Skandal q...wa ...

31.03.06, 21:48
Tego jeszcze nie bylo ...

back to work :(

narazie

-------------------------------------------

Army Bans Use of Privately Bought Body Armor

By LOLITA C. BALDOR, AP

WASHINGTON (March 31) - Soldiers will no longer be allowed to wear body armor
other than the protective gear issued by the military, Army officials said
Thursday, the latest twist in a running battle over the equipment the
Pentagon gives its troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Army officials told The Associated Press that the order was prompted by
concerns that soldiers or their families were buying inadequate or untested
commercial armor from private companies - including the popular Dragon Skin
gear made by California-based Pinnacle Armor.

"We're very concerned that people are spending their hard-earned money on
something that doesn't provide the level of protection that the Army requires
people to wear. So they're, frankly, wasting their money on substandard
stuff," said Col. Thomas Spoehr, director of materiel for the Army.

-----------------------------------------
    • julian.m Re: Skandal q...wa ... 31.03.06, 22:37
      w polskiej armmi tez nie wolno nosic cywilnych majtek z gumka tylko
      przydzialowki z tasiemka, wiec co za roznica, US zolnierze to nie partyzanci
      (czyt.terrorysci)w lapciach z lyka.
    • explicit Re: Skandal q...wa ... 31.03.06, 22:41
      Felusiak ci to wytlumaczy , zakuty lbie :)

      uklony

      ==============================================================================

      Army officials told The Associated Press that the order was prompted by
      concerns that soldiers or their families were buying inadequate or untested
      commercial armor from private companies
      • i-love-2-ski Re: Skandal q...wa ... 31.03.06, 22:50
        explicit napisał:

        > Felusiak ci to wytlumaczy , zakuty lbie :)
        >
        > uklony
        >
        he,he co my bysmy robili na forum bez felusiaka. on ci jak dawna
        partia,rozwiazuje za nas problemy i zbiera plony w grudniu:) ja uwazam,ze armia
        powinna zastrajkowac i tyle. pamietacie jak kiedys jakis zolnierz na grenadzie
        uratowal swych kolesiow bo zadzwonil na karte kredytowa z pierwszej lepszej
        budki (dawne AT&T wtedy dzialo bezproblemowo),bo sprzet wojskowy nie
        dzialal,wiec teraz chyba bedzie podobnie. moze kupimy cos z demobilu ,aby pomoc
        armii:)
        • explicit Re: Skandal q...wa ... 31.03.06, 23:43
          W naszej Konstytucji ta opcja nie jest mozliwa , otherwise , prikaz naczalstwa

          Nasz system jest obstawiony na kazda niespodzianke , na zamach wojskowy rowniez

          uklony

          ==============================================================================

          ja uwazam,ze armia powinna zastrajkowac i tyle.



        • explicit Re: Skandal q...wa ... 01.04.06, 01:53
          Jak to jest , ze ze a Credit Co potrafi znalezc dluznika w ciagu minuty bez
          library record system , a FBI ma problem namierzyc Zyda , ktory sprzedaje
          tajemnice panstwowe do Hutzpaland ,..

          uklony




          ==============================================================================

          pamietacie jak kiedys jakis zolnierz na grenadzie uratowal swych kolesiow bo
          zadzwonil na karte kredytowa z pierwszej lepszej budki (dawne AT&T
          • i-love-2-ski Re: Skandal q...wa ... 01.04.06, 01:55
            explicit napisał:

            > Jak to jest , ze ze a Credit Co potrafi znalezc dluznika w ciagu minuty bez
            > library record system , a FBI ma problem namierzyc Zyda , ktory sprzedaje
            > tajemnice panstwowe do Hutzpaland ,..
            >
            > no swoj swego nie wyda. ciebie by namierzyli,no problem:)
Inne wątki na temat:
Pełna wersja