Pro wojenni pedofile

[Gość: do kastracji]

Dostajecie podniety jak zobaczycie jakiś czołg jadący w tumanach kurzu na
irackiej pustyni czy uzbrojonego po żeby bolusia w pozie Ramba. A najbardziej
podnieca was strach w oczach przerażonych wybuchami dzieci i poranionych
ludzi.

W mordę !!! Sk..syny, pedofile za jaja was i na drzewo z wami, razem
Saddamem i waszym wielkim pedofilem bratem.

Do kastracji z wami prowojenne scierwa!!!

Blair chroni elity pedofilskie.

[watto]

Blair's Protection of Elite Paedophile Rings Spells the End For His Career

Exclusive to Propaganda Matrix.com by Mike James in Frankfurt: March 11 2003

NATO boss and Blair government insider Lord Robertson has threatened to sue
Scotland's leading independent newspaper over internet allegations that he not
only used his influence as a Freemason to procure a gun licence for child
killer Thomas Hamilton, but was also a member of a clandestine paedophile ring
reportedly set up by Hamilton for the British elite.

On 13 March 1996, Hamilton, armed with four hand-guns, opened


fire on a junior school class, killing 16 children and one teacher before
turning the gun on himself, shattering forever the idyllic 13th century
Scottish town of Dunblane.

The controversy is certain to topple the Blair government, which has already
issued a D-Notice to gag the press from revealing the names of known
paedophiles within the British executive, including at least two senior
ministers; and the case highlights the government's antipathy toward the Sunday
Herald and its brand of independent journalism that has, among other things,
exposed the role played by the domestic security agency, MI5, in helping the
IRA to carry out terrorist atrocities.

As reported by this journalist last month at Propaganda Matrix and Counter
Punch, and by the Sunday Herald's Home Affairs Editor, Neil Mackay, the British
intelligence services are actively engaged in preventing any further child sex
revelations that could incite further hostility to an already unpopular Prime
Minister and destroy the morale of troops set to invade Iraq. An intelligence
officer told Mackay that "a 'rolling' Cabinet committee had been set up to work
out how to deal with the potentially ruinous fall-out for both Tony Blair and
the government if arrests occur."

Some commentators, mindful that one of Tony Blair's closest confidante's is a
practising paedophile, are even suggesting that this particular scandal, and
not Blair's repeated lies and fabricated reports in regard to Iraq, may well
prove the downfall of a government mired in sleaze and corruption. The Sunday
Times is reported to have obtained an FBI list of Labour MPs who have used
credit cards to pay for internet child pornography, and Blair has responded by
imposing a massive news blackout, failing however to stop the arrest of one of
his most important aides, Phillip Lyon.

The latest allegations came to light following a campaign to lift the secrecy
on the Dunblane massacre. Large sections of the police report were banned from
the public domain under a 100-year secrecy order. Lord Cullen, an establishment
insider, also omitted and censored references to the documents in his final
report. Parents and teachers were advised to concentrate their efforts on a
campaign to outlaw handguns instead of focusing on how the mentally unstable
Freemason, already known by the police to be a paedophile, had obtained a
firearms licence for six handguns. Hamilton allegedly enjoyed good relations
with both local Labour luminary George Robertson and Michael Forsyth, the then
Scottish Secretary of State and MP for Stirling. Forsyth congratulated and
encouraged Hamilton for running a boy's club. Hamilton was also found to have
exchanged letters with the British monarch, Queen Elizabeth.

The rumours and allegations concerning Lord Robertson's ties to Hamilton, and
the possibility that the American intelligence services may be blackmailing
Tony Blair into continued support for a U.S. invasion of Iraq, have been given
fire by internet investigator and intelligence expert Michael Keaney:

"An additional, and potentially explosive, aspect of US leverage over Blair is
the FBI's investigation of users of child porn websites which has already
claimed a number of high profile scalps. [....] The biggest two fish that come
to mind are indeed high profile: firstly there is George Robertson, who today
has announced that he will step down as NATO Secretary General after four years
and two months in the job. Were he to be fingered the fall out would be
spectacular but short-lived

[watto]

"This scandal is far more important that anything that has happened here in
living memory, in fact I can think of no parallel for it. It certainly pisses
all over anything that happened to Kennedy or was done by Nixon. I am
surprised, given the gravity of this matter, that [an] attempt has yet to be
made on his life, for surely we are dealing with desperate people here. It
also explains a few strange things, such as just why T Blair & co. were so keen
to ban all handguns, and why such obviously talentless nobodies like George
Robertson have risen from being backbench nobodies a couple of years ago to
Defence Secretary, and now Secretary-General of Nato."

"[....] Now where in this is there a national security risk so great, that
documents part of the public enquiry are now state secrets to be held for 100
years? Funny kind of public enquiry. Why, when Thomas Hamilton's application
for a gun licence was turned down, due to him being regarded as a man of
unsound character [and] him being the object of several paedophilia
investigations, did his MP, our friend George Robertson (now Lord Robertson,
Secretary-General of NATO), write him a glowing character reference, and
personally see to it that his application was successful, when he knew the
grounds for the original refusal were because he was suspected of procuring
boys for sexual services?"

"Or take a certain boat seized on Loch Ness [Loch Lomond] by the Strathclyde
Police. It is a very rare thing for assets to be seized in the UK, as [there]
are no asset-forfeiture laws. When it does happen, there is normally a trial
at least, with things only being seized if they are proven to be bought with
money proven to be consequence of a proven crime. Even then, they are sold by
public auction. How come, then, was this very valuable boat sold for the tiny
sum of £5000, without an auction, to none other than our friend Thomas
Hamilton, a man of no financial means whatsoever, nor a sailor, nor lived
anywhere near any open water. Why did not the boats owners complain about
having their property stolen from them in this manner? I can only conclude
because it was being used for some very serious criminal activity, and those on
board were merely glad to escape prosecution. Also, it seems rather odd in
such circumstances that not only were the owners happy to avoid prosecution
enough to lose a valuable boat, but that the Strathclyde Police were not
willing to prosecute. And yet, after these improbable events, it wound up in
none other than our friend Hamilton's hands. Could he have been a blackmailer
as well as a paedophile?"

"But the main thing is what might explain sections of the public enquiry are
now under the hundred year rule. There are only three levels of secrecy in the
UK for state secrets, the 30 year rule, the 80 year rule and the 100 year
rule. Normal secrets, like Cabinet discussions, government papers, espionage,
all that, are under the 30 year rule. Only a very small number of things ever
reached the 80 year rule, particularly events in the Sudan with Kitchener in
1902, where it seems that an act of genocide was committed, and some things
that happened 1914-18, as well as things like potential peace negotiations in
1941, and just about everything to do with the IRA (after all, people are still
alive after 30 years) come under the 80 year rule. Of them, the darkest of
state secrets, when the events of '02 were getting a bit close to their limit
for comfort, a further class of secrets was created to last a hundred years,
and tiny number of things were put in it - e.g. Kitchener in '02, some World
War I things."

But none of these things can be said to apply to Dunblane. That was a case of
a common criminal [and] sexual pervert committing some fairly ordinary murders,
of a kind that happen from time to time. Even if a backbench Labour MP was
implicated, or may have been involved in a large paedophile ring in Scotland,
that is not a matter of vital national importance. You have a prosecution,
there is a bit of a scandal, everyone is disgusted and one MP goes to prison.
Big deal: such things happen. You certainly would not make such information a
state secret just to save one unnamed backbench nobody's miserable neck.
Governments simply don't go to such extreme lengths to save nobodies - power
broking just doesn't work like that. There must be issues of profound national
importance working here, and I put it to you that anything that involves
certain events in Scotland is more likely to be someone of cabinet level than
anything else.

If the physiologically flawed [although Thomas Hamilton was these were the
words of Tony Blair when speaking of Gordon Brown] Thomas Hamilton was the
centre of a paedophile ring in Scotland that procured boys to people of the
amongst the highest rank, and Tony Blair [and] Jack Straw covered this up by
the Official Secrets Act (They would do the covering, as both the Prime
Minister's [and] Home Secretary's permission is needed to put some something
under the 100 year rule.) it is hard to see how they or their close colleges
could possibly remain in office, even if they were never inclined to such
flawed behaviour themselves. The government would fall."

That prospect seems to be energising a government now considered to be fighting
for its political life, even to the extent of killing the review process by
which some of the banned sections of the Cullen Report would be made public,
arguing that freedom of information would somehow harm other abused children in
Dunblane.

In a recent interview with the Guardian newspaper, Michael Matheson, the
Scottish National Party's shadow deputy justice minister, said: "There are more
documents covered by the 100-year rule than this police report. Some of them
have nothing whatsoever to do with children. We need to look at why such a
lengthy ban has been imposed on them. I have been contacted by a number of
families affected by the tragedy who are anxious to ensure this information
becomes public. And so far we have no guarantee that it will. We only have a
review."

"It is important we make available, if it is at all possible, any information
that is available about people in the public eye," said the Scottish first
minister, Jack McConnell.

When Tony Blair took office following a landslide victory in 1997, few
commentators would have suggested that this man would be willing to drag his
country into a war of unjustified aggression against a people that have done no
harm to the British public. Nor would anyone have surmised that a Labour
government would hitch its political fortunes to a shabby cabal of fanatical
neoconservative Zionists working to make real their much-touted biblical
Armageddon. And no one could have predicted that Blair's nominally "Christian"
administration would transform itself into a licentious club of flamboyant
homosexual cruisers and out-of-control paedophiles.

But it is now becoming shockingly clear that the slavish adherence of Tony
Blair and Jack Straw to the Bush line on Iraq may have less to do with
principled arguments, and much more to do with the fear of CIA and FBI
revelations that would make them two of the most hated politicians in modern
British political history.

There is only one way out for Tony Blair - resign.

Pod ścianę pacyf-pedałow-defetystów!/ntx

[Gość: +++Ignorant]

Jak widzę pedofil broni pedofila...

[watto]

Uważaj, bo ty pójdziesz pod ścianę.
Mówię poważnie. Tacy szalency jak ty będą mieli problemy, kiedy nastąpi
debuszyzacja.