Rattler , cos dla ciebie ,... Sit down :)))

07.04.05, 21:49
Sharon wlasnie wybiera sie w odwiedziny do Busha ,... Z kuferkiem :)

uklony

============================================================================

April 5, 2005

More Empty Rhetoric for Veterans
=====================================================

by Rep. Ron Paul

Many military veterans were shocked to see that the federal budget for 2006
makes several cuts in veterans benefits and services. Under the proposed
budget, the Veterans Administration will increase once again the co-pay cost
of prescription drugs, while adding a new annual fee for medical benefits.
The budget also calls for the reduction of veterans home funding and limits
the number of VA nursing home beds. Some members of Congress have even
suggested rewriting the definition of "veteran" in a way that could deny VA
health benefits for millions of retired servicemen.

Unfortunately, the trust that members of our armed forces put in their
government has been breached time and time again, and the recent budget vote
represents another blow to veterans. Even as we send hundreds of thousands of
soldiers into Iraq, Congress can't get its priorities straight.

Our invasion of Iraq will swell the ranks of our combat veterans, many of
whom will need medical care as they grow older. Sadly, health issues arising
from the first war with Iraq still have not been addressed. Congress should
immediately end the silence and formally address Gulf War Syndrome, which has
had a devastating impact on veterans who served in Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and
Kuwait. As a medical doctor, I believe the syndrome is very real, and likely
represents several different maladies caused by exposure to conditions
specific to the Gulf region at the time. Congress and the VA should stop
insulting Gulf War veterans and recognize that the syndrome is a serious
illness that needs treatment. We can only hope and pray that our soldiers in
Iraq today do not suffer from similar illnesses in the future.

It's easy to talk about honoring veterans and their sacrifices, even while
the federal government treats veterans badly. Congress wastes billions of
dollars funding countless unconstitutional programs, but fails to provide
adequately for the men and women who carry out the most important
constitutional function: national defense.

We can best honor both our veterans and our current armed forces by pursuing
a coherent foreign policy. No veteran should ever have to look back and ask
himself, "Why were we over there in the first place?" Too often history
demonstrates that wars are fought for political and economic reasons, rather
than legitimate national security reasons. Supporting the troops means never
putting them in harm's way unless America is truly threatened.

Today's American soldiers are the veterans of the future, and they should
never be sent to war without clear objectives that serve definite American
national security interests. They should never fight at the behest of the
United Nations or any other international agency. They should never serve
under a UN flag, nor answer to a UN commander. They deserve to know that they
fight for the American people and the Constitution, and that the decision to
send them into battle was made by their own Congress via an express
declaration of war – NOT by UN bureaucrats who don't care about them.

Only by using American troops judiciously and in service of the Constitution
can we avoid the kind of endless military entanglements we witnessed in Korea
and Vietnam. We honor our veterans by ensuring that their service to the
nation is never in vain.


    • rattler Re: Rattler , cos dla ciebie ,... Sit down :))) 09.04.05, 22:17
      Powiem ci co tu brakuje i dlaczego zaczyna mi wychodzic bokiem - Od nowego roku
      gabinet w Dalles zamykaja i z kazda pierdolka trzeba bedzie jezdzic do Portland
      albo do Tri-cities - Znam vets, ktorych na to nie stac i znam takich, ktorych
      trzeba bedzie wozic, bo sami nie prowadza. Tym zostaje czekac na srodek
      transportu 'zapewniony' przez Vets Administration, albo prosic kogos z rodziny
      czy znajomych zeby ich zawiozl do Portland.

      Gdyby dzisiaj ktores z moich dzieci oznajmilo nam, (rodzicom) ze 'podpisali' to
      bez wahania wzialbym 2x4 i polamal bym im nogi, zeby ich uchronic przed tym
      watpliwym (dzisiaj) zaszczytem.

      narazie
      • rattler Re: Rattler , cos dla ciebie ,... Sit down :))) 09.04.05, 22:49
        Watpliwosci - dlaczego ?

        -----------------------------------------

        The wordings of the current oath of enlistment and oath for commissioned
        officers are as follows:

        To przysiegalem jako rekrut US Army.

        "I,_____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the
        Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic;
        that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey
        the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers
        appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military
        Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the
        wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

        To przysiegalem po otrzymaniu pierwszego stopnia oficerskiego.

        "I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United
        States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm)
        that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against
        all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to
        the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations
        or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties
        of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God." (DA Form 71, 1
        August 1959, for officers.)

        col (xx) rattler

    • lechu1 gnojki wrocily do akcji nic z papieskich kazan im 09.04.05, 22:20
      nie zostalo w pustych , zakutych lbach
      • rattler Re: gnojki wrocily do akcji 09.04.05, 22:59
        Jesli masz za duzo czasu i nie masz co robic, to skocz przewracac kamienie na
        lace, moze tam, pod nimi, (good luck) tez znajdziesz paru anty-semitow :)

        narazie
        • i-love-2-bike Re: gnojki wrocily do akcji 09.04.05, 23:03
          rattler napisał:

          > Jesli masz za duzo czasu i nie masz co robic, to skocz przewracac kamienie na
          > lace, moze tam, pod nimi, (good luck) tez znajdziesz paru anty-semitow :)
          >
          > narazie

          on nie tyle nie ma co robic ile nie ma z kim gadac, a to juz straszne. taki
          drogi przeszczep mozgu a wynik taki mizerny:jeden temat,jedna melodia . a to pech.
    • kropekuk I CUD sie jednak zdarzyl. Zaraz po powrocie Busha 09.04.05, 23:05
      z Watykanu...
Inne wątki na temat:
Pełna wersja