Rosja próbuje powstrzymać budowę baz tarczy ant...

[gekon1979]

kacapobolszewicy gowno macie do powiedzenia, i to was boli najbardziej
ale te bazy powstana

[ewswr]

Nie, ich boli to że was może nie byc:) Jak bez was?

[gekon1979]

my jestesmy, bylsimy i bedziemy glupcze
a wasze tepawe pogrozki tego nie zmienia
w krotce zbudujemy wlasna bron masowego razenia i nosniki dla niej

Desperacja carputina kaze mu dac d..y Ameryce.

[towarzysz.dyrektor]

Jak on musi tej polszy nienawidziec.

to nie tylko on, to wszyscy kacapowie

[gekon1979]

najlepiej to widac bylo, kiedy papiez byl Polakiem ;)
dzis kiedy jest teuton, dialog itd jest mozliwy, a moze i wizyta

Rosyjscy generalowie popisuja sie przed Putinem:)

[pentagon8]

Rosyjscy generalowie, jak jeden maz zapewniaja, ile to nie byliby
zdolni zrobic, by przeciwstawic sie ''jakze niebezpiecznym''
inicjatywom imperialnych Stanow. Problem w tym, ze to wszystko
zostalo juz powiedziane...i nie ma najmniejszego wplywu na dezyzje o
tarczy jako takiej. Negocjacje trwaja...Mr Putin. Zadne loty
bombowcow strategicznych tego nie zmienia.

Russian bomb claims questionable, Expert Says

[snow21]

WorldEvents Also in this section

Russian bomb claims questionable, Expert Says
Publication time: Today at 07:57 Djokhar time

Western experts questioned the fairness of the test by Russia a vacuum bomb it
described as the world's most powerful conventional weapon. It's a claim arms
expert Sascha Lange said is disputable.



Sascha Lange, an expert in the analysis of arms development at the German
Institute for International and Security Affairs, said a Russian video showing a
massive explosion is not solid evidence that the country has developed the
"father of all bombs."



German military expert Sascha Lange spoke in an interview to DW-WORLD.DE
explaining why the test of the "father of all bombs" reminds him poorly planned
PR action. He said there are too many inconsistencies in video footage shown in
Russian channel.



"I doubt that everything took place the way the Russians claim. The pictures
that were shown on state television do not clearly show what is claimed. For
example, a Tupolev 160 "Blackjack," a strategic bomber, is shown opening its
bomb hatch in the pictures, but you do not see the weapon fall out of the plane.
A cut is made and then a body falls out of a different plane. You can recognize
this because there is a different weapons bay and the bomb releases differently
than it would from a "Blackjack bomber."



You can see the weapon in free fall and you can see an explosion. But as big as
the explosion in the pictures is, you cannot tell if it was caused by the bomb
that has fallen. This large explosion could also have been carried out on the
ground and not have resulted from the dropped bomb.


When you examine the explosion, you see it happens on a completely level plain.
Then pictures are shown with buildings and vehicles that are supposed to have
been destroyed by the bomb. But they are not at visible before the explosion.
There are several points where all the pictures don't entirely fit together and
the claims are not at all supported by these pictures. The bomb is also not
shown dropping from the "Blackjack bomber's" weapons bay. The pictures imply
what is claimed in the Russian media, but they don't show it at all."

Kavkaz Center

Zachodni eksperci śmieją się z imperialnegoPR Czek

[snow21]

Czekistów. Wot taka wyborcza kiełbaska.

Rosja otwarcie przyznaje ze baza w Azerbajdzanie t

[pies_na_lewizne]

Rosja otwarcie przyznaje ze baza w Azerbajdzanie tylko wybieg, aby
uniemozliwic budowe elementow amerykanskiej tarczy antyrakietowej w
Polsce i czechach.

Miejmy nadzieje, ze Amerykanie nie sa tak naiwni, zeby sie dac na to
nabrac.