LA Times zadowolony z przekroju zabitych w Londyni

11.07.05, 23:24
LA Times opublikowal felieton dajacy wyraz zadowoleniu z roznorodnosci
etnicznej zabitych i zaginionych w wybuchach w Londynie:
www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-diverse11jul11,0,264824.story?coll=la-home-world
Trzeba miec niezle wykrecony swiatopoglad aby zaprzatac czytelnika takimi
dyrdymalami. Mozna nawet zaryzykowac twierdzenie, ze LA Times ubolewalby,
gdyby zabilo jedynie rodowitych anglikow.
W tym samym duchu moznaby bylo uchwalic ustawe o dopuszczalnej ilosci decybeli
i scigac terrorystow za naruszenie paragrafu zabraniajacego halasowac.
    • felusiak1 Artykul zbyt dlugi? ADD doskwiera? 12.07.05, 00:32
      • kropekuk Bo JAK to skomentowac? Pozwem sadowym? 12.07.05, 00:33

      • rattler Re: Artykul zbyt dlugi? ADD doskwiera? 12.07.05, 01:02
        Zacznij pajacu odpowiadac na posty , ktore zalozyles ...

        -------------------------------------------------------

        narazie

        Zastanawiam sie czy ktos jak ty , kto goraco poparl zadyme e Iraku ma moralne
        prawo ubolewac nad obecna sytuacja. Trzeba bylo zaczac na eliminacji Talibanu i
        skonczyc budujac szkoly, ksztalcic pedagogow i postawic na nowe pokolenie,
        ktore z braku wyksztalcenia staje sie ofiara wplywu mullow preferujacych ere
        kamienia lupanego, zamiast szukac WMD w Iraku i bawic sie w 'nation building'

        Ktos tu zasral sprawe , sir , ty swoim poparciem pomogles !!!

        -------------------------------------------


        Author: FDRizo 06.29.2005

        We bought it hook, line & sinker

        The full-bird colonel that was briefing our group the day before we crossed the
        LOD* was one convincing son-of-a-bitch. It wasn't that he was particularly
        eloquent, or even charming in the traditional sense. He was a Marine's Marine;
        a field Marine. Even under the MOPP** suit you could tell that this guy wasn't
        one for spit-shining boots or ironing cammies back in the rear.

        What made him so utterly compelling as he stomped around in the middle of our
        massive school-circle in the desert of Northern Kuwait was his absolute faith
        in what his higher-ups had told him. And he did not hesitate to pass this on to
        us.

        "I can't tell you with absolute certainty what's waiting for us on the other
        side, but I can tell you this: we are going to be welcomed as heroes! We will
        be driving through the streets of Baghdad like godd*mned NASA astronauts! You
        are the liberators of Iraq." The faces of my peers were lit up with pride. The
        kind of pride you see on recruit's faces as they finish the Crucible in boot
        camp; the kind of pride you see on a Marine's face when a WWII vet comes up and
        thanks him for serving on the street in Oceanside.

        "Marines, I know that you all want to hear about when we're going home." Nods
        all around. Most of us had been in Kuwait for four months and some of us twice
        that long. "Hell, I wish I knew myself. But I can tell you this: this war's
        gonna be over in a month, tops, and I can guess that most of you will
        retrograde back to the states within a couple of months after that."

        Iraq didn't make me a cynic; my dad did that years before I ever put on a
        Marine uniform. Funny though, that I believed that colonel just like everybody
        else. I'm not sure what George W. Bush was saying on the TV to the folks at
        home while I was waiting to cross the Kuwaiti/Iraqi border on March 20. I'm
        willing to bet it wasn't much different from what that colonel said. I knew
        better, but I believed it then because I wanted to. It was much easier to
        believe myself and my friends to be liberators. It was easier than being scared.

        But that which gave me hope then, I recognize now to be a lie. George Bush may
        not be a genius, but I simply cannot believe that the CIA Middle East desk guys
        and Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice all sat in the Oval Office telling Bush
        and Cheney that we were about to be welcomed with hugs and roses and
        cigarettes. There's just no way. They knew that this was coming; certainly they
        may have underestimated it, but they had to know what would happen.

        Don't let yourself believe them just because it makes you feel better, or
        because the world is less scary when you do. Don't believe them and soon enough
        we'll take this country back.


        *LOD: line of departure
        **MOPP: mission oriented protective posture (a fancy military acronym for the
        nuclear, chemical and biological protective suits we wore for the first phase
        of the war)


    • wojcd Re: LA Times zadowolony z przekroju zabitych w Lo 12.07.05, 00:51
      Ofiary nasze mają dusze.
      Ofiary inne już nie.

      Pamiętasz wstrzemięźliwość massmediów amerykańskich 11.09?
    • abe_ltd Czego ty sie tam doszukujesz, w...ny_przez_zycie? 12.07.05, 01:06
      Masz wyobraznie chorego schizofrenika.
      Wszystko co w tym artykule sie mowi to to ze zamach londynski moglby rownie
      dobrze byc zdefiniowany jako zamach swiatowy ze wzgledu na to ze dotknal
      wszelkie grupy etniczne i religijne z calego swiata. A wiec byl to atak nie
      przeciw Londynowi ale przeciw Swiatu. Bardzo to ladnie uzasadnione jest choc to
      pieprzenie jest nevertheless.
      Nie dostrzegam tam zadnej 'radosci' z przekroju demograficznego ofiar. ty
      jestes pie..iety i tyle.
    • manny_ramirez felusiak a po co sobie tym leb zawracac? 12.07.05, 01:07
      LATimes to szmatlawiec. jedyne co tam dobre to Max Boot;)
Pełna wersja