hadn't czy wouldn't???

[Gość: iwonka]

i jeszcze nie wiedzialam co wpisac w test luk.napiszcie wyrazy ktore
pamietacie.tam bylo "be driven"??" albo parents "living"? a przy tym
help__other out nie wiedzialam!!aha i jeszcze w tym wczesniejszym bylo take
off??

[Gość: lewelka]

ja dalam hadnt, bo to byl ten kondyszonal z musztarda po obiecie......, znaczy
3:D

[Gość: mat]

ja dałem hadn't, take off sie zgadza ,tak samo living, i be driven. w tym help
nie wiedzialem

[Gość: Tomeck]

Tez mam be driven i living ^^

Oprocz tego wpisalem help each other out ale pewnie zle =|

[Gość: m]

a wlasnie ze dobrze :)

[Gość: Tomeck]

Super! A myslalem ze zle mi poszla czesc gramatyczna =P

[Gość: >ICE<]

ja mam wouldn't.

1. living
2. to
3. when
4. they
5. drive
6. had used
7. whose
8. will try
9. each
10. on

[Gość: m]

> 3. when
dałam if, mozliwe ze obie odpowiedzi sa poprawne...:/

> 5. drive
tu raczej chodzilo o strone bierna, czyli 'be driven', dzieciaki same do szkoly
nie pojada ;)

> 6. had used
'have been using', glownie ze wzgledu na 'for' w dalszej czesci zdania

Reszta tak samo :)

[Gość: iwonka]

tam chyba nie bedzie whose,tylko "having" bo nic wiecej nie bylo o tym
synie.poza tym ja wpisalam have been using(albo have used) a nie wpadlam na to
each :/

yyyy

[Gość: ka]

1) have used to niby co wedlug ciebie? wlasnie ze tez z FOR. uwazam ze i
p.perfect i p. perfect continous sa dobre.
2) a moze byc living AT??? bo cos chyba nie do konca..ja wpisalam co innego
3) be driven tez tak srednio pasuje..wiem ze trzeba bylo zmienic,ale ja
zostawilam drive..bo be taken szybciej...jak niby be driven??troche dziwne..

[Gość: ...]

Past Perfect Continuous powinien być proszę Państwa... HAD been using ------>
sytuacja zaprzeszła

[Gość: ka]

tez sie nad tym zastanawialam ale w koncu napisalam inaczej...bo niby tekst
jest w czasie przeszlym..ale jednak tak jak by do ,,teraz" tak sie
dzieje...chociaz sama nie wiem.

[Gość: iwonka]

ale tam jest: the decision has outraged

[Gość: ka]

a poza tym had been using?? to jest czas najrzadziej uzywany ze
wszystkich...wlasciwie nie uzywany...

[Gość: barteksanok]

ja tez dałem drive zamiast strony biernej i jako ze jest to poprawnie
gramatycznie, a o to przeciez chodzi - to powinni uznac, ja jak byłem dzieckiem
to kierowałem juz czasem samochodem, i huj ze to srednio logiczne, ze maluchy
brykaja autkami, wazne ze gramatyka jest jak nalezy, tak sadze :-) !!!

[Gość: malwa]

nie przejmujcie sie tak za to zad jest tak malo punktow ze szok!!! i nie dali
zadnych transformacji... skandal ;)

[Gość: Asiek]

sie zgadzam,zrobilam tak samo...licze na to ze jednak gramatyka bedzie sie
liczyc bardziej niz logika ;-)

[Gość: iwonka]

mam prawidlowe odp: living,when(if,while),they,be driven,have been using(have
used),whose,will try,each(the),on :)) sprawdzone zrodlo

[Gość: Slawek]

ja na samym poczatku dalem wouldn't ... ale potem zmienilem na didn't i chyab
zle zrobilem :/

[Gość: krecik]

hehe jeśli te odpowiedzi są dobre to mam komplet z tego zadania :)

DIDN'T REACH

[Gość: UnionJack]

Chodzi o zadanie z II arkusza, tak? WOULDN'T odpada, bo po IF nie może być czasu
FUTURE (są wyjątki, ale to nie tu). To wcale nie jest III okres! Spójrzcie: oni
sobie siedzą w tym śnieżku i rozumują, że jak rano ich ekipa nie odnajdzie to
sobie umrą. Gdyby wczuć się w nich, to mówili wtedy: "If they don't reach us
(nad ranem, w przyszłości!), we have little chance of surving" (I conditional).
A po sprawie oni relacjonują wydarzenia z przeszłości, używają mowy zależnej, w
której wszystkie czasy cofa się o 1 do tyło. Present simple stanie się Past
Simple, a have przejdzie w had. Dlatego powstaje zdanie: "We knew that if they
didn't reach us, we had little chance of surviving".

[Gość: Slawek]

tez mam didn't :D

[Gość: Paweł]

ZGADZAM SIĘ ... tez mam Didn't reach .. i to jestem prawie pewien że dobrze :D
.... ale mam inny problem .. bo chyab nei zakreśliłem tematu na wypracowaniu ...
i jak mi nie uznają to sie pochlastam

te ZADANIE NA GRAMATYKE

[Gość: BARTEKSANOK]

ZNALAZŁEM TEN ARTYKUŁ Z OFICJALNEJ STRONY GAZETY : WWW.TELEGRAPH.CO.UK TO
POWINNO ROWIAC WSZYSTKIE MOZLIWOSCI ( JA MAM TU DWA ZLE A RESZTE OK) :-)

An education authority has told parents that their children no longer qualify
for free travel after officials measured the distance from their homes and
discovered the school's back gate was 200 yards closer than the front gate.

The school was previously calculated to be just beyond a three-mile limit,
enabling parents living at Titchfield Park, Hants, to qualify for free bus
passes for their children.

Hampshire County Council sent officers to confirm the distance. They discovered
that, if the children used the back gate, it was just under the three-mile
statutory limit.

Parents have now been told they must pay £400 a year to continue using the bus
service or else the pupils must walk or be driven to reach Henry Court
Community School, Fareham.

The decision has outraged the 17 families of the 22 children who have been
using the service. They say their children now have to walk across fields or
alongside busy roads.

Joyce Reilly, a nurse whose son Stuart, 13, is affected by the ruling,
said: "We will try to pool our resources and help each other out. But it is
going to be impossible for some to get to work on time."

Andy Barncastle, manager of the council's passenger transport operations,
said: "The three-mile limit is part of legislation and has to fall somewhere."

[Gość: UnionJack]

Dasz dokładny link? : )

A jeżeli może być "have been using" to może być też, moim zdaniem, "have used".
W końcu teraz przestali i rzecz już nie trwa, prawda? A continues sugeruje
trwanie sytuacji do teraz.

[Gość: ka]

no dobra, ale uwazam ze powinni uznawac kilka odpowiedzi prawidlowych,np.
koniecznie tez have used bo wlasciwie nie ma tu roznicy..

[Gość: scraface]

jest roznica bo present perfect continious uzywasz do wyrazania czynnosci ktora
sie rozpoczela w przeszlosci i trwa dalej (lub ma widoczne skutki w
terazniejszosci), dlatego jest wlasnie
have been using.

p.perfecta uzywasz najczescie do stanow(np. emocjonlanych) ktore sie zdazyly w
przeszlosci i trafiaja do teraz

[Gość: UJ]

Ale ona NIE trwa dalej :) Koniec jazdy, bo mają najpierw zapłącić :) Tu jest
użyte w dugej, żeby podkreślić że to aż 3 lata trwało, jak se jeździły - a teraz
już nie.

[Gość: Asiek]

no to moze "had been using"...?Ja tak wpisalam...:-\

[Gość: rodion]

w 3. nie mogłoby być poza if i when, as?

[Gość: gosc]

mam pytanie do tego fragmentu

Hampshire County Council sent officers to confirm the distance. They discovered
that, if the children used the back gate, it was just under the three-mile
statutory limit.

czy myslicie ze klucz bedzie mial kilka opcji? bo np wydaje mi sie ze po
wpisaniu zamiast if slowa because sens gramatyczny bedzie zachowany? chyba ze
sie myle ?

[Gość: .]

ku rwa

ja dałem "all" the children...

nie wiem w czym rzecz

[Gość: anf]

no patrz, ja tez -___-

[Gość: m]

Because? No co Ty...

[Gość: gosc]

to moze wyjasnisz mi czemu to zdanie jest niepoprawne gramatycznie: They
discovered
that, because the children used the back gate, it was just under the three-mile
statutory limit.

[Gość: m]

Jesli chodzi o gramatyke, to przed 'it' dalabym kropke. Ale ok, gramatycznie w
porzadku.
Jednak sensu w kontekscie calosci zdanie to nie ma w ogole, bez szans zeby
uznali 'because'.

[Gość: ddd mika]

Pupils miss free bus by 200 yards By Stewart Payn
Autor: Gość: Mika IP: *.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl
Data: 06.05.2005 19:12 + dodaj do ulubionych wątków

skasujcie post

+ odpowiedz

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pupils miss free bus by 200 yards
By Stewart Payne

(Filed: 10/10/2003)

An education authority has told parents that their children no longer qualify
for free travel after officials measured the distance from their homes and
discovered the school's back gate was 200 yards closer than the front gate.



The school was previously calculated to be just beyond a three-mile limit,
enabling parents living at Titchfield Park, Hants, to qualify for free bus
passes for their children.

Hampshire County Council sent officers to confirm the distance. They
discovered that, if the children used the back gate, it was just under the
three-mile statutory limit.

Parents have now been told they must pay £400 a year to continue using the
bus service or else the pupils must walk or be driven to reach Henry Court
Community School, Fareham.

The decision has outraged the 17 families of the 22 children who have been
using the service. They say their children now have to walk across fields or
alongside busy roads.

Joyce Reilly, a nurse whose son Stuart, 13, is affected by the ruling,
said: "We will try to pool our resources and help each other out. But it is
going to be impossible for some to get to work on time."

Andy Barncastle, manager of the council's passenger transport operations,
said: "The three-mile limit is part of legislation and has to fall somewhere

[Gość: rodion]

jako że zostałem zignorowany powtórze:
czy to ma sens?

They
discovered
that, as the children used the back gate, it was just under the three-mile
statutory limit.
?

[Gość: Doda]

a tam macie problemy
ja dalam although the children used the back gate ale mi to wisi
za to jest tylko pol punkta

[Gość: Natka]

www.portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/10/10/nbus10.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/10/10/ixhome.html&secureRefr

travel.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,7445,1057746,00.html?77%3A+Travel+news

[Gość: ewka]

Z Guardiana:)

Body suffers symptoms of age with too little sleep

Sarah Boseley, Health Correspondent
Friday October 22, 1999
The Guardian

Sacrificing sleep to longer working hours and nights on the town could bring
about changes in the body similar to ageing, according to new medical research.
A study of the effects on the body of the sort of sleep-debt that is
increasingly common at the end of the 20th century has had startling results.
Although the study was small - 11 young men aged between 18 and 27 took part -
it found "striking alterations" in the way their bodies functioned, according
to a report in this week's Lancet medical journal.

The Chicago-based scientists found that successive nights of four hours' sleep
took its toll on the metabolism and endocrine (hormonal) functioning of the
body. These alterations "mimic some of the hallmarks of ageing". The scientists
suggest that chronic sleep loss could increase the severity of age-related
diseases such as diabetes and high blood pressure.

They also suggest that young, healthy adults may need more than the standard
night's sleep. Their volunteers biologically performed better when they had
slept for more than eight hours.

Karine Spiegel and colleagues from the department of medicine of the university
of Chicago write that it has become common for people to cut back on their
sleep. What is considered normal average sleep duration has decreased from
about nine hours a night in 1910 to about 7.5 hours now. Many shift workers
sleep an average of five hours a night on working days. Margaret Thatcher was
famous for firing on all cylinders after only five hours sleep a night.

It is generally held that sleeping less does you no harm, they say, as long as
you get the core four to five hours of non-REM (non-rapid eye movement) sleep.
There has been an assumption that sleep is intended to repair and refresh the
brain and no studies have previously looked specifically at the effect sleep-
deprivation has on the body.

The 11 young men slept eight hours a night for three nights, then four hours
for six nights and then spent 12 hours a night in bed for a further week to
recover from the sleep debt. The six nights of little sleep had a noticeable
effect on their bodies.

"Less than one week of sleep curtailment in healthy young people is associated
with striking alterations in metabolic and endocrine function," they say. Sleep
debt "could have long-term adverse effects on health". Basic metabolic
functions, such as processing and storing carbohydrates and regulating hormone
secretion, were affected.

Eve Van Cauter, who led the study, said: "We suspect that chronic sleep loss
may not only hasten the onset but could also increase the severity of age-
related ailments such as diabetes, hypertension high blood pressure, obesity
and memory loss."

Tests showed that the volunteers underwent profound alterations of glucose
metabolism during sleep deprivation, in some cases resembling patients with
type-2 diabetes. At the peak of sleep loss they took 40% longer than normal to
regulate their blood sugar levels after a high carbohydrate meal. Their ability
to secrete and respond to insulin fell by about 30%. A similar decrease in
acute insulin response is an early warning of diabetes.

Sleep deprivation altered the production and action of other hormones besides
insulin, dampening the secretion of thyroid-stimulating hormones and increasing
blood levels of the stress hormone cortisol, especially in the afternoon and
evening.

Raised cortisol levels in the evening are typical of much older people and
thought to be related to age-related health problems, such as insulin
resistance and memory impairment.

All these abnormalities faded away during the recovery period, when the
volunteers spent 12 hours in bed.

wiecie co mnie drażni?

[Gość: zuza]

i to drażni kosmicznie? to jest język, coś żywego, a nie historia, gdzie bitwa
pod grunwalnem zawsze bedzie w 1410, zawsze jest kilka możliwości poprawnych -
dzieci drive, dzieci be driven, if dzieci, however dzieci, zależy jak na to
spojrzeć, a klucz bedzie przewidywał jedną poprawną opcję! i to jest właśnie
skandal, no.

[Gość: m]

no a ja sie tu z Toba nie zgadzam, ale nie chce mi sie polemizowac...hehe :P