Gość: sp;lit
IP: *.ipt.aol.com
21.01.05, 17:10
Tak wyglada poszanowanie prawa wlasnosci koszernych sku..eli z pod ciemnej
gwiazdy - Tfu , szescioramiennej ,...
Warto by im bylo podstawic ten artykul pod nos , jak ktorys z nich przyjedzie
do Warszawy czy do Lodzi dopominac sie o "swoje" posiadlosci . Ostatecznie ,
glosowali i popieraja te dyktature
uklony
=============================== =============================== =============
Gov't decision strips Palestinians of their East J'lem property
=============================== =============================== =============
By Meron Rappaport, Haaretz Correspondent
The Sharon government implemented the Absentee Property Law in East Jerusalem
last July, contrary to Israeli government policy, since Israeli law was
extended to East Jerusalem after the Six Day War.
The law means that thousands of Palestinians who live in the West Bank will
lose ownership of their property in East Jerusalem.
Government officials estimate the assets total thousands of dunam, while
other estimates say they could add up to half of all East Jerusalem property.
The government decision in July confirms a decision reached in the
ministerial committee for Jerusalem affairs a month earlier. The decision was
presented to the prime minister and attorney general and met with their
approval, but the decision was not publicized until now and is not listed on
the Web site of the Prime Minister's Office.
The Absentee Property Law of 1950 stipulates, among other things, that an
absentee is someone who at the time of the War of Independence "was in any
part of the land of Israel that is outside the area of Israel" - that is, the
West Bank and Gaza Strip.
According to the law, absentee assets are transfered to the authority of the
Custodian for Absentee Property, without the absentee being eligible for any
compensation. When East Jerusalem came under Israeli law, then-attorney
general Meir Shamgar directed that the law not be applied to West Bank
residents who have property in the parts of East Jerusalem that became part
of the State of Israel. Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin reissued that directive
in 1993.
With the recent construction of the fence in the Jerusalem region,
Palestinian landholders from Bethlehem and Beit Jala requested permission to
continue working their fields, which are within Jerusalem's municipal
jurisdiction. The state's response stated that the lands "no longer belong to
them, but have been handed over to the Custodian for Absentee Property." At
stake are thousands of dunam of agricultural land on which the Palestinians
grew olives and grapes throughout the years.
"These people's property was always considered absentee assets, but so long
as no fence existed, these people could get to their property and everything
was fine from their standpoint," said a senior judicial official involved in
the case. "The fence is the result of terrorism. It's not fair that a man
becomes an absentee because his tie to his land has been cut without his
doing. But morality is one thing, and what is written in our laws another."
The Palestinian landholders and their Israeli lawyers term it a "land grab,"
and also worry that nascent Housing Ministry plans will build on part of
absentees' land.