Re: now you are talking, t1...
Sorry Rooboy, this one will be the last one. Cannot let you get away with a string of typical PiS untruths, which are being manipulated into the public domain as some kind of holy writ.
1. We do not know what happened exactly with the gaming industry bill. So far not even CBA has suggested that any laws have been broken by any of Mr Tusk's ministers. It is the same with the situation at the shipyards. Just because you have fallen prey to such a basic manipulation - you have established guilt in law where none has been established even by the dirty tricksters from PiS- it does not mean that what you say has any truth in it. But that is the way they operate, and they've taken you by the scruff of your neck to rub your nose in the "hot stuff" of their own making. Now, Mr Kamiński, the departing head of CBA, has got already some very serious criminal charges levelled against him by a procurator. There might yet be another charge - to do with what?, you may exclaim Rooboy, with a surprise and reluctance of a man who is afraid of having his eyes prized wide, wide open to see all the dirty machinations, of which he's been a crazed victim hereto, laid bare in front of him, once and for all - presented to Mr Kamiński. When Mr Tusk became PM, two years ago, he ordered that the privatisation of Polish shipyards be given a "counter-intelligence umbrella", to make sure that everything was being played straight. Makes sense, does it not, Rooboy? Your observations about blatant thieving through establishing phoney sister companies are quite justified. However, there is no truth that those sister companies had been acquired by anybody from PO, Mr Tusk's party. What gave you this idea? CBA did. And CBA is one of the agencies responsible for looking after the privatisation of the shipyards. In investigating the privatisation CBA was not acting against Mr Tusk, it was FOLLOWING his instructions that there be this “counter-intelligence umbrella”. Or, rather, it was only pretending to follow the instructions of Mr Tusk, the PM. CBA reports to Mr J. Kaczyński, breaking totally its statutory duty and obligations. Mr Kamiński is on his way out. He has little time before he can discharge his duty to Mr Jarosław Kaczyński, that is to discredit Mr Tusk in any way possible, paying no heed to truth, decency and common sense. Time is against him. So he does his stuff, and sends what he has on the shipyard deals to senior government officials. What he should have done was to inform the office of the Procurator first. But that would have limited the effect of "disclosure" of the shady dealings at the shipyards. However, and now comes the interesting bit. What Mr Kamiński has not noticed is that a former senior minister from the Chancellery of the Polish President, Mr Robert Draba, can be possibly implicated in a shady dealing to do with the long-running privatisation of the Polish shipyards. Now, the Polish President is a staunch supporter of PiS, he is scared stiff of running for presidency against Mr Tusk in a year's time, and he is the twin brother of Mr Jarosław Kaczyński, who, in turn, is really, as I noticed earlier, in charge of CBA. Mr Kamiński will now be investigated by the office of the National Procurator, for failing to follow the due legal process, when reporting possible lawbreaking. It is not the rule of law that Mr Kamiński is trying to uphold. His brief is to prepare ground for President Lech Kaczyński in his fight for the Polish presidency next year.
2. I find you comments about TVP astounding. Let’s, once more, go for an analogy. “The Sun”, and Mr Rupert Murdoch, have decided to back one particular party before parliamentary elections in Britain. (That funny show happens every four years.) So the other two parties go to the BBC and demand biased presentation for the duration of the campaign, because they want to have a “fair go”. Rooboy, are you mad? Go back to Poland!
3. I suggested that you read Tazbir or Davies to get some idea of the development of the Polish notion of nationality. (You know, so many languages, religions, lovely jazz.) However let’s stick to your readymade definition. There’s no need to complicate matters more. Forget the reading. Your son is Australian, because was born in Australia. Now, Mr Tusk was born in Poland. Why that does not make him Polish? If Mr Tusk is not Polish, then your son is not Australian. Rooboy, go back to Poland!
pzdr ciepło,
t1
