>>_Czyrak_(F)_nazwany_"wulgarnym_zbirem"_!^^_!_!+*

20.02.03, 21:17

Wreszcie ktos nazwal Czyraka po imieniu !!!!!!!!!!!

Potępienie "brutalnego zbira" PAP 2003-02-19 (17:37)

Środowy "Washington Times" ostro zaatakował prezydenta Francji Jacquesa
Chiraka, za jego wystąpienie w sprawie poparcia USA przez kraje Europy
Środkowowschodniej. Publicysta dziennika określił Chiraka "wulgarnym i
brutalnym zbirem" za to, że sugerował on, iż Unia Europejska może jeszcze
nie przyjąć do swego grona Polski i innych kandydatów z tego regionu.
Francuski prezydent wypowiedział te słowa po tym, jak kandydaci opowiedzieli
się po stronie Waszyngtonu w sporze o politykę wobec Iraku.

W artykule pt. "Francja szantażuje Polskę", publicysta konserwatywnego
dziennika Tony Blankley nazywa prezydenta Francji "wulgarnym i brutalnym
zbirem", oskarża go o hipokryzję i tchórzostwo - bo Chirac beształ
wspomniane kraje pod ich nieobecność - i przypomina mniej pochlebne
rozdziały z historii Francji.

"Kiedy Polacy umierali, Francuzi opływali w dostatki i wysyłali swoich Żydów
do niemieckich obozów śmierci" - pisze Blankley. "Jak śmieją Francuzi
próbować szantażować Polaków, podobnie jak Czechów i Słowaków, których
zdradzili w Monachium" - kontynuuje autor.

Blankley, który był rzecznikiem prasowym byłego republikańskiego
przewodniczącego Izby Reprezentantów, Newta Gingricha, proponuje następnie,
by Polska - jeśli Francja zablokuje jej wejście do UE - przystąpiła do
układu o wolnym handlu z USA.

"Jeśli Francja nie chce robić interesów ze wschodnimi Europejczykami,
powinniśmy zaprosić ich do przyłączenia się do naszej unii wolnego handlu" -
pisze publicysta.

USA należą do bloku wolnego handlu NAFTA, wraz z Meksykiem i Kanadą. (reb)



    • Gość: mirmat Re: >>_Czyrak_(F)_nazwany_'wulgarnym_zbirem IP: *.dialup.eol.ca 20.02.03, 23:13
      Doskonaly artykol wart przytoczenia w calosci:
      February 19, 2003
      France blackmails Poland

      Tony Blankley
      Many Americans have mischaracterized the French recently. We have accused them
      of being overly sophisticated, of using subtle, clever and high sounding
      language to undercut us in the United Nations. We have accused them of being
      weak, and appeasers by instinct. But this Monday in the European Union meeting
      M. Jacques Chirac, the well-tailored-70-year old French president, proved us
      all wrong. He revealed himself to be a vulgar, unsubtle, bullying thug.
      According to the Associated Press, M. Chirac "launched a withering attack...on
      eastern European nations who signed letters backing the U.S. position on
      Iraq . . ." He accused them of acting irresponsibly by expressing their
      opinions. France, which can't stop talking herself, would silence others who
      speak but rarely.
      Dropping the normal French circumlocutions, M. Chirac simply threatened Poland,
      Hungary, the Czech Republic and others who had been invited to become — but had
      not yet been formally confirmed as — members of the EU, that their words in
      opposition to France's wishes were "dangerous" and risked their membership
      being blocked. Romania and Bulgaria, who had expected to be invited to join the
      EU, were told straight-out that they were "particularly irresponsible to sign
      the letter when their position is really delicate. If they wanted to diminish
      their chances of joining Europe they could not have found a better way."
      Adding hypocrisy to thuggery, the French president lectured Poland, the Czech
      Republic and Hungary that they should have "a minimum of understanding for the
      others" in an organization to which they would belong. This from a country that
      perversely measures her own glory by her capacity to betray a friend and ally.
      Adding cowardice to hypocrisy, President Chirac insisted on hurling his threats
      without his target nations being present. According to the Associated Press
      report, Britain, Spain and other EU nations had suggested that the candidate
      nations attend the Monday emergency summit on Iraq, but France and Germany
      refused to let them in. Then, with the representatives of Poland, Hungary and
      the other countries safely barred from the conference, the heroic French
      President unsheathed his verbal sword and smote his absent allies with economic
      blackmail threats.
      The list of countries under the French whip is ironic: Poland, Hungary, the
      Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Romania and
      Bulgaria. All these countries were on the wrong side of the Iron Curtain during
      the Age of Communism. They were unlucky enough to be occupied by the Soviet Red
      Army in the closing months of WWII, and thus lived in enforced slavery for a
      half-a-century. But geography was destiny. France was occupied by American,
      British, Canadian and other British Empire troops, and was thus saved from such
      a fate by their English-speaking liberators. It is worth recalling that while
      French soldiers were throwing down their rifles in 1940 as the Germans
      advanced, the flower of Polish manhood charged into the invading Nazi tanks on
      horseback in the last and most gallant cavalry charge in history. Of course,
      they were killed to the last man. While the Poles were dying with their boots
      on, the French were living on their knee-pads (during which, they cheerfully
      ferreted out and shipped their French Jews off to the German death camps). How
      dare the French attempt to blackmail the Poles — of all peoples. (And the
      Czechs and Slovaks who they helped to sell out at Munich.)
      If President Bush publicly threatened economic sanctions against countries that
      didn't endorse our Iraqi policy, there would be thousands of Frenchmen in the
      streets condemning such blackmail — and rightly so. But when the president of
      France does so, not only are there no demonstrators, there are barely any news
      accounts. This outrage should be given much broader coverage.
      But perhaps, the Frenchman who talks big but carries a small stick may be over-
      playing his little hand. If France doesn't want to do business with the eastern
      Europeans, we should invite them to join our free trade union. It would be an
      honor for us to trade freely with peoples who know the value of freedom. And
      should, in time, any of the current EU nations feel tainted by doing commerce
      with the French blackmailer and coward, our trade door should be open to them,
      too.
      If and when the French people throw out their current government and elect one
      which respects its neighbors and friends, we should certainly attempt to have
      useful and cordial relations with that government. Until then, we should not
      only not seek their support on Iraq. We should deny them the honor of joining
      in our cause. No blackmailers should rally under freedom's banner.
      Tony Blankley is editorial page editor of The Washington Times. His syndicated
      column appears on Wednesdays. E-mail: tblankley@washingtontimes.com.

      • hans2 Re: >>_Czyrak_(F)_nazwany_'wulgarnym_zbirem 21.02.03, 06:44
        Dobre okreslenie.
Pełna wersja