misterpee
13.07.05, 18:05
oni i ich przyjaciele rzucili sie na ten temat nie po to zeby dyskutowac, ale
dla zupelnego zamglenia tego tematu w kontekscie londynskiej tragedi.
a oto nastepna opinia po ostatnich informacjach londynskiej policji
Zauwazmy ze opis tych terrorystow zmnienil sie, na poocztku policja
twierdzila ze terrorysci uzywali bomby o zdalnym zaplonie, teraz twierdza ze
oni sami zgineli. Czyzby? przeciez bomby wybuchly niemal jednoczesnie w
kazdym punkcie. policja rowniez nie wyjasnila dlaczego prze przeszlo godzine
byla przekonana ze to byla awaria a nie tak terroryzmu. Przeciez nasz
kontrowersyjny minister wiedzial o tym albo przedtem , albo niedlugo potem.
Nawet jego szef dzwonil do niego w kilka minut dpytujac sie jak sie czyje.
Czyrajcie teraz angielski tekst, rowniez mam nadzieje ze dyskusja bedzie
miala charakter merytoryczny.
xymphora.blogspot.com/2005/07/birth-of-london-bomb-official-story.html
xymphora
Wednesday, July 13, 2005
The birth of the London bomb Official Story
You can practically hear the click at that moment in the life of every
conspiracy when the police investigation turns into the Official Story. At
that point, the investigation is intended to 'fix the facts' to the Official
Story, and the cover-up begins. The story of the London bombs has made this
transformation within the last twenty-four hours. The authorities thought it
was small bombs with timers or triggered by cell phones and almost certainly
not a suicide bomb attack; now they claim with certainty that the bombs were
accompanied by handlers, some or all of whom may have died in the blasts,
possibly by accident and probably intentionally (which means they were
suicide bombers, as it is extremely unlikely that all four made a mistake).
The original story was that it was an international al Qaeda operation; now
it is British Muslims. In just a day or two, everything has changed.
The British government has managed to fashion the least damaging story
possible under the circumstances. Cell-phone triggered bombs are out, as that
might lead to calls for cell-phone jammers near transportation routes, a
prospect that would cost rich people who own cell-phone companies money.
Small bags with explosives and timers are out, as that is just too scary. The
prospect of an unlimited quantity of small bombs was causing too much panic.
Suicide bombers are in, as it will be thought that the likelihood of there
being a lot of available suicide bombers is small, and thus the level of
concern can be reduced in the general population. Of course, there will still
be enough tension to lead to more video cameras and more call for national ID
cards and increased police powers. International al Qaeda is out, as it
brings up too many associations of how Blair's alliance with Bush in Iraq put
the British people in direct danger (but watch for the 'mastermind' to
eventually be connected to the governments of Syria or Iran). Any connection
between British government wrong-doing and terrorism must be broken. Local
Muslims are in, as there appears to be a new campaign to demonize British
Muslims as part of the ongoing Zionist program to associate terrorism with
calls for the Islamification of British society. This fits in with the
general idea that terrorists are Evil and have impossible demands which can't
possibly be met, and thus terrorism has to be fought with the 'war on
terror', and not with negotiations and concessions. All these wars suit
Israel and the arms dealers. For that reason, British Muslims are going to be
in for a difficult time, and the 'Londonistan' meme is the start of that
process.
Just a few early questions:
Why would suicide bombers need timers? Are we to believe that all four of
them died when they mistakenly set off their bombs?
Why would suicide bombers carry identification which would lead the
authorities directly to their colleagues? How did it survive in at least
three of the bombs? I am reminded of the convenient passport found at the
World Trade Center.
If all four video cameras on the bus were not working, how do the police know
what happened on the bus? The witness who saw someone fiddling with a bag
just begs the question of whether the fiddler was a bomber. Why do video
cameras on buses need to be switched on by the drivers?
Why did Jack Straw state so quickly that it was al Qaeda? Is the theory that
it is still al Qaeda, or some other group?
How did the British know to warn Netanyahu so quickly? If they knew enough to
warn Netanyahu, why didn't they have enough time to shut down the subway
system? Or did they?
Why was the transportation system still operating when the bus bomb went off,
nearly an hour later than the subway bombs? One theory is that the last
bomber got on the bus after the subway system was closed!
How easy would it be to pay some Muslim British men, who are told to carry
identification, to drive to London and sit in specific places on specific
subway trains or buses? When the bombs go off and the identification is
found, you have instant patsies, and British Muslims in the frame. The fact
they were seen together on video footage then becomes just part of the set-
up. With so many known video cameras in London, why wouldn't they take care
not to be seen together? They could have entered London separately if they
did not want to be identified as part of a 'cell', and avoid giving the
police information that could be used to trace their colleagues. As is often
the case with these stories, we are asked to believe that they would be
technically proficient ('military grade' explosives), but make the dumbest
small mistakes.
What happened to the story, out of Canada and New Zealand, that the police
shot one or two men near Canary Wharf?
The bombers are all dead, and dead men tell no tales. They were kind enough
to leave enough identification, and enough video footage, to tie them to
British Muslim colleagues. Once the 'cell' is broken everybody can rest easy,
with no more inconvenient questions about the sanity of the 'war on terror'
or the fact that Blair's lies led to the attack. Nothing to see here; please
move along (oh, and may I see your ID card please?).
