Europa czasem wybiera ideały, także w sprawie e...

[Gość: cyk]

Ale jaja, Czarnecki daje głos z Brukseli. Dobrze, że tam tłumacze chociaż
nadadzą sens jego wypowiedziom.

ten ideal to 200mld.cash rzadu Chin(szacuje US)

[Gość: tititi]

ten ideal to 200mldUSD.cash rzadu Chin(szacuje US)

[Gość: tititi]

[Gość: A. Domin-Bizjak]

Brawo.

Handlarze bronia tez maja swoje idealy. Jak

[Gość: igor]

myslicie, ktory ideal wygrywa w realnym zyciu ?

Idealy nie wygrywaja,idealy sa.

[Gość: abhaod]

[Gość: SLOTE]

jakby tak jeszcze uchwaly tego szacownego "parlamentu" mialy jakiekolwiek
znacznie to moze byloby co komentowac.. a tak panowie "parlamentarzysci"
wezwali, wybiorcza napisala... a decyzje i tak podejmnie kto inny [rosja co
najwyzej sie ucieszy.. nie ma jak to monopol, mozna sobie dyktowac ceny itp]

Dlatego Europa powinna

[Gość: abhaod]

uzbroic sie w bron nuklearna (neutronowa), a tylko na wschodniej i poludniowej
granicy zostawic regularna armie.

[Gość: Edward Drugi]

Ciekawy jestem, czy p. Czarnecki poparłby protest przeciw dyskryminacji osób
homoseksualnych w Chinach (tam pono jeszcze gorzej niż w Polsce...)

To rzadki przypadek, że muszę się teraz zgodzić z Czarneckim (w sprawie
embarga) - bo zwykle jego poglądy były oszołomskie, czasem niedorzeczne. We
Wrocławiu się spokojniej zrobiło, kiedy Czarnecki przestał tyle bruździć, teraz
więcej bruździ w Brukseli...

Jesli embargo zostanie to Czyrak je i tak OBEJDZIE

[Gość: meerkat]

Tak jak obszedl embargo na dostwy broni do Iraku.
10% lapowki od wartosci kazdej dostawy, to zbytlakowmy kasek dla tego oszusta!

Niemcy, Rosja i Francja - trzej dostawcy do Iranu.

[Gość: Alfred]

Glosowali za rezolucja ONZ ale szmal robia. Szczegolnie Francuzi z ich namolnym
przypominaniem idealow a realiami ich decyzji, to szczyt hipokryzji.

Clinton lovers, read this!!! +Polski z chicago

[Gość: +Polski z chicago]

OK, now - here is something from an 'american'(uhh) site ...
www.libertyunites.tv/index.php
this is what some 'Americans'(ohhh) today think ...
it is an interesting point-by-point in English (uhhh)

ps. i'm postin' it everywhere for ALL to see

pxc

Confusing
I'm confused.......
I'm trying to get all this political stuff straightened out in my head
so I'll know how to vote come November. Right now, we have one guy saying one
thing. Then the other guy says something else. Who to believe? Lemme see;
have I got this straight?

Clinton awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Yugoslavia - good...
Bush awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Iraq - bad...

Clinton spends 77 billion on war in Serbia - good...
Bush spends 87 billion in Iraq - bad...

Clinton imposes regime change in Serbia - good...
Bush imposes regime change in Iraq - bad...

Clinton bombs Christian Serbs on behalf of Muslim Albanian terrorists-
good...
Bush liberates 25 million from a genocidal dictator - bad...

Clinton bombs Chinese embassy - good...
Bush bombs terrorist camps - bad...

Clinton commits felonies while in office - good...
Bush lands on aircraft carrier in jumpsuit - bad...

Clinton refuses to take custody of Bin Laden - good...
World Trade Centers fall under Bush - bad...

Clinton says Saddam has nukes - good...
Bush says Saddam has nukes - bad...

Clinton calls for regime change in Iraq - good...
Bush imposes regime change in Iraq - bad...

Terrorist training in Afghanistan under Clinton - good...
Bush destroys training camps in Afghanistan - bad...

Milosevic not yet convicted - good...
Saddam turned over for trial - bad...

Ahh, it's so confusing!

Every year an independent tax watchdog group analyzes the average tax burden
on Americans, and then calculates the "Tax Freedom Day". This is the day after
which the money you earn goes to you, not the government.

This year, tax freedom day was April 11th. That's the earliest it has
been since 1991. It's latest day ever was May 2nd, which occurred in 2000.

Notice anything special about those dates?

Recently, John Kerry gave a speech in which he claimed Americans are
actually paying more taxes under Bush, despite the tax cuts. He gave no
explanation and provided no data for this claim.

Another interesting fact: Both George Bush and John Kerry are wealthy men.
Bush owns only one home, his ranch in Texas. Kerry owns 4 mansions, all worth
several million dollars. (His ski resort home in Idaho is an old barn brought
over from Europe in pieces. Not your average A-frame).

Bush paid $250,000 in taxes this year; Kerry paid $90,000.
Does that sound right? The man who wants to raise your taxes obviously has
figured out a way to avoid paying his own.