"Kraj płonie": pakistańska opozycja apeluje o r...

[kaczylechu]

widać,ze doradcy z Waszyngtonu ostro doradzaja opozycji..
Jak się nie udało podstawić marionetki to teraz podburzanie i destablizacja za
każdą cene.

Afghanistan does not exist: Viva Pakistan!

[snow21]

Afghanistan does not exist: Viva Pakistan!
By Gaither Stewart
Online Journal Contributing Writer


Dec 31, 2007, 01:11


ROME — I must be paranoid for I believe that Washington stands behind the
assassination of Benazir Bhutto. Since the truth is as hard to come by in
Pakistan as it is in Washington, D.C. most observers can only hazard guesses as
to what really happened there in recent days and weeks. So I, too, will take the
liberty of expounding my version of events.

Though today even how she died is disputed, in my opinion Washington sponsored
Benazir Bhutto’s assassination. Another of Washington’s mad plans gone wrong!
Like so many others in that region. I mean, a courageous woman, secular, in a
limited sense democratic, sent back home, probably with another bag full of
dollars, to clean up the image of General Musharraf’s faltering military regime
in Pakistan. And hopefully to make things right in the US military protectorate
and ally in the East.

But make things right, how? With her life?

Now whoa there! That is stretching matters.

Abroad, Benazir was known as a democrat. Didn’t her children play with Clinton’s
daughter? After all! On the other hand, everybody in Pakistan knew she was an
ally of Washington. True, she was of an illustrious family, corrupt but
illustrious — anything or anyone, it is easy to think, is better than the
military that has ruled over Pakistan forever.

Still, it is misleading to describe her as a martyr. Benazir Bhutto was
certainly no saint. Still, a woman prime minister looks good. I can imagine some
man, yes, it has to be a man, his shirt sleeves rolled up, his tie awry, his
jacket hanging on the back of his chair at a conference table in some grotto
across the Potomac. The others gathered around the table like the image of a
woman at the head of a puppet regime in Pakistan this upper echelon bureaucrat
depicts. Yes, just the thing we need, a woman to head these unruly Asians,
Pashtuns, fundamentalists, terrorists all. And after all she is a pro-American
woman. She will be malleable and controllable.

But, the idea man says — now grimly, saving the best part to last, as if it were
the natural outcome — of course she will never be elected. She has to be
sacrificed. Heads nod, lips tighten, pencils draw circles and bizarre figures.

Yet anyone in his right mind with only vague knowledge of Asia can grasp that a
political alliance between Benazir Bhutto and the ex-general President Musharraf
couldn’t exist in heaven or on earth. Nor does the establishment of democracy in
Pakistan have anything to do with it. As if a woman, secular, mundane, not
widely loved in Pakistan outside her own Pakistan Peoples Party, could
successfully head this Moslem country of 165 million people in which power today
is divided among the military, Taliban fundamentalists and Al Qaida terrorists.

Benazir Bhutto’s elite class not only supported the Taliban for years. With US
help her class in fact created the Taliban in order to extend Pakistani control
over Afghanistan and its rebellious tribes, and also organize them to fight the
Soviet Communist invaders from the north, and perhaps also to somehow get their
hands on the poppy plantations.

Instead, in the end, the Talibans talibanized parts of Pakistan so that today
the northwest borders between the two countries have tended to vanish, creating
a huge, Taliban Pashtun-infested no-man’s land. Italian reporters there say you
can’t tell them apart. Now both Afghan Talibans and Pakistani Talibans are
fighting against US and NATO forces in the same losing war others have fought
earlier in history. It is the very same war that everyone has always lost — one
crisis, one conflict, one holy war.

For it is the same fundamentalism that both Musharraf and Washington have used
and continue to use unabashedly when they agree with one faction or another. Any
number of factions would have killed Mrs. Bhutto.

So this assassination, like that of Martin Luther King or of John Kennedy and
legions of others down the trail of international intrigue, has much wider
ramifications than a secular woman aspiring to political power.

A woman in the trenches against the entire force of the nation! Besides,
Musharraf had told her he would never allow her to return home from her exile in
London and Dubai. What changed his mind?

The old question holds here: Who stands to benefit most from her death? In an
air of her martyrdom and in the atmosphere of chaos reigning in Pakistan, the
result of her removal is that the United States, backed by martial law imposed
by a US-supported military regime, can concentrate on a military build up in
Pakistan as a substitute for defeat in Iraq and impending debacle in Afghanistan.

Afghanistan is an illusion. It is only virtual. Afghanistan doesn’t exist.
England learned that the hard way. Soviet Russia experienced it. Once a favorite
goal of the jet set of former times, Kabul, like the country, is no more. An
Italian journalist friend depicts Kabul today as a place of dust, mud and
bivouacs, heavy Chinese bicycles, rickety taxis, sirens and fires and bombs. In
other words, another Baghdad.

Pakistan is thus the soft under belly of an illusion. Pakistan is to become the
site for future US concentration . . . and more illusions.

Return

Nonetheless, Bhutto’s return was important for Bush and his ridiculous
“exportation of democracy” slogans. Nonetheless, sane observers can only guess
at possible strategic purposes. Yet, the project itself was stupid.

Everybody knew, including Benazir Bhutto herself, that the variegated forces of
the country wanted to kill her. Don’t forget that Benazir’s father Zulfikar Ali
Bhutto, an autocratic opportunist who called himself Socialist who headed one of
the few non-military governments of Pakistan in the 1970s, was overthrown and
hanged by another general-dictator, Zia ul-Haq. There is a tradition here, a
script to be followed.

That must have been the goal.

The country was already in chaos, civil war a constant threat. The obvious next
step for Washington was application of the good old “strategy of tension.” For
now, after the assassination, the road is paved for a ferocious unrelenting
crushing of all opposition inside the identifiable borders of the country and
the salvation of a tottering regime and collapsing US policies in the whole region.

The assassination of Benazir Bhutto is a disaster, the Pearl Harbor permitting
American military build-up in Pakistan. Though al Qaida denies the attentat, it
or one of many fundamentalist groups could have been the willing arm — the
version Musharraf proposes — but surely Washington organized the return home of
Benazir Bhutto, back home to die.

In that sense she was a victim, a sacrificial victim of the US urge for world
supremacy. Benazir Bhutto was a calculating politician. One wonders how she
could be so naïve as to believe in “bringing democracy” to a chiefly
military-fundamentalist nation, with a thin façade of democracy, and a puppet of
the USA?

In the end, it seems, her pro-American, Anglo-Saxon nature and her natural
courage got the best of her. No rational calculation could have suggested return
to Pakistan. I suspect only promises of glory by those gray men in Washington, a
guarantee of total US support and perhaps bags of money could have swayed her.

Again and again, it is the same old story of the USA taking the wrong side, in
this case, of being on any side at all. Which goes to prove that the battle for
justice and democracy has absolutely nothing to do with it; perhaps not even
control over those nuclear weapons held by the Pakistani military regime is the
issue. The issue is again the g

Afghanistan does not exist: Viva Pakistan! part 2

[snow21]

Again and again, it is the same old story of the USA taking the wrong side, in
this case, of being on any side at all. Which goes to prove that the battle for
justice and democracy has absolutely nothing to do with it; perhaps not even
control over those nuclear weapons held by the Pakistani military regime is the
issue. The issue is again the gas and oil pipelines from former Soviet Central
Asia running through Afghanistan and Pakistan to the sea . . . and those poppy
fields, too.

Again: Who benefited from the assassination of Benazir Bhutto? Like Musharraf,
Fox News naturally goes for al Qaida. So that is obviously the line of part of
the US establishment. At this point Musharraf had little to gain from her death.
The truth is that before her assassination the United States had already set in
motion a plan to strengthen its position in Pakistan since the Iraq war is
already lost and the Afghanistan adventure a failure.

Chaos never hurts the truly powerful. Bhutto’s murder and the subsequent
upheaval are the pretext for an iron fist to cover the arrival and concentration
of US forces there, a deployment reportedly scheduled for early 2008. Thus
America is stepping into this huge and complex nation in the first person.

Therefore, I go for the secret services of the United States of America erring
again. In a few years we will doubtless be writing and reading about an exit
strategy from Pakistan.

This is not the first such mistake.

Yet, puppets like Benazir Bhutto and Pevrez Musharraf, courageous or malicious,
continue to come and go.

onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_2788.shtml
iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/152172

A w tle islamska bomba atomowa...

[mlasskacz]

.

bomby nie są religijne, nie zamulaj

[rasta.man]

a jakie?

[justyna373]

[chavez6]

according to wikipedia...

pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benazir_Bhutto
Bhutto mógł zamordować ktoś powiązany z Al-kaidą, a jak wiadomo organizacja ta
wykorzystuje religię islamską do destabilizacji różnych regionów na świecie...
to nie jest wojna religijna, tylko wojna interesów,

Tak jak nie każdy wyznawca islamu jest terrorystą, tak nie każdy islamski
zamachowiec jest "suicide bomber", Pakistan jest obecnie na podobnym poziomie
kultury politycznej jak my w latach 20-stych (zabójstwo Gabriela Narutowicza),
albo i nie jest, ale niektórym ludziom zależy na niestabilnym regionie i chcą,
żeby to tak wyglądało.

Religia może być pretekstem... ale nie jest to wojna religijna, jak już to
starcia spowodowane znacznymi różnicami kulturowymi, politycznymi, braku
stabilnych rządów...

wyobraźcie sobie, jak by np. nasz prezydent sfiksował, przekładał wybory i za
wszelką cenę chciał utrzymać się jak najdłużej przy władzy i to nie tylko jako
prezydent, ale mając też "swoich" w parlamencie... najczęstszy Casus belli

Imagine John Lenon:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEOkxRLzBf0

[gdkj]

snow21 napisał:

np. "Again and again, it is the same old story of the USA taking the wrong side, in
this case, of being on any side at all."

ale USA są mocarstwem a nasze władze z niecierpliwością czekają na tarczę. jak
będziemy mieli takie amerykańskie cuś u siebie to nam prestiż wzrośnie. a oni
zawsze tak pogrywają ,że są wszędzie. amerykańskie firmy Hitlerowi też pomagały.

Biedny kraj

[kamyk_wj]

Nie mają szczęścia do przywódców. Nieudacznika i łobuza Navaza
Sharifa zastapił generał. Chciał dobrze, ywszlo jak zwykle -
korupcja, policja polityczna itp. Może jego współpraca z nieszczęsną
Bhutto dawała jakąś szansę, choć ta kobieta poza ambicjami niczego
nie reprezentowała. Chyba pozostaje pomodlić się o pokój.

Jakie ambicje??

[makabrapolska]

Jakie ambicje?? Buhtto dwa razy ustepowala ze stanowiska premiera za korupcje i
przewaly.W Szwajcarii zostala skazana na 22 mln$ kary za pranie pieniedzy a
sledztwo przeciw jej mezowi toczy sie nadal.
Jej ojciec zostal powieszony za korupcje. Nawet w niemieckiej TV dziennikarze
potwierdzili oficjalnie,ze ona zostala wyslana przez Waszyngton jako marionetka
w celu przejecia wplywow bo obecny prezydent Pakistanu nie chcial zostac
amerykanska marionetka.

W TVN24 słyszałem ,że mają najnowocześniejszy

[gdkj]

na świecie zelektronizowany system ewidencji ludności. A terrorystów i tak nie
mogą złapać."Szatan swoje dzieci chroni."

a niech sie tluka..jedni odchodza inny przychoda

[arahat1]

a ci juz sie szykuja bo nastepni bwoluja sie demokracja....religia i polityka to
opium dla mas nad ktorymi co cwaniaki sprawuja rzad dusz dla chwaly i mamony...a
lud na "haju" szuka igrzysk z nadzieja na miske..

Washinghton's Bushmens podpalili kolejny kraj

[snow21]

Już im Somalia, Liban, Irak i Afganistan nie wystarczają.
Gdzie ci nieudolni zadymiarze się pojawią tam zaraz jest jakaś "zadyma".

Podpalcie tez bron jadrowa, beda fajerwerki ze hoh

[litten]

Podpalcie tez bron jadrowa, beda fajerwerki ze hoho ;-)

a niech sie powybijają

[ihateschool]

skoro tak łatwo ten lud daje się sobą manipulować, niech skończy
swoje cierpienia i je8nie jedną swoją atomówke w Islamabad

Przeciez Muszaraf to demokrata!

[pierredolinski]

Przyjaciel Ameryki, wiec i nasz! Jak mozna go tak znieslawiac, jak
na lamach GW?

Napalm...

[kvakva]

...tylko napalm. Jak w ogródku... Grządka przy grządce...