Promotion w Komisji

[Gość: Promouvable]

2008 PROMOTION EXERCISE

* CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROMOTION SYSTEM IN FORCE SINCE 2003
* PARTICULAR FEATURES OF THE 2008 PROMOTION EXERCISE
* TIMETABLE FOR THE 2008 PROMOTION EXERCISE

The 2008 promotion exercise will be the sixth and final one organised in
accordance with the procedures agreed by the Commission in 2002. This
Administrative Notice recaps the key elements involved.

With regard to future promotion exercises, on 14 April 2008, the Commission
adopted in first reading the draft implementing provisions (GIPs) for a
revised appraisal and promotion system to enter into force in 2009. Final
approval is expected before the end of May 2008. For further information on
this new system, see
:www.cc.cec/pers_admin/revision_cdr_promotion/index_en.html

1. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROMOTION SYSTEM IN FORCE SINCE 2003

The current promotion system was applied for the first time in 2003. The
entire promotion exercise is managed via the Sysper 2 “promotion” module.
Officials have individual access to their promotion files by means of a
personal secret password. Promotion files contain information on the
allocation of priority points received under the exercise and on the
individual’s situation as regards accumulated priority points and merit points.

1.1. What are the key principles of the current promotion system ?

* Officials accumulate merit points and priority points over
successive promotion exercises. The aggregate number of these points produces
an accumulated stock of points.

* In each promotion exercise, the following individuals are promoted:

o all officials with a number of accumulated points above the
promotion threshold (1);

o officials with a number of accumulated points equal to the
promotion threshold, provided that there are sufficient budget resources
available. To this end, provision has been made for a mechanism to choose
between officials having the same ranking (“ex-aequo” officials) on a proposal
from the promotion committees.

* The aggregate number of points accumulated by promoted officials
will be reduced by the number of points corresponding to the promotion threshold.

The principles governing this promotion system are set out in
detail in Administrative Notice No 34-2003 of 2 May 2003.

1.2. How are merit points and priority points accumulated?

Each year, officials are allocated merit points and, in certain cases,
priority points.

* Merit points are the result of the mark out of 20 given in the
annual career development review (CDR). Officials given a mark of 15 in their
CDR for 2007 will be awarded 15 merit points for the 2008 promotion exercise.

However, there are a number of exceptions to this general rule,
for instance, if the official in question has had a number of appraisals each
covering part of the previous year, has changed category or has not been in
active employment for the whole of the reference period. In these cases, merit
points will be calculated in proportion to the period served in the grade.

* There are several categories of priority points:

o Priority points allocated by the Directorate-General (PPDG):
these are awarded by the Directors-General, within the quota available (see
point 1.3.), to officials deemed most deserving, as follows:

+ officials who have demonstrated exceptional merit may
be allocated 6 to 10 priority points;

+ other officials may be awarded a maximum of 4 points;

Officials whose most recent CDR contains an assessment of
“poor” or “inadequate” are not eligible for priority points.

The criteria laid down for allocating these points must be
made known to the staff of the Directorate-General concerned. They are
notified to DG ADMIN, which informs the Staff Committee.

The proposals for the award of priority points by the
Directors-General (the formal intentions) are published by DG ADMIN (see point
3: timetable for the promotion exercise).

o Priority points in recognition of additional work carried
out in the interest of the institution (PPII): the promotion committees may
propose the award of priority points to officials who have carried out tasks
which are in the interest of the institution and which do not form part of
their normal duties. The list of the tasks in question is contained in Annex I
to the general provisions for implementing Article 45 (adopted by the
Commission on 23 December 2004). In 2007, the promotion committees recommended
that to be eligible for these points officials must have carried out the
eligible tasks for at least four days. A maximum of 2 such points may be
awarded per official and per year.

DG ADMIN has asked the European Personnel Selection Office
and each Joint Committee Chair for a detailed list of the Commission officials
who have taken part in their work and the number of days worked by each official.

The information relating to these priority points will be
made known to staff before the promotion committees meet (see point 3:
timetable for the promotion exercise). Officials will therefore be able to
lodge an appeal with the appropriate committee if they consider that the
information published does not reflect the additional work which they
undertook during 2007 in the interest of the institution.

As announced in Administrative Notice 20-2008 of 11 April
2008, the new promotion system to be in force in 2009 foresees the abolition
of the PPII. Eligible tasks carried out in 2008 will therefore not be rewarded
with PPII in the 2009 promotion exercise.

o Priority points awarded by the promotion committees on
appeal (PPPCA): the committees may propose the allocation of priority points
on appeal to officials who have contested the number of Directorate-General
priority points accorded to them by lodging an appeal with the committee
concerned. For the appeal to succeed, the committee must consider the appeal
to be justified and must substantiate its proposal. No limit has been set for
the number of points which may be allocated on appeal.

o Transitional priority points awarded by the Appointing
Authority (PPTAA): these will be awarded to officials whose seniority in their
grade on 1 January 2008 exceeds the average seniority in that grade for
officials promoted in 2007. The number of these points will depend on the
official’s merit mark for 2006. It cannot exceed 4 points and must be
calculated in accordance with the table in point 2.3 of Annex II of the
general provisions for implementing Article 45.

o Transitional priority points awarded by the promotion
committees (PPTPC): the committees are able to propose the allocation of up to
3 priority points to offset any problems resulting from the transition to the
current promotion system entered into force in 2003.

1.3. How is each Directorate-General’s quota of priority points calculated?

Each Directorate-General or department has, for a given grade, a quota
of priority points equal to 2.5 times the number of officials in that grade
(as at 31 December 2007) and for whom the Directorate-General has by 25 June 2008:

* completed the CDR(s) covering 2007;
* set

[Gość: Promouvable]

1.
The quota of priority points is reduced if, for the grade in question, the
average merit marks exceed the expected average by more than one point. However,
Directorates-General may apply for exemptions. These applications are examined
by a joint working party chaired by the Director -General of DG ADMIN and
comprising four members representing the administration and four members
designated by the Staff Committee, representing the staff.

The average number of merit points expected for each grade, as referred to
in Article 8 of the general provisions for implementing Article 43 of the Staff
Regulations, has been set at 14.65 for the 2008 staff appraisal and promotion
exercise.

1.4. How are the promotion thresholds set?

Promotion thresholds for all except the end-of-career grades (AD12, AST10,
AST6/C, AST4/D) derive from the convergence plan which forms part of the revised
appraisal and promotion system to enter into force in 2009. For the 2008
exercises, thresholds have been held at the 2007 level for a number of grades
where the threshold value, if the convergence plan was strictly applied, would
have reached a peak in 2008 and thereafter declined in value. Officials, in all
except end-of-career grades, who have accumulated a number of points equal to or
exceeding the thresholds communicated in Administrative Notice 20-2008 of 11
April 2008 will be promoted.

As mentioned in Administrative Notice 20-2008, the promotion thresholds
remain indicative for the end-of-career grades (AD12, AST10, AST6/C, AST4/D).
They may therefore be adjusted by the Appointing Authority on the
recommendations of the promotion committees at the end of the promotion exercise.

1.5. Who is promoted?

For all grades, except the end-of-career grades, officials with a total
number of points on or above the promotion threshold are promoted, provided that
they meet the criteria applicable under the Staff Regulations (minimum seniority
in the grade and in service; compliance with article 45.2 where applicable).
However, there is one key exception to this rule: officials who scored less than
10 in their most recent CDR cannot be promoted, even if they have accumulated a
total number of points above the promotion threshold.

For the end-of-career grades, officials who have accumulated a number of
points which coincides exactly with the promotion threshold may possibly be
promoted. If budget resources do not permit the promotion of all the officials
who have reached the definitive promotion threshold (“ex aequo” officials), the
promotion committee proposes, from among these officials, those who may be
promoted on the basis of subsidiary criteria such as seniority in the grade and
factors relating to equal opportunities or the nature of duties undertaken.
Officials with the same total number of points (whatever the origin of those
points) are deemed to have the same merit.

1.6. What are the appeal procedures?

The general provisions for implementing Article 43 of the Staff
Regulations (staff appraisal) provide for appeal procedures for officials who
contest the content of their CDR, in particular the merit mark obtained. Joint
Evaluation Committees have been specially set up covering each
Directorate-General (2).

During the actual promotion exercise, officials who contest the proposed
number of priority points from their Directorate-General or for additional work
undertaken in the interest of the institution may lodge an appeal with the
relevant promotion committee in accordance with the following procedures:

* Once priority points have been awarded by the Directors-General, DG
ADMIN informs staff of the lists which show, grade by grade, the officials to
whom it is proposed to allocate priority points from their Directorate-General
and those who might be granted priority points for additional work undertaken in
the interest of the institution. Officials are then invited to consult their
promotion file.

* Officials have five working days from the publication of those lists
to lodge an appeal, via Sysper 2, with the relevant promotion committee.

* The promotion committees (3) are responsible for:

o making proposals on the allocation of some priority points
(see point 1.2. above);
o examining any individual appeals lodged by officials;
o in certain grades selecting possible promotees from among
ex-aequo officials (see point 1.5 above).

* Any points allocated by the Appointing Authority following the
promotion committees’ work are included in the promotion file of each official
concerned. In addition, DG ADMIN publishes the lists of officials whom the
promotion committees consider to be the most deserving of promotion (4), the
lists of officials to whom points have been awarded for additional work
undertaken in the interest of the institution, and the lists of officials promoted.

At the end of the promotion procedure, moreover, officials may lodge
a complaint with the Appointing Authority under Article 90(2) of the Staff
Regulations to challenge:

o the fact that they have not been promoted;

o the calculation of their merit points on the basis of the
marks in the CDR concerned (any challenge involving the merit marks themselves
is to be made as part of the appraisal exercise, as indicated above);

o the total number of priority points obtained during the
promotion exercise, regardless of the type of points concerned.

2. PARTICULAR FEATURES OF THE 2008 PROMOTION EXERCISE

2.1. Ability to work in a third language

Administrative Notice 25-2008 of 14 May 2008 sets out the implementing
conditions for Article 45(2) of the Staff Regulations in 2008 and succeeding years.

To recall the basic principles:

* Article 45(2) refers only to the first promotion after recruitment

* The demonstration of the ability to work in a third language must be
carried out in one of the several ways described in Administrative Notice 25-2008.

* Officials who are in line for a first promotion after recruitment,
in 2008 and who are thus concerned by Article 45(2), must demonstrate the
ability to work in a third language before the end of 2008.

* Officials who do not succeed in demonstrating such an ability will
not be eligible for promotion in 2008.

2.2. Transitional provisions

Article 13 of the GIPs for this promotion exercise refers to transitional
provisions which stipulate, inter alia, that when the promotion thresholds
mentioned are published, the Directorate-General for Personnel and
Administration will indicate the grades for which thresholds have levelled off
and for which the transition phase has been completed.

In this regard, the transition phase has been completed for the following
grades: AD7, AST5, AST2/C and AST2/D. Moreover, for new grades (AD5, AD6, AD9,
AST1, AST2, AST3, AST4, AST9), transitional provisions should not apply. This
means that for these grades there will be no allocation of transitional points
(PPTAA and PPTPC).

In addition, transitional points allocated by the promotion committees
(PPTPC) will not apply to the grades AD13, AD12, AST10, AST6/C, and AST4/D for
which no promotion possibilities were foreseen in the former career structure.

3. TIMETABLE FOR THE 2008 PROMOTION EXERCISE

– May:

* All officials will be able to access, via the 2008 promotion file in
Sysper 2, their merit points

[Gość: Promouvable]

3.

– June:

* Directorates-General will submit any requests for exemption in the
event that they exceed by more than one point the expected average merit marks
covering 2007.

* Directorates-General will inform their staff of the criteria for
awarding priority points.

* The joint working party will meet to examine any requests for exemption.

– July:

* Directorates-General will submit to the Joint Evaluation Committees
their proposals for awarding priority points.

* DG ADMIN will publish the formal intentions regarding the award of
priority points, the lists of officials most deserving of promotion and the
number of days worked in relation to work carried out in the interest of the
institution.

* End of July: closing date for lodging appeals with the promotion
committees.

– September/October:

* The promotion committees will meet.

– November:

* DG ADMIN will publish the lists of those whom the promotion
committees consider most deserve promotion, the lists of those promoted as
decided by the Appointing Authority and the list of those awarded points for
additional work undertaken in the interest of the institution.
Further information on the promotion exercise can be found at:
www.cc.cec/pers_admin/promotions/index_en.html.
__________________
Footnotes

(1) With the exception of certain specific cases such as officials who are not
in active employment at the Commission when promotion decisions are taken,
officials who obtained fewer than 10 merit points in the previous appraisal
exercise, officials who are the subject of disciplinary procedures, etc.

(2) When the promotion exercise is launched, this appeal procedure has in theory
been exhausted.

(3) There are three promotion committees: one for the AD function group, one for
the AST function group (without a career restriction) and one for the AST/C and
AST/D career streams. A promotion subcommittee has also been set up for staff
paid from research appropriations in the general budget.

(4) Lists containing, for each grade, the names of officials who are not more
than five points below the promotion threshold and the names of officials who
have reached or passed that threshold.
Author: ADMIN A.6

[Gość: epopeja]

jaki jest glebszy sens tej epopei w 3 czesciach na ogolno dostepnym
forum, skoro wszystkie informacje sa dostepne dla zainteresowanych
na intracommie i w broszurkach zwiazkow zawodowych?