Gość: sp;lit
IP: *.ipt.aol.com
31.07.04, 17:52
Nareszcie jakis glos rozsadku w tym kraju i to glos, ktory ma wage i z ktorym
nawet prezydenci sie licza . Przytemperowac chorego maniaka i na bocznice ,
albo na szmelc , tam gdzie jego miejsce ,...
Nareszcie tez , ktos glosno sie przyznal , ze zio-nazisci swoja polityka
zasrali i maja potencje pogrzebac w koszernych odchodach na amen , nasze
stosunki z Swiatem arabskim .
Brawo CFR ! Nie znosze was , ale czapka z glowy tym razem .
uklony
=============================================================================
CFR to Bush: Stop Israeli strike on Iran's nuke sites
SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM
Friday, July 30, 2004
A report by the New York-based Council on Foreign Relations urged the Bush
administration to stop any Israeli attempt to strike Iran's nuclear
facilities. The council warned that such an Israeli attack would be blamed on
the United States and hurt its interests in the region.
"Since Washington would be blamed for any unilateral Israeli military strike,
the United States should, in any case, make it quite clear to Israel that
U.S. interests would be adversely affected by such a move," the report,
entitled "Iran: Time for a New Approach," said.
On Thursday, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said the United States supports
Israel's right to what he termed weapons of deterrence, regarded as a
reference to nuclear weapons, Middle East Newsline reported. He said the
United States was also pressing Iran to halt its nuclear weapons program
"Israel faces an existential threat, and it must be able to defend itself by
itself by preserving its deterrent capability," Sharon said. "We have
received here a clear American position that says in other words that Israel
must not be touched when it comes to its deterrent capability."
An air strike on Iran's nuclear facilities would incur civilian casualties,
the report said. It pointed out that many of Iran's nuclear facilities have
been located in or near urban centers.
Israel has never directly threatened Iran's nuclear facilities. But the
Sharon government has warned that it would not allow Iran to develop a
nuclear weapons arsenal.
The U.S. report, drafted by an independent task force sponsored by the
council, said Washington should resolve concerns over Iran's nuclear weapons
program by coordinating with the European Union. But the council ruled out
any military attack on Iran's nuclear facilities.
"In addition, any military effort to eliminate Iranian weapons capabilities
runs the significant risk of reinforcing Teheran's desire to acquire a
nuclear deterrent and of provoking nationalist passions in defense of that
very course," the task force said. "It would most likely generate also
hostile Iranian initiatives in Iraq and Afghanistan."
The report also said direct U.S. efforts to overthrow the Iranian clerical
regime would not succeed. The council said the regime could eventually
provide greater liberties to its people.
"Despite considerable political flux and popular dissatisfaction, Iran is not
on the verge of another revolution," the report, entitled ". The current
Iranian government appears to be durable and likely to persist in power for
the short- and even medium-term. However, Iran's generational shift and
prevailing popular frustration with the government portend the eventual
transformation to a more democratic political order in the long term. That
process is too deeply entrenched in Iran’s political history and social
structure to be derailed or even long delayed."
