przemyslawo2 24.10.08, 11:25 pb.pl/Default2.aspx?ArticleID=6bb9c3dc-4eac-476d-bdb9-d763e5a35eeb&open=sec news.money.pl/artykul/aig;dostal;123;mld;dolarow;wydal;prawie;wszystko,24,0,379672.html Boże, brak mi słów. Odpowiedz Link Obserwuj wątek Podgląd Opublikuj
przemyslawo2 Re: Greenspan 24.10.08, 20:12 > skad takie zaskoczenie? Zaskoczony nie jestem, ale nadal brak mi słów... jeden człowiek w dużej mierze przyczynił się do kryzysu na całym świecie, a teraz mówi, że on nie chciał i że jest zaskoczony. Odpowiedz Link
robisc Re: Greenspan 25.10.08, 22:04 MarketWatch's top stories of the week By MarketWatch Everybody makes mistakes, even Alan Greenspan. That may well have been the biggest news of the week. The good news is that the once-respected chairman of the Federal Reserve admitted in congressional testimony this week that he had made a mistake. But the bad news is that it looks like he is at least partly mistaken about what he got wrong. Greenspan appears to believe his big mistake was that he believed in the corrective power of self-interest in the marketplace. That belief was the keystone to his free-market ideology. Self-interest was supposed to ensure that banks and other companies didn't do anything that put their shareholders and their equity at risk. And clearly he was wrong about that. If we have learned anything over the past year, it is that companies and individuals don't always make choices that advance their self-interests. Markets don't reliably self-correct. The bad news actually comes on two fronts. First, even though Greenspan acknowledged this error, he didn't propose any significant changes to the financial system to make up for it. But Greenspan appears to have made a more profound mistake, which was to confuse the importance of having an ideology with being ideological. It may be true, as he told Congress Thursday, that we all need an ideology to help us organize our approach to the world. But Greenspan, whose free-market ideology led him to fight meaningful regulation for his entire career, didn't use his ideology this way. Instead, he allowed it to govern all his decisions, even when the facts and logic contradicted it. That's not having an ideology. That's zealotry. Odpowiedz Link