CO W SA

06.11.02, 20:34
Zwyciezyli Republikanie. I Jeff Bush i zona Dola...TO SWIETNIE!
Jest tylko jeden malutki niuans.Nie bedzie mozna zrzucic winy na kongres w
razie czego.Nawet wpadki prezydenta Buscha pokazywane w czasie kampanii
ochoczo przez media przysporzyly mu popularnosci.I bardzo dobrze.
Wpadki sa rzecza ludzka i u mnie przynajmniej powodowaly przyplyw sympatii
dla prezydenta supermocarstwa. "Patrzcie to tez zwyczajny, normalny facet tez
sie myli " - to swietny przyklad,lekacja dla kazdego z polskich politykow.
Dlaczego polskich? Bo Ci staraja sie zawsze byc najmadrzejsci i nie umieja w
przeciwienstwie do amerykanskiego prezydenta smiac sie z siebie.
Nawet Kanclerz Gerhard Schrodeder spieszy z gratulacjami. To tez bardzo dobry
objaw. Znaczy to: stosunki pomiedzy obydwoma krajami od czasu slynnej,nolens
volens,wypowiedzi niemieckiej minister sprawiedliwosci zaczynaja sie
normalizowac. Poza tym gratuluje uderzenia jemenskiego tj. wyslania PREDATORA
na samochod Al Kaidy - tak twierdza media m.in TVN .

Niech Bo blogoslawi Stany Zjednoczone!


    • pauline_kaczanow CO W USA 06.11.02, 20:35
    • Gość: osioł Re: CO W USA IP: 213.25.23.* 06.11.02, 20:42
      Gerhard, ten tchórz, niech sie wstydzi i nie przysyla gratulacji. Mogl
      gratulowac Bushowi zdecydowania w sprawie Iraku, a wtedy trząsł portkami
    • Gość: kapitalizm Re: CO W SA IP: *.proxy.aol.com 07.11.02, 00:28
      pauline_kaczanow napisała:

      > Zwyciezyli Republikanie. I Jeff Bush i zona Dola...TO SWIETNIE!
      > Jest tylko jeden malutki niuans.Nie bedzie mozna zrzucic winy na kongres w
      > razie czego.Nawet wpadki prezydenta Buscha pokazywane w czasie kampanii
      > ochoczo przez media przysporzyly mu popularnosci.I bardzo dobrze.
      > Wpadki sa rzecza ludzka i u mnie przynajmniej powodowaly przyplyw sympatii
      > dla prezydenta supermocarstwa. "Patrzcie to tez zwyczajny, normalny facet tez
      > sie myli " - to swietny przyklad,lekacja dla kazdego z polskich politykow.
      > Dlaczego polskich? Bo Ci staraja sie zawsze byc najmadrzejsci i nie umieja w
      > przeciwienstwie do amerykanskiego prezydenta smiac sie z siebie.
      > Nawet Kanclerz Gerhard Schrodeder spieszy z gratulacjami. To tez bardzo dobry
      > objaw. Znaczy to: stosunki pomiedzy obydwoma krajami od czasu slynnej,nolens
      > volens,wypowiedzi niemieckiej minister sprawiedliwosci zaczynaja sie
      > normalizowac. Poza tym gratuluje uderzenia jemenskiego tj. wyslania PREDATORA
      > na samochod Al Kaidy - tak twierdza media m.in TVN .
      >
      > Niech Bo blogoslawi Stany Zjednoczone!

      Podzielam Twoja opinie,

      polecam:
      www.objectivismtoday.com/
      >
      >
    • Gość: kapitalizm Re: CO W SA IP: *.proxy.aol.com 07.11.02, 00:32

      rowniez:

      www.moraldefense.com/, szczegolnie Frequently Asked Questions on
      Capitalism,

      oraz:

      www.capmag.com/
      • hitler23 Re: Co W uSA ? 07.11.02, 00:35

        www.capmag.com/article.asp?ID=2108
        John Allen Muhammad: Convert to Violence?
        by Daniel Pipes (November 4, 2002)



        Summary: It came as no surprise to learn that the lead suspect as the
        Washington, D.C.,--area sniper is John Allen Muhammad, an African-American who
        converted to Islam about 17 years ago. Nor that seven years ago he provided
        security for Louis Farrakhan's "Million Man March." Even less does it amaze
        that he reportedly sympathized with the 9/11 attacks carried out by militant
        Islamic elements. All this was near-predictable because it fits into a well-
        established tradition of American blacks who convert to Islam turning against
        their country.

        [CAPITALISM MAGAZINE.COM]
        It came as no surprise to learn that the lead suspect as the Washington, D.C.,-
        -area sniper is John Allen Muhammad, a Black-American who converted to Islam
        about 17 years ago. Nor that seven years ago he provided security for Louis
        Farrakhan's "Million Man March." Even less does it amaze that he reportedly
        sympathized with the 9/11 attacks carried out by militant Islamic elements.
        All this was near-predictable because it fits into a well-established
        tradition of American blacks who convert to Islam turning against their
        country.

        Of course, this is not a universal pattern, as some of the roughly 700,000
        Black-American converts to Islam are moderate and patriotic citizens. One well-
        known example is Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, the basketball player; another, jazz
        pianist McCoy Tyner.

        In brief, there is nothing inherently antagonistic between the faith of Islam
        and good American citizenship.

        Converts most likely turn anti-American when they adhere to either of two
        specific forms of Islam: either the Nation of Islam (NoI, the black-
        nationalist sect that originated in Detroit in 1930) or militant Islam (mostly
        imported from the Middle East and South Asia).

        The pattern of alienation goes back decades. From the 1940s onward, NoI's
        longtime leader, Elijah Muhammad, told his followers "You are not American
        citizens" and he spent years in jail for draft evasion during World War II. In
        the 1960s, the NoI's most famous convert, boxer Muhammad Ali, refused to be
        drafted and fight in Vietnam.

        Other NoI leaders have spoken with intense hostility against their country.
        Malcolm X dismissed his American passport as signifying "the exact opposite of
        what Islam stands for." Louis Farrakhan announced that "God will destroy
        America at the hands of Muslims."

        But Black Americans who adhere to normative Islam also have a pattern of
        alienation from the United States:

        After breaking from the NoI, Malcolm X proclaimed, "I'm not an American."
        Jamil Al-Amin, once known as H. Rap Brown and now in prison for murdering a
        policeman, wrote that "When we begin to look critically at the Constitution of
        the United States . . . we see that in its main essence it is diametrically
        opposed to what Allah has commanded."
        Mahmoud Abdul-Rauf, a National Basketball Association player, refused to stand
        during the playing of the national anthem on the grounds that the American
        flag is a "symbol of oppression, of tyranny."
        Imam Siraj Wahhaj, one of the country's most prominent Muslim leaders, calls
        for replacing the U.S. government with a caliphate.
        And American converts who fought the Soviets in Afghanistan during the 1980s
        imbibed a vision of destroying both superpowers. One such jihadist explained
        in 1989: "It is the duty of all Muslims to complete the march of jihad until
        we reach America and liberate her. And I will be a guide for them."

        Nor are these sentiments confined to words alone:

        The U.S. attorney for New York listed Wahhaj as one of the "unindicted persons
        who may be alleged as co-conspirators" in an attempt to blow up New York City
        landmarks.
        Clement Rodney Hampton-el of New Jersey returned home from fighting the
        Soviets in Afghanistan and joined a gang that in February 1993 bombed the
        World Trade Center.
        This well-established pattern of alienation, radicalism and violence among
        black American converts to Islam suggests two points, should John Allen
        Muhammad in fact be implicated in the D.C. sniper attacks.

        First: The troubling coincidence of conversion to Islam and hatred of the
        United States needs to be looked at very closely. To what extent does Islam
        attract the disaffected, to what extent does it actively turn them against
        their country? Probing the source of the disaffection that can inspire
        terrorism has important security implications.

        Second: To what extent does the rhetoric and example set by prominent figures
        such as Louis Farrakhan and Siraj Wahhaj influence followers like the alleged
        sniper to engage in violence? If it does, given that this is wartime, do steps
        need to be taken to curtail their rhetoric?

        That one should even have to raise these issues points, yet again, to the
        unpleasant realities that Americans must confront if they want to win the war
        on terror.
Pełna wersja