And I should be happy with .eu?

09.04.06, 11:46
Finally, after the money I pay to cybersquat 35 prime .eu domains for the
last six months has been sitting that long inactive on the registrar's bank
account at 18 EUR a shot, we finally arrive at that fateful day 7th April,
when my registrar can compete with all the johnny come lately registrars on a
first come first served basis for those domains which did not go through the
sunrises and where available for the so-called "landrush".

And it transpires that of my 35 shots, I only got 7. I am now the proud owner
of:

nivella.eu

geugle.eu

dotheyrate.eu

good4.eu

ineed.eu

fancymeeting.eu

placefor.eu

All I need now is someone with good web skills to make the sites for them,
and I'll be able to either do things with them, or wait for a buyer.

I suppose 7 out of 35 is not such a bad hit rate when you consider how many
people, it transpires, sunrised some of the best names and got away with it
even though they had nothing to do with their company names.

For example, "auditors.eu" is now the property of a tiny, unheard-of firm in
the Czech Republic only. Because they had the foresight to sunrise it, and
EURid, believe it or not, accepted their documents!

The whole sunrise thingy turned out to be mothing more than a ruse to get
more money out of applicants. Had I known that, I might have sunrised more
domains instead of getting in the landrush queue, but then it cost four times
as much to sunrise as to landrush anyway, so I may have had a worse outcome
anyway. And you have the rigmarole of providing documents, but then for that
you do probably get more valuable domains.

I now get my money back on the domains that other cybersquatters snaffled
before I did, and I can go through my original list of 100 names which I
didn't invest in 65 of (I didn't want to put more than 700 EUR on this
gamble) and see if any of them have escaped the greedy ravages of my fellow
domaingrubbing, dirty cybersquatting landrushers.

But there is a chance that by Tuesday I will have a few more of the 35, as
not all of the processes have been finally concluded, and there is always an
outside chance that some sunrisers will simply fail to conclude with their
purchases - although I doubt that very much.

Did anyone else take a punt on the .eu landrush, and if so, was your success
rate any different to mine?
    • ejmarkow Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 10.04.06, 09:08
      Dave,

      Interesting investment in the 'EU'. In time, if and when the EU starts to gain
      in popularity and momentum amongst all of its member states, it should have a
      generous rippling effect. I still enjoy trading equities on the NYSE. For the
      international scene, ADRs are nice.

      Regards,

      Eugene
      • marimax Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 12.04.06, 14:15
        So you are not so smart after all.
        I had almost 2000 names reserved and got only 145 but did not have to pay for
        it until April 7th.
        You should have asked me how to do it (without tying up your money for so long)
        • ianek70 Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 12.04.06, 15:05
          marimax napisał:

          > I had almost 2000 names reserved

          That must have kept you busy.
          Are there no pubs where you live? Cinemas, libraries, parks? People?
          Television sets are quite cheap nowadays, and very popular among sad people
          with nothing interesting to do.
        • usenetposts Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 12.04.06, 15:32
          marimax napisał:

          > So you are not so smart after all.
          > I had almost 2000 names reserved and got only 145 but did not have to pay for
          > it until April 7th.
          > You should have asked me how to do it (without tying up your money for so
          long)

          Well, I am interested to know how you went about that. I thought I was ahead of
          the game in only having my money tied up for 6 months. I had my place in the
          queue for some names about 4 months earlier to that.

          Of the 35 I went for, and got 7 (I might add that that's a 20% hit rate
          compared to your 7.25% hitrate, so I got something for something) and also I
          managed to use my account credit to get some quite nice ones in the mop-up
          phase.

          Here's a little list of what I've got which I could sell, now:

          dotheyrate.eu

          fancymeeting.eu

          geugle.eu

          good4.eu

          harkat.eu

          imtelling.eu

          ineed.eu

          listento.eu

          phemism.eu

          placefor.eu

          serviceregister.eu

          withorwithout.eu

          And then I registered at least as many on top that I will use, if only to
          redirect traffic to existing sites.

          If I don't sell them then over time I would like to use them to develop active
          sites, but I need someone with better php than I have.

          The placefor.eu I think is a very good name for a European wide real-estate
          portal, and I don't think I would part with that for under 5,000 EUR.

          Anyway, I just got a sedo account to sell these domains, but I'm not expecting
          any sudden rush as they are all priced up to the hilt.
          • marimax Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 12.04.06, 20:14
            Ianek, you must be one very frustraded person.
            To answer you Yes I have better things to do than sit in a pub, breath the
            smoke in and talk to drunks.You probably have a boss you hate and after work
            you have to go to your drinking joint to get drunk so you don't remember what
            your boss told you during the day.
            I don't have a boss, work for myself in front of my computer and do whatever I
            want and wherever I want.
            I am investing for myself and make a living this way.
            One of the investment vehicles I invest in are domains.Most people don't
            realise what a good investment it can be.
            I started reserving my .eu domains last July so I had enough time to preregister
            2000 domains and about 3 weeks ago I had to give them my credit card number so
            they could charge me for the secured domains. Yes that was it no money up front.
            Now for usenetposts;
            By telling us your domains it is very easy to find your identity.
            I would never tell it to anybody.
            Also I don't find your .eu domains very interesting. Maybe one or two are worth
            anything, the rest you can drop because you will never get any real money for
            them.
            IF you want to get more into this business you should research it more.
            It's obvious you don't have a lot of experience so I give you one advice.
            Go to www.dnjournal.com and read it. It is one of the best websites about
            buying, selling domains and it is updated every wednesday
            • usenetposts Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 13.04.06, 16:32
              marimax napisał:

              > Ianek, you must be one very frustraded person.
              > To answer you Yes I have better things to do than sit in a pub, breath the
              > smoke in and talk to drunks.You probably have a boss you hate and after work
              > you have to go to your drinking joint to get drunk so you don't remember what
              > your boss told you during the day.
              > I don't have a boss, work for myself in front of my computer and do whatever
              I
              > want and wherever I want.
              > I am investing for myself and make a living this way.
              > One of the investment vehicles I invest in are domains.Most people don't
              > realise what a good investment it can be.
              > I started reserving my .eu domains last July so I had enough time to
              preregiste
              > r
              > 2000 domains and about 3 weeks ago I had to give them my credit card number
              so
              > they could charge me for the secured domains. Yes that was it no money up
              front
              > .
              > Now for usenetposts;
              > By telling us your domains it is very easy to find your identity.
              > I would never tell it to anybody.
              > Also I don't find your .eu domains very interesting. Maybe one or two are
              worth
              >
              > anything, the rest you can drop because you will never get any real money for
              > them.
              > IF you want to get more into this business you should research it more.
              > It's obvious you don't have a lot of experience so I give you one advice.
              > Go to www.dnjournal.com and read it. It is one of the best websites about
              > buying, selling domains and it is updated every wednesday

              Well, I always appreciate all the advice anybody can give me, but how can
              imtelling.eu or placefor.eu or listento.eu or geugle.eu be anything other than
              a real coup?

              I'm gonna have a look at that journal and see what it has to offer, anyway.
            • ianek70 Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 13.04.06, 17:02
              marimax napisał:

              > To answer you Yes I have better things to do than sit in a pub, breath the
              > smoke in and talk to drunks.You probably have a boss you hate and after work
              > you have to go to your drinking joint to get drunk so you don't remember what
              > your boss told you during the day.

              I don't have a boss, and I've never had I boss that I hated, so maybe I'm lucky.
              Pubs were only one of the things I mentioned, but your fantasies about the
              lives of normal people are very revealing...
    • bartis_ervin Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 13.04.06, 17:40

      Nice to be back and read this thread with a nice chat between ianek and marimaxsmile

      You are making money of something that I never thought of. The downside of
      working in not-for-profit is that sooner or later you loose you business skills.
      However, I doubt that I ever had one.

      Dave, I would say that your most valuable asset is serviceregister.eu.

      Ervin

      Thebartiski.blogspot.com
      • usenetposts Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 14.04.06, 12:17
        bartis_ervin napisał:

        >
        > Nice to be back and read this thread with a nice chat between ianek and
        marimax
        > smile
        >
        > You are making money of something that I never thought of. The downside of
        > working in not-for-profit is that sooner or later you loose you business
        skills
        > .
        > However, I doubt that I ever had one.
        >

        Just hang out with me a bit and I will sort you out.

        > Dave, I would say that your most valuable asset is serviceregister.eu.

        Thanks for that. By the way, last time I looked charityregister was still free,
        but I left it anyway. Maybe you could get that one and ensure that your charity
        has a prominent place in the register.
        • usenetposts Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 14.04.06, 12:33
          bartis_ervin napisał:
          >
          > >
          > > Nice to be back and read this thread with a nice chat between ianek and
          > marimax


          It's lovely, isn't it?
    • firemouse Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 13.04.06, 23:40
      Why bother about .eu domain if EU disappears within 10 years (or I just hope so).

      What's so special in this domain, Europe even has no common cultural heritage.
      We have been killing ourselves for ages. We have reached for our lands. We
      betrayed other "Europeans" towards outer opponents. And now we just pretend all
      to be friends. Funny.

      This is just another EU whining about US success, and does anybody register .usa
      domains? OK, .us is another thing.

      If I need to be successful, I go for .com

      FM
      • marimax Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 14.04.06, 10:59
        I hope you are right about EU and it's future.
        I also think it will be gone within 10 - 15 years but you can not deny that
        there is something called Europe and it will never disappear from the map.
        For this reason I think domain .eu will become very important and of course .com
        will always be the king and .us will be very important too but I hope you agree
        with me that for example Madrit.eu sound better than Madrit.us so both are
        regional and very important domains
        • usenetposts Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 14.04.06, 12:13
          Quite frankly, I think madrid.eu sounds better than either of them, but maybe
          I'm old-fashioned.
          • varsovian Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 14.04.06, 12:16
            You are !!
        • firemouse Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 18.04.06, 13:47
          marimax napisał:

          >crying...)but I hope you agree
          >
          > with me that for example Madrit.eu sound better than Madrit.us so both are
          > regional and very important domains

          Well, I hope that you agree that madrid.es sounds better than madrid.eu?

          Europe is not USA with all ups and downs, and regionalism is very strong (and
          good) asset of our corner of the world.

          I would not like to see a company claiming .eu domain, because it is important
          for me whether this is from UK or Estonia. Not that I have something against UK.

          All this domain hijacking even raises my suspiscious about the connotations of
          any .eu company. So I will stay with old plain country domains.
          • usenetposts Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 18.04.06, 14:23
            firemouse napisał:

            > marimax napisał:
            >
            > >crying...)but I hope you agree
            > >
            > > with me that for example Madrit.eu sound better than Madrit.us so both ar
            > e
            > > regional and very important domains
            >
            > Well, I hope that you agree that madrid.es sounds better than madrid.eu?
            >
            > Europe is not USA with all ups and downs, and regionalism is very strong (and
            > good) asset of our corner of the world.
            >
            > I would not like to see a company claiming .eu domain, because it is important
            > for me whether this is from UK or Estonia. Not that I have something against
            UK
            > .
            >
            > All this domain hijacking even raises my suspiscious about the connotations of
            > any .eu company. So I will stay with old plain country domains.

            You remind me of good old King Canute holding back the tide.

            Why don't you remain true to your principles in other areas also, and still pay
            in shops with guilders and deutschmarks?
            • firemouse Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 18.04.06, 14:58
              > Why don't you remain true to your principles in other areas also, and still pay
              >
              > in shops with guilders and deutschmarks?
              >

              Because they don't accept it, that's why. And introduction of Euro were not such
              a success story as it is touted.

              With internet domains, as long as I have choice, I will stick rather with
              regional domains.

              Truly, I don't understand this criticism; you have said that auditors.eu is
              bought by an unknown company from Czech Republic. So what can you say about
              value of this domain? Or a company behind it? Were I a non-European investor
              looking for an auditor for my European companies (in different countries) would
              I trust a no-name auditors.eu company or an international establishment?

              Europe is not as unified market as it should be; mostly because politicians
              demand too much power for their particular interests. As long as the business
              conditions vary between Spain, Norway, Poland and Ukraine (even as two of these
              countries are not EU-members) I want to know who is well settled in the local
              market.
              • usenetposts Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 18.04.06, 15:27
                firemouse napisał:

                > > Why don't you remain true to your principles in other areas also, and sti
                > ll pay
                > >
                > > in shops with guilders and deutschmarks?
                > >
                >
                > Because they don't accept it, that's why. And introduction of Euro were not
                suc
                > h
                > a success story as it is touted.
                >
                > With internet domains, as long as I have choice, I will stick rather with
                > regional domains.
                >
                > Truly, I don't understand this criticism; you have said that auditors.eu is
                > bought by an unknown company from Czech Republic. So what can you say about
                > value of this domain? Or a company behind it? Were I a non-European investor
                > looking for an auditor for my European companies (in different countries)
                would
                > I trust a no-name auditors.eu company or an international establishment?
                >

                That's a very good question, and one that I deal with quite a lot of the time.

                Many companies coming in can only deal with the big international auditors,
                some are able to deal with middle tier international auditors like my firm, but
                some are free to do as they like. the most cost-conscious of these will avoid
                the biggest firms and they come and address the middle tier, but then I find
                myself being asked to compete in price against less known firms. How do they
                find these firms? In many cases they use the internet.

                Now I did criticise the fact that a little known firm has obtained auditors.eu,
                but this is not a criticism of the Czech professional colleagues who registered
                it. They increased the value of their Firm, and good luck to them. It was a
                criticism in the vagaries of the registration process and the fact that despite
                all this bruhaha about sunrises at the end of the day it didn't always amount
                to much.

                > Europe is not as unified market as it should be; mostly because politicians
                > demand too much power for their particular interests. As long as the business
                > conditions vary between Spain, Norway, Poland and Ukraine (even as two of
                these
                > countries are not EU-members) I want to know who is well settled in the local
                > market.

                Well, Arthur Andersen were settled in all their local markets, but that's
                another story.
                • firemouse Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 19.04.06, 13:41
                  usenetposts napisał:


                  > Now I did criticise the fact that a little known firm has obtained auditors.eu,
                  >
                  > but this is not a criticism of the Czech professional colleagues who registered
                  >
                  > it. They increased the value of their Firm, and good luck to them. It was a
                  > criticism in the vagaries of the registration process and the fact that despite
                  >
                  > all this bruhaha about sunrises at the end of the day it didn't always amount
                  > to much.

                  This is exactly what I mean; the .eu domains will remain (for me) a curiosity
                  for some time more, but certainly a company using .eu address does not have more
                  creditability for me than a one using .cz for example.

                  > Well, Arthur Andersen were settled in all their local markets, but that's
                  > another story.
                  >

                  You must be joking.

                  Having a local subisidiary all around the world does not mean settled in. The
                  company would not fall like a cardhouse if their all "local firms" would be
                  truly independent. Look at the franchising policy which E&Y had some time ago.
                  The Dutch always referred to the Dutch E&Y as "Moret" and had problems in
                  locating this as part of E&Y Global. They even were saying "we're using Moret in
                  Poland".

                  I am sure that if Enron case would happen in E&Y, Moret would be virtually
                  untouched.


                  • usenetposts Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 20.04.06, 17:23
                    firemouse napisał:

                    > usenetposts napisał:
                    >
                    >
                    > > Now I did criticise the fact that a little known firm has obtained audito
                    > rs.eu,
                    > >
                    > > but this is not a criticism of the Czech professional colleagues who regi
                    > stered
                    > >
                    > > it. They increased the value of their Firm, and good luck to them. It was
                    > a
                    > > criticism in the vagaries of the registration process and the fact that d
                    > espite
                    > >
                    > > all this bruhaha about sunrises at the end of the day it didn't always am
                    > ount
                    > > to much.
                    >
                    > This is exactly what I mean; the .eu domains will remain (for me) a curiosity
                    > for some time more, but certainly a company using .eu address does not have
                    mor
                    > e
                    > creditability for me than a one using .cz for example.

                    OK, well, time will tell whether your view is the majority view or not.

                    If you are right, I will have wasted a few hundred EUR.

                    If you are wrong, I will have won a few thousand.

                    The upside at the moment seems bigger for me than the downside.

                    >
                    > > Well, Arthur Andersen were settled in all their local markets, but that's
                    >
                    > > another story.
                    > >
                    >
                    > You must be joking.
                    >
                    > Having a local subisidiary all around the world does not mean settled in. The
                    > company would not fall like a cardhouse if their all "local firms" would be
                    > truly independent. Look at the franchising policy which E&Y had some time ago.
                    > The Dutch always referred to the Dutch E&Y as "Moret" and had problems in
                    > locating this as part of E&Y Global. They even were saying "we're using Moret
                    i
                    > n
                    > Poland".
                    >
                    > I am sure that if Enron case would happen in E&Y, Moret would be virtually
                    > untouched.
                    >

                    Very interesting. Now I wonder how many of the Moret partners are actually ex-
                    Arthur Andersen partners. In Poland, for example, and not only poland, AA
                    partners virtually bought out and took over E&Y. E&Y's position as the biggest
                    accounting firm there has ever been is, arguably, thanks to their ability to
                    absorb Arthur Andersen people and clients without a major stir.

                    Now legislation in the EU about accounting networks will make it impossible for
                    Morets to go untouched if another part of E&Y is touched by a major scandal - I
                    don't wish that on them by the way - if they hold themselves out to be part of
                    the E&Y network.

                    If E&Y were to go under in the way that AA did, then the remaining three Big
                    Firms would become such an oligopoly that it would trigger a much larger change
                    in the accounting profesion, whether generated internally or by goverment, than
                    we saw after Enron. After Enron the accounting profession actually benefitted,
                    as it was us that had to do all the SOX work, but clients resent that as it
                    brings no added value. In the cases of most US publically owned companies and
                    their subsidiaries, it was only a tedious and expensive formality.

                    And apart from anything else, these scandals - moreso Parmalat than Enron,
                    though, slowed the downward slide in professional fees. We were able to argue,
                    as a profession, that you cannot expect good audits unless the market is ready
                    to pay properly trained people to put the hours into the work.

                    It's not the fault of firms like Deloittes or Grant Thorntons International,
                    who were implicated in the Parmalat issue, that the fees have gone down so
                    badly that there is pressure on the profession to cut corners. They are not the
                    major culprits when it comes to low-balling, but they were in the wrong place
                    at the wrong time.
                    • firemouse Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 21.04.06, 11:31
                      usenetposts napisał:


                      >
                      > Very interesting. Now I wonder how many of the Moret partners are actually ex-
                      > Arthur Andersen partners. (... and so on)

                      Hey, I am discussing here a historic thing. Sure now after E&Y absorbed AA this
                      is true - but in reality I think that now E&Y is really a revamped AA. That was
                      really a smart move, AA just rebranded and took over E&Y.

                      For the fees this is true that pressure on cost cutting brings the quality down,
                      but unfortunately majority of people do not see it this way. They just think
                      "what the heck, this is (auditor/lawyer/accountant/whoever) so if one offers
                      half a price of the other I am just saving here". Yes and no. Interestingly, the
                      same people do not drive Daewoos (oops, Chevys wink ) or Dacias but BMWs or
                      Mercedes and I always wonder what are their priorities. If this is the car they
                      can park before their house in front of envy neighbours, suddendly the cost
                      cutting is an obsolete issue.

                      Well, the price can be negotiated but there is always a zone where discounts
                      mean second rate service and I agree with you here completely that there is a
                      level where you just can afford quality if you go down. But from the other hand
                      in the past these rates were often inflated beyond absurd.
      • usenetposts Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 14.04.06, 12:32
        firemouse napisał:

        > Why bother about .eu domain if EU disappears within 10 years (or I just hope
        so
        > ).
        >
        > What's so special in this domain, Europe even has no common cultural heritage.
        > We have been killing ourselves for ages. We have reached for our lands. We
        > betrayed other "Europeans" towards outer opponents. And now we just pretend
        all
        > to be friends. Funny.

        Well the funny thing about the US and its success is that it is a free mixof
        all the European nations. They have shown us Europeans that people can be happy
        to merge together as one from this continent. In America the faultlines are not
        between Europeans of different origins, if they were then the line "Dutch
        hater!" in Austin Powers' "Goldmember" wouldn't be funny, but it is because
        Americans of Dutch extraction are not at enmity with Americans of for example
        Scottish extraction - in fact they are well interbred anyway.

        You think maybe that they can do it because they were somewhere else, and not
        on the old territory? But we are already doing it. We are already moving around
        in Europe and getting on very well with each other, on a personal level,
        whatever governments may do. We certainly have a common competitor in the US,
        and need for that reason to assert our own "united we stand, divided we fall"
        mentality, and certainly there are marrons like Chitrack who will resist the
        fact that for this to happen the English language will rise to even more
        prominence in this continent at the cost of French, etc, but we will do it. We
        have also a common enemy, in the Islamic countries which hate us, and a key to
        our future success will be keeping the likes of Turkey at bay.

        Which is, of course why the American government is pushing us so hard to take
        them on board.

        >
        > This is just another EU whining about US success, and does anybody
        register .us
        > a
        > domains? OK, .us is another thing.
        >
        > If I need to be successful, I go for .com

        If the .com is available, then in many cases it is wise to take it.

        .us is a single country ccTLA, and , in case you had not noticed, the EU is now
        a larger market than the US.

        However, most of my domains at .eu are things that work because the sound
        of .eu sounds like a phrase ending in "you" in English. Placefor.eu or
        Imtelling.eu sound a lot snappier than placefor.com and imtelling.com, but
        still the latter are taken anyway and you would need to shell out at least 300
        USD to get hold of either of them, which I got for 18 EUR a piece.

        >
        > FM
        • marimax Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 14.04.06, 14:21
          As I expected you are not a good businessman.
          Why pay 18 Euro for something you can get for 10 ?
          • usenetposts Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 14.04.06, 21:27
            marimax napisał:

            > As I expected you are not a good businessman.
            > Why pay 18 Euro for something you can get for 10 ?

            You're bluffing, I'm calling. 18 EUR is the standard price everywhere.
        • ejmarkow Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 14.04.06, 14:54
          Good point Dave! It must be stressed, that the USA is one nation with a common
          language (English) and similar culture, and has a unique melting pot component
          as well that tries to assimilate at its best. The USA doesn't have a similar
          dilemma as Europe. It is a "nation" (the European Union actually) consisting of
          distinct cultures, languages, and even habits. I am impressed the EU has come
          as far as it has, and I wish the union success in the future.

          Regards,

          Eugene
          • usenetposts Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 14.04.06, 21:29
            ejmarkow napisał:

            > Good point Dave! It must be stressed, that the USA is one nation with a
            common
            > language (English) and similar culture, and has a unique melting pot
            component
            > as well that tries to assimilate at its best. The USA doesn't have a similar
            > dilemma as Europe. It is a "nation" (the European Union actually) consisting
            of
            >
            > distinct cultures, languages, and even habits. I am impressed the EU has come
            > as far as it has, and I wish the union success in the future.
            >

            Thanks for that.

            Best,

            Davey
            • marimax Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 19.04.06, 08:49
              Yes I paid 10 Pounds for each registration and it's a lot less than 18 Euros.
              I still believe your .eu domains have no commercial value
              They may sound OK but it is a different story
              • marimax Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 07.05.06, 12:43
                I think I have a good business idea.
                I have no technical knowledge to do it but someone could start a search engine
                dedicated strictly to .eu domains.
                There are a lot of good an cheap programmers in Poland so go ahead and organise
                it and become filthy rich
                • usenetposts Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 07.05.06, 17:23
                  marimax napisał:

                  > I think I have a good business idea.
                  > I have no technical knowledge to do it but someone could start a search engine
                  > dedicated strictly to .eu domains.
                  > There are a lot of good an cheap programmers in Poland so go ahead and
                  organise
                  >
                  > it and become filthy rich


                  I think my domain geugle.eu would be ideal for that. At the moment it is for
                  sale on sedo, but I can always take it off.

                  Do you use Sedo?
                  • marimax Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 08.05.06, 01:39
                    Yes I use Sedo and yes here I will agree with you about your domain but we could
                    be sued by Google.
                    • usenetposts Re: And I should be happy with .eu? 08.05.06, 11:46
                      marimax napisał:

                      > Yes I use Sedo and yes here I will agree with you about your domain but we
                      coul
                      > d
                      > be sued by Google.

                      But geugle has nothing to do with google though. It doesn't even sound the same.
Pełna wersja