annaste1
19.02.10, 22:46
www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/feb/18/dubai-hamas-murder-uk-israeli-ambassador?showallcomments=true#comment-51
swietny artykul i prawie 700 komentarzy, z ktorych 99% potepia Mosad
tu jeden z moich ulubionych:
18 Feb 2010, 5:09PM
Tompolo
Sorry to take you all the way back to 3.56pm, but your post doesn't really seem to make any point except that Israel is violent therefore we shouldn't be unhappy if it acts violently.
If I bought an axe, broke into your house, forced you to live in what was once your - now my - back garden and then said anyone who objected to my actions was my enemy and would therefore be chopped to pieces with my axe, (I am not going to do any of this), would that mean it would be OK if people who objected got chopped up by me?
No, it wouldn't, would it. It would mean I was a psychopath and hopefully I would be arrested and locked up.
Israel is not right to kill people it disagrees with, just because it has warned it might do so.
This was torture followed by murder. There are historic reasons and there are atrocities commited by both sides, but it's not unfair to say that 11 people employed by the Israeli government torturing and killing one person is wrong.
It is. It's atrocious behaviour by a state which calls itself civilised.
And for the record, the application of light brings heat as well..