marcus_crassus 27.06.05, 11:15 To nie jest zly wynik.To swietny wynik dla US.Ten beton jak nic da powod do bombardowanka :) Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś Obserwuj wątek Podgląd Opublikuj
zyks Niech się Putin nie podnieca, w Iranie nic się nie 27.06.05, 12:44 zmieni, to nie pomoże na rozkład imperium, telegramy nic nie dadzą. Te śmieszne nadzieje: nowy prezydent ma dobre stosunku z burmistrzem Moskwy (sic!), ameryka będzie mieć kłopoty (ach, jak to dobrze), itp... W ogóle, komentarze ros. prasy są coraz bardziej infantylne (lub milczą o niewygodnych dla władzy tematach), to b.charakterystyczne dla systemów autorytarnych z cenzurą formalną lub faktyczną... Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
zyks A "Rosijskaja Gazieta" pociesza siebie i Putina, ż 27.06.05, 12:52 -e nie grozi znowu tuż obok jakaś nastepna "kolorowa" rewolucja. Śmieszne: Putin walczy tak ofiarnie z terroryzmem islamskim, ale popiera tuż obok fundamentalizm islamski i wciska im a-bombę do łapy... Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
philipp_k Re: A "Rosijskaja Gazieta" pociesza siebie i Puti 27.06.05, 13:22 zyks napisał: > -e nie grozi znowu tuż obok jakaś nastepna "kolorowa" rewolucja. Śmieszne: Puti > n > walczy tak ofiarnie z terroryzmem islamskim, ale popiera tuż obok fundamentaliz > m > islamski i wciska im a-bombę do łapy... USA i jej sojusznicy tez walcza z teroryzmem islamskim ale zamykaja oczy na jego jedno z jego wcielen w Czczeczenii. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
bedulek Putin wie co robi !!!! 27.06.05, 13:12 Mocny Iran to przeciwdla terroru izraelskich pejsów!! Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
marcus_crassus jak sie pejsy wkurza i jak przyp...la ;) 27.06.05, 13:25 to ladne swiecace po nocach popromienne ptaszki beda nad dziura w ziemi gdzie dzis jest teheran przez kolejne 2 tys lat latac. :) Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
j-k Re: Rosyjska prasa o zwycięstwie Ahmadineżada 27.06.05, 13:22 marcus_crassus napisał: > To nie jest zly wynik.To swietny wynik dla US.Ten beton jak nic da powod do bom > bardowanka :) Dokladnie . Z pewnoscia ladnie sie podlozy, niczym Saddam. > Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
nikola_piterski2 And what about British press? 27.06.05, 13:25 Iran victor turns his back on US to pursue nuclear aim From Ramita Navai in Tehran Women stand on the side of a street as Iranians celebrate the hardliner's victory in the election (PHOTO: MORTEZA NIKOUBAZL/REUTERS) IRAN’S new ultra-conservative President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, defended yesterday his country’s right to pursue its nuclear programme regardless of European and American pressure. He said that he would continue discussions with Europe but insisted that his country had no need for ties with the United States. In the first press conference since his shock election victory on Friday, his replies about the nuclear issue were the only time that his monotone voice became emotive and defiant. “It is Iran’s right and it is what every single Iranian wants. With preserving national interests and by emphasising the right of the Iranian nation for using peaceful nuclear technology, we will continue the talks (with Europe),” he said. The EU has reacted nervously to Mr Ahmadinejad’s victory. He is surrounded by ideological hardliners who are loath to make concessions to the West over Iran’s nuclear programme. Analysts have predicted that his win will mark a downturn in Iran’s relations with the West. His supporters are from Iran’s main conservative parties who have often stridently criticised Western countries and accused them of exploitation and imperialism. However, he may not have much power in setting foreign policy. That right is bestowed on the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, and the Supreme National Security Council, of which the President is a member, but not the deciding influence. Mr Ahmadinejad will also find it hard to criticise the nuclear policy, as it has been set by the Leader and any criticism would appear as directly challenging his opinions. What is clear is that it will be much harder to reach agreements with Britain, Germany and France, who have continued the negotiations. It appears that it will be harder still to reach any rapprochement with America. “Our nation is continuing the path of progress and on this path has no significant need for (relations with) the United States,” he said. Donald Rumsfeld, the US Defence Secretary, said yesterday that Mr Ahmadinejad was no friend of democracy. “He is very much supportive of the current ayatollahs, who are telling the people of (Iran) how to live their lives, and my guess is over time the young people and women will find him as well as his masters unacceptable.” Mr Ahmadinejad began his press conference by reciting a passage from the Koran in Arabic. Dwarfed by his aides — if he is Iran’s first non-cleric President in 24 years he is also its shortest — he smiled broadly for photographers and even gave a regal wave to journalists in the gallery. He deftly deflected thorny questions — when asked about Iran’s human rights record he questioned Europe’s. His rhetoric was peppered with revolutionary talk of brotherhood and love for the nation and he continued his campaign themes of eradication of poverty and corruption. But speaking in general terms, he gave no hard guarantees on issues that are concerning some Iranians, such as social freedoms and women’s rights. Mr Ahmadinejad has a reputation as a religious hardliner who has opposed measures to relax some restrictions on life in Tehran. His win marks a resurgence of the conservatives and highlights the stark class divides in Iran. His campaign agenda targeted the working classes, with his promises to solve the housing crisis, poverty and unemployment — which is unofficially 30 per cent — and transformed him into an Islamic Robin Hood. But his critics say that Mr Ahmadinejad’s mix of strict Islamic values and politics will drag Iran back into the dark days after the revolution when women were flogged for wearing too much make-up. However, the biggest fear, his critics say, is that his victory gives the conservatives control of Iran’s two highest elected offices — the presidency and parliament — taking conservatives a step nearer to absolute power. Such a concentration of strength at the top could ultimately bring Iran closer to dictatorship. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś