jola_z_dywit_2006a 13.02.09, 00:45 To juz dzieci ze szkol nie beda ganiane, jak za komuny, do ogladania tego slusznego i zbawienego gniotu ? Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś Obserwuj wątek Podgląd Opublikuj
komarowo Re: Gorące brawa dla "Katynia" w Rzymie 13.02.09, 01:52 jola_z_dywit_2006a napisał: > To juz dzieci ze szkol nie beda ganiane, jak za komuny, do ogladania tego slusznego i zbawienego gniotu ? Pluję ci w twarz, tępa chamobronówko. Tfu. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
yamat Re: Gorące brawa dla "Katynia" w Rzymie 13.02.09, 01:59 Ty taki głupi jesteś na trzeźwo, czy tylko jak wypijesz? Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
komarowo Mam sporo szacunku dla Wajdy 13.02.09, 02:30 że nagłośnił tę ohydną ober-zbrodnię ludobójstwa kacapstwa na Polakach, która do dziś się nam odbija, m.in. w postaci postbolszewickiej ynteligencji robotniczo-chłopskiej i homo-sovietycznej mentalności. Web Brygady za bolszewizowanie przed wojną zostałyby osądzone i deportowane do Kraju Rad. Było blisko Oskara i jeszcze większej popularności. Szkoda, że się nie udało. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
jola_z_dywit_2006a Wajda to komuszy rezyser jego dziela powstaly za 13.02.09, 08:09 komuny. I tego nawet jak go lubisz to nie zmienisz. To co teraz kreci to zal ogladac jak nisko upadl. Dzieci tylko dreczy. "Patriotyczni" ludzie twojego pokroju gonia je do kina na podratowanie ogadalnosic jego filmow. A wez spiwor i zarcie i siedz w kinie i ogladaj jego chlam caly czas A z pluciem to uwazaj bo w pysk mozesz dostac. komarowo napisał: > że nagłośnił tę ohydną ober-zbrodnię ludobójstwa kacapstwa na Polakach, która d > o > dziś się nam odbija, m.in. w postaci postbolszewickiej ynteligencji > robotniczo-chłopskiej i homo-sovietycznej mentalności. > Web Brygady za bolszewizowanie przed wojną zostałyby osądzone i deportowane do > Kraju Rad. > > Było blisko Oskara i jeszcze większej popularności. Szkoda, że się nie udało. > Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
highalt Pytanie.. 13.02.09, 04:11 Czy film Katyn podkresla role zydowska w mordzie na Polakach Katolikach? Zydo-Sowietcka NKWD (KGB) byla totalnie w rekach etnicznych zydow.. czy swiat dowie sie prawdy? Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
highalt Talking with Jews (or not) 13.02.09, 04:13 Talking with Jews (or not) By Dr. Kevin MacDonald A topic that is not discussed enough is the screaming, in-your-face, hostile aggression that people must withstand when they dare to trample on Jewish sensibilities. I am not talking about the sophisticated rationalization one sees in the op-ed pages of the mainstream media, or even the smear techniques of organizations like the ADL or the SPLC. We are talking about interpersonal aggression. There is something absolutely primal about it. Now comes a refreshingly frank blog post by Karin Friedemann, an ethnically Jewish anti-Zionist. She notes the “violent intolerance” that defenders of Israel show towards people with different opinions: American Jews are actually being trained since childhood to interact with non-Jews in a deceitful and arrogant manner, in coordination with each other, to emotionally destroy Gentiles and Israel critics in addition to wrecking their careers and interfering with their social relationships. This is actually deliberate, wicked, planned behavior motivated by a narcissistic self-righteous fury…. The problem is that Gentiles are taught through emotional pressure and violence via the media and the school system to be very sensitive to Jewish suffering so when a Zionist becomes outraged at them for challenging their world view, the Gentile really has to fight against his own inner self in a huge battle against his “inner Jew” making him feel inadequate and intimidated. But the Jew doesn’t care how much he or she hurts others. Jews only care about what’s good for the Jews. … I once reduced a 50 year old man to hysterical sobbing tears because I told him gently and lovingly that Jews were not that unique. I just told him the Jews, like everyone else, have had good times and bad times. Times when they were slaughtered and other times when they slaughtered others. Just like everyone else. Guess what he did next. He emotionally abused me in an insulting way and then cut off all further communication. Jewish behavior is so predictable that it’s truly scary. … If you mention cutting off the money or if you mention the possible compromise of living with Palestinians as equals in one state they become very angry and start using bullying tactics, unless they have some reason to fear you, in which case they shun you and complain about you to the authorities, try to get you arrested or try and destroy your career or social status through character assassination. … Zionists all believe in the myth of “1000 years of Jewish suffering” and feel that the world owes them compensation for their ancestors’ “unique” suffering. It’s a criminally insane viewpoint. They cope with the contradictions between their belief that they are the good guys and what Jews are actually doing to their neighbors, both in the Middle East and in the US, by developing mental health issues. Most Zionists are functional schizophrenics. My take: – These tactics are not restricted to critics of Zionism. As one who has experienced a barrage of hostile email from my faculty colleagues, I can certainly attest to this. A correspondent sent me the following recently: I have encountered many liberal, politically correct Jews who react vociferously (almost violently) to the most innocuous comments about any topic related to Israel or Jews. One Jew upon my mentioning that my wife and I had been to Russia spent several minutes virtually frothing at the mouth about Russians. Another upon hearing me say I was sympathetic to the problems of the Palestinians demanded to know who I was and how dare I say such a thing. Often zero tolerance for any difference in opinion. – The media constantly present images of Jewish suffering-most recently the endless glut of Holocaust movies. But the media ignore instances, such as the early decades of the USSR and now in Greater Israel, where Jews have inflicted horrible suffering. Right now I am reading E. Michael Jones’ The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Effect on History. It is striking to read his account of Jewish violence against non-Jews in the ancient world, particularly the persecution of Christians whenever Jews had the power to do so. Long before Christians had any influence on Roman policy, Christians’ complaints about Jews were not stereotypes based on historical memory but resulted from direct experience with Jews: “Origen understood that Jewish calumny helped to cause Christian persecution, and that Jewish hatred was a fact of life for the Christians, continuing unabated after the repeated defeats of Messianic politics” (i.e., the defeats of Jewish rebels at the hands of the Romans in 70 and 135 ad) (p. 69). This is the basis of my concern on what will happen to whites when Jews become part of a hostile elite in white-minority America. – Non-Jews absorb these media images and as a result feel inadequate, emotionally intimidated. Eventually they identify with the aggressor, much like a browbeaten hostage or, as Friedemann suggests, an abused spouse. Or they maintain their friendships but studiously avoid talking about anything related to Israel. Non-Jews do the bidding of their “inner Jew” because they have internalized images of Jewish suffering. They therefore aid and abet Jewish brutality and aggression. – Non-Jews who persist in criticizing the organized Jewish community are threatened with loss of livelihood and social ostracism. As I noted in a previous article the organized Jewish community does not believe in free speech. It is important to keep in mind that when Jews were dominant in the first decades of the Soviet Union, the government controlled the media, anti-Semitism was outlawed, and there was mass murder of Christians and the destruction of Christian churches and religious institutions. As Friedemann notes, the situation is nothing less than a sign of serious mental health issues for the mainstream Jewish community: “Most Zionists are functional schizophrenics.” I think this is what happens when people who deal with Jewish issues finally realize that there is no hope for dialogue and begin to think of what to do next. Honest people finally realize that when it comes to critical issues like Israel and multicultural America, the divisions among Jews are an illusion. (Friedemann herself has renounced her Jewish identity.) As Friedemann’s husband, Joachim Martillo, notes, “Jews, who want to be decent human beings, have no choice but to renounce being Jewish and serve the anti-Zionist struggle (right now).” Exhibit A for this right now is the murderous Israeli invasion of Gaza. We know (see, for example, John Mearsheimer’s article in The American Conservative) that this invasion occurred after a prolonged period when Israel restricted supplies into Gaza and then attacked tunnels between Gaza and Egypt. We know that the invasion was designed to “to inflict massive pain on the Palestinians so that they come to accept the fact that they are a defeated people and that Israel will be largely responsible for controlling their future.” The tone of Mearsheimer’s article suggests a dramatic shift in attitude where the usual inhibitions on public discourse are finally beginning to fall, even for a respected academic: There is … little chance that people around the world who follow the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will soon forget the appalling punishment that Israel is meting out in Gaza. … [D]iscourse about this longstanding conflict has undergone a sea change in the West in recent years, and many of us who were once wholly sympathetic to Israel now see that the Israelis are the victimiz Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
des4 dla joli nakręćmy film "Klewki" 13.02.09, 08:15 czyli thriller sensacyjno-szpiegowski... o pornolach z udziałem wybitnych macho z SO nawet nie wspominam... Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś