Poczytajcie tylko...

17.11.09, 00:38


www.globalnaswiadomosc.com/profmajewskalist.htm
    • miskidomleka Re: Poczytajcie tylko... 17.11.09, 01:00
      Majewska, mówiąc delikatnie, mija się z prawdą:

      modnebzdury.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/polskie-towarzystwo-wakcynologiczne-krytykuje-organizatorke-konferencji-
      antyszczepieniowej/

      modnebzdury.wordpress.com/2009/05/27/zastrzyk-dezinformacji-czesc-1/

      modnebzdury.wordpress.com/2009/05/29/zastrzyk-dezinformacji-czesc-2/

      modnebzdury.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/niewiarygodny-list-prof-majewskiej-wprowadzenie/

      modnebzdury.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/list-prof-majewskiej-lokalizacja-konferencji-w-simpsonwood-selektywne-cytowanie-nie-
      spisek/

      modnebzdury.wordpress.com/2009/10/08/list-prof-majewskiej-naukowcy-bez-cenzury-ukryta-prawda-czy-urojony-spisek/

      modnebzdury.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/klamliwe-cytaty-z-konferencji-w-simpsonwood-dalsza-kompromitacja-antyszczepieniowego-
      twa/

      modnebzdury.wordpress.com/2009/10/23/szkodliwosc-listu-prof-marii-majewskiej/
      • marekatlanta71 Re: Poczytajcie tylko... 17.11.09, 03:21
        No, it is the anti-vaccine zealots who are scary. They are not insane, just
        self-deluded and misguided. I hope the swine flu won’t develop into a reprise of
        1918; but if it does, the false information these people are spreading could be
        responsible for a great deal of death and suffering. Freedom of speech is a good
        thing, but this kind of fear-mongering is almost as bad as shouting “Fire!” in a
        crowded theater.
      • i.p.freely Re: Poczytajcie tylko... 17.11.09, 03:35
        Hmmm, Dr.Verstraeten wydaje sie byc szarpany miedzy mlotem i
        kowadlem.

        .... the more troubling findings of early datasets were not
        discussed at this two day meeting. It is interesting to note the
        findings he discussed at this public meeting and the closed door
        meeting held at Simpsonwood are quite different from the findings in
        his confidential draft of February 29, 2000.


        Dr. Verstraeten's paper of February 29, 2000 showed a 2.48 relative
        risk increase (a 248 percent increase) of autism in children who had
        received the mercury laced vaccines (see graph 3 at the top of page
        15 of the above report).

        www.nomercury.org/science/documents/ThimerosalVSDstudy_2-29-00.pdf

        Ciekawe, ciekawe ....


        www.nomercury.org/science/documents/FOIA_emails_11-03.pdf

        Even more troubling than the first written, yet unpublished,
        analysis of February 29, 2000 by Dr. Verstraeten and the CDC is the
        initial analysis which has been dubbed "Generation Zero" and was
        apparently never compiled into a formal report. In this analysis,
        done in November and December of 1999, CDC researchers found a
        relative risk of 11.35 for autism for those infants with >25 mcg
        exposure at one month. In other words, children exposed to
        thimerosal levels as low as those found in the flu vaccine of today
        were over 11 times more likely to acquire a neurodevelopmental
        disorder.

        These results were so disquieting to the CDC they apparently felt
        the need to revise the data by including younger infants (not yet
        diagnosed) and pulled in data from a financially faltering
        Massachusetts HMO that dramatically under reported autism rates (due
        to a poorly designed database) and used these "new" calculations in
        the second and third drafts of this report. Internal e-mails from
        the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta, obtained by SafeMinds
        under FOIA, appear to confirm this suspicion.

        All of these numerical permutations dramatically decreased the
        relationship of Thimerosal to the risk of neurodevelopmental
        disorders, including autism. Unfortunately for millions of children
        around the world, the published analysis of the VSD (Vaccine Safety
        Datalink) data had eliminated the risk, never informing others of
        their initial findings that were of great significance. Sadly, this
        version would be repeatedly cited by other authors in many medical
        publications and news stories over the next few years, even today.
        The various manipulations the dataset went through over the course
        of 4 years prior to publication is discussed in detail in the
        science section of this website.

        In the November 5, 2003 issue of Pediatrics, Verstraeten, et al
        published data based upon the manipulated figures from the VSD study
        as discussed above.

        Ironically, even Neal Halsey, M.D., a staunch supporter of the
        National Vaccine Program, and former Chairman of the CDC Advisory
        Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), raised credibility
        issues as evidenced in his December 17, 2003 letter to Pediatrics.

        In February 2004, Geier and Geier published a letter to the editor
        in Pediatrics which detailed the serious errors in the Verstraeten
        study.

        Most telling is the letter from Dr. Verstraeten himself to
        Pediatrics about the allegation that his study "cleared" thimerosal.

        www.nomercury.org/science/documents/verstraeten_letter_peds_2004.pdf

        Congressman David Weldon, M.D. (R-FL) has also detailed his concerns
        about the credibility of the these studies and suspected statistical
        cover-ups in his letter to Judy Gerberding, M.D., Director of the
        Centers for Disease Control, in his letter to her dated October 31,
        2003. Congressman Weldon stated:

        “I am very concerned about activities that have taken place in the
        National Immunization Program (NIP) in the development of this
        study, and I believe the issues raised need your personal attention.”

        “I found a disturbing pattern which merits a thorough, open, timely,
        and independent review by researchers outside of the CDC, HHS, the
        vaccine industry, and others with a conflict of interest in vaccine
        related issues (including many in University settings who may have
        conflicts).”

        “A review of these documents leaves me very concerned that rather
        than seeking to understand whether or not some children were exposed
        to harmful levels of mercury in childhood vaccines in the 1990s,
        there may have been a selective use of the data to make the
        associations in the earliest study disappear.”

        To date, there has been no corrective action taken at the CDC by Dr.
        Gerberding, in fact, the pattern of behavior continues to be
        reflected the their ongoing studies and published papers.

        ----------------





Pełna wersja