Gość: TRO4J
IP: *.bootp.Virginia.EDU
12.03.01, 01:31
To write in a non-native language is an odd decision. And yet, such is both necessity and intention of
mine.
Necessity, for reasons obvious from the nature of the submissions which you have been
inadvertently(?) inviting and so creating a need to hide in a kind of 2n+1 linguistics, in between the
natural entries.
Intention, for reasons of lingistic economy. Certain J. Derrida wrote in 1998 in a text (Demeure)
about M. Blanchot, literature, death and testimony: "For even in the hypothetical case of [...] a lie,
the event described [...] will have taken place." Of course such condition: "[...] does not invalidate
the exigency of truthfullnes [...], but the chaos remains."
Moral "prawosc": whose "prawosc", by whom and for whom; when is it spoken and how, or maybe
silently witnessed? Attested? Arrived at or rather passed by?
Mr Stasinski, how can one asked such a question even though one must asked such a qustion? Is it
not clear that - between you and "jakas kobieta" or even "radny Janczyk" - it is not in (or even
through) Jedwabna in the age of radny Godlewski or "biskup Stefanek" where the chaos may be
understood, wittnessed and testified?
tro4j@virginia.edu
