Gość: izzz IP: *.icpnet.pl 11.12.11, 23:28 moze ktos mnie oswiecic? przez mcierzynski jestem bardzo do tylu z biezacymi informacjami. dzieki wielkie Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś czytaj wygodnie posty
katoda_ltd Re: jaka indeksacja w tym roku? 12.12.11, 09:59 Propozycja ze strony KE to 1,7%, oczywiście musi to jeszcze zatwierdzić Rada UE. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
Gość: izzz Re: jaka indeksacja w tym roku? IP: *.icpnet.pl 12.12.11, 11:35 dzieki wielkie! Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
Gość: Krysia Re: 3,8? IP: *.access.telenet.be 12.12.11, 19:01 www.fakt.pl/Podwyzki-dla-eurourzedasow-Ile-dostana-,artykuly,139480,1.html Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
tuhanka Re: jaka indeksacja w tym roku? 16.12.11, 14:41 Na razie żadnej indeksacji nie będzie. Rada odrzuciła dziś wniosek Komisji w tej sprawie. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
tuhanka Re: jaka indeksacja w tym roku? 16.12.11, 14:44 Przejęzyczyłam się - to był na razie COREPER. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
Gość: Nic z tego Annual Adjustment of Salaries and Pensions UE IP: *.187-128-109.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be 21.12.11, 19:42 Nie dostaniemy. Odmowa z Rady. .../... "The Council position : Despite the above legal and political considerations, on 19 December 2011, the Council formally took a decision NOT to adopt the Commission proposal to adjust the remuneration and pensions of EU staff. Moreover, the Council decided to bring an action before the Court of Justice against the Commission for not applying the Exception Clause. The next steps : The European Commission will now take appropriate legal action to defend the Staff Regulations and to protect the staff of the EU Institutions, etc...". Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
Gość: Epska i nic nowego pod sloncem IP: *.access.telenet.be 21.12.11, 19:56 Nasza waloryzacja miala zalezec od waloryzacji w krajach czlonkowskich - i znowu dla siebie maja, a dla nas juz nie. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
tuhanka Re: i nic nowego pod sloncem 22.12.11, 00:17 No i jeszcze zaskarżają Komisję, że nie chce ona łamać prawa... hipokryzja w czystej postaci. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
Gość: Anna Re: i nic nowego pod sloncem IP: *.ec.europa.eu 22.12.11, 09:58 > No i jeszcze zaskarżają Komisję, że nie chce ona łamać prawa... hipokryzja w cz > ystej postaci. Ale zobaczysz, jak bedzie populistycznie nosna. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
tuhanka Re: i nic nowego pod sloncem 22.12.11, 11:10 Owszem, będzie. A tu wybory w paru państwach się zbliżają... Mam nadzieję, że Trybunał znów da jednak Radzie po głowie, a przyzna rację Komisji. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
Gość: Voilà The background IP: *.231-128-109.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be 22.12.11, 11:30 The background On 24 November 2011, the European Commission adopted a Proposal for a Council Regulation adjusting the remuneration and pension of EU civil servants by 1.7% for Brussels and Luxembourg. This adjustment is calculated according to the method enshrined in the Staff Regulations, which ensures that salaries and pensions of EU staff are adjusted in parallel to salary adjustments in eight Member States, representing 76% of the EU GDP. Five out of eight Member States increased their salaries (3.6% in Belgium, 2% in France, 2% in the Netherlands, 1.3% in Germany and 1.3% in the United Kingdom) and three of them adopted small decreases. As national officials lost purchasing power (-1.8%), exactly the same loss has to be applied to EU officials, which due to the high inflation in Brussels (3.6%), results in the 1.7% increase. On the same day, the Commission submitted a Communication to the Council on the Exception Clause. This clause requires the Commission to submit an appropriate proposal in case of a sudden and serious deterioration in the economic and social situation within the Union. According to the Court of Justice, the Exception Clause can be applied only "in an extraordinary situation" and, secondly, it "enables account to be taken of the consequences of a deterioration in the economic and social situation which is both serious and sudden where, under the ‘normal method’, the remuneration of officials would not be adjusted quickly enough". The Commission, after having examined the economic and social data in the 2011 Autumn Economic Forecast, concluded that the conditions set by the legislator and interpreted by the Court of Justice were not met, since the 1.8% loss in purchasing power of national and EU officials appears in line with the current economic and social situation, and this situation does not justify any measures going beyond that loss. Therefore, the Commission was not in a position to use the exception clause without breaching the Staff Regulations and the case-law of the European Court of Justice. Although the exception clause as such could not be applied, the Commission took into account general austerity measures introduced by the Member States. In this context it proposed modifications of the Staff Regulations and a reduction of 5% of the staff of the EU Institutions. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś