Merchants of death ,...

07.06.08, 00:17

Oprocz krotkiej wzmianki w NY Times temat zamieciono pod dywan
w jew-infested mediach w Stanach z kilku powodow na temat afery
Viktora Baut i spolki handlarzy bronia i smiercia ,...

===================================================================

Russian Charged With Trying to Sell Arms
==================================
Agence France-Presse - March 7, 2008

Security officials in Bangkok on Thursday led away Viktor Bout after
he was arrested. The United States charged him with conspiracy for
trying to smuggle weapons to rebels in Colombia.

WASHINGTON — A Russian businessman regarded by the United States as
one of the world’s most notorious arms dealers was arrested in
Thailand on Thursday as part of an American-led sting operation. He
was promptly charged in the United States with conspiracy for trying
to smuggle missiles and rocket launchers to rebels in Colombia ,...

www.nytimes.com/2008/03/07/world/europe/07dealer.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1



    • rccc A to "przeoczono" w polskojezycznych mediach 07.06.08, 01:55
      online.wsj.com/article/SB121245110938939473.html
      forum.gazeta.pl/forum/72,2.html?f=902&w=80508646&a=80538643
      Russia Can Be Part of the Answer on Iran
      By CHARLES SCHUMER
      June 3, 2008; Page A19

      Last month, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad announced that
      Iran was installing an additional 6,000 centrifuges at Iran's main
      nuclear enrichment complex. The Bush administration in turn needs to
      use every diplomatic tool in its arsenal to halt Tehran's
      development of nuclear weapons.

      While the military option can never be taken off the table, most
      experts admit it would be unlikely to succeed. Because Iran has
      dispersed its nuclear facilities and buried some deep underground,
      an air strike will at best slow down, without preventing, its
      eventual creation of nuclear weapons. A military occupation might do
      so, but there are less costly solutions available.

      Those solutions begin with understanding the fundamental instability
      of Iran's theocratic dictatorship. Iran is not a homogenous country.
      It is home to several major and traditionally competitive ethnic
      groups – Persians, Azeris, Kurds and Arabs. The predominant Iranian
      culture is mild and secular, not prone to religious fanaticism.
      Iranians have a great affinity for Western goods and ideas.
      Satellite TV is illegal in Iran, but there are an estimated five
      million satellite dishes in Iranian households. The most popular
      television station is not Al Jazeera nor even CNN, but MTV.

      Most importantly, Iran is considerably younger, more educated and
      more middle class than its neighbors. More than two-thirds of the
      population is under 30, and the literacy rate is 79%. Women make up
      half of all incoming university students. Iran's average income far
      exceeds its neighbors. The growing middle class treasures economic
      success above political or religious rights, and they measure the
      success of the current regime on an economic scale.

      This dynamic creates an opportunity. Economic sanctions could cause
      the Iranian government to negotiate seriously with us, and might,
      over time, topple the theocracy. In fact, the mildest of economic
      sanctions – a boycott of Iranian banks by U.S. and European central
      banks – has already produced an economic slowdown, and unrest among
      Iranians.

      Stronger economic sanctions could produce more effective results. To
      work, these sanctions would require the cooperation of the U.S.,
      Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China. The U.S. and Britain
      have always backed tougher action; Germany and France are also now
      on board. The Chinese may go along if everyone else will. That
      leaves Russia and its prime minister, Vladimir Putin. Thus far, it
      is Russia that has blocked more effective economic sanctions.

      There are three reasons. First, Russia has a longstanding, close
      relationship with Iran and regards itself as Iran's protector.
      Second, the Russian economy benefits from its relationship with Iran
      by several billion dollars a year. Third and most important is
      leverage. Mr. Putin is an old-fashioned nationalist who seeks to
      regain the power and greatness Russia had before the fall of the
      Soviet Union. Russia's relationship with Iran is a key point of
      leverage over the West that he will not relinquish easily.

      To bring Putin's Russia on board we must make it an offer it cannot
      refuse. The offer has three parts.

      First, we must treat Russia as an equal partner when it comes to
      policy in the Caspian Sea region, recognizing Russia's traditional
      role in the region. Second, we must offer to make Russia whole if it
      joins in our Iranian boycott and forgoes trade revenues with Iran.
      That will cost the U.S. roughly $2 billion to $3 billion a year,
      about what we spend in Iraq each week. Third, we should tell Mr.
      Putin we will cease building the ineffective antinuclear missile
      defense sites in Eastern Europe in return for him joining the
      boycott.

      Two years ago, under NATO auspices, Poland, the Czech Republic and
      Romania agreed to build an antimissile defense site to thwart the
      threat of a nuclear missile attack by Iran. The threat is
      hypothetical and remote, and the Bush administration's emphasis on
      pursuing the antimissile system, without Russia's cooperation, still
      baffles many national security experts.

      It also drives Mr. Putin to apoplexy. The antimissile system
      strengthens the relationship between Eastern Europe and NATO, with
      real troops and equipment on the ground. It mocks Mr. Putin's dream
      of eventually restoring Russian hegemony over Eastern Europe.

      Dismantling the antimissile site, economic incentives and creation
      of a diplomatic partnership in the region – in exchange for joining
      an economic boycott of Iran – is an offer Mr. Putin would find hard
      to refuse. It is our best hope to avoid a nuclear Iran, because a
      successful economic boycott would certainly force the Iranian regime
      to heed Western demands more than anything attempted so far.

      Mr. Schumer is a Democratic senator from New York.

    • warmi2 Re: Merchants of death ,... 07.06.08, 07:17
      "jew-infested mediach w Stanach "

      Brzmisz doslownie jak Goebbels... slowo w slowo.
      • kyle_broflovski Re: Merchants of death ,... 07.06.08, 08:02
        www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuE1X94LqlQ
      • spitt Re: Merchants of death ,... 14.06.08, 18:18

        A co , nie sa ??? ,...
        ===================================================================
        Brzmisz doslownie jak Goebbels... slowo w slowo.
    • spitt Re: Merchants of death ,... 07.06.08, 13:59

      Wiecej info w linku ,...
      ===================================================================
      www.dea.gov/pubs/pressrel/pr030608p.html
      • hubert100 Re: Merchants of death ,... 07.06.08, 16:48
        Szczerosc i dobroc az bije z tego czlowieka!!!
        • spitt Re: Merchants of death ,... 07.06.08, 18:15
          Jeden z powodow dlaczego tak cicho w tej sprawie ,... Otoz Victor
          Bout i spolka (Rabinowitch , Minin , Smulian i kilku pomniejszych)
          zaopatrywali nie tylko roznej masci warlords na 3-ch kontynentach ,
          ale rowniez Taliban , Al Qaeda , Hezbollah i inne organizacje uznane
          za terrorystyczne dzialajace na szkode Stanow , to w tym samym czasie
          pracowali dla US Defence Departament za Rumsfelda i Wolfowitz'a,...

          Taliban , miedzy innymi kupil od niego 200 czolgow tuz przed nasza
          inwazja Afganistanu ,...

          ====================================================================

          MJ: Your reporting indicates that Bout has supplied not only the
          Taliban, Liberia's Charles Taylor, and Congolese warlords, but the
          U.S. Army and its contractors as well. Can you describe how the U.S.
          government and U.S. contractors have responded to revelations about
          who they are doing business with?

          DF: The U.S. government response to revelations of the use of Viktor
          Bout to fly for government contractors in Iraq (not just a few
          flights, but hundreds, and perhaps a thousand) has been mixed. Bear
          in mind most of these flights occurred after President Bush had
          signed an executive order making it illegal to do business with
          Bout, because he represented a security threat to the United States.
          The State Department, under a congressional inquiry initiated by
          Senator Russell Feingold, found it had used Bout companies,
          acknowledged it, and stopped. Paul Wolfowitz, while at DOD, did not
          respond to queries for nine months, then acknowledged that DOD
          contractors had subcontracted to Bout companies. Despite the public
          revelation, the congressional inquiry, the executive order, and a
          subsequent Treasury Department order freezing the assets of Bout and
          his closest associates, the flights continued for many months, at
          least until the end of 2005. The Air Force cut him off immediately,
          but other branches of the military continued to use him.

          MJ: Any evidence that Bout is authorized by governments to play this
          murky role because he is as useful as he is dangerous?

          DF: Bout, through an intermediary, approached the CIA and FBI
          immediately after 9/11, and offered his services in helping to oust
          the Taliban if he were paid tens of millions of dollars for his
          efforts. Negotiations were serious and lasted several months, but we
          do not know what, if any, parts of the deal he offered were
          accepted. There is no doubt he has benefited from the schizophrenic
          policies of the U.S. government (the Treasury and State departments
          going after him, while DOD pays him money to fly), but it is
          difficult to say whether that is the result of calculation or just
          sloppiness ,...

          www.motherjones.com/interview/2007/09/viktor-bout.html

          • spitt Re: Merchants of death ,... 09.06.08, 18:28

            Nastepny powod , to fakt ze wyzej wymienieni handlarze smiercia sa
            pochodzenia zydowskiego , co jest skrzetnie pomijane w jew-infested
            mediach ,...
            ====================================================================
            Jeden z powodow dlaczego tak cicho w tej sprawie ,... Otoz Victor
            Bout i spolka (Rabinowitch , Minin , Smulian i kilku pomniejszych)
            zaopatrywali nie tylko roznej masci warlords na 3-ch kontynentach ,
            ale rowniez Taliban , Al Qaeda , Hezbollah i inne organizacje uznane
            za terrorystyczne dzialajace na szkode Stanow , to w tym samym czasie
            pracowali dla US Defence Departament za Rumsfelda i Wolfowitz'a,...
    • bywszy1 Re: Merchants of syf+ 14.06.08, 18:54
      Wlasnie,inni dziewczynkami krajankami chandluja.
      Syfem zarazonymi.
      Tez bron zabojcza.

      P.S
      Pieluszki obesrane przez latorosl zasrana,splicie,juz wymieniles?
      Czy polowicy to zostawiasz,zydom reklame robiac?
Inne wątki na temat:
Pełna wersja