>>> I R A K <<<

    • Gość: Mosze Juz teraz mozna... IP: 5.3R2D* / 62.219.114.* 10.09.02, 19:20
      ...powiedziec ze 13go Wrzesnia 2001r zostalo zlapanych w Holandii 4 czlonkow
      Alqaidy co szli atakowac Europejskie i Amerykanskie instytucje (Mossad byl w
      tym wlaczony razem z wywiadiem Holandyjskim)
      • Gość: Sala Re: Juz teraz mozna... IP: *.toya.net.pl 10.09.02, 19:27
        GREAT MOSHE!!!!!!!

        smile))))
        • sala.hamil Re: Juz teraz mozna... 11.09.02, 07:52
          Mosze co z Libanem co pisza gazety?
    • Gość: Mosze Jericho 1+2+3... IP: *.red.bezeqint.net 15.09.02, 07:15
      Zobacz:
      www.globalsecurity.org/
    • Gość: Tytus Re: >>> I R A K <<< IP: *.ti.telenor.net / *.ti.telenor.net 15.09.02, 10:02
      Bum Bum Bum Bum

      Bum Bum Bum Bum
      Leci B 52 Sadam pełne portki ma
      Leci B 53 Sadam łapie swoje wszy

      Jesteśmy na wczasach w tych pustynnych oazach
      W promieniach napalmu lekko rozgrzewamy się
      Leżymy na perskiej plaży płomień ropy nas parzy
      Z działek orkiestra przygrywa zabawa zaczyna się

      Dla najdroższego Husajna
      Od sympatycznego pilota B 52
      Bum, Bum , Bum , Bum

      Sadam już się ukrywa i atomu parasolem przykrywa
      To przecież nie jego wina, że ta wojna jeszcze trwa
      Powiewający bomb wiaterek zrzucamy bez rozterek
      Na Irackie domy i chałupy, bo Sadam jest do dupy

      Dla umiłowanego Sadama
      Od bliskiej sercu załogi B 53
      Blue Bum , Blue Bum ,Blue Bum

      Armia pieje z radości każdy jej pozazdrości
      Precyzyjności uderzenia tak rządy zmienia się
      Zastąpią tyrana na nowego Husajna Sadama
      On przecież pod dyktando pieje murmurando

      A Ameryka, Ameryka co kieruje światem nie od dzisiaj
      Bombarduje niweluje prewencyjną wojnę prezentuje nam

      Spałem długo tak bardzo spokojnie
      Nie myślałem o bestialskiej wojnie
      To nie moja wina, że ta wojna trwa

      Jeździmy po wydmowych piaskach
      Zapijamy łyskacza w gaz-maskach
      Już likwidować ludzi nie boimy się


      Tytus


    • Gość: Mosze Re: >>> I R A K <<< IP: *.red.bezeqint.net 15.09.02, 18:30
      www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=208649&contrassID=1&subContrassID=0&sbSubContrassID=0

      w w w . h a a r e t z d a i l y . c o m


      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Analysts: Iraq aiming planes carrying 'dirty bombs' at Israel
      Western intelligence analysts say that Iraq has readied a number of its longer-
      range aircraft for "one-way missions," carrying non-conventional payloads and
      targeting cities in Israel.

      According to the analysts, the Iraqi air force has managed to prepare a number
      of its Soviet-made Tupolev-16 and Sukhoi-25 aircraft for suicide missions
      against Israel, which would be equipped with a "dirty bomb" (radiological
      weapon) as a possible payload.

      Meanwhile, a British newspaper quoted reports from the United States on Sunday
      suggesting that British and American troops have already been deployed in
      western Iraq, in order to prevent an attack on Israel.

      According to the Sunday Telegraph, the special troops are there to prevent the
      mobilization of Scud missile launchers for an attack on Israel.

      IDF Chief of Staff Moshe Ya'alon said Sunday that Israel is prepared for a
      possible missile attack in case Iraq fires missiles at the country in
      retaliation for a U.S. strike.

      Speaking to Israel Radio, Ya'alon said there are enough gas masks for everyone
      in the country in case Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein loads his missiles with
      chemical or biological weapons.

      "The other side very well knows Israel is capable of defending itself if
      attacked," he said.

      Ya'alon also did note rule out the possibility of Israeli retaliation against
      Iraq.

      Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Defense Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer have both
      said that Israel would respond to an attack by Iraq, unlike in the 1991 Gulf
      War.

      The prime minister at the time, Yitzhak Shamir (Likud) bowed to U.S. pressure
      and did not retaliate for the some 40 Scud missiles that landed in Israeli
      territory, due to American concerns that such a move would break up the
      international coalition against Saddam, which contained a number of Arab states
      including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Syria.

      By Amos Harel, Ha'aretz Correspondent, Ha'aretz Service and Agencies


      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      /hasen/objects/pages/PrintArticleEn.jhtml?itemNo=208649

      close window
    • Gość: 25 godzina Re: >>> I R A K <<< IP: *.red.bezeqint.net 16.09.02, 08:30
      Iraqi scientist says materials for nuclear bombs in hand
      Paul Martin
      THE WASHINGTON TIMES

      Published 9/16/2002


      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      LONDON � Iraq is already using copies of pirated German equipment to
      process nuclear material for an atomic weapons program, according to a former
      Iraqi nuclear scientist who testified before the U.S. Senate this summer.
      Khidir Hamza, who led a section of the Iraqi nuclear bomb program before
      his defection in 1994, said the devices may not be discovered even if U.N.
      inspectors are allowed to return to Iraq.
      "The beauty of the present system is that the units are each very small,
      and in the four years since the inspectors left, they will have been concealed
      underground or in basements or buildings that outwardly seem normal," he said.
      Mr. Hamza was one of the first witnesses at Senate hearings on Iraq in
      July. But in a series of interviews over the past several weeks, he painted a
      much more alarming picture than was laid out before the Senate or in a widely
      discussed report released last week by the London-based International Institute
      for Strategic Studies.
      That study concluded that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein's regime could
      make an atomic bomb within months if it succeeded in acquiring the necessary
      nuclear fuel from an outside source.
      But Mr. Hamza said Iraq already has, and is processing some 1.3 tons of
      low-enriched material bought many years ago from Brazil.
      He maintained that Iraq has also been processing many tons of its own
      yellow-cake uranium, which has been extracted from large supplies of phosphates
      in the north.
      U.N. inspectors were shown 162 tons of the material before their expulsion
      in 1998, but Mr. Hamza said there are several other sites that can be used.
      "The amount of uranium it already has � conservatively estimated in a
      German intelligence report at 10 tons of natural uranium and 1.3 tons of low-
      enriched uranium � is enough for three nuclear weapons," Mr. Hamza said.
      Before their expulsion, the inspectors dismantled an illegally imported
      German centrifuge that had been used in a program that progressively refines
      natural or low-enriched uranium until it becomes suitable for weapons.
      But Mr. Hamza, who was the science adviser to the Atomic Energy
      Establishment and later helped start and direct Iraq's nuclear weapons program,
      said by then the "cat was out the bag."
      He said he suspects the Iraqis have taken advantage of the four years
      since the inspectors' expulsion to make numerous copies of the original
      smuggled centrifuge and are busily refining uranium into the necessary material
      for nuclear bombs.
      "It's a relatively simple process once you have the plans and some
      experience operating one or two centrifuges," he said.
      The key was provided, he said, when German Karl Schaab showed the Iraqis
      how to build and operate a centrifuge in 1989, and later helped them build a
      second.
      "Our engineers videoed as it was put up, so they could build identical
      ones. Then he also provided 130 classified documents and charts detailing every
      aspect of the construction.
      "When the inspectors took away the original centrifuge, we already had the
      know-how. I believe there are probably hundreds of copies today," said Mr.
      Hamza, who now lives in the United States.
      "They are easy to hide � undetectable from satellites if built within or
      under other buildings."
      The problem for Iraq, he says, is simply to keep reprocessing the material
      so that after each run it gets more and more enriched, until it reaches the 90
      percent level needed to make a nuclear weapon.
      The process can be completed more quickly if one begins with low-enriched
      uranium � which is at 3 percent to 4 percent � rather than only natural
      uranium, which is at about 0.7 percent.
      A really efficient weapons program requires thousands of such centrifuges,
      as each has a very small output of enriched uranium, Mr. Hamzi said.
      Further evidence that such a program is in place came this month when the
      United States announced the interception of a shipment to Iraq of highly
      refined aluminum tubes suitable for making centrifuges.
      "The whole centrifuge method of getting to a bomb is much easier for Iraq
      than, for example, it was for Pakistan, which took 17 years in going the same
      route," Mr. Hamza said. "They had to get it in bits and pieces, whereas we got
      a whole centrifuge and all the plans."
      Experts suggest the method being used by Iraq can take from four to seven
      years, depending on the number of centrifuges. Mr. Hamza said Iraq would have
      begun work in earnest as the inspectors left in 1998.
      "This means, unless he's stopped soon, Saddam will have set up a whole
      nuclear bomb industry, not just have made a couple of bombs," he said.
      Iraq has repeatedly denied having such a program.
      "It's not that Iraq has no material," said Foreign Minister Naji Sabri in
      a televised interview last week. "From the beginning of 1991 the government had
      a decision to leave the weapons-of-mass-destruction club. So we presented all
      we had to UNSCOM [the U.N. weapons inspectors]. There is nothing."
      Mr. Hamza, who was working on Saddam's weapons program when Israeli jets
      bombed the French-supplied 40-megawatt Osirak research reactor in 1981,
      confirmed long-held suspicions that the facility was to have been used to
      develop nuclear weapons material.
      Scientists had planned not to divert the existing French-supplied highly
      enriched nuclear fuel � enough for one bomb � but rather blanket the reactor
      with natural or depleted uranium, which would produce plutonium. That would
      have made it possible to continue producing, eventually allowing repeated bomb
      production.
      "From the moment Osirak was hit we knew we had to try another method to
      get the bomb, and the centrifuge approach is the easiest to conceal," Mr. Hamza
      said.


      Copyright © 2002 News World Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Return to the article
      • Gość: 25 Godzina Re: >>> I R A K <<< IP: 62.219.113.* 16.09.02, 08:56
        www.msnbc.com/modules/exports/ct_email.asp?/news/722016.asp
        “WE’RE SHOOTING electrons, not bullets,” said an electronic warfare
        specialist, a Master Sergeant nicknamed D.J., who requested that his real name
        not be used.
        While the U.S. Air Force has air superiority over Afghanistan, it’s
        using highly specialized aircraft to achieve information superiority as well.
        This is the brave new world of information warfare. The plane — called
        Commando Solo II and attached to the 193d Special Operations Wing of the
        Pennsylvania National Guard — operated without fighter escorts from a
        classified forward base of operations. Its altitude and route are also
        classified.
        The broadcasting platform can transmit on AM, FM and short-wave
        frequencies. It’s also an airborne TV station capable of using any of the four
        worldwide television standards. Until recently, these electronic combat
        missions were considered “black ops” — so secret, the crew was forbidden tell
        their wives or children about them. Commando Solo II’s mission was the first
        electronic warfare combat flight on which journalists were permitted to
        travel.
        Advertisement





        BIG PAYLOAD
        The plane, the oldest Hercules aircraft in the Air Force inventory, is
        crammed with electronic gear, making it one of the heaviest C-130s still
        flying.
        Six 1,000-watt and three 10,000-watt transmitters occupy the back half
        of the airplane. The front half contains dozens of electronic instruments
        manned by an electronic warfare officer and three electronic communications
        specialists.
        Once over Afghan airspace, a conical device, or drogue, is lowered over
        300 feet from the bottom of the aircraft. D.J. pulls out a minidisk and drops
        it into a standard commercial minidisk player. He pushes a play button to begin
        broadcasting a greeting in Dari and Pashto, the main languages in Afghanistan.
        Then four minutes later, a broadcast is beamed down in Arabic — targeted at al-
        Qaida fighters.



        LATEST DEVELOPMENTS


        THE HOME FRONT
        • U.S.: N.Y. men formed al-Qaida cell
        • More sleeper cells in U.S.?
        • Complete coverage
        THE WAR ABROAD
        • U.S. wants custody of 9/11 suspect
        • Powell pushes U.N. on Iraq
        • Case raises questions about intelligence gathering
        • Complete coverage






        Then, over a speaker system in D.J.’s console, fast-paced local music is
        played.
        “Music has not been heard for years. It has huge psychological impact,”
        said the mission control chief, identified as Maj. John. The music was followed
        by a carefully crafted statement about the legitimacy of the Afghan government.
        Other messages suggested that Taliban fighters surrender because Mullah
        Mohammed Omar, the Taliban’s supreme leader, and Osama bin Laden have
        themselves fled the battle. The goal is to destroy the enemy’s willingness to
        fight, Maj. John said. The message is heard on the ground throughout much of
        Afghanistan.




        • The units that go in first




        U.S. Army detachment commander Capt. Mark Mauri was with the 4th
        Psychological Operations group onboard the plane. Mauri, a special forces
        veteran, said, “We don’t do actual propaganda, we use the truth.”

        ‘HITTING THE HEARTSTRINGS’
        Psychological Operations, known as PsyOps, use country studies,
        intelligence reports, the current situation on the battle field and knowledge
        of the local population to shape their message.
        The broadcasts are targeted to “hit the heartstrings” of fighters who
        have family and loved ones back home, Mauri said. One radio script
        begins: “Attention soldiers of the Taliban! You do not have to risk your lives.”
        Hard-core al-Qaida and Taliban fighters also hear: “Osama bin Laden has
        abandoned you … because he has no concern for your life … his life is more
        important than yours … he does not care if you die … he hides in safety waiting
        for your death. You are dying only for a man who has abandoned you.”

        <a href="/news/target_front.asp"><img src=/c/0/61/361/bcol_nav.gif
        border=0></a>


        Part 1: Changing perspective
        • The new view from America
        • Hard choices on defense
        Part 2: About face on Sudan
        • U.S. warms to 'rogue' regime
        Part 3: Who defines terrorist?
        • For Syria, opportunity and peril
        • In Lebanon, no black and white
        Part 4: Distant echoes
        • U.S. crosses a line in Colombia
        • Broadcasts make Prague a target
        Part 5: Spinning on the 'axis'
        • 'Axis' missiles fall short
        • Where China fits in
        Part 6: Special forces
        • The 'special forces' war
        • The perils of new tactics
        Part 7: Iraq, Israel and the U.N.
        • On Iraq, Israel now a player
        • Will a new U.N. rise from the ashes?
        Part 8: Rethinking Asia
        • U.S. walks a Filipino tightrope
        • With India, U.S. does the Kashmir tango
        Part 9: After the fighting
        • What's next for Afghanistan
        • Old friends, new problems







        1 of 17

        The new view from America



        Do these messages work? Military officials point to the 1991 Gulf War,
        when an estimated 90,000 Iraqis, in interviews conducted by U.S. military
        intelligence, said they surrendered as a direct result of PsyOps messages.
        The same officials say scores of Taliban now held at a U.S. detention
        facility in Guantanimo Bay in Cuba say they surrendered after hearing PsyOps
        transmissions. Broadcasts are supplemented by leaflets dropped on the enemy by
        military planes.
        Special operations officials said their information warfare enhances the
        effectiveness of U.S. and coalition forces on the ground. They call it a “force
        multiplier.”





        • NBC, MSNBC and Newsweek correspondents in the war zone.




        “If we get a thousand Taliban on the ground to surrender, that’s a
        1,000 fewer Taliban that American forces will have to fight,” said Mauri.
        After an 8-hour tour of duty, the Commando Solo II returned to its
        classified base as preparations are made for the next day’s flight.

        Bob Arnot is MSNBC’s special foreign correspondent.

    • Gość: Mosze Janes ! IP: 5.3R2D* / *.red.bezeqint.net 20.09.02, 13:29



      01/09/97

      Could Israel's nuclear assets survive a pre-emptive strike?

      By Harold Hough

      Although Israel has often said that it would not be the first to introduce
      nuclear weapons into the region, Israeli officials have often publicly implied
      that certain circumstances - especially the use of chemical weapons by their
      enemies - would elicit a nuclear response. In fact, evidence indicates that
      Israel might launch a pre-emptive nuclear strike under certain conditions. A
      critical part of Israel's nuclear strategy is the Jericho 2 missile, and some
      insight can be gained into the Jericho 2 and its employment by studying
      satellite imagery of the missile base at Zachariah, several miles southeast of
      Tel Aviv. Off-nadir viewing by satellites like the high-resolution Indian IRS-C
      allows the development of three dimensional scenes, which highlight the
      geological structures that house the missile bunkers. Combined with other
      imagery and advanced enhancement techniques, significant intelligence can be
      gathered concerning Israel's nuclear strategy.

      The Jericho 2
      Several satellite images showed the massive Jericho 2 transporter-erector-
      launcher (TEL) during training exercises on a small pad north of the nuclear
      weapon bunkers at the missile base at Zachariah (which in Hebrew means 'God
      remembers with vengeance'). The resolution makes accurate measurement
      difficult, but the best estimate obtainable suggests the missile transporter is
      about 16 m long, 4 m wide and 3 m high (according to reports, the missile is 14
      m long and l.5 m wide). There is no indication of whether the TEL is wheeled or
      tracked, but there is no evidence that it is on rails. The missile transporter
      also has three support vehicles around it. Adjacent to the TEL and probably
      connected to it by cables is a guidance programmer and power vehicle
      approximately the size of a truck. On the other side of the pad, about 10 m
      away, are two other vehicles: probably a firing control vehicle and a
      communications vehicle. Such a configuration would mirror that of the Pershing
      II missile system deployed by the USA in Europe and then dismantled under the
      INF Treaty. This would confirm reports that Israel was very interested in the
      design of the Pershing missile and aggressively pursued US technology to build
      the Jericho. Although the range of the Jericho 2 is unconfirmed, scientists
      have estimated its maximum range as 5,000 km with a warhead of 1,000 kg: enough
      for a nuclear weapon.

      Missile base vulnerability
      Although the approximately 50 Jericho 2 missiles housed at Zachariah are
      formidable, an analysis of the base with satellite imagery shows considerable
      weaknesses. Even though the base was built in the 1980s, when the Soviet Union
      was considered a threat, the base is vulnerable to a Soviet nuclear strike. The
      Jericho 2 missile is deployed on a lightly armoured transporter and there is
      little above ground protection. Contrary to published reports, there are no
      signs of missile silos in the satellite imagery. These are distinctive, since
      they have heavy silo closure doors that can withstand a nearby nuclear blast
      and clear debris piled on top of them. Instead, the missiles appear to be
      stored in limestone caves under the site. If ordered to attack, the missiles
      would leave their underground shelters and move to prepared cul-de-sacs or
      deploy around the countryside. Clearly, the missile base was not designed to
      survive a Soviet attack since an accurate Soviet ICBM could easily destroy the
      base and everything underground. According to analysts, Israeli strategy vis-à-
      vis the USSR was to immediately retaliate, before the base was destroyed.

      Although the Soviet threat is gone, the missile base remains vulnerable to a
      nuclear-tipped ballistic missile such as the Chinese M-9, which has a CEP of
      300 m - accurate enough to threaten the base. Although accuracy and the type of
      nuclear explosion would determine the extent of the damage, a quick review of
      the effects of a nuclear blast raise serious questions about Zachariah's
      ability to survive a Third World-produced nuclear missile. If a missile
      containing a crude, 20 kiloton nuclear warhead detonated 2,200 m above and
      1,000 m away from its intended target within Zachariah, the surface target
      would still sustain severe damage from heat, radiation, and blast effects. Two
      kilometres from ground zero, the shock wave (at 34.5 KPa) would be powerful
      enough to destroy unreinforced buildings and unprotected TELs, while the
      thermal radiation (10 calories/cm2) would be enough to ignite combustible
      materials. If the base were hit with missiles having the accuracy of the M-9,
      even reinforced underground caves would be seriously damaged by a ground burst.

      ICBM silos like those in the USA and Russia are designed to protect the crew
      and equipment from the blast, heat and radiation damage of a nearby nuclear
      blast. Constructed from above ground and then covered with dirt, they are built
      using a single cement pour to provide structural integrity and shock support
      and incorporate tunnels that can survive the fracturing and ground movement
      sustained by a ground burst while allowing instant access to the surface.

      The base at Zachariah is built in a limestone region and probably uses caves,
      which are common to the area. An analysis of three-dimensional imagery based on
      satellite data shows entrances leading into several small hills, which have
      probably been hollowed out to house the Jericho 2 and its TELs. In the case of
      the two largest bunker complexes, hills surround the entrances to the bunkers,
      providing a degree of protection to the entrance. However, these caves cannot
      be reinforced to provide the same blast protection as a specially built blast-
      proof bunker. Even a low-yield nuclear ground blast could fracture and shift
      the ground enough for tunnels leading from the bunkers to the surface to be
      impassable to TELs. Since the missile site covers an area smaller than 6 x 4
      km, just a few nuclear- tipped missiles might neutralise Israel's missile
      threat and damage the nearby bunkers holding the air force's nuclear gravity
      bombs. By being vulnerable to a ballistic missile with a crude nuclear device,
      Israel may be forced to launch a pre-emptive nuclear strike rather than risk
      losing its ability to respond with nuclear weapons. This vulnerability appears
      to show an inertia within the Israeli military and has serious implications for
      the region. Instead of reviewing its nuclear strategy after the fall of the
      Soviet Union and focusing on making a nuclear deterrent that could survive an
      attack by Third World nuclear weapons, Israel continued to focus on producing
      more nuclear weapons as if envisioning a nuclear exchange with a geographically
      large country.

      During the Cold War both US and Soviet leaders had numerous false indications
      of attacks by the other side. In each case, the leaders waited until further
      evidence showed that the launch signal was false. Part of this willingness to
      wait was due to the knowledge that their nuclear deterrent was dispersed
      throughout their country and hardened against attack.

      Nuclear weapon bunkers
      Just to the south of the Jericho 2 training pad are several bunkers thought to
      contain nuclear gravity bombs for Israel's attack squadrons at the Tel Nof air
      base just a few kilometres to the northwest. Although some bunker dimensions
      vary, five of the larger ones are about 15 m wide and 20 m long. The above-
      ground height is 6 m. In all, there are 21 pads, each with a bunker. The
      scarring around the site indicates that the bunkers were built at different
      times, and the condition of the roads leading to each bunker indicates that
      they are all in use.

      The size and number of bunkers indicates that Israel's nuclear arsena
    • Gość: Mosze Re: >>> I R A K <<< Pollard >>> IP: 5.3R2D* / 62.219.112.* 23.09.02, 08:18
      www.jonathanpollard.org/iraq.htm#articles
    • Gość: Mosze Re: >>> I R A K <<< IP: 5.3R2D* / *.red.bezeqint.net 23.09.02, 17:45
      Saddam May Get First Strike in:
      Israel Is Prime Target
      DEBKAfile Military Analysis:
      21 September: DEBKAfile’s military sources point to the danger of Iraqi ruler
      Saddam Hussein attempting to turn the tables on the American offensive against
      his regime by stealing a leaf from the Bush administration’s newly- enunciated
      first-strike strategy.
      An Iraqi pre-emptive could take three forms:
      1. Nuclear, biological or chemical terror strike in a major American city or
      closer to home against Israel.
      2. Military or terrorist action against one of the Persian Gulf nations that
      have made bases available to the United States, with Kuwait, Qatar and Oman
      first in line.
      3. A large-scale missile assault on Israel.
      The latest official pronouncements have played down any such threat to Israel.
      US defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld said on Thursday, September 19, that he
      trusted Israel would not react if struck by Iraqi missiles, while the Israel
      chief of staff, Lt. Gen. Moshe Yaalon said last week that he is less worried
      about the Iraqi threat than he is by Palestinian terror. Nonetheless, neither
      official is oblivious to the possibility of an Iraqi first strike action and
      both the United States and Israel have made appropriate preparations.
      DEBKAfile reports as a certainty that, far from refraining to respond, Israel
      will reply to any Iraqi strike by making its military presence known to Iraq in
      the full strength.
      The threat of an Iraqi military strike increases the closer the Americans come
      to launch-date for their overt war against Baghdad. Washington admitted
      Saturday, September 21, that a detailed Pentagon plan containing the military
      options for deposing Saddam had been delivered to the White House in early
      September.
      In its latest issue, on September 20, DEBKA-Net-Weekly reported that, on
      September 10, the Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Richard Myers, and
      the head of the Central Command, General Tommy Franks, informed President Bush
      they had wound up the preparations for war and it was over to the president for
      the countdown to D-Day. The exclusive report noted that covert military
      operations are advancing stage by stage, concurrently with the White House’s
      all-out bid for support in and outside the United Nations and in the US
      Congress.
      “It is a kind of modular exercise” - one high-placed Washington source put
      it, "structured so that when it is completed, the commander in chief can signal
      the transition to open war without further preliminaries on the ground.”
      DEBKA-Net-Weekly ’s military sources report that special forces units from the
      United States,Britain, Turkey,Jordan are operational inside Iraq. A steel ring
      furthermore encloses Iraq by land and sea, some of its links formed by bases in
      such countries as Saudi Arabia (despite its ifs and buts - as we first revealed
      on August 2), Egypt,Qatar, Bahrain,Oman, Kuwait.
      Friday, September 20, President George W. Bush, when he hosted Russian defense
      and foreign ministers at the White House, opened the door to a compromise on
      Moscow’s resistance to a new and tougher UN Security Council on Iraq that spelt
      out the consequences for Iraq’s failure to disarm. This was confirmed in the US
      president’s conversation with Vladimir Putin at his Black Sea holiday resort.
      In any case, US counteraction by veto is in the air. US Secretary of State
      Colin Powell warned Council members that if they refuse to endorse the American
      resolution, Washington will vote against sending UN arms inspectors to Iraq.
      Baghdad has meanwhile announced that it will not admit inspectors dispatched in
      accordance with the American-formulated resolution.
      Cutting through this diplomatic cat’s cradle, Franks stepped forward Saturday,
      September 21, to confirm his forces are ready to undertake whatever activities
      and actions may be directed as soon as the president makes the decision to go
      to war. He spoke while touring US bases in Kuwait after calling two unscheduled
      training exercises that could quickly be converted into war action in
      neighboring Iraq.
      The evidence in hand at the moment points to the first or second week of
      October as the likeliest time for the overt side of the war to be launched by
      Washington – barring any unforeseen Iraqi pre-emptive move.
      With telling timing, the Bush administration unveiled Friday, September 20, its
      national security strategy, a document that emphasized military pre-emption as
      the prime means for maintaining America’s political and military superiority
      against the newly-emerging threats.
      “As a matter of common sense and self-defense”, says the paper, “America will
      act against such emerging threats before they are fully formed”. It is
      therefore willing to launch pre-emptive military strikes against perceived
      dangers posed by tyrant state and terrorist networks before they reach American
      shores. Terrorists and rogue states were identified as the common enemy of the
      world’s great powers. “The greatest danger our nation faces lies at the
      crossroads of radicalism and technology.”
      The paper addresses the transformation of national security institutions,
      stressing the need to improve intelligence.
      ________________________________________
      • Gość: © Re: >>> I R A K <<< IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 09.10.02, 00:15
        www.jonathanpollard.org/1998/080698.htm
    • Gość: Mosze Re: >>> I R A K <<< IP: 5.3R2D* / *.red.bezeqint.net 25.09.02, 07:20
      wiadomosci.wp.pl/temattygodnia.html?kat=1591
      Wiadomości > O tym się mówi > Konflikt Izrael-Palestyna
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Blair: Saddam może zaatakować w 45 minut 2002-09-24 (16:39)

      Prezydent Iraku Saddam Husajn może w ciągu 45 minut uruchomić broń chemiczną i
      biologiczną - wynika z dokumentacji w sprawie Iraku, którą premier Tony Blair
      przedstawił we wtorek na nadzwyczajnej sesji w Izbie Gmin.

      Husajn dysponuje ponadto rakietami, które mogą dosięgnąć m.in. Izrael, Turcję -
      państwo członkowskie NATO i brytyjskie bazy na Cyprze.

      Irak Saddama dysponuje potencjałem, który w przypadku zniesienia obowiązujących
      sankcji ONZ, pozwoli wyprodukować z pomocą zagranicy w ciągu roku lub dwóch
      bombę atomową.

      To tylko niektóre z najważniejszych punktów dokumentacji przedstawionej we
      wtorek przez Blaira w parlamencie brytyjskim i dowodzącej, że Irak posiada broń
      masowego zniszczenia.

      Z dokumentacji tej, opartej na informacjach pozyskanych przez brytyjskie tajne
      służby i przez inspektorów rozbrojeniowych ONZ, wypływa tylko jeden wniosek:
      Musimy zagwarantować, że Saddam nie wykorzysta broni, którą posiada i nie
      wejdzie w posiadanie tej, którą chce mieć - powiedział Blair.

      Krytycy Blaira z szeregów liberalnych demokratów i jego własnej Partii Pracy
      uznali wystąpienie premiera za chwyt polityczny, bowiem większość faktów
      przedstawionych przez niego, była znana już wcześniej. Także niektórzy eksperci
      w dziedzinie obrony wypowiedzieli się w tym duchu.

      Przywódca liberalnych demokratów Charles Kennedy ostrzegł Blaira w debacie
      parlamentarnej przed pospiesznymi akcjami i wypowiedział się przeciwko
      amerykańskiej jednostronności.

      Irak określił informacje brytyjskie jako kampanię kłamstw. Twierdzenia Blaira
      są pozbawione podstaw - powiedział w Bagdadzie minister kultury Iraku Jusef
      Hammadi.

      Blair w swym parlamentarnym wystąpieniu wskazał na fakt, że rząd brytyjski
      jeszcze nigdy nie publikował podobnej dokumentacji. Wymagała tego obecna
      dyskusja na temat ewentualnej operacji wojskowej przeciwko Irakowi - powiedział
      brytyjski premier. Irak stwarza, według Blaira, poważne zagrożenie dla
      brytyjskich interesów narodowych.

      Iracki minister spraw zagranicznych Nadżi Sabri oświadczył we wtorek, że Bagdad
      gotowy jest przyjąć brytyjskich ekspertów rozbrojeniowych, by W. Brytania miała
      szanse dowieść swych oskarżeń pod adresem jego kraju.

      Broni masowego zniszczenia i broni atomowej nie można schować w kieszeni. Jeśli
      oni (Brytyjczycy) mają tyle dowodów co do tej broni, jesteśmy skłonni ułatwić
      wizytę ekspertom brytyjskim, by powiedzieli światu, gdzie znajduje się ta broń -
      powiedział Sabri w Kairze. Te twierdzenia są jedynie próbą usprawiedliwienia
      agresywnych zamiarów wobec Iraku - dodał iracki minister. Jesteśmy skłonni
      uczynić wszystko, co pozwoliłoby ONZ i wspólnocie międzynarodowej upewnić się,
      że oskarżenia te są kłamliwe. (an)

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    • Gość: Mosze >>> I R A K <<< IP: 5.3R2D* / *.red.bezeqint.net 25.09.02, 08:59
      Arafat-Saddam-Bin Laden Links Surface
      DEBKAfile Expose
      24 September: DEBKAfile’s readers were not taken aback by the Israeli Shin
      Beit’s (Security Service) disclosure on September 23 that it had custody of a
      three-man Palestinian cell from Ramallah who trained in Iraq with Iraqi
      instructors in the execution of strikes against Israeli targets - in the
      company of al Qaeda terrorists.
      Their admissions - which link Yasser Arafat, Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden
      in a collaborative relationship for the pursuit of terror – were included in a
      sensitive file carried to Washington this week by a team of Israeli officers.
      DEBKAfile pointed attention to this association right after the Passover
      massacre at the Park Hotel in Netanya on March 27, 2002. Three months earlier,
      in January 2002, we highlighted secret rendezvous taking place regularly in
      Amman between two childhood friends: Col. Tawfiq Tirawi, chief of West Bank
      General Intelligence and one of Arafat’s most trusted aides, and another
      Palestinian terror executive, Mohammad Abbas, known as Abu al-Abbas, head of
      the Baghdad-based Arab Liberation Front. The two men were born and went to
      school in the village of Tirah north of Ramallah. From 1991, they have been
      meeting regularly in Amman, which is halfway between the West Bank and Baghdad,
      to trade directives, intelligence, funds and messages between their respective
      bosses.
      Abu al-Abbas is better known for hijacking the Achille Lauro pleasure craft in
      985 in an operation ordered by Arafat’s and throwing the American Jewish Leon
      Klinghoffer overboard in his wheelchair.
      Tirawi’s importance to Arafat is such that is willing to see his government
      compound in ruins rather than hand his senior aide over with his pockets full
      of incriminating secrets.
      According to DEBKAfile’s military and counter-terror sources, the Israeli
      officers brought to Washington two further pieces of information:
      1. The interrogations of Palestinian and Iraqi terrorists and agents picked up
      in recent weeks in the West Bank, at the Jordan Bridges crossings from Jordan
      and in Jordan itself, yielded the discovery that Yasser Arafat’s hand was
      behind the assassination in Baghdad on August 16 of the terror master Abu
      Nidal, his notorious former partner turned rival, with four of his aides.
      Indeed, Tirawi and Abu al-Abbas were entrusted with setting up the murder.
      Arafat asked Saddam Hussein to get rid of Abu Nidal, claiming he was on the
      point of passing to American parties in the Persian Gulf evidence of the three-
      way partnership-for-terror forged by Arafat, Saddam and bin Laden. Arafat
      relayed his request to the Iraqi leader through Ahmed Azzam, Arafat’s special
      envoy to Baghdad, together with Al-Abbas.
      Saddam gave his assent at the beginning of August. The plan of operation
      entailed Abu Nidal’s regular contacts in Iraqi intelligence calling on him and,
      when he opened the door unsuspectingly, standing aside for the Palestinians to
      burst in and do the deed..
      2. The second piece of information relayed to Washington exposes another
      hidden facet of the working relationship binding Arafat and his PLO with Saddam
      and al Qaida. That facet surfaced after Italy seized a ship on August 5,
      carrying a suspected al Qaeda cell of 15 Pakistanis. The ship’s smudged name
      appeared to be “Sara”. The Pakistanis were detained in Sicily after US naval
      intelligence deciphered coded messages and gathered evidence on some of the
      men. One coded note used the expression “united in matrimony”, which was
      similar to a reference intercepted during the first attack on New York’s
      TwinTowers in 1993.
      DEBKAfile ’s counter-terror sources reveal exclusively one of the most telling
      discoveries of the Italian investigation: The “Sara” was owned by the same
      shipper as the Karine-A, the freighter captured by Israel last January with 50
      tonnes of arms bound for the Palestinian Authority. Both vessels were also
      purchased by the same Palestinian-Iraqi company; the Palestinians negotiated
      the purchase with money put up by Iraq. Both ships flew the Tongan flag of
      convenience.
      Whereas the Karine-A carried a cargo of contraband weapons provided by Iran,
      the Sara carried a suspected al Qaeda terrorist cell.
      Arafat may protest he is innocent of terrorist activities and make a show of
      demanding a halt to terror. However, ample evidence continues to pile up
      demonstrating his hand in violence not only against Israel, but also in al
      Qaeda’s global terror campaign and Iraq’s machinations against the United States
    • Gość: Mosze >>> I R A K <<< Wazne >>> IP: 5.2.1R* / 62.90.180.* 26.09.02, 09:23
      In Two Air Raids Wednesday, US-UK Warplanes Hit
      Air Defense Installation at Al Amarah, 165 Miles SE of
      Baghdad, Defense Communications Facility at Talil,
      170 Miles South of Capital


      Izrael bierze pod uwage, kiedy bedzie atak na Irak-to jego kamradzi Arafat i
      Hizbulla otworza nowy front przeciwko Izraelowi. Hizbulla przygotowal okolo
      10,000 katiusz dalekiego zasiegu (40 km). Teraz oni tylko potrzebuja przyczyny
      zeby ostrzelac nasze miasta. Kiedy to stanie sie, bedzie mozna skreslic Libanu
      z mapy...

      Z drugiej strony pan Arafat przygotowal nowa Intyfade, ktora ta co teraz jest
      bedzie podobna do dziecinnej zabawki...
      • Gość: ... Re: >>> I R A K <<< Wazne & IP: *.warszawa.sdi.tpnet.pl 26.09.02, 11:11
        Mosze co ty tak sam ze sobą? Kłopoty masz kup sobie psa. Masz jakiś inny powód
        aby reanimowac martwy temat? Masz jakąś tajemnicza misje? Nadmierny przyrost
        ambicji? Widzisz ogólny brak zainteresowania, to daj sobie spokój nie podnoś
        martwego tematu kto będzie chciał to go sobie znajdzie.
    • Gość: MOSZE >>> I R A K <<< IP: 5.2.1R* / 62.90.180.* 30.09.02, 14:21
      Iran Jumps Aboard US War on Iraq
      DEBKAfile’s Washington, Gulf Sources
      30 September: America’s failure to enlist UN Security Council members for a
      tough new ultimatum to Baghdad is misleading. On the quiet, Washington has made
      important strides in the bid to assemble an Arab-Muslim coalition for its war
      effort. Egypt and Saudi Arabia were the first to come on board, although they
      refrain from publicly admitting to having made their sea and air bases
      available for the American assault.
      According to DEBKAfile ’s military sources, the big Egyptian military base at
      Cairo West has been turned over to the US war command as its foremost
      logistical launching pad, while US warships freely navigate the Suez Canal.
      The Saudi Prince Sultan air base northeast of Riyadh is now an American forward
      base for air raids over southern Iraq. Sunday, September 29, US AWACs took off
      from Sultan to escort American bombers raiding Iraqi command posts and radar
      systems at the big international airport of Basra, Iraq’s port city on the
      Persian Gulf. This second American air assault against Basra inside a week had
      more than one effect; one was to disable Iraq’s potential for striking out at
      neighboring Iran and its Khozistan oilfields.
      What has happened to place Iran, one of Washington’s fiercest critics, in
      Saddam’s gun-sights? And why are US warplanes protecting the Islamic Republic?
      The answer was offered in Issue 78 of DEBKA-Net-Weekly that came out on
      September 27:
      President George W. Bush and his aides must be patting themselves on the back
      this week over the remarkable feat of turning round an implacable foe for its
      line-up against Iraq: DEBKA-Net-Weekly’s military and Iranian sources report
      that months of laborious bargaining have produced a secret US-Iran military
      cooperation agreement for the operation to overthrow the Saddam Hussein regime.
      Iran’s first quid pro quo was having its forces co-opted to the assault.
      According to our military sources, a several hundred-strong Iranian vanguard
      apparently went into northern Iraq some ten days ago. It is believed to be made
      up of Iraqi and Afghan rebels fighting inthe Badr force, an elite counter-
      terrorism contingent of the Revolutionary Guards. US and Turkish special forces
      officers escorted the Iranian unit to its deployment zone in the Kurdish
      Sulimaniyeh area.
      This week, DEBKAfile adds, the military partnership went into political gear.
      Iraqi foreign minister Naji Sabri, who flew to Tehran Sunday, September 29 to
      seek support against Washington, was coldly informed by President Mohamed
      Khatami that Iran wanted the entire Persian Gulf free of weapons of mass
      destruction. On his way out, the Iraqi minister almost bumped into Kuwait’s
      defense minister Sheikh Jaber Mubarak al-Hamad, who arrived on a diametrically
      opposed errand: a two-day conference with his Iranian opposite number, Rear
      Admiral Ali Shamkhani, on “collective security”.
      According to DEBKAfile’s sources in Tehran, the two defense ministers have been
      assigned by the US war command to line up their military front against Iraq.
      Iran’s still secret about-face gives substantial ballast to the anti-Saddam
      Arab-Muslim alliance put together by the Bush team and offers a rebuttal for
      much of the criticism of an American military move against Baghdad coming from
      the Democrats in the US Congress, the Europeans led by France and Germany and
      the UN secretariat under Kofi Annan. Many critics claim to speak for the Arab
      Middle East and Persian Gulf. Now that the strongest Gulf power, Iran, has
      crossed the floor – and is not the first to do so - President George W. Bush
      can claim a regional coalition weightier than the one which confronted Iraq in
      1991.
      DEBKA-Net-Weekly ’s Iran experts recall that just before the Afghan War last
      October, Washington and Tehran secretly shook hands on a military pact to do
      battle against al Qaeda and the Taliban and in particular protect the Shiite
      population of W. Afghanistan, especially in the Herat province. That pact is in
      effect reaffirmed in a different context.
      One key rationale for Tehran is its compulsion to hold onto its influence among
      Iraq’s Shiites, who make up some 60 percent of the 23 million strong
      population, and protect its interests in any future government rising in
      Baghdad. Ever practical, the ayatollahs calculated that the American military
      operation against Saddam is a foregone conclusion anyway; therefore it was more
      to their advantage to jump aboard the speeding American bandwagon than to snipe
      at the US war effort from the shrinking opposition.
      The Iranians are now keen to pull Syria out of the opposition camp and over to
      the American side so as to ward off a potential American or Israeli strike
      against the Damascus-based Palestinian radical terror groups and Hizballah
      strongholds in South Lebanon.
      Tehran was also influenced by the recent outbreak of stormy anti-government
      riots in Damascus, reported exclusively by DEBKAfile last Thursday, September
      26. The Assad regime turns out to be a lot less stable than thought. Its fall
      would remove one of the Hizballah’s key props.
      Iran’s crossover to the American side against Iraq does not detract an iota
      from its sponsorship of the Hizballah’s war against Israel or the Lebanese
      government’s plan for plugging an important source of Israel’s water supply
      with the Wazzani River diversion project.
      This gives Tehran a chance to pull off a double: If the Lebanese get away with
      this project under Iranian protection, while at the same time the Iranian-
      American military collaboration in Iraq is successful, Iran’s standing in the
      Persian Gulf and Middle East will be much enhanced. At the same time Tehran
      will not be required to abandon its ingrained animosity to Israel.
      To make sure Israel did not upset the gathering US Islamic-Arab alliance,
      Washington forced Israel into a military climb-down in Ramallah, giving Yasser
      Arafat his moment of triumph as he emerged from 11 days of Israeli blockade.
      Pale and trembling amid the rubble of his government headquarters, he
      brandished the V-sign for the tiny following that came out to cheer him.
      Although Israeli siege forces have moved back, Arafat is still trapped. His
      presence in the only building left standing in his compound is the last shield
      protecting his terrorist masterminds from Israel’s grasp.
      DEBKA-Net-Weekly’s sources find neither the Americans nor Iranians under any
      illusion that their old feud is resolved by their new military accord. But, as
      an ad hoc device, this collaboration has made it possible for the United States
      to tighten its noose around the necks of Saddam and his regime, while putting
      its longstanding war of words with Iran on hold for the duration.
      This analysis contained one high point from a single article appearing in the
      last DEBKA-Net-Weekly,
    • Gość: MOSZE >>> I R A K <<< Rzeznik z Bagdadu uwazaj!!!>>> IP: 5.3R2D* / *.red.bezeqint.net 30.09.02, 19:17
      www.isayeret.com/operations/desert.htm
      While it was never officially admitted, several Israeli Defense Force (IDF)
      elite Special Forces (SF) teams took active yet covert part in the Desert Storm
      campaign, Persian Gulf, 1991.

      In August 2, 1990, the Iraqi armed forces invaded Quait and declared it as an
      integral part of the Iraqi state. Soon afterwards the U.S. called for the Iraqi
      retreat from the area, formed a very fragile coalition with several European as
      well as Arab countries, and started mobilizing troops and equipment to the
      region.

      Like in the 1973 Israeli-Arab Yom Kippur War, the Israeli intelligence was
      caught off guard and without any worthwhile intelligence sources in the region.
      In order to fix that, several field agents from the Mossad - the Israeli
      Foreign Intelligence Gathering Service - were inserted into to Iraq and to
      Quait. At the same time operators from Sayeret MATKAL (Unit 767) - the IDF
      primary SF unit - were sent it to obtain more tactical oriented intelligence on
      the Iraqi army movements.

      At the time, the chances for Iraq to actually attack Israel were still slim,
      but the Mossad agents as well as the Sayeret MATKAL operators were sent in just
      in case.

      In January 16, 1991, a day after the UN ultimatum to Iraq expired, the U.S.
      began massive aerial assault against Iraqi targets. Less then 24 hours later
      Iraq sent 8 Scud land-to-land missiles on Israel, targeting mainly the heavily
      populated Tel-Aviv city area. After the Scud assault the Israeli Air Force
      (IAF), which was already on high alert, began preparations for a long-range
      retaliation attack. However, feared for the sake of its already fragile
      coalition, the U.S. demanded that Israel will not take any offensive measures
      against Iraq, and that the U.S. will make a special effort to track down and
      destroy the mobile Scud launchers. In return for the Israeli official non-
      participation in the crisis, Israel received a U.S. permission to deploy
      several SF teams in the American sector of the Scuds hunt, located north of the
      Baghdad-Amman highway and better known as the "Scud Boulevard".

      The Israeli SF teams were to deploy at an absolute covert manner, without any
      interface what so ever with other coalition forces and without any trace that
      may identify them as Israeli.

      Shortly after the U.S. permission was granted few teams from several different
      SF units were inserted to the area by CH53 transport helicopters and the
      operation began.

      Quite ironically, the intelligence gathered by the Mossad and Sayeret MATKAL
      operatives, which were inserted few months earlier, was used as a bargain cheep
      by the Israelis in their negotiations with the Americans and was one of the
      main reasons why the Israelis were authorized to operate in the area.

      The teams, which were sent in, were from the following units:

      Sayeret Shaldag.

      Sayeret Maglan.

      One reserve team from Unit 669.

      Sayeret MATKAL.

      Few teams from classified electronic warfare and communication units.

      All teams were equipped with non-Israeli oriented Land Rover jeeps,
      experimental dune buggies, and specially modified Swedish Husqvarna
      motorcycles. All vehicles were painted in desert camouflage layout and had no
      Israeli markings on them. Due to the long duration of the operation and the
      lack of any nearby support, massive auxiliary equipment and gear was also
      taken.

      The main offensive elements of Israeli SF group were the teams from Sayeret
      Shaldag and Sayeret Maglan. More then half of these two units' operators
      participated in the Scud hunt, and were equipped with Land Rover jeeps fitted
      with Anti Tank Guided Missiles (ATGM).

      On the other hand, since Sayeret MATKAL had deployed in the Area of Operation
      (AO) long before the rest of the units did, the unit role in the operation was
      more an intelligence oriented one, as the unit is originally designed to do.
      Part from few unavoidable incidents, Sayeret MATKAL didn't handle the offensive
      missions at all, and instead acted as the Long Range Reconnaissance Patrol
      (LRRP) and pathfinders for all of the other teams.

      Once deployed to the region, the Israeli SF teams began seeking for mobile Scud
      launchers as well as for other high value targets. The teams stayed hidden
      during the day to avoid any detection by Iraqi as well as by coalitions forces,
      and went on Scud hunts during the night. The days were used for planning,
      technical maintenance and sleep.

      Each mobile Scud party was composed of three elements:

      A Scud Tractor-Erector-Launcher (TEL), a vehicle that carries the
      missile, brings it to a standing position at the launch site and then
      fire it.

      A Zill truck which carry guards.

      The Commanding Officer (CO) Land Cruiser jeep.

      Since the very presence of the Israeli teams in the area was highly classified,
      no air assets could be called upon for bombardment or support, and
      insertion/extraction as well supply flights were very complex and long. In one
      incident an IAF CH53 leading Israeli operators to Iraq was almost shot down by
      American fighter jets unaware of its identity.

      The operation itself ran generally smoothly. Eventually, the Israeli teams from
      Sayeret Shaldag and Sayeret Maglan were able to detect and destroy several
      mobile Scud launchers as well as ammunition carriers and few Iraqi army front
      posts. Most of the kills were made by long range ATGM, but few were done by
      direct assaults and were the source for most of operation's injuries.

      One unique and rare incident did take place in broad daylight. While a Sayeret
      Shaldag team was resting in its hideout inside a small creek, a Scud launcher
      convoy drove above the creek and made a short stopped. The team couldn't
      believe its good luck and since the location was far away in the desert the
      team decided to take the risk and to attack right from the hideout in daylight.
      It was a total success. The Scud group was composed of about six guards and a
      launching crew - no match for a much superior trained and equipped Israeli
      elite SF team.

      Since for political reasons nobody wanted to take the chance of the Israeli
      teams being spotted by foreign armies washing through Quait or Iraqi lands, few
      days before Iraq surrendered the teams were extracted back to Israel by CH53.

      The operation in whole is considered a success. While the Israeli teams'
      activity was a rather symbolic one and only for short few weeks period, they
      were very effective compared to their size and to the limited assets at their
      disposal. The Israeli teams also managed to gather the most valuable
      intelligence in the Desert Storm campaign out of all the coalition forces in
      the area, an intelligence, which was later passed on by Israel to the U.S.
      Moreover, unlike American and British patrols no Israeli patrol or hideout was
      ever revealed by the local Iraqis or by army patrols of any sources, and no
      Israeli soldiers were killed during the covert insertion.

      Operations Guide


      • puls Fajne czytanie gratuluje udanych operacji ! 09.10.02, 07:41
        Zapewne i obecnie Izrael aktywnie dba o wlasne bezpieczenstwo.
    • przyjaciel_2002 Re: >>> I R A K <<< 06.10.02, 10:45
      debka.com/body_index.html
    • Gość: dEBKA Re: >>> I R A K <<< IP: *.red.bezeqint.net 09.10.02, 00:06
      debka.com/body_index.html
    • Gość: Mosze >>> I R A K <<< IP: SMS* / *.red.bezeqint.net 17.10.02, 17:12
      Zeby zepsuc koalicje USA. Saddam Hussain i jego banda zrobia wszystko przeciwko
      Ameryki i jest mozliwe ze zaatakuja pierw Izrael, zeby byl Izraelski odwet i
      tak bedzie Ameryce ciezko zrobic koalicje Arabow i ONZ . Izrael wszystko wie i
      czuwa!
      Smierc rzeznikowi z Bagdadu!!!
    • Gość: Mosze >>> I R A K <<< Bin Ladden - Saudja >>> IP: proxy / *.barak.net.il 21.10.02, 12:27
      DEBKA Exclusive:
      Bin Laden Is Back in Saudi Arabia –
      Is Working Closely with Baghdad
      Based on summary of latest DEBKA-Net-Weekly Revelations
      19 October: DEBKAfile reveals that the long-lost al Qaeda leader, Saudi-born
      Osama bin Laden, is alive and inSaudi Arabia. He is believed to have landed
      secretly at the end of September, shortly before the latest upsurge of
      international terrorist attacks against the French oil tankerLimburg, the
      shooting of American Marines in Kuwait, the Bali bomb disaster.
      This exclusive information reached DEBKA-Net-Weekly (October 18, Issue 81) from
      its most credible intelligence and counter-intelligence sources. His re-
      appearance in Saudi Arabia, which withdrew his citizenship and sent him into
      exile, brings to a close the debate and speculation rife since the Tora Bora
      battle in Afghanistan 11 months ago over Bin Laden’s fate and whereabouts.
      Two sightings of the elusive terrorist chief have now been reported – both in
      the wildest, most inhospitable regions of Saudi Arabia, the Rub al Khali, the
      Empty Quarter of the Arabian Peninsula, and Najran on the Yemen frontier.
      DEBKA-Net-Weekly’s sources are certain that Bin Laden has brought with him his
      closest companions - his Number Two and chief of operations, the Egyptian Ayman
      Zuwahri, the hard core of the Islamic terror group’s command, his close family
      and his bodyguard. The size of this party indicates the al Qaeda leadership’s
      belief they have found a safe hideout, situated in the Rimar Ar Rakabh (Rider’s
      Dunes), deep inside the Empty Quarter, a 220,000- sq. m expanse, the largest
      sand sea on the face of the earth which straddles Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Yemen
      and Oman.
      Here, the al Qaeda chief was seen on horseback - the way he was often depicted
      in Afghanistan before the American 2001 invasion - reportedly riding through
      the barren lands of the nomadic Al Murrah tribe, about 100 m southwest of the
      Al Ghawar oil fields.
      No signs of disability or ill health were on view.
      The Al Murrah, renowned as first rate field scouts, are among the fiercest
      elements of the extremist Muslim Wahabi sect, Saudi Arabia’s state religion,
      and number some of Bin Laden’s most fervent followers. Without friends in the
      Al Murrah, this empty wasteland is impassable and uninhabitable.
      The second bin Laden sighting took place in the Najran, a region lying across
      the frontier between the south Saudi province of Asir and Yemen. Here, he was
      observed on Saudi Bani Yam Saudi tribal land opposite Oman on the fringes of
      the Empty Quarter. The Bani Yam are close allies of the neighboring Yemeni
      tribes of the Hadhramauth, the Saudi-born terrorist’s ancestral homeland.
      In the Najran, Bin Laden is not only within reach of his Yemeni friends and
      kinsmen, but in a position to control and deploy the 700 al Qaeda fighters who
      escaped Afghanistan at the end of 2001 and early 2002 and set up base in the
      Asir province.
      Al Qaeda fugitives from the Afghan War have settled at strategic points in the
      Gulf and Middle East Region, a legion of close to 2,000 battle-seasoned
      zealots, ready and waiting for orders. Intelligence estimates reaching DEBKA-
      Net-Weeklyplace around 1,000 fighting men inside Saudi Arabia, most
      concentrated in the Asir, the rest scattered round the kingdom; 300-400 in
      Yemen; 150 in the south Lebanese Palestinian refugee camp at Ein Hilwa; 300 in
      Mashhad, northern Iran; and 150 in the north Iraqi Kurdish districts of Bayara
      and Tawalla, where Iraqi instructors trained al Qaeda operatives in chemical
      warfare earlier this year.
      His presence in Saudi Arabia explains the easy flow and frequency of statements
      and messages reaching the Arabic satellite TV station al Jazeera and other
      media in the region this month from Bin Laden and his lieutenant, that were
      succeeded in rapid succession by fresh terror outbreaks. Some even speculate in
      Washington that the mystery sniper who has murdered 9 in the Washington area
      this month may be an al Qaeda operative.
      The most intriguing question is this: How did the Islamic terror master manage
      to slip into Saudi Arabia? What political and intelligence elements lent him a
      hand? The American and British maintain an extensive military intelligence
      presence in the Gulf region for the buildup to the war on Iraq. Without a
      helping hand from some governmental body or official, Bin Laden and his top
      staff could not have touched Persian Gulf soil, let alone Saudi Arabia.
      How he manages to move in the dark was indicated in the testimony presented by
      National Security Agency Director Michael Hayden at a Senate hearing. He
      admitted that these terrorists have learned how to evade US interception
      technology (first reported by DNW on September 6: Al Qaeda Messages Still
      Invisible.) While the terrorists are able to feed disinformation to the NSA,
      US intelligence has virtually no clue that any attack is coming.
      What US intelligence has picked up is the deadly partnership taking shape
      between Iraq and al Qaeda, whose potential for damage gives its heads sleepless
      nights.
      It enables Saddam to vicariously hit US Gulf forces, including warships and
      carriers and strike at US targets outside the region, as well as giving him the
      power to manipulate oil prices by sabotaging oil installations and routes,
      using al Qaeda as his proxy.
      And there is more. DEBKA-Net-Weekly’s intelligence sources report the al
      Qaeda’s return in the last two weeks to their previous training bases at Bayara
      and Tawalla in northern Iraq. Some 150-180 fighting men are assembled no more
      than 200 km from the US-Turkish special forces vanguard in the north. They have
      been joined by a large group of Iraqi military intelligence officers.
      Together, they have set up a new pro-Saddam enclave of al Qaeda, Iraqi
      intelligence and Kurdish Islamic extremists in northern Iraq to serveBaghdad as
      a thorn in the side of the American campaign.
      Our intelligence source comments: If Iraqi intelligence and al Qaeda work so
      well together, there is nothing to stop them from expanding their joint
      operation to other places, even the United States itself.”
      This is what the CIA director George Tenet may have had in mind when he said to
      the same Senate committee hearing on Thursday, October 17, that the danger of a
      terrorist attack being attempted on American soil was as acute today as it was
      before September 11, 2001.
      Bin Laden’s return to Saudi Arabia and the bracketing together of al Qaeda and
      Saddam Hussein confront the Bush administration with new and pressing dilemmas,
      such as: Whom to go after first? The top al Qaeda command which eluded capture
      in Afghanistan, or the Iraqi ruler?
      These and other explosive revelations appear in the latest issue of our
      exclusive intelligence electronic publication DEBKA-Net-Weekly for subscribers.
      For information on how to place your order, click HERE.
      ________________________________________
      • Gość: agost Re: >>> I R A K <<< Bin Ladd IP: *.kv.net.pl / 192.168.0.* 21.10.02, 13:38
        Mosze, Biedaku, Ty chyba nie masz co robić.
        Nie katuj się tak, wkrótce i tak nastąpi koniec świata.
    • Gość: Mosze >>> I R A K <<< IP: SMS* / *.red.bezeqint.net 11.12.02, 23:21
      www.debka.com/article.php?aid=194
    • Gość: Mosze VX, Alqaidah, Sa-Dam... IP: 194.90.236.* 12.12.02, 10:17
      Teraz USA szuka gdzie podzial sie transport gazu VX co w zeszlym miesiacu
      Sa-Dam wyslal dla ELQAIDY (zobacz na internet co to za gaz i co on potrafi)
    • pauline_kaczanow Re: >>> I R A K <<< 12.12.02, 10:58
      wiemy co to..
      A teraz beda udawac ze sie sami rozbroja...
      • Gość: V.C. DEMONSTRACJA PRZECIW WOJNIE Z IRAKIEM! IP: *.czestochowa.sdi.tpnet.pl 12.12.02, 18:59
        DEMONSTRACJA PRZECIW WOJNIE Z IRAKIEM!

        Sobota 14 grudnia - godz. 12.00 - Plac Zamkowy w Warszawie,

        przemarsz pod ambasadę USA, al. Ujazdowskie 29/31

        Organizatorzy: Inicjatywa "STOP wojnie"

        Jeśli chcesz uczestniczyć w kampanii antywojennej skontaktuj się z
        Inicjatywą "STOP wojnie": stopwojnie@go2.pl lub z Pracowniczą Demokracją:
        pracdem@go2.pl , tel. 0600 599 306

    • Gość: Mosze Grad Czerwony IP: proxy / *.red.bezeqint.net 14.01.03, 09:21
      15-01-2003
    • Gość: Mosze >>> I R A K <<< +3 IP: *.pop.bezeqint.net 17.03.03, 17:04
      00:00:00
    • Gość: * >>> Droga do UR <<< IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 17.03.03, 17:09
      www.bhagavad-gita.org/
    • Gość: Mosze ALQAIM IP: *.red.bezeqint.net 12.04.03, 07:43
      mappoint.msn.com/(ubrvd355lj2tco454jdawmux)/map.aspx?L=WLD&C=34.36721%2c41.11666&A=215.00000&P=|693E88|&TI=Al+Q%c4%81%e2%80%9dim%2c+Iraq
    • Gość: test Re: >>> I R A K <<< IP: *.red.bezeqint.net 12.04.03, 14:56
      test
      • Gość: *©*©* >>> ALFA<<< IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 12.04.03, 15:03
        Gość portalu: test napisał(a):

        > test

        ALPHA

        When a person turns their attention inward, or closes their eyes, the
        electrical activity of the brain immediately changes. The electrical
        discharges immediately slow down and become larger in amplitude, or have more
        power. Consciousness has become slower, more stilled, and more reflective. The
        rhythmic discharges of the brain cells slow down and become larger in
        amplitude - have more power.

        The pulsing of the brainwaves at this time falls between 13 and 7 Hz and are
        named "Alpha" brainwaves. This "Alpha" state of consciousness could be looked
        upon as inner-directed, non-linear thinking. It is still a mental state, an
        activity of the mental body, but inner directed - more of a "pondering"
        function. The Beta state could be seen as looking at the trees and the Alpha
        state as looking at the forest



        mappoint.msn.com/(ubrvd355lj2tco454jdawmux)/map.aspx?L=WLD&C=33.51906%2c36.29445&A=286.66667&P=|2170|&TI=Damascus%2c+Syria
Inne wątki na temat:
Pełna wersja