Peer - Review

[dr_pitcher]

Ciekawe jak jest w innych dziedzinach:
cytuje za s Cambridge Pres

Subject: Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again

With fictitious names and institutions substituted for the original
ones (e.g., Tri-Valley Center for Human Potential), the altered
manuscripts were formally resubmitted to the journals that had
originally refereed and published them 18 to 32 months earlier. Of the sample of 38 editors and reviewers, only three (8%) detected the resubmissions. This result allowed nine of the 12 articles to continue
through the review process to receive an actual evaluation: eight of
the nine were rejected. Sixteen of the 18 referees (89%) recommended
against publication and the editors concurred. The grounds for
rejection were in many cases described as “serious methodological
flaws.” A number of possible interpretations of these data are
reviewed and evaluated.

[dala.tata]

No, warto by zapytac, jak jest teraz w psychologii. To artykul sprzed 30 lat.

[charioteer1]

The present investigation was an attempt to study the peer-review process directly, in the natural setting of actual journal referee evaluations of submitted manuscripts. As test materials we selected 12 already published research articles by investigators from prestigious and highly productive American psychology departments, one article from each of 12 highly regarded and widely read American psychology journals with high rejection rates (80%) and nonblind refereeing practices.

Moglo by sie wydawac, ze to jest klucz do zagadki. Poza tym, cos, co idzie do druku 1,5-2,5 roku po publikacji oryginalnych wynikow to nie jest juz kwiatek pierwszej swiezosci. Te badania byly duzo wczesniej przeprowadzone i prawdopodobnie wyniki byly znane na dlugo przed ich publikacja. Wiele opublikowanych wynikow mozna podwazyc na gruncie metodologicznym, zwlaszcza w psychologii. Dlatego wlasnie planuje sie kolejne eksperymenty na podstawie tego, co juz wiadomo, glownie po to, by wyeliminowac jakies zmienne zaklocajace. Nie mam dostepu do BBS z 1982 roku. Ciekawi mnie, w jaki sposob autorzy interpretuja wyniki swojego eksperymentu.