A. General Ramsey Clark na prezydenta !

IP: *.NYCMNY83.covad.net 26.09.03, 15:17
Ten wybitny czlowiek od lat reprezentowal idee nam bliskie. Dzis kiedy
neofaszysci i sionisci proponuja na prezydenta gen. W. Clarka, przypominam ze
jest wybitny, genialny polityk amerykanski ktory mysli tak jak my myslimy,
ktory dziala jak prawdziwy przewodca. Powinnismy jego bybrac na prezydenta
tego wielkiego kraju!
Oto jeden z jego
listow:



THE UNITED NATIONS MUST ACT TO PREVENT AN ATTACK BY THE UNITED STATES AGAINST
IRAQ
Letter to the United Nations
by Ramsey Clark
The following letter by former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark has been
sent to all members of the UN Security Council, with copies to the UN General
Assembly and Senator Biden of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.
Please circulate.

International Action Center http://www.iacenter.org 29 July 2002.
Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG), globalresearch.ca , 14 August
2002

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

Global Outlook , Issue No 2 9-11: Foreknowledge or Deception? Stop the
Nuclear Threat. Now available (for details click here) .
Order by phone from publisher. Call (toll free) 1-888-713-8500.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

July 29, 2002

Dear Ambassador,

Any remaining hope the peoples of the United Nations have to save succeeding
generations from the scourge of war through the United Nations would be
crushed by another United States attack on Iraq. Threats to attack, invade
and overthrow the government of Iraq by President George Bush, Vice President
Cheney, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, various cabinet officers and Pentagon
officials have been routine for a year. The psychological warfare is itself a
crime against peace and violates the U.N. Charter. Today's front-page
headline story in the New York Times, "U.S. Exploring Baghdad Strike As Iraq
Option," is typical of the in terrorem intention of the threats. The danger
to civilian life in Baghdad from such a strike would be enormous.

THE UNITED NATIONS MUST ACT TO PREVENT AN ATTACK BY THE UNITED STATES AGAINST
IRAQ
If the United Nations is unable to restrain the United States, a permanent
member of the Security Council, from committing crimes against peace and
humanity as well as war crimes against a nation that has already been
violated by the U.S. beyond endurance, then what is the United Nations worth?
At the very least, opposition to any attack or attempt to overthrow the
government of Iraq by force must be publicly expressed by the United Nations.

THE UNITED STATES BOMBED DEFENSELESS IRAQ MERCILESSLY FOR FORTY-TWO DAYS IN
1991
The U.S. led and glorified the massive assault on Iraq in January and
February 1991. The Pentagon announced it conducted 110,000 aerial sorties
against the defenseless "cradle of civilization," dropping 88,500 tons of
bombs. The widespread bombing destroyed the economic viability of the
civilian society throughout the nation. It killed tens of thousands of Iraqi
citizens and others. A major part of the bombing was directed at civilians
and civilian facilities. It was less accurate than the recent indiscriminate
attacks in Afghanistan. U.S. bombs destroyed Iraqi water systems, electric
power transmission, communications, transportation, manufacturing, commerce,
agriculture, poultry and livestock, food storage facilities, markets,
fertilizer and insecticide production, business centers, archeological and
historical treasures, apartment houses, residential areas, schools,
hospitals, mosques, churches and synagogues.

The Pentagon stated its casualties were 156. One third were from "friendly
fire"; the rest were accidental. The U.S. had no combat casualties.

THE UNITED STATES FORCED THE IMPOSITION OF GENOCIDAL SANCTIONS ON IRAQ IN 1990
The U.S. crafted economic sanctions against Iraq which the Security Council
approved on August 6, 1990, the 45th anniversary of the U.S. atomic bomb
attack on Hiroshima. Those sanctions are the direct cause of the very cruel
deaths of more than a million people. This is the greatest crime against
humanity, in the last decade of the most violent century in history. Each
painful death of an individual wasting away--from malnutrition; Kwashiorkor;
the rush of dehydration from contaminated water and from diseases was
preventable. The sanctions continue to this time to cause hundreds of deaths
each day. Every United Nations agency dealing with food, health and children--
including FAO, WFP, WHO, UNICEF--has proclaimed the horror, magnitude and
responsibility for this human catastrophe.

The great majority of the deaths caused by the sanctions are infants,
children, the elderly, the chronically ill and emergency medical cases. These
are the people most vulnerable to polluted water, malnutrition, and the lack
of medicines and medical equipment and supplies.

U.S. claims that it is the Iraqi government that is responsible for deaths
from shortages of food and medicine are false. The U.S. blocked oil sales by
Iraq for six years before appearing to yield to humanitarian pleas to permit
oil sales to purchase food and medicine. Since 1997, when sales began, it has
effectively frustrated and delayed the Oil for Food program, which does not
provide sufficient income at the levels approved to stop the daily
deterioration of health and growing death rates in Iraq.

Before sanctions there was virtually no malnutrition in Iraq and free
hospital, health services and medicines were a model for the region. Its
present system of government distribution of available food staples is a
model of fairness and efficiency, lacking only in quantity and variety of
food.

UNITED STATES MILITARY AIRCRAFT HAVE ATTACKED IRAQ AT WILL FOR ELEVEN YEARS
The U.S. has engaged in air strikes against Iraq at will since March 1991,
when the massive attacks averaging one aerial sortie every 30 seconds ended.
Without losing a single plane, U.S. attacks have killed: cleaning personnel
at the Al Rashid Hotel in Baghdad in a failed attempt to assassinate Saddam
Hussein; scores of people each year in attacks on radar stations in or near
the U.S.-imposed no-fly zones; all the persons aboard a U.N. helicopter shot
down by U.S. aircraft; and civilians from all walks of life, including the
internationally famous artist and Director of Iraqis' National Center for
Arts, Leila al Attar.

IRAQ IS NOT A THREAT TO THE U.S., COUNTRIES IN THE REGION OR OTHERS
The U.S. has falsely claimed that Iraq is working to develop weapons of mass
destruction to attack the U.S., Israel, its neighbors and others. The U.S.
claimed its 1991 attacks destroyed 80% of Iraq's military capacity. The U.N.
inspection efforts claimed to discover and dismantle 90% of Iraq's post-1991
capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction. Iraq, its peoples and
resources are exhausted. It has a "stunted" generation of children under age
10 and a debilitated population at all ages. It is the victim of the worst
crime against humanity in recent decades.

THE UNITED STATES IS THE GREATEST PURVEYOR OF VIOLENCE ON EARTH
Two of the highest U.N. officials responsible for U.N. weapons inspection
within Iraq and a principle U.S. citizen participating in the inspections
have resigned, denounced the sanctions and denied that there is a threat that
Iraq will develop weapons of mass destruction.

The U.S. has more nuclear weapons than all other nations combined as well as
the most sophisticated and numerous systems for the delivery of nuclear
weapons, including the Trident II submarine fleet. It possesses the greatest
stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons and the most advanced and
extensive research in mass destruction weapo
    • marcus_crassus dla zdrajcow powinien byc sznur,na szczescie 26.09.03, 15:24
      jestescie bezsilni lewackie popluczyny i mozecie sobie najwyzej marzyc :)))))

      jestescie poprostu bez szans :)))

      i na tym polega piekno tego swiata.

      ps

      Ramsey Clark, the war criminal's best friend


      The former U.S. attorney general has become the tool of left-wing cultists who
      defend Slobodan Milosevic, Saddam Hussein and Rwandan torturers as anti-
      imperialist heroes.



      - - - - - - - - - - - -
      By Ian Williams


      June 21, 1999 | In the most morbidly literal way, NATO forces are "sniffing
      out" more mass graves than alliance spokesman Jamie Shea ever suspected. Dog-
      eaten sticks of bone poke from putrescent pits on television screens. So it is
      not surprising that on July 31 New York will see the opening of a commission
      of inquiry for an international war crimes tribunal. What may surprise some is
      that its target is NATO's war crimes.

      Those who know him will be less surprised that the inspiration for this circus
      is former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark, whom one long-standing colleague
      described as "a good man gone ga-ga
      • Gość: A Re: Ten sznur,na szczescie, dla MC IP: *.NYCMNY83.covad.net 26.09.03, 15:44
        tak odpowiada Marcuss, ten faszysta nie potrafi urzywac normalnych argumetow,
        ale wylewa z siebie piane wscieklosci. Shame on you !
        • Gość: votetoimpeach Re: R.Clark - glousuj przeciw Bushowi IP: *.NYCMNY83.covad.net 26.09.03, 15:52
          www.votetoimpeach.org/articles_rc.htm
      • Gość: marcus_crassus RASIZM,NIENAWISC, KSENOFOBIA,ZABIJANIE - to ja IP: *.cable.mindspring.com 29.09.03, 19:17
    • Gość: a Re: A. General Ramsey Clark na prezydenta ! IP: *.NYCMNY83.covad.net 26.09.03, 16:17
      • Gość: . Re: A. General Ramsey Clark na prezydenta IRAKU! IP: *.home.cgocable.net 26.09.03, 18:45
    • Gość: c Re: A. General Ramsey Clark na prezydenta ! IP: *.NYCMNY83.covad.net 26.09.03, 17:19
      • Gość: a Re: bieda i nizsze place w USA IP: *.NYCMNY83.covad.net 26.09.03, 17:48
        Jezeli amerykanie wybiora Busza albo podobnego jastrzebia to bieda i coraz
        nizsze place stana sie powszechna plaga Ameryki. Tylko Ramsey Clark moze
        przywrocic Ameryce dobrobyt.

        Poverty Rises, Income Down, Census Says
        1 hour, 21 minutes ago Add Business - AP to My Yahoo!


        By GENARO C. ARMAS, Associated Press Writer

        WASHINGTON - Poverty rose and income levels declined in 2002 for the second
        straight year as the nation's economy continued struggling after the first
        recession in a decade, the Census Bureau (news - web sites) reported Friday.

        Related Quotes
        DJIA
        NASDAQ
        ^SPC
        9319.81
        1808.55
        998.60
        -24.15
        -8.69
        -4.67



        delayed 20 mins - disclaimer
        Quote Data provided by Reuters



        The poverty rate was 12.1 percent last year, up from 11.7 percent in 2001.
        Nearly 34.6 million people lived in poverty, about 1.7 million more than the
        previous year.


        Median household income declined 1.1 percent between 2001 and 2002 to $42,409,
        after accounting for inflation. That means half of all households earned more
        than that amount, and half earned less.


        The poverty rate rose again after having fallen for nearly a decade to 11.3
        percent in 2000, its lowest level in more than 25 years. Income levels
        increased through most of the 1990s, then were flat in 2000 and fell the last
        two years.


        Experts had predicted rising unemployment last year and the still shaky economy
        would increase poverty and lower income for most people, even though the
        recession officially ended in November 2001.


        In 2002, 12.1 million children were in poverty, or 16.7 percent of all kids, up
        from 11.7 million, or 16.3 percent, the previous year. The Census Bureau said
        the increase was not statistically significant.


        The estimates, calculated annually by the Census Bureau, came from a survey of
        78,000 households taken in March. They are the government's official measure of
        income and poverty.


        Comparing poverty rates and income for racial and ethnic groups was more
        difficult in 2002 because the Census Bureau for the first time allowed survey
        respondents to report if they were of more than one race.


        However, the bureau reported the poverty rate increased for blacks and was
        relatively unchanged for whites, Asians and Hispanics. Median income was
        highest among non-Hispanic whites and Asians.


        The poverty threshold differs by the size and makeup of a household. For
        instance, a person under 65 living alone in 2002 was considered in poverty if
        income was $9,359 or less; for a household of three including one child, it was
        $14,480.


        A separate Census Bureau survey released earlier this month also showed more
        people living in poverty in 2002, along with a slight increase in median
        income. However, that survey did not ask as detailed a series of questions on
        people's financial status.


        Even before the data was made public, House Democrats charged the Bush
        administration was trying to hide bad economic news by releasing the numbers on
        a Friday when people are paying more attention to the upcoming weekend. In
        previous years, the estimates were released on a Tuesday or Thursday.


        "Sounds like they're trying to bury the numbers where people won't find them,"
        said Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y. "This is another clear example of political
        manipulation of data by the Bush administration to avoid the glare of public
        scrutiny about the country's worsening economy."


        Census Bureau spokesman Larry Neal said the time change wasn't politically
        motivated. It was originally scheduled to be released this past Tuesday, he
        said, but was moved to Friday because statisticians asked for more time to
        process the numbers.


        "These are the official estimates of income and poverty in America and every
        debate on income and poverty for the next year will rehash them," Neal
        said. "The notion that we should, could or would suppress these numbers doesn't
        pass the laugh test."


        ___

    • Gość: U Re: A. General Ramsey Clark na prezydenta ! IP: *.75.22.242.Dial1.Boston1.Level3.net 26.09.03, 18:03
      Ile razy mysle-Ameryka,ktora chcialbym szanowac-Ramsey
      Clark jest tuz,tuz...
      • Gość: d Re: A. General Ramsey Clark na prezydenta ! IP: *.NYCMNY83.covad.net 26.09.03, 18:17
        Spotkalem go w subway'u, potem szlismy razem do kosciola w ktorym byl owacyjnie
        przyjmowany. Potem widzialem go w Riverside church. Dawniej nie zgadzalem sie z
        jego polityka w czasie Nixona. Dzis jestesmy po tej samej stronie. Ramsey for
        President!
        • Gość: e Re: A. General Ramsey Clark na prezydenta ! IP: *.NYCMNY83.covad.net 26.09.03, 18:43
    • Gość: f Re: A. General Ramsey Clark na prezydenta ! IP: *.NYCMNY83.covad.net 26.09.03, 19:33
    • Gość: g Re: A. General Ramsey Clark na prezydenta ! IP: *.NYCMNY83.covad.net 26.09.03, 21:08
    • Gość: i Re: A. General Ramsey Clark na prezydenta ! IP: *.NYCMNY83.covad.net 26.09.03, 21:26
    • Gość: j Re: A. General Ramsey Clark na prezydenta ! IP: *.NYCMNY83.covad.net 26.09.03, 22:14
    • Gość: y Re: A. General Ramsey Clark na prezydenta ! IP: *.NYCMNY83.covad.net 29.09.03, 15:19
Pełna wersja