Bush bankrutuje Ameryke

IP: *.mco.bellsouth.net 02.07.03, 17:24
>> Bush i zydowska maszynka do glosowania zwana 'Kongresem i Senatem'
bankrutuja Ameryke!! Jeszcze za Clintona budzet byl na plusie a teraz w
dwoch latach tylko, deficyt pojawil sie ogromny. Wszystko pakuja w bron i
amunicje i za kilka lat deficyt wyniesie przeszlo 4 tryliony, zgodnie z
najnowszymi przewidywaniami. Zanosi sie na to, ze za kazda bombe i rakiete
amerykanie beda obciazac...nieboszczykow, ktorych nimi zamorduja.Groups
Predict Staggering U.S. Deficits

Wednesday July 2, 2003 3:29 PM


By ALAN FRAM

Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - A liberal advocacy group and an investment bank are
projecting federal deficits over the next decade exceeding a staggering $4
trillion.

In a study to be released on Wednesday, the Center on Budget and Policy
Priorities estimates that the cumulative shortfall through 2013 will be $4.1
trillion. That assumes Congress will enact a new prescription drug benefit,
extend a series of recently enacted tax cuts that would otherwise expire,
and approve other tax reductions and spending increases that many believe
are inevitable.

During that period, annual deficits would never dip below $325 billion and
would hit $530 billion in 2013, the liberal center said. The highest deficit
ever was $290 billion in 1992.

``Acting now to reduce future deficits will make the burden imposed on
future generations noticeably smaller than if we wait five, ten or more
years to act,'' wrote Richard Kogan, author of the center's study.

Two weeks ago, the investment banking firm Goldman Sachs used many of the
same assumptions to project deficits over the same period totaling $4.5
trillion. Its forecast - which it also attributes to the weak economy and
the likelihood of election-year spending increases next year - includes
projected deficits of $425 billion this year and $450 billion in 2004.

Conservatives and another Wall Street firm said such estimates are
unreliable and probably overstated.

In its most recent forecast, the Bush administration estimated in February
that deficits would total $1 trillion over the next five years, assuming
that the president's tax and spending proposals become law.

It did not issue a 10-year projection, saying such forecasts are unreliable,
and is likely to issue an updated five-year estimate later this month that
analysts expect to be worse than February's. Joined by conservatives, the
administration argues that slight, unpredictable changes in the health of
the country's economy can have massive long-term effects on federal revenue,
spending and the budget's bottom line.

``Ten-year projections are like trying to forecast the weather 10 years
out,'' said Brian Riedl, a budget analyst with the conservative Heritage
Foundation.

Echoing that view was a newsletter last week from the investment bank J.P.
Morgan, which said many budget forecasts are far too gloomy.

``Doomsday United States budget scenarios are based on pessimistic growth
assumptions about the economy and future federal revenue,'' the newsletter
said.

Underlining the uncertainty of such long-range forecasts, they come 2- years
after government analysts envisioned 10-year surpluses totaling a record
$5.6 trillion. Thanks to a recession, higher spending and deep tax cuts that
President Bush moved through Congress, that figure has vanished in a
dizzyingly fast and steep decline such as the federal budget has never
before seen.

The predicted shortfalls also come as Congress, on vacation until next week,
moves with Bush toward enacting new prescription drug benefits that
lawmakers say should cost $400 billion over the coming 10 years. Legislators
are also working on new tax cuts and are expected to increase spending for
defense, education, domestic security and other programs later this year.

Some assumptions from the liberal budget center's study include:

-Political pressure will mean that cuts in income and other taxes, enacted
over the last three years, will not expire at various times over the next
decade, as now scheduled. 10-year cost: $1.7 trillion.

-Congress will fix the alternative minimum tax, originally designed to
ensure that the richest Americans pay at least some taxes, to prevent
millions of Americans from having to pay it. Cost: $760 billion.

-Lawmakers will enact a prescription drug benefit and provide more than
inflation increases for defense, rebuilding Iraq, domestic security and
other programs. Cost: up to $1.9 billion.

Congressional Democrats and liberal groups like the center are worried that
growing deficits will erode federal resources needed to bolster government
programs. They have accused Bush of fostering fiscal policies that are
threatening the solvency of Social Security, Medicare and other programs -
just as the huge baby boom generation prepares to retire.

As the budget picture has deteriorated, Bush administration officials have
said their chief concerns are righting the economy and fighting terrorism.
Tax cuts will strengthen the economy, producing more federal revenue that
will help eventually balance the budget, they say.

In March, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projected a $1.8
trillion deficit through 2013. But that excluded the 10-year, $350 billion
tax cut and state aid package enacted in May and any other budgetary changes
that have not yet become law.

Last month, the congressional budget agency worsened its estimate of this
year's deficit to exceed $400 billion. It will not update its 10-year
forecast until August.


    • bimi tryliony? 02.07.03, 19:40
      :)
      • Gość: A.D. He,he... IP: *.mco.bellsouth.net 02.07.03, 19:55
        bimi napisał:

        > :)>>> Nu, tak u nich to stoi. Bilion to u nich miliard, wiec pewnie ten
        trylion to...bilion ! Zwazywszy na fakt ze ten dwudziesty pierwszy wiek, to
        raczej sredniowiecze w Ameryce, wiec czemu sie dziwic...
        • Gość: a Re:tu miema smiechu IP: 168.103.126.* 02.07.03, 19:58
          jest to interesujce jak banki pod rarzadem tych samych ludzi wiedza jak
          drukowac bumage we wlasnym interesie.
          • bimi Re:tu miema smiechu 02.07.03, 20:03
            Gość portalu: a napisał(a):

            > jest to interesujce jak banki pod rarzadem tych samych ludzi wiedza jak
            > drukowac bumage we wlasnym interesie.

            Standard - pewnie liczą na to, że zdążą umrzeć, zanim ktoś sie pokapuje.
            Jak to w życiu... :)

            Szkoda tylko, że ci umierają z trylionami na kontach. ;)
    • Gość: Tysprowda Re: Bush bankrutuje Ameryke IP: 193.188.161.* 02.07.03, 21:02
      Innymi slowy, militaryzacja USSA odbywa sie za pozyczone pieniadze.

      Czy to przypadek, ze te 400 miliardy to roczny budzet armii ktora walczy
      bohatersko i wygrywa wojne z glodujaca armia z budzetem 100 razy mniejszym?

      Zakladajac, ze zbrojeniowka zarabia na czysto 10%, to jest to 40 miliardow
      zostawione w kieszeniach kumpli-z kieszeni podatnikow do kieszeni kumpli
      buszewikow.
      • Gość: A.D. Re: Bush bankrutuje Ameryke IP: *.mco.bellsouth.net 02.07.03, 21:18
        Gość portalu: Tysprowda napisał(a):

        > Innymi slowy, militaryzacja USSA odbywa sie za pozyczone pieniadze.
        >
        > Czy to przypadek, ze te 400 miliardy to roczny budzet armii ktora walczy
        > bohatersko i wygrywa wojne z glodujaca armia z budzetem 100 razy mniejszym?
        >
        > Zakladajac, ze zbrojeniowka zarabia na czysto 10%, to jest to 40 miliardow
        > zostawione w kieszeniach kumpli-z kieszeni podatnikow do kieszeni kumpli
        > buszewikow.



        >>> "Zbrojeniowka" nalezy glownie do finansjery....zydowskie! Jasne?
    • Gość: funkyzyte Tancowaly dwa Michaly IP: *.nyc.rr.com 02.07.03, 21:31
      Jeden duzy
      Drugi maly

      Bardzo zaciekawilo mnie stwierdzenie o 10% zysku dla buszewikow.
      Czy droga analogii mam mniemac, ze za Clintona szlo do kieszeni buszewikow
      30 mld dolarow?

      A wode to wy zdrowa pijecie? A co jecie na lunch? Moze cos jest w jedzeniu?
      • Gość: Tysprowda Re: Tancowaly dwa Michaly IP: 193.188.161.* 03.07.03, 22:05
        Ciekawosc to pierwszy stopien do wiedzy, wiec masz przyszlosc przed soba.

        Zaczales myslec dzieki moim stwierdzeniom, wiec zaczales trudna, chociaz
        wlasciwa droge.

        Nie ulega kwestii, ze 10% od wiekszej sumy jest wieksza suma, wiec jak chcesz
        robic pieniadze, zainwestuj w "growth industry"-bushkrieg. Finansuja to
        podatnicy spoleczenstwa=socjalizacja kosztow, prywatyzuje sie zyki, jednym
        slowem: buszyzm.

        Buszyzm to nasza mysl nowa, blaski promiennymi, niech wiedzie ich na boj, na
        trud.

        My buszysci sfinansujemy koszty boju i trudu poprzez socjalizacje (zabierajac
        pieniadze podatnikow na armie) a potem sobie sprywatyzujemy zyski (z tego co
        armia zdobyla).

        My to ideologowie, tchorze i dekownicy, tzw chickenhawks, czyli
        kurne jastrzebie, oni to rzesze zolnierzy ktorzy ida na boj na trud, ginac
        czesto za nasze zyski.

        Mysl nowa opromieniona blaskiem zlota i krwi. Zloto nasze, krew innych.

        Boj to jest ich ostatni,
        krwawy skonczy sie trud,
        gdy PNAC nasz bratni,
        ogarnie ludzki rod!

        Wiecej w linku:

        www.beachonline.com/iraqplan.htm

        Buszyzm sie zaczal gdy niejaki dziadek Prescott Bush robil za bankiera Hitlera
        i zarabial pieniedze na wojnie i holocauscie.

        Ojciec George Bush przewodzil CIA, organizacji zalozonej przez Gehlena, asa
        wywiadu Hitlera.

        Obecny Bush doszedl do wladzy glosami 5:4 niewybieranych przez nikogo sedziow,
        mianowanych przez ojca George Busha. Przy rozwinieciu amerykanskiej zasady
        demokracji, gdzie ten kto otrzyma mniej glosow, jest wybrany na Rezydenta
        Bialego Domu.

        Obecny Rezydent Bush kontunuuje polityke Hitlera, wylozona czarno na bialym w
        nowym wydaniu Mein Kampf pod nowym tytulem PNAC.

        Rumsfeld wykonal zadanie Feldmarszalka Rommela-opanowal zrodla ropy dla swego
        Fuehrera.
    • Gość: A.D. Re: Bush bankrutuje Ameryke IP: *.mco.bellsouth.net 03.07.03, 13:30
      Gość portalu: A.D, napisał(a):

      > >> Bush i zydowska maszynka do glosowania zwana 'Kongresem i Senatem'
      > bankrutuja Ameryke!! Jeszcze za Clintona budzet byl na plusie a teraz w
      > dwoch latach tylko, deficyt pojawil sie ogromny. Wszystko pakuja w bron i
      > amunicje i za kilka lat deficyt wyniesie przeszlo 4 tryliony, zgodnie z
      > najnowszymi przewidywaniami. Zanosi sie na to, ze za kazda bombe i rakiete
      > amerykanie beda obciazac...nieboszczykow, ktorych nimi zamorduja.Groups
      > Predict Staggering U.S. Deficits
      >
      > Wednesday July 2, 2003 3:29 PM
      >
      >
      > By ALAN FRAM
      >
      > Associated Press Writer
      >
      > WASHINGTON (AP) - A liberal advocacy group and an investment bank are
      > projecting federal deficits over the next decade exceeding a staggering $4
      > trillion.
      >
      > In a study to be released on Wednesday, the Center on Budget and Policy
      > Priorities estimates that the cumulative shortfall through 2013 will be $4.1
      > trillion. That assumes Congress will enact a new prescription drug benefit,
      > extend a series of recently enacted tax cuts that would otherwise expire,
      > and approve other tax reductions and spending increases that many believe
      > are inevitable.
      >
      > During that period, annual deficits would never dip below $325 billion and
      > would hit $530 billion in 2013, the liberal center said. The highest deficit
      > ever was $290 billion in 1992.
      >
      > ``Acting now to reduce future deficits will make the burden imposed on
      > future generations noticeably smaller than if we wait five, ten or more
      > years to act,'' wrote Richard Kogan, author of the center's study.
      >
      > Two weeks ago, the investment banking firm Goldman Sachs used many of the
      > same assumptions to project deficits over the same period totaling $4.5
      > trillion. Its forecast - which it also attributes to the weak economy and
      > the likelihood of election-year spending increases next year - includes
      > projected deficits of $425 billion this year and $450 billion in 2004.
      >
      > Conservatives and another Wall Street firm said such estimates are
      > unreliable and probably overstated.
      >
      > In its most recent forecast, the Bush administration estimated in February
      > that deficits would total $1 trillion over the next five years, assuming
      > that the president's tax and spending proposals become law.
      >
      > It did not issue a 10-year projection, saying such forecasts are unreliable,
      > and is likely to issue an updated five-year estimate later this month that
      > analysts expect to be worse than February's. Joined by conservatives, the
      > administration argues that slight, unpredictable changes in the health of
      > the country's economy can have massive long-term effects on federal revenue,
      > spending and the budget's bottom line.
      >
      > ``Ten-year projections are like trying to forecast the weather 10 years
      > out,'' said Brian Riedl, a budget analyst with the conservative Heritage
      > Foundation.
      >
      > Echoing that view was a newsletter last week from the investment bank J.P.
      > Morgan, which said many budget forecasts are far too gloomy.
      >
      > ``Doomsday United States budget scenarios are based on pessimistic growth
      > assumptions about the economy and future federal revenue,'' the newsletter
      > said.
      >
      > Underlining the uncertainty of such long-range forecasts, they come 2- years
      > after government analysts envisioned 10-year surpluses totaling a record
      > $5.6 trillion. Thanks to a recession, higher spending and deep tax cuts that
      > President Bush moved through Congress, that figure has vanished in a
      > dizzyingly fast and steep decline such as the federal budget has never
      > before seen.
      >
      > The predicted shortfalls also come as Congress, on vacation until next week,
      > moves with Bush toward enacting new prescription drug benefits that
      > lawmakers say should cost $400 billion over the coming 10 years. Legislators
      > are also working on new tax cuts and are expected to increase spending for
      > defense, education, domestic security and other programs later this year.
      >
      > Some assumptions from the liberal budget center's study include:
      >
      > -Political pressure will mean that cuts in income and other taxes, enacted
      > over the last three years, will not expire at various times over the next
      > decade, as now scheduled. 10-year cost: $1.7 trillion.
      >
      > -Congress will fix the alternative minimum tax, originally designed to
      > ensure that the richest Americans pay at least some taxes, to prevent
      > millions of Americans from having to pay it. Cost: $760 billion.
      >
      > -Lawmakers will enact a prescription drug benefit and provide more than
      > inflation increases for defense, rebuilding Iraq, domestic security and
      > other programs. Cost: up to $1.9 billion.
      >
      > Congressional Democrats and liberal groups like the center are worried that
      > growing deficits will erode federal resources needed to bolster government
      > programs. They have accused Bush of fostering fiscal policies that are
      > threatening the solvency of Social Security, Medicare and other programs -
      > just as the huge baby boom generation prepares to retire.
      >
      > As the budget picture has deteriorated, Bush administration officials have
      > said their chief concerns are righting the economy and fighting terrorism.
      > Tax cuts will strengthen the economy, producing more federal revenue that
      > will help eventually balance the budget, they say.
      >
      > In March, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projected a $1.8
      > trillion deficit through 2013. But that excluded the 10-year, $350 billion
      > tax cut and state aid package enacted in May and any other budgetary changes
      > that have not yet become law.
      >
      > Last month, the congressional budget agency worsened its estimate of this
      > year's deficit to exceed $400 billion. It will not update its 10-year
      > forecast until August.
      >
      >
    • pepita California najbogatszy stan USA bankrutem !! 03.07.03, 13:59
      Dzisiaj w nocy minal termin zatwierdzania budzetow w stanach USA. 46 na 50
      stanow ma problemy budzetowe.Gubernator Californi oglosil ,ze formalnie stan
      jest bankrutem z $38.2 billionowym deficytem.Szykuje sie zmiana gubernatora i
      jednym z powazniejszych kandydatow jest.. A.Schwarzenegger !!!! terminator z
      bozej laski.
      w/g Agence France-Presse
      • bam_buko Re: California najbogatszy stan USA bankrutem !! 04.07.03, 04:22
        W lokalnym szmatlawcu NYT "eksperci" twierdza,ze Schwarzenegger to
        najpowazniejszy kandydat na gubernatora Californii a ztamtad sladem innego
        marnego aktorzyny Regana droga prosta do Bialego Domu.
Inne wątki na temat:
Pełna wersja