memphis90
24.03.23, 09:12
konferencja-etyka.pl/konferencja-etykamedyczna/2023/sesja/sesja-3/wyklad/8004/
Taki sobie wykładzik przypadkiem wklejony w sesję o in vitro. Na szczególne uznanie zasługuje kreatywne wklejenie badań dr Foster z komentarzem „wg dr Foster 98% kobiet, które nie uzyskały aborcji jest zadowolonych z tego powodu” - z pominięciem calej reszty badań dr Foster, szczególnie tej części o popadaniu w ubóstwo.
„ Women denied an abortion were more likely than were women who received an abortion to experience economic hardship and insecurity lasting years. Laws that restrict access to abortion may result in worsened economic outcomes for women.”
Skrót z konkluzji z książki dr Foster :
„Judges, politicians, and pro-life advocates routinely defend their anti-abortion stance by claiming that abortion is physically risky and leads to depression and remorse. Dr. Foster’s data proves the opposite to be true. Foster documents the outcomes for women who received and were denied an abortion, analyzing the impact on their mental and physical health, their careers, their romantic relationships, and their other children, if they have them. Women who received an abortion were better off by almost every measure than women who did not, and five years after they receive an abortion, 99 percent of women do not regret it.”
Oczywiscie niczego z tego nie ma z wykładzie. Jest o depresji, alkoholizmie i zwiększonej śmiertelności.
