ONZ: w Darfurze nie ma ludobójstwa

IP: *.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl 02.02.05, 01:47
W raporcie ONZ dotyczącym konfliktu w Darfurze ani razu nie pada określenie ?
ludobójstwo?. Jednocześnie wzywa się w nim do osądzenia sprawców dokonywanych
tam zbrodni. Miałby się tym zająć Międzynarodowy Trybunał Karny. Według ONZ
zbrodni tych nie nazwano ludobójstwem, aby uniknąć interwencji w Sudanie. W
ciągu dwóch lat w Darfurze zginęło 70 tys. ludzi, a prawie dwa miliony
zostało zmuszonych do opuszczenia domów.

"milczenie owiec" ech
    • Gość: che guevara US-syny w rok wymordowały 100tys irakijczyków IP: *.ipartners.pl / *.ipartners.pl 02.02.05, 01:50
      a miliony pozostawiły bez prądu, wody, opieki medycznej i środków na minimum
      biologicznej egzystencji. Myślę że to kolejny pokaz serwalizmu ONZ wobec USA,
      jakby nazwali to co się dzieje w Darfurze ludobójstwem, tym bardziej musieliby
      tak nazwać zbrodniczą okupację Iraku przez pindosów.
      • www.pkb.nrd KOMUCHU JEDEN SPADAJ NA KUBE 08.02.05, 12:44
        Tam Twoja marna publicystyka zyska uznanie.
      • zyta17 Re: US-syny w rok wymordowały 100tys irakijczyków 08.02.05, 19:05
        Dziekuje, ze tak dobrze przedstawiles te sprawe. tak wlasnie dzieje sie w
        Iraku . oczywiscie ze w Sudanie jest tragedia, ale w Iraku wcale nie lepiej
        ostatnio mowiono, ze wysla tam wojska polskie, Nie wytrzymaja tam kilku dni.
        poza tym czy maja znowu robic kolejne "w pustyni i w puszczy "?
    • kropekuk Drugie tyle umrze z glodu lub z zarazy w obozach 02.02.05, 01:51
      uchodzcow. Z glodu, bo Muslimy uniemozliwiaja dostawy zywnosci, wiele agencji
      pomocowych ze wzgledow bezpieczenstwa podjelo decyzje o wycofaniu sie.
      W Darfurze jest ropa - korzystaja z niej min. Chiny i Franc(j)a - zadna
      interwencja wiec nie wchodzi w gre;)
    • viri Re: ONZ: w Darfurze nie ma ludobójstwa 07.02.05, 20:31
      tylko araby wyrzynaja w pin , gwalca i morduja ludnosc tak jak to robia
      od 10 lat w Sudanie
      • zyta17 Re: ONZ: w Darfurze nie ma ludobójstwa 08.02.05, 18:58
        INVISIBLE AFRICAN: Sudan: Land of the Blacks




        Salah Ahmed


        When I saw the lights in my rearview mirror, I knew we were screwed. On the
        radio, a commercial blared, “There’s more than corn in Indiana.”

        The radio wasn’t lying. Indiana also had the Ku Klux Klan, and on our way to
        Indianapolis, my brother and I were taking the scenic route through
        Martinsville — KKK country.

        “Where ya’ll goin’?” the thick-accented, pork-bellied cop asked us, pointing a
        flashlight at my face. Fields of corn rustled around us.

        “Indianapolis,” I replied. “Okey-doke,” he said in his corn-fed drawl, “So
        where y’all from?”
        I figured we were screwed anyway. “Sudan,” I confessed. “Sudan?” he asked,
        scratching his head in bewilderment. “Ain’t that over by Muncie?” I seized what
        I saw as my only chance: “Yup.” “Well, s***!” The cop’s eyes lit up. “Why
        didn’t you say so in the first place? How’s their basketball team doin’ these
        days?”
        Officer Billy Bob wasn’t alone. Almost anytime I would tell anyone I was from
        Sudan on my father’s side, the reaction would be similar: a confused look,
        followed by a stupid one after I revealed Sudan was only the largest country in
        Africa.

        Americans would usually have less trouble with my mom’s side, especially in
        Indiana, where I spent part of my childhood: “Poland — ain’t that over there by
        McCormicks Creek State Park?”

        Today, Sudan is all over the news, and with good reason. Thousands have been
        killed in the west of the country, where the Sudanese government is said to be
        complicit in the violence waged by so-called “Arab Janjaweed” against so-
        called “Black Africans.”

        But who are the Janjaweed?

        “The rebels spread the word Janjaweed as if it were an organization,” Musa
        Hilal, an alleged Janjaweed leader, told UK’s Guardian newspaper recently. “As
        a political group, there is no specific concept called Janjaweed . . . It means
        nothing, but has been used to mean everything.”

        What’s happening in Sudan is as horrible as it sounds. The photos taken by the
        BBC, The New York Times and other news organizations don’t lie. But the
        violence isn’t between Africans and Arabs, as many reports suggest, but between
        Africans and Africans.

        Sudan is a Black country, and references to “Arabs” and “Black Africans” by
        Darfur refugees are both new — and imported. Some Sudanese identify more
        closely with Arab culture than others, but that isn’t to say there is a Black-
        white component to the violence, as many news reports strongly suggest.

        The sudden interest in Sudan, where a separate, decades-old civil war in the
        south has claimed more than 2 million lives without the world lifting a finger,
        is religion — particularly the effort by foreign-based Christian organizations
        to do what they like to do best around the world: proselytize.

        Groups like these have been trying to convert Sudanese to Christianity for
        years, both from Islam and various animist traditions. These groups have an
        advantage in reducing Sudan, truly a melting pot, to “Arabs” and “Africans”
        because, understandably, it makes their job a lot easier.

        Their efforts may explain why Darfur refugees and rebel soldiers have taken to
        using the same terms when the press come calling. In the meantime, the issue of
        why the violence is happening gets clouded.

        The western part of Sudan is occupied by various tribes, almost all of them
        Muslim.

        Desertification has made already scarce natural resources even scarcer. That
        recently prompted rebel groups in the region to take up arms against the
        government, to get it to pay more attention to Darfur.

        If news reports are correct, the government responded predictably — with force,
        only it used local people to do it. It wasn’t anything new; the government has
        pitted one group against another for years, wherever it needed to squelch
        popular dissent.

        “The labels Arab and African are rather misleading, given the complexity of the
        region’s ethnic history,” Brendan I. Koerner wrote recently in Slate Magazine,
        in a rare, but telling, instance of journalistic integrity.

        In Sudan, people are dying in violence caused as much by poverty as by
        politics. Growing up, I lived in the north of the country, in Omdurman, often
        described as a suburb of Khartoum, the capital. We were supposed to be the so-
        called economic middle-class, yet even our house was made of a combination of
        mud, straw and cow dung.

        The unmistable thing, however, is that the people I grew up around — on the
        streets, in the market place, at weddings — were all Black. We spoke different
        languages, prayed differently and practiced different traditions. Being half-
        white, I stuck out like a light bulb, but we were all, simply, Sudanese. That
        is why the conflict in Darfur isn’t about race.

        For the Sudanese government the conflict is about money and power; for foreign
        Christian organizations, it is about winning the hearts and minds of more and
        more converts.

        Meanwhile, the poverty afflicting all of Africa has hit Sudan upside the head.
        And while the international community gets whipped up about a conflict that has
        been boiled down to easy, inaccurate terms, the Black people of Sudan, Africa’s
        largest country — far away from Muncie, Indiana — continue to die.
    • hans2 Re: ONZ: w Darfurze nie ma ludobójstwa 08.02.05, 12:40
      Islam kontynuje to co nazizm rozpoczal
    • samsone Re: ONZ: w Darfurze nie ma ludobójstwa 08.02.05, 13:24
      Ale jak napisali sa tam warunki---jak to mozna intepretowac, moze zamiast do
      Israela Nato wyslac, bylo by dobrze tam wyslac, bo jak juz warunki sa, to Araby
      je na pewno wykorzystaja.
      • zyta17 Re: ONZ: w Darfurze nie ma ludobójstwa 08.02.05, 18:59
        bardzo prymitywne uwagi
        radze poczytac artykul mlodego Sudanczyka, syna kobiety wychowanej w Warszawie
        i Sudanczyka z Omdurmanu
      • zyta17 Re: ONZ: w Darfurze nie ma ludobójstwa 08.02.05, 19:03
        nie araby a Arabowie (poprawnie po polsku) :)))
    • wojo1111 W Sudanie jest i niewolnictwo i ludobojstwo 08.02.05, 19:06
      maitri.diecezja.gda.pl/gazetka/my_37/niewolni.htm
      niewolnictwo jest uznane przez islam i sa fatwy na to .(XXI WIEK ich nie
      rusza )
      • lechu1 Re: W Sudanie jest i niewolnictwo i ludobojstwo 15.09.05, 16:13
        nadal morduja araby w Sudanie
Inne wątki na temat:
Pełna wersja