch on the Hudson River rather than attempting to land at an airport provided the highest probability that the accident would be survivable.
ntsb.gov/Publictn/2010/AAR1003.pdf
Jak dla mniej wymowa oryginalu komisji jest diametralnie rozna od wymowy wzmiankowanego artykulu.
--
C.
And the fun of it will get you
And the joy of it will fetch you
