Jak o każdym tragicznym wydarzeniu

[napoj.chmielowy]

całej prawdy o strzelaninie nigdy nie poznamy
stormcloudsgathering.com/charlie-hebdo-shootings-censored-video

[najglupszy-nick]

Podejrzliwość ludzka nie ma granic, ale Amerykanie są w niej (jak we wszystkim) do przodu
21stcenturywire.com/2015/01/10/new-twist-charlie-hebdo-lead-investigator-turns-up-dead-suicided/
sgtreport.com/2015/01/paris-siege-false-flag-analyzing-the-cop-shooting-footag
zeeklytv.com/video/13910/SLOW-MOTION-FAKE-PARIS-SHOOTING-MISS-7-1-15-FRENCH-SATIRE-YT-banned-with-120000-views

[napoj.chmielowy]

Cytat
Questions that remain unanswered include the following.

The Charlie Hebdo gunmen, identified by police as brothers Cherif and Said Kouachi, were said to display professional training as if they were highly-skilled Special Operations soldiers. They were calm and controlled, well equipped, and well trained. Exactly where did they get their training and high-tech equipment?
The Kouachi brothers were identified by DNA testing in only two hours. Although rapid DNA tests can be performed in a matter of hours, a match requires DNA from the suspect. How did the testing match with these suspects in such a short time? Did authorities have the Kouachi brother’s DNA from samples or was it already in a database? In either case, how did that happen?
Videos quickly showed two people in the getaway car with one in the driver’s seat. Why did authorities name and interrogate a third suspect (who turned out to not be involved) as the getaway car driver?
Why would the Koachi brothers wear balaclavas (i.e. ski masks) to hide their identity and then simply leave Said’s national ID card in the car? If they took the time to hide their faces, why would they bring their IDs with them?
Why did the masked attackers work to make sure they were quickly portrayed as Muslims and members of al Qaeda during the attacks? Witnesses said one shouted to onlookers—”Tell the media it was al-Qaeda in Yemen.” Other videos and reports indicate that they repeatedly shouted “Allahu Akbar” and proclaimed that they were avenging the Prophet Mohammad. Who benefits from this?
How did the attackers escape (to the northeast—the longest route through Paris) despite the police having raised the “alarm level for the greater Paris area to its highest level.” Did they have logistical support?
Why does the video of the shooting of victim Ahmed Merabet, reportedly killed by a shot to the head, suggest that he was not shot in the head?
How did Helric Fredou die? A Paris police commissioner conducting the investigation, Fredou died while preparing a report on the crimes. And why did Western media not report his death for at least three days?
The alleged Kosher grocery gunman, Amedy Coulibaly, met with the President of France just a few years ago. What are the odds of such a coincidental meeting and does the connection relate to the attacks?

Całość digwithin.net

Poprawny link

[napoj.chmielowy]

digwithin.net/2015/01/11/paris-attacks/

[napoj.chmielowy]

Podejrzenia narastają
www.activistpost.com/2015/01/paris-attackers-funded-by-pentagon.html

[map4]

napoj.chmielowy napisał:

> całej prawdy o strzelaninie nigdy nie poznamy

Kiedyś jeszcze policja strzelała, aby ranić. Ranny trafiał do szpitala, potem do sądu a potem na długie lata do więzienia.

Dziś dzieje się inaczej. Podejrzani są zabijani na miejscu i nie słyszałem jeszcze o przypadku, aby komuś z umundurowanych morderców postawiono zarzuty.
Wyłączyć z walki można również strzelając w obojczyk, niekoniecznie trzeba od razu mierzyć między oczy. Snajperzy to wiedzą, ale wiedzy tej nie stosują.
I tu powstaje pytanie kto wydał taki rozkaz i dlaczego jeszcze nie został aresztowany. Czy to jest normalne ?

[najglupszy-nick]

map4 napisał:
> I tu powstaje pytanie kto wydał taki rozkaz i dlaczego jeszcze nie został aresz
> towany. Czy to jest normalne ?

Powstaje znacznie więcej pytań. A ludzie są coraz bardziej podejrzliwi:
www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/04/interest-in-false-flags-at-all-time-high.html

[najglupszy-nick]

najglupszy-nick napisał:

> Powstaje znacznie więcej pytań. A ludzie są coraz bardziej podejrzliwi:
> www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/04/interest-in-false-flags-at-all-time-high.html

I ta podejrzliwość ma swoje historyczne uzasdnienie
www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/04/interest-in-false-flags-at-all-time-high.html

Wątpliwości zebrane do kupy

[napoj.chmielowy]

www.veteranstoday.com/2015/01/12/bbcpresident-of-france-false-flag-terrorism-in-paris/