A my mamy serial killer-a

[Gość: A27]

pod Waszyngtonem i...ja sie troszeczke boje chodzic do pracy piechota...

[aniutek]

i masz racje Aniu, to niezly psychol.

Jak praca, czy fajna?
pozdrawiam
aniutek

[dundee_girl]

Jak ogladalam wiadomosci to wlasnie myslalam o Tobie!

Mam nadzieje ze znajda wariata szybciutko.



Pozdrawiam serdecznie

[Gość: A27]

Wow, to nawet w Australii slyszeli o naszym snajperze...
Chyba jutro do pracy wezme taksowke.
Aniutek, w prcy niezle - chyba mnie nawet awansuja...

[aniutek]

no to pieknie Ania, tak trzymac :)))))

[znikad]

A to wszystko dlatego, ze kazdy moze sobie kupic pukawke bez zadnych (prawie)
ograniczen. No to sobie kupuja i strzelaja - zwykla kolej rzeczy - az dzwine,
ze czesciej nie ma takich chetnych do postrzelania sobie po okolicy.
Wspolczuje adresu (jesli mieszkasz gdzies blisko D.C.) ale czy to taki wielki
problem dla snajpera przejachac glupich 100 mil czy innych 500 kilometrow
i postrzelac w innych rejonach?
Na cholere Wam wszystkim bron w tych Stanach?

[drizzlys]

Druga poprawka do konstytucji gwarantuje prawo posiadania broni. Jak masz z
tym problem i jestes obywatelem USA to przepchnij zniesienie tej poprawki i
sprawa zalatwiona. A tak na marginesie to w GB po zakazaniu w 1996 posiadania
broni palnej obywatelom, ilosc zbrojnych napadow wzrosla wielokrotnie.

[Gość: gaga]

My mamy odwrotny problem. Ludzie sie zbroja, wystepuja o pozwolenia, bo
przestepczosc rosnie (napady na wille przez Albanczykow) i policja z tym sobie
nie radzi. Bylam swiadkiem jak facet zadzwonil na policje, bo ktos w garazu
sasiadow gmeral (sasiedzi na wakacjach), a policja mu na to, ze moze zejdzie i
sam sprawdzi. A jak by dostal kulke w lep, to kto by za to odpowiadal?
Nieodpowiedzialny obywatel, bo chcial zlodziei pogonic.

[znikad]

drizzlys napisał:
A tak na marginesie to w GB po zakazaniu w 1996 posiadania
> broni palnej obywatelom, ilosc zbrojnych napadow wzrosla wielokrotnie.

I mozesz jeszcze podac zrodlo tej statystyki.

[drizzlys]

znikad napisała:

> drizzlys napisał:
> A tak na marginesie to w GB po zakazaniu w 1996 posiadania
> > broni palnej obywatelom, ilosc zbrojnych napadow wzrosla wielokrotnie.
>
> I mozesz jeszcze podac zrodlo tej statystyki.

Prosze bardzo:

www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/745983/posts

[znikad]

Dzieki. Jak to zwykle bywa ze statystykami, caly problem w interpretacji liczb.
Polecam strone archiwow panstwowych GB www.archive.official-documents.co.uk
Z niej jest ten fragmencik (te same liczbe, tylko ciekawa przy tym
interepretacja "uzycia"):

Chapter 3 Recorded crime in which firearms were reported to have been used or
misappropriated

Key Points

In 1999/00, there were 6,843 offences recorded in which firearms other than air
weapons were reported to have been used. This was 31 per cent higher than in
1998/99, and the highest number since 1993. The rise in recorded firearm
offences in Scotland from 1998 to 1999 was 32 per cent. (Table 3.3)
There were 10,103 offences in which air weapons were used, the highest number
recorded. This was 17 per cent higher than in 1998/99. Nearly three-quarters of
these offences were of criminal damage. (Tables 3.3, 3.4)
The proportion of all notifiable offences in which firearms (including air
weapons) are used is small, 0.3 per cent in 1999/00. The proportion excluding
air weapons was 0.1 per cent. (Table 3.2)
The proportion of homicides involving firearms in 1999/00 was 8.1 per cent. The
proportion of robberies involving firearms (including air weapons) has remained
in the 4 to 5 per cent range for the last three years. The number of firearm
robberies increased by 32 per cent between 1998/99 and 1999/00, close to the
general increase in recorded robberies of 26 per cent. (Tables 3.2, 3.1, Figure
3.1)
Weapons were fired in only 21 per cent of firearm offences excluding those
involving air weapons. (Tables 3.5, 3.6)
Figure 3.1 Offences in which firearms were reported to have been used: criminal
damage, robbery, and other offences

Introduction
3.1 This chapter looks at notifiable offences recorded by the police
(‘offences’ hereafter) in which firearms were reported to have been used
(‘firearm offences’. One cannot always be certain whether a real firearm was
actually used. This is because unless a weapon is fired, or recovered after a
crime, there is no way of knowing for certain whether it was real or an
imitation (or whether it was loaded or unloaded). The categorisation of
firearms will depend on descriptions by victims and witnesses, or on other
evidence. Imitation weapons are used in some offences, and supposed firearms in
others (i.e. something was concealed which was presumed to be a firearm). There
is also a residual category of ‘other’ weapons (e.g. CS gas).

3.2 This chapter starts with an overview of firearms offences, drawing a
distinction between offences involving air weapons, and those involving other
firearms. It also takes up trends over time. There is then a section on the
extent of injuries from firearm offences, including injuries to police
officers. This section also looks at the dangerousness of different types of
firearms if they are fired. After this, firearm robberies are discussed, then
the number of firearms misappropriated.

3.3 There was a change in the counting rules for recorded crime on 1 April 1998
in which both the methods of counting and the coverage for recorded crime were
revised. Resulting from this, the offences covered by this chapter from that
time have increased in number. It is not possible to accurately assess the
effect of this change on firearms offences. However, in some offence groups
there is likely to be little effect on numbers of firearm offences recorded,
including homicide, violence against the person endangering life, robbery, and
burglary.

3.4 The figures may have been more affected for more minor violence and
criminal damage. In violence against the person offences, the new counting
rules have greatly expanded the coverage of less serious violence. Also, as
offences under the Firearms Act are now included, this will increase the number
of offences recorded under ‘other offences’. Criminal damage figures from
1998/99 no longer exclude offences where the value of the criminal damage is
under £20, and this will have an impact on the number of air weapon offences.

Air weapon offences
3.5 During 1999/00, 10,103 of the 16,946 firearms offences (60 per cent)
involved air weapons (Table 3.3). The number of air weapon offences notified
was 17 per cent higher than in 1998/99. Nearly three-quarters of air weapon
offences involved criminal damage (Table 3.4). As air weapon offences are much
larger in number than offences involving other firearms, this means that
approaching half of all firearm offences involved criminal damage (Table 3.1).