Jarosław Kaczyński: To sprawa pana Tuska

Hi, Rooboy

I will be brief.

1. You did say in one of your posts something about corruption within PO. So far
none has been found. Read today's news from Poland.

I quote you: "… ultimately tusk and tusk alone is responsible for the widespread
corruption within his government, and his inability to address this situation
confirms that he is a poor manager...”

Rooboy, there is no corruption in the PO government.

2. I am not a PR man for PO. What on earth gave you this idea? I'm an ordinary
citizen expressing his views. Just like you. Rooboy relax. This forum is now
read by just the two of us, I reckon. What we write here is of no interest or
importance to anybody. Do you really think that any decision makers are reading
the "GW" forums? Most unlikely. So I will not pass on to Mr Tusk your advice,
which you have so generously given free of charge. One advice of yours is that
Mr Tusk does not sack Mr Kamiński. Rooboy, Mr Kamiński has got serious criminal
charges laid against him, of abusing power, of being in charge of illegal CBA
operations, of forging documents, of committing perjury. Not bad for a chief of
state anticorruption bureau. How can Mr Tusk not sack him? Do you
really think Mr Tusk can afford to ignore the present situation, and the serious
criminal charges facing Mr Mariusz Kamiński, without risking damaging his
credibility? Apart from the fact, that if found guilty, Mr Kamiński could face
imprisonment of up to 8 years, he is also a serious threat to the
constitutional stability of Poland. Mr Tusk is guilty of a serious error to do
with Mr Kamiński. He should have sacked him two years ago.

3. Are you saying that Poland is not ready for a civilised and independent
public television service? Why not? Do you not think that PiS has done enough
damage to the process of Polish democratisation? Twenty years have passed from
the fall of Communism. And there still is external political pressure and
censorship at TVP. Just because there are politicians afraid of free debate,
does that mean that they should have any say in the running of a public
broadcaster? They want to be free to limit my freedom. But I want to be free, as
well. Is that not reasonable?

4. I do not understand your views on nationality. I used your son's example only
because you seem to have proposed a syllogism.

pozdr

t1