first of all thanks for the time you spent to write your essay. let
me deal with some of its points.
1. my criticism of tusk. obviously i meant to say it
jokingly,however it doesn't mean that it cannot be taken more
seriously, because it does have very, very solid foundations. tusk
is a lifelong career politician in opposition, prior to becoming a
pm, he'd never had any corporate/government/statutory body position
to gain some experience in basic management skills like, for
instance, people management. don't have the time to check, but
believe that he's only official posting while in opposition was the
speaker of the senate some time back, whereby his main achievement
was the overthrowing of the olszewski government, otherwise known
as "nightshift". why the olszewski government had to be shot i don't
have to tell you i believe. given his limited experience in
management, he manages his troops by threats, fear and humiliation,
all of them public. examples? public threats to grabarczyk (?) to
complete contracts for a section of a freeway by a certain date or
face the sack. public threats to grad to sell the shipyards or face
the sack. public kiss of death to drzewiecki to prove his innocence
to the public or face the sack. outbursts of anger during cabinet
meetings as reported by the press. i believe i have proved my point.
i understand that polish and australian cultures are vastly
different, but i have never noticed these kind of behaviours from
either our pms (and i have witnessed a few by now) or the state
premiers...
2. i don't condone the actions of cba and kaczynski as described by
you. to say more, i am disgusted by the methods employed to crash
their opponents. however poland nowadays looks up to the states as
being the pattern for everything and provocation is considered a
legitimate and extremely usefool tool by both fbi and cia. take the
very first example from the net...
justgetthere.us/blog/archives/Hal-Turner-Admits-He-Worked-for-the-FBI.html#
if americans can master it, so can cba, abw and cbs in poland. is,
or has been (at least some of) it planned by the highest level of
governemnt in poland?? possibly yes, but i have no doubt that many
of fbi, cia provocations are prepared in conjunction with the
american hierarchy, too. personally i'm disgusted by such approach,
but i'm equally disgusted by palikot's public questioning of the
kaczynski's gender and the public ridicule that follows...
3. are you sure you don't take political sides??? i made a
lighthearted, one-sentence criticism of tusk's ability to manage and
at first you have tried to ridicule my comment and then (when i
attempted to defend my original point) you have unleashed the
heaviest artillery (and a page long too) against kaczynski and
kaczynski-controlled cba... any particular reason why you have
devoted your entire post to kaczynski's and kaminski's alleged
misdeeds since i gave you none in my previous posts???
let me stress again, kaczynskis are not my preferred candidates to
lead poland in the future... there might be some aspects of their
policies that i do subscribe to (most notably their desire to ensure
poland's level of independence rather than total and unreserved
dependency on brussels)... i can't say much more on that because
their energy is consumed not on promoting their policies but on
weakening and eliminating their political opponents as you rightly
state... this part of their operations i'm disgusted with as i'm not
happy with their brown-nosing of the states... however, i'm also not
happy with tusk as his and his government's main focus is to deliver
him the presidency at any cost and in the meantime the average
polish joe bloggs suffers...
4. final point... i hope in the above i have pretty much agreed with
you on kaczynski and his standards, so we are more or less in
agreement on this, but the outstanding matter is our disconnect on
tusk's management abilities and i would welcome some honest debate
with you on this one...
take care
rooboy
