Gość: Polak_w_Koreii
IP: proxy / 219.240.32.*
10.01.03, 12:03
Ten post napisalem po angielsku na innym forum, a ze jest dosyc dlugi, nie
bede go tlumaczyl na jezyk polski.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Even as Washington under George W. Bush demands that other countries meet
various obligations, disavow any nuclear plans and substantially disarm their
conventional forces, the US itself refuses to ratify the nuclear test-ban
treaty, withdraws from various conventions to control missile and chemical
and bacteriological weapons development and deployment, signals its intent to
pursue nuclear hegemony including the domination of space, continues to base
its defence on nuclear weapons (an armoury of an estimated 9,000 of them),
deploys 'conventional weapons' which use the radioactive by-products of
nuclear technology (depleted uranium), and pushes Congress to authorize small
nuclear warheads, known as 'Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator' weapons,
undoubtedly with North Korea's bunkers and underground complexes in mind.
The NKoreans know that America is not a trustworthy partner. NK knows that
America is hell-bent on war, with anyone they can possibly bully into a war.
While America prepares to attack Iraq, which has agreed to just about
everything that Washington has demanded, NK knows that it is also in Bush's
crosshairs. Bush keeps ranting about the need for Kim to be credible. Well,
Bush is not living up to demands that he places on others. The IAEA has found
absolutely nothing. And lets be realistic. Nuclear and bioloogical programs
are not easy to hide.
Rumsfeld has recently asserted that the war in Iraq could be prevented
if "Saddam stepped down." What we see here is American usurping the right to
dictate who rules which country. Let's just overlook the fact that this is
absolutely ludicrous. What credibility can a guy who falsified election
results have when making such demands? America doesnt have the right to
demand any change in government. Kim see this and he has to wander.
Let's also not be stupid and ignorant of the fact that it has been America,
NOT NKorea which has for 5 decades threatened its counterpart with nuclear
weapons. Threatening to drop the atom on NK has been an american way of
interaction with our northern neighbors. Even now, it is NK that is more
lilely to be the victim of a nuclear strike. The American track-record is
well known.
1. In the early winter of 1950 General MacArthur sought permission to
drop 'between 30 and 50 atomic bombs' and lay a belt of radioactive cobalt
across the neck of the Korean peninsula. The Joint Chiefs of Staff several
times deliberated and came very close to using the bomb, and during the
autumn of 1951 one US operation, known as 'Operation Hudson Harbor', involved
the dispatch of a solitary B 29 to Pyongyang as if on a nuclear run. It was
designed to cause terror, and undoubtedly it did.
2.Four years after the war ended, the US introduced nuclear artillery, mines,
and missiles into Korea, adding thereafter to its stockpile kept adjacent to
the Demilitarized Zone and designed to intimidate the non-nuclear North. When
nuclear weapons were withdrawn in 1991, at South Korean demand, the US
continued its rehearsals for a long-range nuclear bombing strike on North
Korea, certainly until 1998, and probably till today.
3. If you were payint attention to the news you would know that America has
changed the criterias needed for launching a nuclear strike. Henceforth
nuclear weapons could be employed in “retaliation for attack with nuclear,
biological or chemical weapons” and “against targets able to withstand non-
nuclear attack,” an apparent reference to North Korean underground
industrial and military facilities. A third category called for nuclear
attack “in the event of surprising military developments,”- quite vagie
isnt it? Exaclty what does it mean?
4. Remember the axis of evil speech? Well guess who is on a list of potential
American nuclear targets. Russia, China, Iraq, Iran, North Korea, Libya and
Syria. Does NK have reasons to worry?
Yes he does. The American history of brutal murders is well known to all
those who dont pander to America as if it was some kind of humanitarian hero.
NK doesnt need to look to the murders in central Ameica or the middle east or
to Vietnam. It needs only to remember the Korean War. In the first year of
that war, on November 5, 1950, General Douglas MacArthur ordered the
destruction of “every means of communication, every installation, factory,
city and village” in an area stretching from the Yalu River to the battle
line. Over 2,300 gallons of napalm were dropped on Pyongyang in one raid
alone, in July 1952. Mass fire bombings systematically wiped out one town
after another, and US planes also targeted power stations and irrigation dams
that supported rice fields. As irrigation dams were destroyed, villages
downstream were swept away in the resulting floods, inflicting enormous death
and destruction. At various times during the war, the US even considered use
of tactical nuclear weapons.
America had alot to be proud of in that war. And with great General Curtis
LeMay stated, “We burned down just about every city in North and South Korea
both,” and “we killed off over a million civilian Koreans and drove several
million more from their homes.”
Did NK really admit to anything in that meeting with Kelly? Its doubtful.
1. Bush wanted to kill the 1994 deal really badly.
2. Remember the so called admission of nuclear weapons in the Korean media
not so long ago? It turned out to be a mistranslation.
3. In 1993 Clinton wanted a war really badly, and the deal that was struck
was not something he welcomed.
4. What happened when Kelly went to the North?At no time during the meetings
was Kelly willing to discuss the resumption of relations. Instead, Kelly led
off the first meeting by ignoring the usual protocol of greetings, blunting
saying that he had not come to negotiate. Kelly then accused North Korea of
violating the terms of the Agreed Framework by conducting a secret uranium
enrichment program to develop nuclear weapons. Furthermore, he added, there
could be no dialogue between the two nations until this program was
disbanded. According to the North Koreans, Kelly was “very rude” and
presented his demands in an “extremely threatening and arrogant manner.”
Does America care about the South? No. America has no intention to listen to
South Korea worries about a possible war. Clinton proved it. When he was in
power he was going to attack Korea, caring little about what such a war would
mean to South Korea. Total devastation? Who cares!
Who started that conflict with the DPRK in 1993? Well here is a little
timeline.
1. The conflict in U.S.-North Korean relations over the nuclear issue first
arose on January 26, 1993, when President Clinton announced that the U.S
military would conduct war games in South Korea
2. This was followed the next month by the news that some of the nuclear
weapons previously targeted on the Soviet Union would be redirected at North
Korea.
3. By March, the massive Team Spirit war games involving bombers, cruise
missiles and naval vessels were underway.
4. new difficulties soon arose when the International Atomic Energy Agency
(IAEA) insisted on inspecting undeclared nuclear sites in North Korea,
something the agency had never demanded from any other nation. Followed by
more intrusive demands. Again, never damanded of from any other country.
5. Talks broke off. In November of that year, President Clinton appeared
on “Meet the Press,” insisting that “North Korea cannot be allowed to
develop a nuclear bomb.”
6. Defense Secretary