patience Re: wzyciu narodu najpiekniejsze są garnizony woj 06.02.05, 16:15 ... pod warunkiem, ze w lufy wsadzi sie kwiatki, rakiety bezzalogowe ziemia - ziemia przerobi sie na zalogowe ziemia- alfa centauri, a czolgi przekuje na lądowniki. Zołnierzy upić. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
stormy_weather Re: wzyciu narodu najpiekniejsze są garnizony woj 06.02.05, 16:22 juz to chwytam, ale dusze mam armijca....jaruzel skonczyl z chlaniem..chlali my w domu po cichu , ale z wiadra... Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
patience Re: wzyciu narodu najpiekniejsze są garnizony woj 06.02.05, 16:29 To chlejcie dalej. Chlejac z wiadra nikomu krzywdy nie zrobicie. A poza tym nie jestem pacyfista ortodoksyjny. Na przyklad nic bym nie miala przeciw jakiejs akcji komandoskiej polegajacej na wypadzie do Korei Polnocnej i poderznieciu gardla jej wodzowi. Jeszcze przez jakis czas armia moze sie przydac. A potem poszukiwaczy przygod mozna wyslac zeby budowali kolonie na Marsie. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
stormy_weather Re: wzyciu narodu najpiekniejsze są garnizony woj 06.02.05, 16:34 nie wzbudzaj się i nie graj kartą osamy czy zarkaviego...my mamy dusze naturalnych militarystow i cywilow nie ruszamy...mamy charakter zolnierzy wszyskoch frontow w tym Legii Cudzoziemskiej..po prostu jestesmy kolegami... bandyci to nie nasza braża... Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
patience Re: wzyciu narodu najpiekniejsze są garnizony woj 06.02.05, 16:38 www.fortunecity.com/victorian/riley/787/Napoleon/Prussia/Biografy/clausewitz.html ? Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
stormy_weather Re: wzyciu narodu najpiekniejsze są garnizony woj 06.02.05, 16:47 zdumiewasz mnie, jak mnie odnalazłas.. ??? Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
patience Re: wzyciu narodu najpiekniejsze są garnizony woj 06.02.05, 17:05 To jest Aquanet. To tak dziala. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
drf teoria wojny ...The aim is to disarm the enemy.... 06.02.05, 17:04 War is nothing but a duel on an extensive scale. If we would conceive as a unit the countless number of duels which make up a war, we shall do so best by supposing to ourselves two wrestlers. Each strives by physical force to compel the other to submit to his will: his first object is to throw his adversary, and thus to render him incapable of further resistance. War therefore is an act of violence to compel our opponent to fulfil our will. Violence arms itself with the inventions of Art and Science in order to contend against violence. Self-imposed restrictions, almost imperceptible and hardly worth mentioning, termed usages of International Law, accompany it without essentially impairing its power. Violence, that is to say physical force (for there is no moral force without the conception of states and law), is therefore the means; the compulsory submission of the enemy to our will is the ultimate object. In order to attain this object fully, the enemy must be disarmed; and this is, correctly speaking, the real aim of hostilities in theory. It takes the place of the final object, and puts it aside in a manner as something not properly belonging to war. 3. Utmost use of force. Now, philanthropists may easily imagine there is a skilful method of disarming and overcoming an enemy without causing great bloodshed, and that this is the proper tendency of the art of War. However plausible this may appear, still it is an error which must be extirpated; for in such dangerous things as war, the errors which proceed from a spirit of benevolence are just the worst. As the use of physical power to the utmost extent by no means excludes the co-operation of the intelligence, it follows that he who uses force unsparingly, without reference to the quantity of bloodshed, must obtain a superiority if his adversary does not act likewise. By such means the former dictates the law to the latter, and both proceed to extremities, to which the only limitations are those imposed by the amount of counteracting force on each side. This is the way in which the matter must be viewed; and it is to no purpose, and even acting against one's own interest, to turn away from the consideration of the real nature of the affair, because the coarseness of its elements excites repugnance. If the wars of civilised people are less cruel and destructive than those of savages, the difference arises from the social condition both of states in themselves and in their relations to each other. Out of this social condition and its relations war arises, and by it war is subjected to conditions, is controlled and modified. But these things do not belong to war itself; they are only given conditions; and to introduce into the philosophy of war itself a principle of moderation would be an absurdity. The fight between men consists really of two different elements, the hostile feeling and the hostile view. In our definition of war, we have chosen as its characteristic the latter of these elements, because it is the most general. It is impossible to conceive the passion of hatred of the wildest description, bordering on mere instinct, without combining with it the idea of a hostile intention. On the other hand, hostile intentions may often exist without being accompanied by any, or at all events, by any extreme hostility of feeling. Amongst savages views emanating from the feelings, amongst civilised nations those emanating from the understanding, have the predominance; but this difference is not inherent in a state of barbarism, and in a state of culture in themselves it arises from attendant circumstances, existing institutions, etc., and therefore is not to be found necessarily in all cases, although it prevails in the majority. In short, even the most civilised nations may burn with passionate hatred of each other. We may see from this what a fallacy it would be to refer the war of a civilised nation entirely to an intelligent act on the part of the Government, and to imagine it as continually freeing itself more and more from all feeling of passion in such a way that at last the physical masses of combatants would no longer be required; in reality, their mere relations would suffice—a kind of algebraic action. Theory was beginning to drift in this direction until the facts of the last war taught it better. If war is an act of force, it belongs necessarily also to the feelings. If it does not originate in the feelings, it re-acts more or less upon them, and this more or less depends not on the degree of civilisation, but upon the importance and duration of the interests involved. Therefore, if we find civilised nations do not put their prisoners to death, do not devastate towns and countries, this is because their intelligence exercises greater influence on their mode of carrying on war, and has taught them more effectual means of applying force than these rude acts of mere instinct. The invention of gunpowder, the constant progress of improvements in the construction of firearms are sufficient proofs that the tendency to destroy the adversary which lies at the bottom of the conception of war, is in no way changed or modified through the progress of civilisation. We therefore repeat our proposition, that war is an act of violence, which in its application knows no bounds; as one dictates the law to the other, there arises a sort of reciprocal action, which in the conception, must lead to an extreme. This is the first reciprocal action, and the first extreme with which we meet (first reciprocal action). ............................... . www.clausewitz.com/CWZHOME/On_War/BK1ch01.html BOOK III Same Book in Vom Kriege OF STRATEGY IN GENERAL I Strategy II Elements of Strategy III Moral Forces IV The Chief Moral Powers V Military Virtue of an Army VI Boldness VII Perseverance VIII Superiority of Numbers IX The Surprise X Stratagem XI Assembly of Forces in Space XII Assembly of Forces in Time XIII Strategic Reserve XIV Economy of Forces XV Geometrical Element XVI On the Suspension of the Act in War XVII On the Character of Modern War XVIII Tension and Rest BOOK IV Same Book in Vom Kriege THE COMBAT I Introductory II Character of a Modern Battle III The Combat in General IV The Combat in General (continuation) V On the Signification of the Combat VI Duration of Combat VII Decision of the Combat VIII Mutual Understanding as to a Battle IX The Battle X Effects of Victory XI The Use of the Battle XII Strategic Means of Utilising Victory XIII Retreat After a Lost Battle XIV Night Fighting BOOK V Same Book in Vom Kriege MILITARY FORCES I General Scheme II Theatre of War, Army, Campaign III Relation of Power IV Relation of the Three Arms V Order of Battle of an Army VI General Disposition of an Army VII Advanced Guard and Out-Posts VIII Mode of Action of Advanced Corps IX Camps X Marches XI Marches (continued) XII Marches (continued) XIII Cantonments XIV Subsistence XV Base of Operations XVI Lines of Communication XVII On Country and Ground XVIII Command of Ground BOOK VI Same Book in Vom Kriege DEFENCE I Offence and Defence II The Relations of the Offensive and Defensive to Each Other in Tactics III The Relations of the Offensive and Defensive to Each Other in Strategy IV Convergence of Attack and Divergence of Defence V Character of Strategic Defensive VI Extent of the Means of Defence VII Mutual Action and Reaction of Attack and Defence VIII Methods of Resistance IX Defensive Battle X Fortresses XI Fortresses (continuation) XII Defensive Position XIII Strong Positions and Entrenched Camps XIV Flank Positions XV Defence of Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
patience The aim is to stop the war through the means of w 06.02.05, 17:11 The aim is to stop the war through the means of war. www.kimsoft.com/polwar.htm Sun Tzu Wu (=Sun Tzu) was a native of the Ch`i State. His ART OF WAR brought him to the notice of Ho Lu, [2] King of Wu. Ho Lu said to him: "I have carefully perused your 13 chapters. May I submit your theory of managing soldiers to a slight test?" Sun Tzu replied: "You may." Ho Lu asked: "May the test be applied to women?" The answer was again in the affirmative, so arrangements were made to bring 180 ladies out of the Palace. Sun Tzu divided them into two companies, and placed one of the King's favorite concubines at the head of each. He then bade them all take spears in their hands, and addressed them thus: "I presume you know the difference between front and back, right h and and left hand?" The girls replied: Yes. Sun Tzu went on: "When I say "Eyes front," you must look straight ahead. When I say "Left turn," you must face towards your left hand. When I say "Right turn," you must face towards your right hand. When I say "About turn," you must face right roun d towards your back." Again the girls assented. The words of command having been thus explained, he set up the halberds and battle-axes in order to begin the drill. Then, to the sound of drums, he gave the order "Right turn." But the girls only burst out laughing. Sun Tzu said: "If words of command are not clear and distinct, if orders are not thoroughly understood, then the general is to blame." www.kimsoft.com/polwar03.htm ;-D Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
drf Passage of Rivers.... 06.02.05, 17:11 XV Defence of Mountains XVI Defence of Mountains (continued) XVII Defence of Mountains (continued) XVIII Defence of Streams and Rivers XIX Defence of Streams and Rivers (continued) XX A. Defence of Swamps B. Inundations XXI Defence of Forests XXII The Cordon XXIII Key of the Country XXIV Operating Against a Flank XXV Retreat into the Interior of the Country XXVI Arming the Nation XXVII Defence of a Theatre of War XXVIII Defence of a Theatre of War (continued) XXIX Defence of a Theatre of War (continued) Successive Resistance XXX Defence of a Theatre of War (continued) When No Decision is Sought For SKETCHES FOR BOOK VII Same Book in Vom Kriege THE ATTACK I The Attack in Relation to the Defence II Nature of the Strategical Attack III Of the Objects of Strategical Attack IV Decreasing Force of the Attack V Culminating Point of the Attack VI Destruction of the Enemy’s Armies VII The Offensive Battle VIII Passage of Rivers IX Attack of Defensive Positions X Attack of an Entrenched Camp XI Attack of a Mountain Range XII Attack of Cordon Lines XIII Maneuvering XIV Attack of Morasses, Inundations, Woods XV Attack of a Theatre of War with the View to a Decision XVI Attack of a Theatre of War without the View to a Great Decision XVII Attack of Fortresses XVIII Attack of Convoys XIX Attack of the Enemy's Army in its Cantonments XX Diversion XXI Invasion SKETCHES FOR BOOK VIII Same Book in Vom Kriege PLAN OF WAR I Introduction II Absolute and Real War III A. Interdependence of the Parts in a War B. Of the Magnitude of the Object of the War and the Efforts to be Made IV Ends in War More Precisely Defined—Overthrow of the Enemy V Ends in War More Precisely Defined (continuation) —Limited Object VI A. Influence of the Political Object on the Military Object B. War as an Instrument of Policy VII Limited Object—Offensive War VIII Limited Object—Defence IX Plan of War when the Destruction of the Enemy is the Object ............................... ..... fascynujaca literatura i bardzo... bardzo wspolczesna ... (.) JoD Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
canaris.jr Re: Passage of Rivers.... 06.02.05, 17:15 super !! jak znalazleś kod do mojego biura... Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś