Naczelny Hutzpiarz wyglosil przemowienie

[Gość: zbalansowany]

....do gawiedzi.

Oczywiscie calosc to jedna wielka brednia i propaganda dla ubogich.

Ariel Sharon's speech is a masterpiece of misrepresentation, half-truths and
outright lies," the Gush Shalom peace movement declared.


He said the plan includes redeployment of the IDF along a "security line" in
the territories, and evacuation of isolated settlements that Sharon said
would in any case not be included in Israeli territory in any future
settlement. At the same time, Israel will strengthen its control over "those
parts of the Land of Israel that will be an inseparable part of the state of
Israel in any future settlement."

Tlumaczac to na normalny jezyk Szaron powiedzial ze odda to czego i tak nie
da sie ukrasc, natomiast trzeba zwiekszyc wysilki aby ukrasc to co sie ukrasc
da.


Nie watpie ze przemowienie Szarona spotka sie z aprobata wiekszosci
hutzpiarzy w Hutzpalandzie.

[Gość: zbalansowany]

Jakos rozsadniejszy Zyd tak to wystapienie skomentowal:

At the Herzliya Conference we saw a government that is befuddled and confused:
a minister calling upon Abu Ala to negotiate; a minister calling for unilateral
action; a minister against unilateral action; a minister against the road map,
but committed to it; a minister who supports dismantling outposts; a minister
who supports withdrawal from isolated settlements; and a minister who says they
should stay.

What hasn't been articulated at this conference is that the U.S.
administration, the media and American public opinion are showing signs of
fatigue. They are getting tired of Sharon and of his double talk.

As a person who promised peace and security, but hasn't brought it, as a
person who promised painful concessions, but hasn't made any, as a person who
shoved us down the hill, but won't accept responsibility for it - it doesn't
matter what Sharon said last night and how nicely he said it. It's his actions
that will talk.


nawet Zydzi mowia ze Szaron to Hucpiarz

[Gość: zbalansowany]

Czy to milczenie mam uwazac za calkowita zgode z moimi pogladami?

do naczelnego hutzpiarza australijskiego

[Gość: dana33]

nu, to milczenie masz uwazac za to, czym ono jest: jestes nudny, powtarzasz
sie, twoj slepy antysemityzm jest znany i nawet twoi kolezcy po fachu nie maja
ochoty odpisywac na twoje prowokacyjne i idiotyczne watki. zjechales na dno,
zafajdancu. tak jak cie kiedys lubilam, tak na sam widok twojego nika dostaje
odruchow wymiotnych w kolorze zielonym.

[Gość: fląder]

Gość portalu: dana33 napisał(a):

> na sam widok twojego nika dostaje
> odruchow wymiotnych w kolorze zielonym.


Ale.! Wypadałoby doda ć troche czerwonego, np, od pomidorow.

do fladra

[Gość: dana33]

alez, moj drogi.... nie skapnales sie? jak odruchy moga byc w kolorze???? :)

[Gość: flader]

Nie, bo to mi przypomnialo widok jednego takiego rekruta co sie wychylal z pociagu i puszczal pawia takiego dziwnie zielonego z pomidorami. Dlatego mówi sieę: puszczac pawia.

do fladra

[Gość: dana33]

nu, przeciez nie bedziemy sie klocic o kolory nie? :)
a wiec i paw i odruchy, ten zafajdaniec warty obu..... :)

[fredzio54]

Zablo
gdzie twoja linie z Aborginaly co im swpj krak obkradles
Ty kolonialisata wroc do polski i przestam lizac arabskie tylky oni nieplaca
dobrze

przylaczam sie do dany...

[goldbaum]

twoj "slepy antysemityzm jest znany" zbalansowany :))))))

[Gość: zbalansowany]

Ani antysemita, ani slepy.

Jezeli juz to antysyjonista i antyhutzpiarz nie cierpiacy straganiarskiej
mentalnosci. I naprawde znam bardzo wielu przyzwoitych, normalnych Zydow
patrzacych z przerazeniem co Izrael na BW wyprawia.

[fredzio54]

twoja hutzpa polega ze zyjesz na opca zimie i wypedziles aborginaly napewno
porwales ich dzieci according to bill from 1906 o masakrowales ich kobiet.
to chcesz od zydow.
slyszalem z arabtwo w australi sa nastepne australiackie kroliki :)))))))))

[Gość: zbalansowany]

Sharon's Speech -
The Decoded Version
By Uri Avnery
CounterPunch.org
12-24-3

He read out the written text of his speech, word for word, without raising his
eyes from the page.

It was vital for him to stick to the exact wording, since it was an encoded
text. It is impossible to decipher it without breaking the code. And it is
impossible to break the code without knowing Ariel Sharon very well indeed.

So it is no surprise that the flood of interpretations in Israel and abroad was
ridiculous. The commentators just did not understand what they had heard.
That's why they wrote things like "He did not say anything new", "He has no
plan", "He is marking time", "He is old and tired". And the usual Washington
reaction: "A positive step, but"

Nonsense. In his speech, Sharon outlined a whole, detailed--and extremely
dangerous--plan. Those who did not understand--Israelis, Palestinians and
foreign diplomats--will be unable to react effectively.

Here is the deciphered text of Sharon's "Herzliyah speech":

The name of the game is Hitnatkut ("cutting ourselves off"). Meaning: most of
the West Bank area will become de facto a part of Israeli, and the rest we
shall leave to the Palestinians, who will be enclosed in isolated enclaves.
From these enclaves, the settlements will be removed.

Stage One: In order to do this, we need time--about half a year. We are talking
about a large-scale and complicated military operation. The army will have to
occupy and fortify new lines, while "relocating" dozens of isolated
settlements. This will require detailed planning, which has not yet even
started. The necessary forces and instruments will have to be prepared. Half a
year is the minimum.

During this period we shall not be idle. On the contrary, we shall finish
the "separation fence", and it will play a major part in the new deployment. We
shall develop the "settlement blocs", to which we shall transfer the settlers
who will be relocated.

The execution of the plan in half a year is perfectly timed. At exactly that
time the American election campaign will reach its climax. No American
politician will dare to utter a word against Israel. The Democrats need the
Jewish votes and money. The Republicans also need the votes and the money of
the 60 million Christian fundamentalists, who support the most extreme elements
in Israel.

While we quietly prepare the big operation, we shall continue to flatter
President Bush and praise his idiotic Road Map, without, of course, fulfilling
any of our obligations under the Map. But we shall blame the Palestinians for
violating it.

At the same time we shall pretend to seek negotiations with the Palestinians.
We shall try to meet with Abu-Ala as many times as possible and play the game
to the end. When we are ready to go, we shall terminate the contacts, declare
the Road Map dead and state sorrowfully that all our efforts to start peace
negotiations have failed because of Arafat.

Stage two: By then, the "separation wall" will be ready. The Palestinian
territories (Areas A and B under Oslo) will be surrounded on all sides. In
practice there will be about a dozen isolated pockets. In order to fulfil our
promise about Palestinian "contiguity" we shall connect the enclaves by special
roads, bridges and tunnels, which we shall be able to cut at a moment's notice.

The army will withdraw gradually to the separation barrier and redeploy in the
territories that will be annexed to Israel, including, inter alia, the
settlement blocs of Karney Shomron, Elkana, Ariel and Kedumim; the Modi'in Road
and the territory south of it up to the Green Line, all the Greater Jerusalem
area already annexed in 1967; the new neighborhoods around Jerusalem up to
Maaleh Adumim and perhaps further; the Jewish settlement in Hebron and Kiryat
Arba and the settlements in the Hebron area; all the Dead Sea shore; all the
Jordan valley, including about 15 km of the banks. Altogether, more than half
the West Bank.

These areas will not be annexed officially, but we shall annex them as rapidly
as possible in practice. We shall fill them with settlements (also using the
settlers from the "relocated" settlements), industrial parks, roads, public
institutions and army installations, so that they will become indistinguishable
from parts of Israel proper.

At the same time, we shall evacuate the settlements beyond the barrier,
including those in the Gaza Strip (with or without the Katif bloc.)

In line with the American proposal, we shall call the Palestinian enclaves "a
Palestinian State with Temporary Borders". That will give the Palestinians the
illusion that they will be able to negotiate the "permanent" borders. But, of
course, the "separation fence" will be the final border.

The terror will not stop completely, but the Palestinian enclaves will be at
our mercy and we shall be able to cut each of them off at any time, prevent
movement from one to another and make life in them intolerable. It will not be
worthwhile for them to conduct violent acts.

Officially, the Palestinians will have free access to the border crossings to
Egypt and Jordan, but in practice we shall maintain an effective military
presence, enabling us to stop movement there at any time.

At first the world will scream, but faced with a fait accompli they will
quieten down. Even if Bush remains in the White House, he will be paralysed
until after the elections at the end of 2004. If a Democrat is elected
president, he will need some months to settle down. By then everything will be
finished, and we shall be able to generously agree to some minor adjustments.

This is the Plan. Can it be realized?

It is quite possible that Sharon will convince Israeli public opinion. The
great majority of the public is united around two points: (a) the longing for
peace and security, and (b) the distrust of Arabs and the unwillingness to deal
with them. (Some weeks ago, a satirical supplement published a slogan: "YES to
peace, NO to Palestinians".)

Sharon's plan promises both. It promises peace and security, and it is
entirely "unilateral". No negotiations with Palestinians are required, it does
not depend on the will of the Arabs, who can be ignored entirely.

In this respect, Sharon's plan has a great advantage over the Geneva
Initiative, which is entirely based on the assumption that "there is a partner"
and that we must negotiate with the Palestinians and make peace with them. Long
years of brainwashing, led by Ehud Barak and most of the other leaders of
the "Zionist Left", have convinced the Israeli public that there is no partner,
that the Arabs are cheating, that Arafat has broken every single agreement he
has signed, etc. The Sharon plan conforms to all these myths, while the Geneva
Initiative clashes with them.

But beneath the road to the implementation of the Sharon Plan there lie two big
landmines: the settlers and the Palestinians.

The inhabitants of the settlements that are supposed to be "relocated" include
some of the most extreme elements of the settlement movement. There is no
chance that these will go away peacefully. They will have to be removed by
force.

That will require a huge military effort. While many moderate settlers will
remove themselves voluntarily if given fat compensation, many others will
resist. According to an informed estimate, some 5000 soldiers and policemen
will be needed to remove just one small "outpost": Migron, near Ramallah, which
Sharon was supposed to have removed long ago according to the Road Map. When
dozens of bigger and more established settlements have to be removed, it will
need a giant, quasi war-like operation, requiring a general call up of
reserves, with all the po