Solidarnosc byla prowokacja SB w celu

[orwella]

uwlaszczenia Polaka esbecko-czerwonych mafii?

www.poloniasf.org/english/article0611n02.php

Ekononiczne zbrodnie przeciw ludzkosci

[orwella]

www.feedback.nildram.co.uk/richardebbs/essays/gfinance.htm

[wikul]

orwella napisała:

> www.feedback.nildram.co.uk/richardebbs/essays/gfinance.htm


Mogłabyś te komunistyczne brednie zawieszać na innych forach ? Tutaj wystarczy
idiotów.

[wikul]

orwella napisała:

> uwlaszczenia Polaka esbecko-czerwonych mafii?
>
> www.poloniasf.org/english/article0611n02.php


W którym miejscu ten link (w wersji angielskiej)potwierdza twoje chore urojenia,
sieroto po Stalinie.
www.poloniasf.org/index_polish.php

[orwella]

In 1997 the total foreign debts of all developing countries were more than US$2
trillion (million million) and still growing. (Only some of this is owed to the
IMF of course).
The result is a debt of US$400 for every man, woman and child in the developing
world where average income in the very poorest countries is less than a dollar
a day. (Source: New Internationalist Issue 312 on Debt).
Half the world's people live on less than US$2 a day.
1.2 billion people live on less than US$1 per day.
When the inescapable compound interest owed by the debtor nations is taken into
account the situation is even more absurd, ridiculous, and life-and-death-
serious: writing in 1994 (when the total foreign debt of the developing world
stood at US$1.5 trillion) this is how economist JW Smith described the
situation: 'if allowed to continue to grow the magic of compound interest
dictates it is unsustainable. One trillion dollars compounded at 10 percent per
year becomes US$117 trillion in fifty years and US$13.78 quadrillion in one
hundred years, about US$3.5 million for every man, woman and child in the Third
World. Their debt is 50 percent greater than this and has been compounding at
twice that rate -over 20 percent per year- between 1973 and 1993'. (Source: JW
Smith, The World's Wasted Wealth 2, Institute for Economic Democracy, 1994, p
143).
In 1998 developing countries paid back $13 for every $1 they received in
grants.
And still, in 2000 alone the total amount invested in developing countries was
US$1.7 trillion. (Source: United Nations Report Of The High-Level Panel On
Financing For Development).

Money-lending has often been one of the less savoury ways to earn a living,
and, like money-lenders in the poorer parts of the city, lenders may have no
real interest in educating, encouraging and helping people to find better ways
of doing things, such that they avoid the trap altogether. Like drug pushers,
what they really want is that you should take that first step with them into a
new landscape, where they hold your hand and do their best to make you 'trust'
them. The first step is the difficult one. After that it's all downhill. And
thus it is with the IMF. The developed world currently owes a total of more
than US$2 trillion to governments and private financial institutions in the
developed world, and once in that trap, if the experience of the countries
listed above is anything to go by, they will squeeze (and squeeze, and squeeze)
and it does not matter how poor you are, or how much you are suffering...

One of the age-old tricks of the loan shark is to somehow push the debtor into
a situation where they default on a loan. This gives the shark a whole lot more
leverage, enabling them to push the debtor yet further into a debt trap,
enabling the shark to make yet more money from extortionate interest
repayments, etc. Looking at the case of Mexico in 1995, for instance, it is
hard not to come to the conclusion that this was precisely what the IMF was up
to in their use of innappropriately negative financial 'gossip' regarding
Mexico's economy.

'Debt is an efficient tool. It ensures access to other peoples' raw materials
and infrastructure on the cheapest possible terms'. (Source: Susan George, A
Fate Worse Than Debt). Let's take a step back and look at the generalised
IMF/World Bank strategy of imposing conditions- the conditions tend to include
some or all of these (usually all of them):

Privatising and 'liberalising' the economy, including
Liberalising import controls
Liberalising capital markets
Reducing financial and legal safety nets for businesses
Introducing a payment ethic for social services of all kinds

Rescheduling existing debt

Decreasing government spending, by
Ending subsidies, and allowing the market to regulate prices
Laying off workers
Reducing education, reducing health expenditure

Increasing exports, by
Devaluing the currency
Improving the terms of foreign investment
Reducing or freeze wages
Reducing worker power

Regarding privatisation, Joseph Stiglitz' (ex-chief economist of the World
Bank) view is that when international financial institutions stepped into the
breach made by perestroika in the Soviet Union's defenses in 1995, for
instance, US-backed oligarchs stripped Russia's industrial assets. In the
ensuing chaos national output was cut nearly in half. When state-owned
enterprises are sold off to foreign interests in this manner Stiglitz said
that 'rather than objecting to the sell-offs of state industries, some
politicians -using the World Bank's demands to silence local critics- happily
flogged their electricity and water companies. "You could see their eyes widen
at the possibility of commissions for shaving a few billion off the sale
price"'. (Source: The Observer 29th April, 2001). Did you know that Thames
Water owns and manages Jakarta's water supply? Elsewhere Stiglitz has observed
that the IMF's objectives have changed 'from serving global economic interests
to serving the interests of global finance'.

In theory 'liberalising capital markets' allows investment capital to flow in
and out. Unfortunately, as demonstrated in Indonesia and Brazil, the money
often simply flows out. Cash may come into the country for speculation in real
estate and currency, but it may also fly out of the country at the first hint
of trouble. A nation's reserves can drain in days. And when that happens, to
seduce speculators into returning a nation's own capital funds, the IMF may
then demand that these nations raise interest rates to 30%, 50% and 80%, thus
demolishing property prices, savagely reducing industrial production and
draining national treasuries. 'Liberalising capital markets' may well also
involve devaluation of a country's currency. When the IMF/World
Bank/GATT/NAFTA/WTO/ colossus somehow forces a country to devalue its currency,
and reduce consumption to increase sales of resources to the developed
countries, this lowers the costs of such labor and commodities to outsiders,
while raising the costs of manufactured products from outside when imported in
to the country. The claim is often made that such a situation is an inevitable
result of inefficiencies in the developing country's industry and labor, but
actually such a situation can clearly benefit foreign investors and/or asset-
strippers if ENGINEERED by them. And where this is the case (as it all too
often it seems to have been in recent years) what we are seeing is effectively
21st century colonialism. By way of example, as a result of austerity measures
forced on rubber-producing countries by the international financial
institutions, the relative value of world rubber exports dropped 300 percent
between 1960 and 1975. Cotton exporters lost 60 percent of their buying power
in the same time span. The price of primary commodities that developing
countries in general export have collapsed to the same price as 20 years
earlier while prices for manufactured products have soared, forcing the
developing countries to export more and more while importing less and less. Is
this 'development'? The liberalising of capital markets may well also involve
enticing the country into (further?) debt: the IMF or World Bank persuading
that country to borrow more money. This is sometimes referred to as the 'debt
trap' or 'debt dependence'. In general the scenario is this: typically the
debts are incurred by the developing country for investments to extract
resources, produce agricultural exports, and build the infrastructure to ship
commodities to developed countries. The developing country is then expected to
lower living standards and export more minerals, lumber, and food, all to pay
debts that did little for their economic development in the first place.
Acc

[pozarski]

A wlasnemy slowamy nie laska Orwellko?Myslisz,ze ktos,poza Haszem i Picardem,to
bedzie czytal?

w wielkim skrocie...

[orwella]

a Ty nie len sie Pozi, tylko czytaj wtedy pojmiesz o co i jak biegalo...

---
Polska jak Papua, Brazylia, Meksyk, Tailandia etc zostala przeznaczona przez
globalne mafie, inaczej zwane zlodziejska fianajera, do skolonizowania. I
zostala skolonizowana i ograbiona na maksa. Solidarnosc i SB byly narzedziami
tego procesu. Mafia-finanjesa dobrze wiedziala, ze moze sie posluzyc esbekami
do skoku na polska kase, bo esbecy byli przeciez gangsterami wytresowanymi w
zbrodniach przeciw wlasnemu narodowi.

[pozarski]

Tera Orwelko juz wsio panimaju i jedyne czego zaluje,to ze sie nie zalapalem
ani na Solidarnosc,ani na SB!

[orwella]

ja tez nie, nie zaluj. Daz do zrozumienia tego pasjonujacego swiata, czego Ci
zycze

[pozarski]

Bede dazyl.Przyrzekam.

tabletki się skończyły? Mokre prześcieradła...

[babariba-babariba]

...chwilową ulgę przynieść mogą

[orwella]

szanowny pan swiezo po treningu KGB w puszczy bialowieskiej, czy tez alkohol
rozpuscil calkowicie szare komorki? a moze to niezdolnosc rozumienia jezyka
angielskiego wywoluje panska wscieklosc? lekarstwem jest nauka.

---------------wagon prześcieradeł!!

[pan.scan]

forum.gazeta.pl/forum/72,2.html?f=28&w=62336479&a=62336479

[wikul]

babariba-babariba napisała:

> ...chwilową ulgę przynieść mogą



Watpię, przypadek beznadziejny. Chyba że jakiś chłop by sie poswiecił.

[jaceq]

wikul napisał:
> Watpię, przypadek beznadziejny. Chyba że jakiś chłop by sie poswiecił.

Tym bardziej, że "nauczyła się szukać" także w angielskiej wikipedii:

forum.gazeta.pl/forum/72,2.html?f=13&w=62312203&a=62362168

Teraz można się spodziewać, że przepisze ją tu całą w jakieś dwa tygodnie, albo
i nawet krócej.

[jaceq]

wikul napisał:
> Chyba że jakiś chłop by sie poswiecił.

Właśnie przeczytałem linkowany przez Scana wątek. Pomijając to, że znajdują się
ludzie, którzy traktują Ją poważnie i chcą z Nią dyskutować na serio, być może
chodzi właśnie o to, co piszesz. Brrr, musi być brzydka jak noc listopadowa.

[wikul]

jaceq napisał:

> wikul napisał:
> > Chyba że jakiś chłop by sie poswiecił.
>
> Właśnie przeczytałem linkowany przez Scana wątek. Pomijając to,że znajdują się
> ludzie, którzy traktują Ją poważnie i chcą z Nią dyskutować na serio, być może
> chodzi właśnie o to, co piszesz. Brrr, musi być brzydka jak noc listopadowa.


Kilka "zastrzyków" testosteronu może by pomogły.

Witam milych Panstwa:)))))))

[orwella]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Aurora_cruiser_St_Petersburg_June_2006.JPG

The blue ship!:)

[orwella]

spokojnie plywa sobie w solo-geo-magnetycznym morzu i czeka na sygnal Heliosa)

www.finescenery.com/v/NorthWest/Aurora.jpg.html

[orwella]

lektury zycze cierpliwym.

---
In its earliest years the CIA, and its predecessor, the OSS, attempted to
rollback communism in eastern Europe by supporting local, anti-Communist
political and para-military groups; none of the attempts were particularly
successful. Attempts at instigating right-wing counter-revolutions in the
Ukraine and Belarus, by infiltrating anti-Communist spies and saboteurs failed.
In Poland, the CIA spent years sending money and equipment to an anti-Communist
organization invented and run by Polish intelligence.

Yet, it was successful in limiting native Communist influence in France and
Italy, notably in the 1948 Italian election. After WWII, the CIA set up the
right-wing Gladio network, a secret government network of organizations, in
Italy and other Western European countries. Throughout the 1960s, 1970s, and
1980s, independent states Gladio operatives, were involved in a series
of "false flag" fascist terrorist actions in Italy that were blamed on the "Red
Brigades" and other Left-wing political groups in an attempt to politically
discredit the Italian Left wing.[23]

After World War II, the CIA protected many high profile Nazi war criminals,
including Adolf Eichmann.[24] The Agency absorbed as many as tens of thousands
of Nazis into the intelligence apparatus,[25] many of whom were later sent to
aid in operations in South America.

In some unexplained way, the CIA managed to acquire the Rosenholz files,
containing the list of the foreign spies of the Stasi, during the breakup of
the GDR in 1990.[26]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Intelligence_Agency

[orwella]

Czego to nie mozna znalezc w necie, kiedy sie umie szukac. To jedyne dzis
zrodlo prawdy.

www.twf.org/News/Y2001/0215-CIAfunds.html
... these public-private philanthropies have worked together to fund and direct
overthrow movements. . . . The grantees' activities included destabilization,
the creation of mobs preventing elected governments from ruling, chaos, and
violence. Among those funded were the Civic Forum in Czechoslovakia, Solidarity
in Poland, Union of Democratic Forces in Bulgaria, Otpor in Serbia, and, more
recently, similar groups in the succession states of the USSR. Sometimes mobs
(especially of young people) have been moved around from one country to another
to give the impression of vast popular opposition.

nastwacie uszy, mili:DD

[orwella]

www.marxists.org/subject/art/music/mp3/fr/Varsovienne.mp3

[wolomin_w_nocy]

No to wygląda na to, że wprowadzając stan wojenny generał Wojciech Jaruzelski
przerwał te esbeckie harce i powstrzymał całą tę esbecką rewolucję na kilka
lat. Nawet ZOMO-wcy z Wujka to ZOMO-wcy mogli nie być tylko powaga chwili
wymagała aby w taki a nie inny sposób wyeliminować esbeckich prowokatorów.
Później widocznie mieli jakieś haki na generała bo się poddał i stąd cały ten
OS. Tylko jak teraz Kaczki chcą generała zdegradować za stan wojenny
zdegradować i emerytury pozbawić to czy oni też?