Raport Kongresu w sprawie 11 września obciąża a...

[Gość: meerkat]

Ponieważ finansowanie i wspomaganie terrorystów przez reżym w
Rijadzie było tajne, 38 stron raportu poświęconych temu
procederowi też utajniono. Przeciw czemu protestuje więc
ambasador Arabii Saudyjskiej?!

Poniewaz za zamachem stala Arabia Saudyjska, wiec

[Gość: baby]

zaatakowano Irak, to ma sens.

Irak a Arabia Saudyjska,

[Gość: meerkat]

Gość portalu: baby napisał(a):

> zaatakowano Irak, to ma sens.


Pamiętaj że z amerykańskiej perspektywy A.S. i Irak są tuż obok,
więc Pentagon mógł się pomylić. :)

[Gość: IRAKIJCZYK]

Gość portalu: meerkat napisał(a):

> Gość portalu: baby napisał(a):
>
> > zaatakowano Irak, to ma sens.
>
>
> Pamiętaj że z amerykańskiej perspektywy A.S. i Irak są
tuż .obok,.Wpierw nich wyjde z Iraski bjachua, jesli bede mieli
troche rozumu w glowie nie powturza ten sam bledu i pakuja sie
do inniego mulzumanskiego kraju.Mozesz pomazyc chyba nie
ogladac wiadomosci(tylko nie Polskie)kazdego dnia ginie
mlodziez Amrikanski w imie czego bo tak chce alkocholik
amrikanski(BUSH)i jego wsciekle psow jak Blair,kwaszniewski i
inni
> więc Pentagon mógł się pomylić. :)

[Gość: grunch]

Gość portalu: meerkat napisał(a):

> Ponieważ finansowanie i wspomaganie terrorystów przez reżym w
> Rijadzie było tajne, 38 stron raportu poświęconych temu
> procederowi też utajniono. Przeciw czemu protestuje więc
> ambasador Arabii Saudyjskiej?!
===============================================================
Moze przeciwko temu, iz Amerykanie zaatakowali Irak,
a nie glowne i podstawowe "zrodlo" terroryzmu z 11 wrzesnia,
tzn. Arabie Saudyjska...

FRAJERZY MICHNIKA NAUCZCIE SIE ANGIELSKIEGO!

[Gość: basia]

A pozniej piszcie:


news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/911rpt/index.html

[Gość: globalresearch]

globalresearch.ca/articles/JOI307A.html
We are providing the links to Report and Sections of the Report published by
the US Congress: (pdf).

In future postings, www.globalresearch.ca will be providing commentary and
debate on the Report.

To access the numerous documents and articles, which were excluded by the Joint
inquiry's terms of reference, see the following Archives:

1. The CRG's September 11: 9/11 READER

2. The CRG's Foreknowledge Archive: 9/11: Bush KNEW, key articles

3. . Centre for Research on Globalization, Bush family financial scams: key
articles

4. September 11th and The New World We Live In, FTW

5. The Complete 9/11 Timeline by Paul Thompson.

6. Oddities of 9/11 Little-known facts of the world's best-known event

7. The 9/11 Navbar at www.whatreallyhappened.com/

8. The People's Investigation of 9/11

Careful Omission

While the 9/11 Inquiry has collected a large amount of intelligence material,
through careful omission, the numerous press and intelligence reports in the
public domain (mainstream media, alternative media, etc), which confirm that
key members of the Bush Administration were involved in acts of political
complicity and camouflage, have been carefully removed from the Inquiry's data
bank and excluded from the hearings, held behind closed doors.

The fact that Al Qaeda is a creation of the CIA, a so-called "intelligence
asset" (confirmed by official reports and congressional transcripts), is not
part of the Joint Inquiry's terms of reference, nor is the insidious role of
Pakistan's military intelligence, which has consistently supported the "Islamic
militant network", always acting on behalf of the CIA.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities before and after the
Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001
The Full Report (5.51MB, 858 pages) contains the errata print, which includes
recommendations that were inadvertently not included in S. Rept. 107-351 and H.
Rept. 107-792. Also available are the:

Report without the errata. (4.92MB, 838 pages)

[Gość: MChossudovsky]

globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO307F.html
The Joint inquiry is to churn out red herrings: a data bank of unconnected
occurrences on "intelligence failures", FBI lapses, etc.

Political Complicity and the 9/11 Joint Inquiry
by Michel Chossudovsky
Global Outlook, Fall 2002
www.globalresearch.ca 25 July 2003
The URL of this article is: globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO307F.html

Note: This article published in the Fall 2002 issue of Global Outlook , was
written in June 2002 at the outset of the Joint committee's activities.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In June 2002, in a closed session, the House and Senate intelligence committees
decided to probe "the evolution of the international terrorist threat… and
scrutinize the intelligence community's response through Sept. 11 and beyond."
1 (SFC, 5 June 2002). The "intelligence panel" was given the mandate to comb
through some 360,000 pages of top secret information "gathered by wiretaps,
spies, and spy satellites" 2 (CBS, 4 June 2002).

Now it just so happens, or is a pure coincidence, that this Congressional
inquiry on 9/11 is an initiative of the two individuals Sen. Bob Graham a
Democrat and Rep. Porter Goss, a Republican, who were having breakfast on 9/11
with the alleged money man behind the terrorist attacks, General Mahmoud Ahmad,
head of Pakistan's Military Intelligence (ISI). (For details see Michel
Chossudovsky, Political Deception: The Missing Link behind 9-11,
www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO206A.html )

Punishing the Whistleblowers

The mandate of the joint inquiry is to reveal the truth behind 9/11. What we
want, said Rep. Porter Goss, is: "to explain to the executive branch, Congress
and most importantly to the American people what happened, how it happened, and
what we need to do to reduce the risk of a reoccurrence of such horrific
events." 3 (Miami Herald, 4 June 2002)

The joint inquiry has focussed its attention on the "unauthorized disclosures"
which triggered the foreknowledge "Prez knew" scandal last May. While seeking
who is behind these "intelligence leaks" and punishing the whistleblowers, the
broader issue of political accountability, which is on everbody's lips is not
part of the inquiry's terms of reference.

The joint inquiry was also given the mandate to carefully "document"
new "alleged terrorist threats". The thrust of this exercise --led by Rep.
Porter Goss, a former uncover CIA agent of the Cold War era

Czy ktoś jeszcze wierzy w oficjalna wersję nt 911?

[Gość: www.irak.pl]

Czy ktoś jeszcze wierzy w oficjalna wersję nt 911?

Impeachment dla Busha, dymisja Kwacha, Millera,
media od kłamliwej, prowojennej propagandy pod sąd!

www.irak.pl

CIA stworzyla Al-Kaide?

[Gość: meerktat]

Gość portalu: MChossudovsky napisał(a):

>
> globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO307F.html
> The Joint inquiry is to churn out red herrings: a data bank
of unconnected
> occurrences on "intelligence failures", FBI lapses, etc.
>
> Political Complicity and the 9/11 Joint Inquiry
> by Michel Chossudovsky
> Global Outlook, Fall 2002
> www.globalresearch.ca 25 July 2003
> The URL of this article is: globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO307F.html
>
> Note: This article published in the Fall 2002 issue of Global
Outlook , was
> written in June 2002 at the outset of the Joint committee's
activities.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------
> -
>
> In June 2002, in a closed session, the House and Senate
intelligence committees
>
> decided to probe "the evolution of the international
terrorist threat… an
> d
> scrutinize the intelligence community's response through
Sept. 11 and beyond."
> 1 (SFC, 5 June 2002). The "intelligence panel" was given the
mandate to comb
> through some 360,000 pages of top secret
information "gathered by wiretaps,
> spies, and spy satellites" 2 (CBS, 4 June 2002).
>
> Now it just so happens, or is a pure coincidence, that this
Congressional
> inquiry on 9/11 is an initiative of the two individuals Sen.
Bob Graham a
> Democrat and Rep. Porter Goss, a Republican, who were having
breakfast on 9/11
> with the alleged money man behind the terrorist attacks,
General Mahmoud Ahmad,
>
> head of Pakistan's Military Intelligence (ISI). (For details
see Michel
> Chossudovsky, Political Deception: The Missing Link behind 9-
11,
> www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO206A.html )
>
> Punishing the Whistleblowers
>
> The mandate of the joint inquiry is to reveal the truth
behind 9/11. What we
> want, said Rep. Porter Goss, is: "to explain to the executive
branch, Congress
> and most importantly to the American people what happened,
how it happened, and
>
> what we need to do to reduce the risk of a reoccurrence of
such horrific
> events." 3 (Miami Herald, 4 June 2002)
>
> The joint inquiry has focussed its attention on
the "unauthorized disclosures"
> which triggered the foreknowledge "Prez knew" scandal last
May. While seeking
> who is behind these "intelligence leaks" and punishing the
whistleblowers, the
> broader issue of political accountability, which is on
everbody's lips is not
> part of the inquiry's terms of reference.
>
> The joint inquiry was also given the mandate to
carefully "document"
> new "alleged terrorist threats". The thrust of this exercise -
-led by Rep.
> Porter Goss, a former uncover CIA agent of the Cold War era