Dlaczego Polacy zastawiali zloto u ZYDA????

14.04.06, 16:39
nie dowiezali nawet najblizszym z rodziny...odpowiedz prosta... forsa byla
JAK U BOGA POD PACHA...zawsze zwracana czasami po smierci nawet
spatkobiercom..moja reklama POLAKOM wkladac forse na procety w BANK OF
ISRAEL..:-))))
    • 1ja Re: Dlaczego Polacy zastawiali zloto u ZYDA????+ 14.04.06, 16:56
      A czy reklama na tym forum nie jest zabroniona?
      • arap1 Re: Dlaczego Polacy zastawiali zloto u ZYDA????+ 14.04.06, 17:01
        to nie jest reklama. to rada .1ja..to zabespieczenie pienedzy...kto wie co
        PUTIN mysli i BANK RP niepewny.....:-)))
    • ichwan.as.safa Re: Dlaczego Polacy zastawiali zloto u ZYDA???? 14.04.06, 16:59
      Mieli u Polaka złodzieja?
    • explicit Re: Dlaczego Polacy zastawiali zloto u ZYDA???? 14.04.06, 17:01
      Nie daj Boze ,...

      uklony

      nie dowiezali nawet najblizszym z rodziny...odpowiedz prosta... forsa byla
      JAK U BOGA POD PACHA...zawsze zwracana czasami po smierci nawet
      spatkobiercom..moja reklama POLAKOM wkladac forse na procety w BANK OF
      ISRAEL..:-))))

      ==============================================================================

      Israel Banks Called Lax on Holocaust Fund Returns
      ========================================================
      Israeli banks and institutions kept Nazi victims' assets

      New York Times, January 19, 2005 by Steven Erlanger - JERUSALEM, Jan. 18 -
      Israeli banks holding assets from European Jews killed in the Holocaust failed
      to make a determined effort to return the holdings to their heirs, and when
      they were returned, they were not returned at their proper value, according to
      a report of the Israeli Parliament, or Knesset, released Tuesday.

      The Israeli government, as custodian for a large part of the assets, also
      failed to make a serious effort to maintain their value or to return them to
      survivors or heirs, the report said.

      "What we have discovered, in particular the attitude of the banks, has filled
      us with disgust," said the chairwoman of a parliamentary committee, Colette
      Avital, a Labor Party legislator.

      "Neither the state nor the banks paid enough attention to this problem," Ms.
      Avital said. "We don't think the state of Israel should act differently from
      what we've demanded from other countries."

      Under pressure from the United States and Israel, the banks and governments of
      Switzerland and Austria have worked to disclose the accounts of those believed
      to be Holocaust victims and survivors, so assets can be returned to relatives.
      Switzerland, for example, agreed to pay compensation of $1.25 billion after
      more than 54,000 dormant accounts traced to World War II or earlier were found
      in Swiss banks.

      The Israeli report, after four years of investigation, found that 9,000 people
      or their heirs were eligible for compensation from the Israeli government and
      the banks, amounting to an estimated $31.5 million. Of those 9,000 names, about
      6,000 were listed as victims of the Holocaust by Yad Vashem, Israel's Holocaust
      museum.

      Members of the committee called on Parliament to approve the report and pass
      legislation to put into effect the return of the assets to heirs, where they
      can be found, at a fair value.

      Where heirs cannot be found, the committee recommended using the money to
      benefit Holocaust survivors.

      The committee still intends to look into the real estate holdings in Israel of
      Holocaust survivors or victims. Some of the property, bought before the state
      was founded, would now be worth a great deal.

      The history of the Israeli assets is different from that of Switzerland, for
      example. Jews in Europe bought land and opened bank accounts in British Mandate
      Palestine from the 1920's on, to invest in the Zionist enterprise or to
      establish a nest egg for possible immigration by them or their children. The
      Anglo-Palestine Bank, for example, was founded in 1903 and later became Bank
      Leumi, which held by far the largest number of the accounts in question.

      After the outbreak of World War II, land and bank accounts held by Jews from
      countries under Nazi rule were seized by the British mandate government in
      Palestine as enemy property, and most of it was transferred to England and held
      by the British Custodian of Enemy Property. But the banks also hid some of
      their accounts, trying to protect their account holders.

      After the war and the establishment of the state of Israel, Britain paid back
      some $1.4 million in 1950 as compensation, and records of the accounts were
      turned over to the Israeli government, which set up its own custodian general's
      office.

      Some accounts were returned by the custodian, mostly at values that were not
      realistic. But many were not, and neither the custodian nor the banks,
      according to the committee, made serious efforts to find survivors or heirs.
      Nor did they manage the accounts properly, and their value eroded. According to
      the committee, the banks did not take sufficiently assiduous action to locate
      accounts even when asked to do so by Holocaust survivors or the heirs of
      Holocaust victims.

      The committee valued the accounts in two different ways: the initial assets
      indexed to inflation since World War II, plus either 3 percent interest or 4
      percent interest through Sept. 30, 2004. With 3 percent interest, the committee
      found the state liable for $23 million in frozen accounts under its
      custodianship and the banks were responsible for a further $8.5 million. At 4
      percent, the state's liability is about $133 million and the banks' liability
      is some $73 million.

      Bank Leumi, Israel's second-largest bank, is responsible for about 95 percent
      of the banks' liabilities. Four other banks are responsible for the rest.

      Bank Leumi issued a statement saying that it had cooperated fully with the
      committee's efforts to trace the accounts. Yona Fogel, an executive vice
      president, told The Jerusalem Post that if the report was based "on factual
      evidence, we will not fight it."

      The bank has not held any such accounts for decades, Mr. Fogel said. "We will
      cooperate with every legal process aimed at aiding Holocaust survivors," he
      said.

      Ms. Avital, the committee chairwoman, said: "There was no intentional act to
      keep people from getting their money. But there was callousness and
      insensitivity."

      Efraim Zuroff, the Israel director of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, called the
      report "a sad commentary on the inability or unwillingness of Israel to deal
      with these issues, while demanding that other countries do so."

      He criticized the attitude of the state's business and political leaders. "The
      powers that be have been stonewalling this again and again," Mr. Zuroff
      said. "This is only a committee report, a revelation of the scope of the
      problem. This is not the Knesset passing a law forcing the banks and the
      custodian to return the money. For that, there has to be political will."

      A copy of the report and a list of the account holders is online in English at:
      http//www.knesset.gov.il/committees/eng/docs/shoa_finalreport_eng.htm.

      • 1ja [...] 14.04.06, 17:12
        Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.
Pełna wersja