ksieza pedofile film BBC

ohne_zucker Re: nie tylko 20.01.10, 10:21

This "divine truth" which "a whole people venerate" of which "not a
single letter of it is missing" and today "is flourishing to such a
degree as cannot be found in its history" is illustrated by the
additional verbatim quotations which follow:

SANHEDRIN, 55b: "A maiden three years and a day may be acquired in
marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband's brother cohabits
with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred
through her; (if a niddah) she defiles him who has connection with
her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a
garment which has lain upon (a person afflicted with gonorrhea)."

(footnotes) "(2) His wife derives no pleasure from this, and hence
there is no cleaving. (3) A variant reading of this passage is: Is
there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen.
Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew. (4) By taking the two in
conjunction, the latter as illustrating the former, we learn that
the guilt of violating the injunction `to his wife but not to his
neighbor's wife' is incurred only for natural but not for unnatural
intercourse."

SANHEDRIN, 69b "Our rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with
her young son (a minor), and he committed the first stage of
cohabitation with her, -Beth Shammai says, he thereby renders her
unfit for the priesthood (1). Beth Hillel declares her fit...All
agree that the connection of a boy nine years and a day is a real
connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not (2);
their dispute refers only to one who is eight years old.

KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. "Rabba said, It means (5) this: When a grown up
man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the
girl is less than this (6), it is as if one puts the finger in the
eye (7), but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown up woman,
he makes her as `a girl who is injured by a piece of wood' ".
(footnotes) "(5). Lit., `says'. (6) Lit., `here', that is, less than
three years old. (7) Tears come to the eyes again and again, so does
virginity come back to the little girl under three years."

KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. "Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who
has intercourse with a grown up woman makes her (as though she
were ) injured by a piece of wood (1). Although the intercourse of a
small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is
injured by it as by a piece of wood."
(footnotes) "(1) Although the intercourse of a small boy is not
regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as
by a piece of wood."

ABODAH ZARAH, 36b-37a. "R. Naham b. Isaac said: They decreed in
connection with a heathen child that it would cause defilement by
seminal emission (2) so that an Israelite child should not become
accustomed to commit pederasty with it...From what age does a
heathen child cause defilement by seminal emission? From the age of
nine years and one day. (37a) for inasmuch as he is then capable of
the sexual act he likewise defiles by emission. Rabina said: It is
therefore to be concluded that a heathen girl (communicates
defilement) from the age of three years and one day, for inasmuch as
she is then capable of the sexual act she likewise defiles by a
flux.

SOTAH, 26b. "R. Papa said: It excludes an animal, because there is
not adultery in connection with an animal (4). Raba of Parazika (5)
asked R. Ashi, Whence is the statement which the Rabbis made that
there is no adultery in connection with an animal? Because it is
written, Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot or the wages of a
dog etc.; (6) and it has been taught: The hire of a dog (7) and the
wages of a harlot (8) are permissible, as it is said, Even both of
these (9) - the two (specified texts are abominations) but not four
(10)...As lying with mankind. (12) But, said Raba, it excludes the
case where he warned her against contact of the bodies (13). Abaye
said to him, That is merely an obscene act (and not adultery), and
did the All-Merciful prohibit (a wife to her husband) for an obscene
act?"
regrets!

Drzewko
Od najstarszego
Od najnowszego

ohne_zucker nie tylko 20.01.10, 10:18

www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=11756
- ohne_zucker Re: nie tylko 20.01.10, 10:21
  
  This "divine truth" which "a whole people venerate" of which "not a
  single letter of it is missing" and today "is flourishing to such a
  degree as cannot be found in its history" is illustrated by the
  additional verbatim quotations which follow:
  
  SANHEDRIN, 55b: "A maiden three years and a day may be acquired in
  marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband's brother cohabits
  with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred
  through her; (if a niddah) she defiles him who has connection with
  her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a
  garment which has lain upon (a person afflicted with gonorrhea)."
  
  (footnotes) "(2) His wife derives no pleasure from this, and hence
  there is no cleaving. (3) A variant reading of this passage is: Is
  there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen.
  Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew. (4) By taking the two in
  conjunction, the latter as illustrating the former, we learn that
  the guilt of violating the injunction `to his wife but not to his
  neighbor's wife' is incurred only for natural but not for unnatural
  intercourse."
  
  SANHEDRIN, 69b "Our rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with
  her young son (a minor), and he committed the first stage of
  cohabitation with her, -Beth Shammai says, he thereby renders her
  unfit for the priesthood (1). Beth Hillel declares her fit...All
  agree that the connection of a boy nine years and a day is a real
  connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not (2);
  their dispute refers only to one who is eight years old.
  
  KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. "Rabba said, It means (5) this: When a grown up
  man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the
  girl is less than this (6), it is as if one puts the finger in the
  eye (7), but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown up woman,
  he makes her as `a girl who is injured by a piece of wood' ".
  (footnotes) "(5). Lit., `says'. (6) Lit., `here', that is, less than
  three years old. (7) Tears come to the eyes again and again, so does
  virginity come back to the little girl under three years."
  
  KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. "Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who
  has intercourse with a grown up woman makes her (as though she
  were ) injured by a piece of wood (1). Although the intercourse of a
  small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is
  injured by it as by a piece of wood."
  (footnotes) "(1) Although the intercourse of a small boy is not
  regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as
  by a piece of wood."
  
  ABODAH ZARAH, 36b-37a. "R. Naham b. Isaac said: They decreed in
  connection with a heathen child that it would cause defilement by
  seminal emission (2) so that an Israelite child should not become
  accustomed to commit pederasty with it...From what age does a
  heathen child cause defilement by seminal emission? From the age of
  nine years and one day. (37a) for inasmuch as he is then capable of
  the sexual act he likewise defiles by emission. Rabina said: It is
  therefore to be concluded that a heathen girl (communicates
  defilement) from the age of three years and one day, for inasmuch as
  she is then capable of the sexual act she likewise defiles by a
  flux.
  
  SOTAH, 26b. "R. Papa said: It excludes an animal, because there is
  not adultery in connection with an animal (4). Raba of Parazika (5)
  asked R. Ashi, Whence is the statement which the Rabbis made that
  there is no adultery in connection with an animal? Because it is
  written, Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot or the wages of a
  dog etc.; (6) and it has been taught: The hire of a dog (7) and the
  wages of a harlot (8) are permissible, as it is said, Even both of
  these (9) - the two (specified texts are abominations) but not four
  (10)...As lying with mankind. (12) But, said Raba, it excludes the
  case where he warned her against contact of the bodies (13). Abaye
  said to him, That is merely an obscene act (and not adultery), and
  did the All-Merciful prohibit (a wife to her husband) for an obscene
  act?"
  regrets!
  - zgr-edo Re: nie tylko 24.01.10, 08:47
    
    dranie
- Gość: Vlad.H. ohne zucker to antysemita IP: *.cable.quicknet.nl 24.01.10, 22:47
  
  tralala antysemita tralalalalala antysemita

Najnowsze z forum Szczecin

Zaloguj się