Dodaj do ulubionych

--------------------AQUANET-----------------------

    • alef1 --------------------SPinOz------------------ 25.11.03, 21:50

      a mNie jeDen kaRaluch zadziwil znajomOscia Kafki....inSektIntelektuaLista ?
      Ta stonka to jego.. Rodzaj.. a ze Ziemniaki lubi to oznaka inteRnaCjoNaliZmu
      nie ?
      ================================================
      SpinOZ:doWe<beLiEve>oNlyIn<eArt-stOne!>?-)

      • Gość: Koziolek Matolek Kiedw spi NOS budza sie de MONY IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 26.11.03, 20:33
        Zlapalem bakcyla i nie odpowiadam za skutki.Kiedw spi NOS budza sie de MONY.
        Koziolek Matolek
        • zupagrzybowa Teoria klas w praktyce ? 27.11.03, 02:05
          A moze to virusMACowy ? Kuracje proponuje Klasowo :
          Przykłady
          W tym przykładzie najpierw zdefiniujemy bazową klasę i jej rozszerzenie. Klasa
          bazowa opisuje normalne warzywo, czy jest jadalne czy nie oraz jego kolor.
          Podklasa Szpinak dodaje metodę pozwalającą go zagotować i drugą, która pozwala
          dowiedzieć się, czy jest zagotowany.

          Przykład 1. classes.inc

          <?php

          // klasa bazowa wraz z jej właściwościami i metodami
          class Warzywo {

          var $jadalne;
          var $kolor;

          function Warzywo( $jadalne, $kolor="zielony" ) {
          $this->jadalne = $jadalne;
          $this->kolor = $kolor;
          }

          function jest_jadalne() {
          return $this->jadalne;
          }

          function jaki_kolor() {
          return $this->kolor;
          }

          } // koniec klasy Warzywo

          // rozrzesza klasę bazową
          class Szpinak extends Warzywo {

          var $ugotowane = false;

          function Szpinak() {
          $this->Warzywo( true, "zielone" );
          }

          function ugotuj() {
          $this->ugotowane = true;
          }

          function jest_ugotowane() {
          return $this->ugotowane;
          }

          } // koniec klasy Szpinak

          ?>

          przeprogramuj sie
          pzdr z wzgorzaSzoku
          zGrzyb

    • Gość: Hakim RAMADAN POLSKI IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 25.11.03, 23:01
      According to the Holy Quran:


      One may eat and drink* at any time during the night "until you can plainly
      distinguish a white thread from a black thread by the daylight: then keep the
      fast until night"


      *czysta swiencona wyborowa
      ------------------------------------------------------------------------

      The good that is acquired through the fast can be destroyed by five things -

      the telling of a lie**
      slander**
      denouncing** someone behind his back
      a false** oath
      greed** or covetousness**

      **
      do uzgodnienia z kalifem

      -----------------------------------------

      During Ramadan, it is common for Muslims to go to the Masjid (Mosque) and spend
      several hours praying and studying the Quran. In addition to the five daily
      prayers, during Ramadan Muslims recite a special prayer called the Taraweeh
      prayer (Night Prayer). The length of this prayer is usually 2-3 times as long
      as the daily prayers. Some Muslims spend the entire night in prayer

      ............................................wink


      • Gość: ( * ) dziwnaStrona IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 15.12.03, 16:21
        homepage.mac.com/khsu/
    • Gość: PolakPolski-niezyd [...] IP: *.bchsia.telus.net 27.11.03, 04:31
      Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.
      • Gość: FUCK_NAZISLAM Defending Western Civilization IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 27.11.03, 18:32
        www.omdurman.org/
    • Gość: <©> sp...daaaalaaaaaaaaaaaajjjjMUSTAFA ! IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 27.11.03, 19:09


      arabterrorism.tripod.com/
      • zupagrzybowa A Polish Gift to Civilization? 27.11.03, 22:55
        "A Muslim imam, calling on Allah to 'annihilate the Jews and their supporters,'
        envisioned a day when all the lands of the earth will be 'owned by the Muslim
        nation,' in his Friday sermon last week, broadcast live on Palestinian
        Authority television" (Worldnetdaily.com).

        -----------------------------------------------
        www.polamjournal.com/Library/APHistory/coffee/body_coffee.html
      • Gość: *©*©* Can a non-Muslim go to heaven? IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 28.11.03, 01:42
        www.al-sunnah.com/convert/can_a_non.htm
        And whoever seeks a religion other than Islaam, it will never be accepted of
        him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers...

        WYJSCIE : nie wybierac zadnej religi...
    • Gość: jk Re: --------------------AQUANET------------------ IP: *.espol.com.pl 28.11.03, 02:53
      k
      • Gość: *}* ==============Free Patterns IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 28.11.03, 15:53
        www.quiltwoman.com/sp_links.cfm
        www.checkerdist.com/patterns/patterns_index.html
        • Gość: Kartofel Re: ==============Free Patterns IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 28.11.03, 21:34
          Szpinak? A co ta stonka? W koncu zywe i do tego yankee connection. Cos mojej
          stonki towarzyszu nie lubicie!
          • zupagrzybowa Arthur Schnitzler ******************************** 28.11.03, 21:59
            In his novel 'Der Weg ins Freie' and in his drama 'Professor Bernhardi', Arthur
            Schnitzler dealt, among other things, with the problematic relations between
            Jews and non-Jews in fin-de-siecle Vienna. This is widely known. So far,
            however, whenever the author's Jewish identity has been discussed, it has
            nearly always been just his autobiography, 'Jugend in Wien', and quotations of
            his fictional characters which have been considered. The focus of this
            dissertation is a careful approach to Schnitzler's self-image as a Jew, based
            primarily on his non-fiction writing. His early diaries refer to this topic in
            only a few isolated entries. This changes in later years: more than a thousand,
            mostly very short passages referring in one way or another to Jews and Judaism
            ('Judentum') or antisemitism help to piece together Schnitzler´s very complex
            relationship with his Jewish identity. On the basis of relevant examples from a
            period of more than fifty years between 1879 and 1931, this dissertation
            attempts to reconstruct the complex formative process of his changing Jewish
            identity. Schnitzler's diaries provide the starting point and main source of
            this analysis. In addition, his letters, aphorisms and notes - to a large
            extent published after his death - as well as his autobiography covering his
            early years up to 1889, are taken into account. Moreover, a number of
            heretofore unknown Schnitzler interviews on Jews, Judaism and antisemitism
            offer a wealth of new source material. This large collection of mostly
            fragmentary notes presents a kaleidoscope of observations, from everyday
            antisemitic utterances of neigbour children or Jewish jokes in their
            typical 'jargon' to his own reflections on how his being Jewish influenced his
            voting record in elections or was responsible for his supposed lack of talent
            as a dramatist. Schnitzler´s ambivalece to Judaism and being a Jew, but also to
            Austria and to German culture constantly forced him to manoeuvre between
            various positions of self-definition. He pressured to defend his right of
            decision to regard himself as a Jew, a German or an Austrian, since 'the
            Germans' or 'the Austrians' often denied this right. At the same time, he saw
            himself often in a position to defend one community against the other. He
            strongly opposed being characterized by the simple label of Jewish author,
            pointing at his close links to German culture. On the other hand, if his roots
            in German culture were overrated, he referred to his Jewish background,
            stressing how much German culture has benefited from Judaism. Schnitzler was
            well aware of his problematic situation but insisted until the end on his right
            to decide his identity. This specific reaction to his personal dilemma of
            a 'multiple identity in times of nationalistic simplicity' distinguished him,
            e.g. from Sigmund Freud, who, in the light of growing antisemitic attacks,
            stopped terming himself as being German and defined himself as a Jew only.
            Schnitzler's relentless insistance on his right of self-determination regarding
            his identity is one of the most important reasons for the absence over a period
            of decades of any radical breaks in his position vis a vis Jews, Judaism and
            antisemitism. Compared with his contemporaries, who were also constantly forced
            to deal with the so-called 'Jewish question', Schnitzler's statements show a
            remarkable degree of continuity. Table of Contents: Part I: Antisemitism;
            Public and political antisemitism; Part II: Jews and Judaism; Remarks on Jewish
            movements and Jewish politics; Schnitzler and Theodor Herzl; Jewish aspects in
            Schnitzler's everyday-life; Schnitzler and the Jewish theatre; traces of
            Jiddish and 'Juedischdeutsch' Part III: Works and Reception; Models for
            characters in 'Der Weg ins Freie'; Schnitzler's comments on 'Der Weg ins
            Freie'; Prelude: protests in Wiener Neustadt; A public excitation: 'Der
            Reigen'; Painful aftermath: two disrupted Schnitzler-readings [Graz and
            Teplitz]; Part IV: Facets of a Jewish-Austrian-German Identity; Schnitzler as a
            Jew in his political decisions; being characterized as a Jew or non-Jew;
            Schnitzler's remarks on the Jewish identity of his contemporaries; Jewish
            cultural production and Jewish interpretation of culture ('Kulturverständnis');
            Schnitzler's self-image as a Jew and German writer; influences of Judaism
            on 'the physiology of creativity'; interviews and reflections; affiliation and
            separations; between philosemitism and being stigmatized: a methodological
            tight-rope walk; Echo: dreams.

            www.arcs.ac.at/DissDB/diss/UI/GW/trn100075
    • Gość: *©*©* THE ROAD TO THE OPEN IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 29.11.03, 00:02
      "Do you think there's a single Christian in the world, even taking the noblest,
      straightest and truest one you like, one single Christian who has not in some
      moment or other of spite, temper or rage, made at any rate mentally some
      contemptuous allusion to the Jewishness of even his best friend, his mistress
      or his wife, if they were Jews or of Jewish descent?" And without waiting for
      George's answer: "There isn't one. I assure you. You can try another test also
      if you life. Read for instance the letters of any celebrated and otherwise
      perfectly shrewd and excellent man and observe the passages which contain
      hostile and ironic expressions about his contemporaries. Ninety-nine times out
      of a hundred it simply deals with an individual without taking any account of
      his descent or creed. In the hundredth case, where the miserable victim has the
      misfortune to be a Jew, the writer will certainly not forget to mention that
      fact. That's just how the thing is, I can't help it. What you choose to call
      persecution-mania, my dear George, is in reality simply an extremely intense
      consciousness that has been kept continuously awake of a condition in which we
      Jews happen to find ourselves. And as for talking about persecution-mania, why
      it would be much more logical to talk about a mania for being hidden, a mania
      for being left alone, a mania for being safe; which though perhaps a less
      sensational form of the disease is certainly a much more dangerous one for its
      victims. My father suffers from it, like many others of his generation. He at
      any rate made such a radical cure that he went mad in the process."

      By Arthur Schnizler.
      Translated by Horace Samuel from the orinal Germen DER WEG INS FREIE, 1908.
      412 pages
      New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1923.

      www.webster.edu/~corbetre/personal/reading/schnitzler-road.html
      It is to Heinrich that this fundamental revelation is given, and the root of
      the English title. While discussing the battles within the Jewish community
      over Hertzl's Palestinian dreams, George asks Heinrich how the question should
      be settled. Heinrich's reply is more than just to that question, it is a
      fundamental orientation toward life:

      "Who knows," said George reflectively, "if you won't be regarded as right
      • Gość: <©> THE ROAD TO THE OPEN IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 03.12.03, 14:11
        wiem.onet.pl/wiem/006f06.html
        4. EYES WIDE SHUT (Stanley Kubrick; 1999) 4 stars

        The great filmmaker's last feature, based on Artur Schnitzler's "Dream Novel,"
        was greeted in America with derision. A pity. This modern sexual odyssey
        • drf The Jewish Freud 04.12.03, 01:34
          http://www.nybooks.com/articles/4898


          Michael Ignatieff's review of William McGrath's Freud's Discovery of
          Psychoanalysis: The Politics of Hysteria and Marianne Krull's Freud and His
          Father [NYR, June 12, 1986] has some of his usual felicities and suggestive
          speculations. But unfortunately, it is vitiated by a series of errors that
          deserve to be noted. These are not simply careless mistakes about minor
          biographical detail, but they lie at the heart of Ignatieff's argument and, I
          believe, have incapacitated him from getting to the heart of the two books he
          has reviewed.

          First: "…his very last work, the posthumous Moses and Monotheism." The fact is
          that Freud had been at work on this study at least since 1934, and published
          the first two of its three parts, "Moses an Egyptian," and "If Moses was an
          Egyptian," in Imago in 1937. He completed the last, longest and most subversive
          part during the early days of his English exile in 1938, and lived to see not
          only the original German in print, but even a complete English translation.

          Second: this first mistake acquires its importance from the second one: "What
          dark energies drove Freud to make this disavowal of Moses [that Moses was not a
          Jew after all, but an Egyptian] at the very moment in 1938 when his daughter
          Anna was forced to spend hours with the Gestapo?" It is an intriguing question,
          but it is unanswerable because the puzzle is imaginary. As I have noted, Freud
          published his "disavowal" of Moses the year before, that is to say, a year
          before the Nazis marched into Austria. This matters, because Freud's insistence
          on his theory that Moses must have been an Egyptian got him into a good deal of
          trouble in his own last years, and has occasioned much head-shaking since. If
          it could be shown that Freud came upon this radical notion (which in any case
          he did not invent) just as his beloved daughter, partner, and successor was
          being interrogated by the Gestapo, one would have to make some interesting
          amendments to Freud's biography. But, for the reasons I have indicated, it
          cannot be shown.

          Third: "In the same weeks that Freud returned from his first visit to Rome, at
          last free of the hold of the Hannibal fantasy, he wrote to Fliess announcing
          his renunciation of the seduction theory." With deep regret (for the scene
          would make a terrific television drama), I must point out that Freud repudiated
          the seduction theory in a letter to Fliess in September 1897, but could not
          bring himself to go to Rome until four years later, September 1901. What he did
          do in 1897 was to recognize, as he told Fliess, that his longing for Rome was
          very neurotic. This too matters, because Freud suffered from an inhibition
          about Rome, which stood for more things in his mind than I have time to
          enumerate in a single letter. The four years that intervened between his giving
          up the seduction theory and his final conquest of Rome were occupied with the
          most strenuous years of Freud's self-analysis, and it was this analysis that
          made it possible for Freud to conquer his neurotic inability to visit the
          Mother of Cities.

          Fourth: Freud "only dared broach the issue of female sexuality on his mother's
          death in 1930…." Here Ignatieff is paraphrasing Krull, but since he does not
          object to this statement, one must assume that he is making it his own. Again,
          what drama reality denies us! Freud no doubt had his psychological problems
          with his mother, and never analyzed them. But they did not keep him from
          writing about female sexuality. He broached the subject in the mid-1890s in the
          Studies on Hysteria he did with Josef Breuer; he referred to it in the several
          editions of his Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality, which he first
          published in 1905. None of these treatments may be considered systematic; that
          had to wait until he had developed the structural theory of mind in 1920. But
          after that, there was no holding him. I refer only to important papers
          like "The Infantile Genital Organization" (1923), "The Dissolution of the
          Oedipus Complex" (1924), and most important, "Some Psychical Consequences of
          the Anatomical Distinction Between the Sexes" (1925). Precisely because Freud's
          theories of female sexual development are enveloped, rightly, in controversy,
          it is important to note that whatever his difficulties with his mother may have
          been, this did not inhibit him from studying the female psychology even while
          she lived.

          Fifth: "In 1897 after attending The New Ghetto, a play written by the future
          Zionist leader Theodor Herzl, Freud wrote Fliess that he had been
          worrying 'about the future of one's children to whom one cannot give a country
          of their own.' Here the forlorn image of the wandering Jew reveals itself
          beneath the cosmopolitan mask." There is no such letter. The passage belongs to
          Freud's Interpretation of Dreams. There one may read of the worry of which
          Ignatieff speaks, but that book was not published until the end of 1899 (dated
          1900). Freud tells Fliess in January 1898 that he is going to see Herzl's play,
          but does not comment on it later to Fliess at all. Rather, he dreamt about it
          and then used the dream as one of the many specimens in his "dream book." The
          year 1897 is important for those, like McGrath, who insist on interpreting
          Freud's psychoanalysis as a kind of "counter-politics." It was in 1897 that the
          populist and anti-Semitic Karl Lueger was finally installed as Mayor of Vienna,
          after Emperor Francis Josef had prevented his accession before. Again this
          matters for our reading of Freud, because what is striking about Freud's
          intimate correspondence with Fliess, the most intimate correspondence he ever
          carried on except with his fiancée in the early 1880s, is the absence of
          political comment. When, in 1895, the Emperor refuses to confirm Lueger's
          election, Freud triumphantly celebrates with some forbidden cigars and tells
          Fliess about it. Otherwise, virtually nothing.

          And this is why I am writing. It would be one thing if a busy scholar like
          Michael Ignatieff, pressed for time and drafting this review, as I imagine him
          doing, on a trans-Atlantic plane ride, simply got a few things wrong because he
          has failed to look them up later and misremembers them. But the errors I have
          cited make it impossible for him to see that the question of Freud's character,
          especially the matter of his Jewishness which is in question in the books under
          review, and in the review itself, has not been resolved by those two books. He
          quotes McGrath to the effect that "the political events he lived through
          stirred his own phantasies so powerfully and directly that Freud suddenly came
          to realize that phantasy could foster driving emotional forces as powerful as,
          or even more powerful than those generated by real events." This of course
          means that, according to McGrath, Freud rejected the seduction theory of
          neuroses because Lueger's access to power convinced him that fantasy has a
          profound impact over the human mind.


          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

          The trouble with his political reading of Freud's inner history (first
          developed in an influential, elegant, but to me wholly unconvincing article by
          Carl Schorske, "Politics and Patricide in Freud's Interpretation of Dreams," of
          1973), is that there is virtually no evidence for, and much evidence against
          it. Freud, as I have written elsewhere, had many very different ambitions, and
          his dreams and correspondence testify to the variety and their power. He
          identified himself with great figures of the past and present, not all of whom
          were politicians. The idea that he invented or discovered psychoanalysis
          because he could not, as he had hoped, become Prime Minister, must fail simply
          as we consider the chronology of his life and
          • Gość: "|||" Nicolo Machiavelli IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 04.12.03, 22:40
            The Prince


            Machiavelli opens The Prince describing the two principal types of governments:
            monarchies and republics. His focus in The Prince is on monarchies. The most
            controversial aspects of Machiavelli's analysis emerge in the middle chapters
            of his work. In Chapter 15 he proposes to describe the truth about surviving as
            a monarch, rather than recommending lofty moral ideals. He describes those
            virtues which, on face value, we think a prince should possess. He concludes
            that some "virtues" will lead to a prince's destruction, whereas some "vices"
            allow him to survive. Indeed, the virtues which we commonly praise in people
            might lead to his downfall. In chapter 16 he notes that we commonly think that
            it is best for a prince to have a reputation of being generous. However, if his
            generosity is done in secret, no one will know about it and he will be thought
            to be greedy. If it is done openly, then he risks going broke to maintain his
            reputation. He will then extort more money from his subjects and thus be hated.
            For Machiavelli, it is best for a prince to have a reputation for being stingy.
            Machiavelli anticipates examples one might give of generous monarchs who have
            been successful. He concludes that generosity should only be shown to soldiers
            with goods taken from a pillaged enemy city. In Chapter 17 he argues that it is
            better for a prince to be severe when punishing people rather than merciful.
            Severity through death sentences affects only a few, but it deters crimes which
            affects many. Further, he argues, it is better to be feared than to be loved.
            However, the prince should avoid being hated, which he can easily accomplish by
            not confiscating the property of his subjects: "people more quickly forget the
            death of their father than the loss of their inheritance." In Chapter 18,
            perhaps the most controversial section of The Prince, Machiavelli argues that
            the prince should know how to be deceitful when it suits his purpose. When the
            prince needs to be deceitful, though, he must not appear that way. Indeed he
            must always exhibit five virtues in particular: mercy, honesty, humaneness,
            uprightness, and religiousness. In Chapter 19 Machiavelli argues that the
            prince must avoid doing things which will cause him to be hated. This is
            accomplished by not confiscating property, and not appearing greedy or wishy-
            washy. In fact, the best way to avoid being overthrown is to avoid being hated.
            ................................................................
            Tutti li stati, tutti e' dominii che hanno avuto et hanno imperio sopra li
            uomini, sono stati e sono o repubbliche o principati. E' principati sono o
            ereditarii, de' quali el sangue del loro signore ne sia suto lungo tempo
            principe, o e' sono nuovi. E' nuovi, o sono nuovi tutti, come fu Milano a
            Francesco Sforza, o sono come membri aggiunti allo stato ereditario del
            principe che li acquista, come è el regno di Napoli al re di Spagna. Sono
            questi dominii cosí acquistati, o consueti a vivere sotto uno principe,o usi ad
            essere liberi; et acquistonsi, o con le armi d'altri o con le proprie, o per
            fortuna o per virtù.


            www.utm.edu/research/iep/m/machiave.htm
            ftp://sailor.gutenberg.org/pub/gutenberg/etext97/nmchv10.txt
            Those who can make you believe absurdities
            can make you commit atrocities.

            www.lucidcafe.com/library/95nov/voltaire.html
    • Gość: <©> ALEF1 Research Studies 1.1.1 IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 29.11.03, 04:00
      He blends in well these days, living most of his quiet life in an apartment
      building on the outskirts of Washington, D.C., his accent piquing no curiosity
      among neighbors of all the nationalities one encounters in the capital. In the
      midst of these mostly retired educators, civil servants, diplomats, soldiers
      and business people, he cuts a dignified but unexceptional figure.

      Many of them know about him now, but most have never seen the compact study in
      his modest widower's apartment, its walls and table space full of talismans of
      honor: honorary degrees from universities; awards from organizations such as
      the American Jewish Committee, the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith,
      United States Holocaust Memorial Council and the Archdiocese of Washington; the
      Polish military equivalent of the U.S. Congressional Medal of Honor; and a
      certificate commemorating the highest honor the State of Israel can bestow,
      honorary citizenship.

      Jan Karski, now 81 years old, a Polish-born Roman Catholic, an American citizen
      since 1954, retired after many years as a professor of political science at
      Georgetown University, has received all these and other accolades for an effort
      he made a half-century ago as a young, clandestine operative from Nazi-occupied
      Poland
      • zupagrzybowa zupaGrZybowaResearchStudies X.X.X 16.01.04, 11:52
        sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/sunearthday/media_viewer/flash.html
        What Do We Know?
        How Do We Know It?
        Why Are We Confident About Our Knowledge?
        What are the Unanswered Questions?

        tatania.phsx.ukans.edu/KU-conf/
    • slonidarnosc NOWY SWIATOWY RUCH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 06.12.03, 19:36
      GDANSK W CENTRUM EUROAZJI !!!
      LECHICI MIRIAMSCY NOBILITOWANI !!!
      www.sIonidarnosc.©
      ---------------------------------
      ©oR
      spise©
      ©oncpt
    • zupagrzybowa SŁONECZNY SPISEK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 07.12.03, 17:45
      SŁO NIE NA HA SŁO SŁO WA SŁO NECZ NIK
      NO BI LI TUJą SIę ...
      IZ RA EL RULEZ !

      ©iddish
    • Gość: drf Lista Morderstw Popelnionych przez Zydow-LINK IP: *.bchsia.telus.net 07.12.03, 20:16
      forum.gazeta.pl/forum/72,2.html?f=13&w=3836579
      • drf Re: Lista Morderstw Popelnionych przez Zydow-LINK 07.12.03, 22:25
        forum.gazeta.pl/forum/72,2.html?f=13&w=741459&a=9540576
    • Gość: >< < > IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 08.12.03, 00:53
      Drexler and Smalley debate feasibility of molecular nanotechnology in Chemical
      & Engineering News cover story.
      Foresight issues press release. "[Smalley] offers vehement opinions and
      colorful metaphors but no relevant, defensible scientific arguments..."
      Kurzweil analyzes the issues. "Smalley's position, which denies both the
      promise and the peril of molecular assembly, will ultimately backfire"

      http://www.kurzweilai.net/meme/frame.html?main=/articles/art0604.html

      Howard Lovey's nano blog covers Clash of the nanotech titans. "...I've covered
      local and national government enough to confidently question the motives of
      those who side with the Smalley camp."
      The Center for Responsible Nanotechnology (CRN) issued a press release. "If
      Smalley's goal is to demonstrate that machine-phase chemistry is fundamentally
      flawed, he has not been effective..."
      Major nanotechnology initiative planned at Georgia Tech
      Christine Peterson, President, Foresight Institute, testified before the House
      Committee on Science about societal implications of advanced nanotechnology.
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      The next few paragraphs provide a brief introduction to the core concepts of
      molecular nanotechnology, followed by links to further reading.
      Manufactured products are made from atoms. The properties of those products
      depend on how those atoms are arranged. If we rearrange the atoms in coal we
      can make diamond. If we rearrange the atoms in sand (and add a few other trace
      elements) we can make computer chips. If we rearrange the atoms in dirt, water
      and air we can make potatoes.
      Todays manufacturing methods are very crude at the molecular level. Casting,
      grinding, milling and even lithography move atoms in great thundering
      statistical herds. It's like trying to make things out of LEGO blocks with
      boxing gloves on your hands. Yes, you can push the LEGO blocks into great heaps
      and pile them up, but you can't really snap them together the way you'd like.

      http://www.zyvex.com/nanotech/selfRep.html

      In the future, nanotechnology will let us take off the boxing gloves. We'll be
      able to snap together the fundamental building blocks of nature easily,
      inexpensively and in most of the ways permitted by the laws of physics. This
      will be essential if we are to continue the revolution in computer hardware
      beyond about the next decade, and will also let us fabricate an entire new
      generation of products that are cleaner, stronger, lighter, and more precise.

      It's worth pointing out that the word "nanotechnology" has become very popular
      and is used to describe many types of research where the characteristic
      dimensions are less than about 1,000 nanometers. For example, continued
      improvements in lithography have resulted in line widths that are less than one
      micron: this work is often called "nanotechnology." Sub-micron lithography is
      clearly very valuable (ask anyone who uses a computer!) but it is equally clear
      that conventional lithography will not let us build semiconductor devices in
      which individual dopant atoms are located at specific lattice sites. Many of
      the exponentially improving trends in computer hardware capability have
      remained steady for the last 50 years. There is fairly widespread belief that
      these trends are likely to continue for at least another several years, but
      then conventional lithography starts to reach its limits.

      If we are to continue these trends we will have to develop a new manufacturing
      technology which will let us inexpensively build computer systems with mole
      quantities of logic elements that are molecular in both size and precision and
      are interconnected in complex and highly idiosyncratic patterns. Nanotechnology
      will let us do this.

      When it's unclear from the context whether we're using the specific definition
      of "nanotechnology" (given here) or the broader and more inclusive definition
      (often used in the literature), we'll use the terms "molecular nanotechnology"
      or "molecular manufacturing."

      Whatever we call it, it should let us

      Get essentially every atom in the right place.
      Make almost any structure consistent with the laws of physics that we can
      specify in molecular detail.
      Have manufacturing costs not greatly exceeding the cost of the required raw
      materials and energy.

      There are two more concepts commonly associated with nanotechnology:
      Positional assembly.
      Self replication.

      Clearly, we would be happy with any method that simultaneously achieved the
      first three objectives. However, this seems difficult without using some form
      of positional assembly (to get the right molecular parts in the right places)
      and some form of self replication (to keep the costs down).
      The need for positional assembly implies an interest in molecular robotics,
      e.g., robotic devices that are molecular both in their size and precision.
      These molecular scale positional devices are likely to resemble very small
      versions of their everyday macroscopic counterparts. Positional assembly is
      frequently used in normal macroscopic manufacturing today, and provides
      tremendous advantages. Imagine trying to build a bicycle with both hands tied
      behind your back! The idea of manipulating and positioning individual atoms and
      molecules is still new and takes some getting used to. However, as Feynman said
      in a classic talk in 1959: "The principles of physics, as far as I can see, do
      not speak against the possibility of maneuvering things atom by atom." We need
      to apply at the molecular scale the concept that has demonstrated its
      effectiveness at the macroscopic scale: making parts go where we want by
      putting them where we want!

      The requirement for low cost creates an interest in self replicating
      manufacturing systems, studied by von Neumann in the 1940's. These systems are
      able both to make copies of themselves and to manufacture useful products. If
      we can design and build one such system the manufacturing costs for more such
      systems and the products they make (assuming they can make copies of themselves
      in some reasonably inexpensive environment) will be very low.

      There is a brief and accessible video introduction to the basic idea of
      nanotechnology (Windows Media Player 56 kilobits/second or 165 kilobits/second)
      from Big Thinkers "Ralph Merkle: Nanotechnology"



      More Information
      Foresight's nanotechnology resource page
      News and topical discussions
      Nanodot
      Books
      The following books can be ordered directly from The Foresight Institute or
      through Foresight's affiliation with Amazon.
      The best technical introduction to this area is:
      Nanosystems: molecular machinery, manufacturing, and computation by K. Eric
      Drexler (Wiley 1992).
      A technical introduction to medical applications of nanotechnology:
      Nanomedicine, currently being written by Robert A. Freitas, is a technical
      introduction to medical applications of nanotechnology. Volume I is available.
      A web page on Nanomedicine has an overview. The full text is also available.
      Further reading::
      Engines of Creation(full text in html) by K. Eric Drexler (Anchor 1986)
      discusses both the technology and its possible applications and consequences.
      Unbounding the Future, by K. Eric Drexler, Chris Peterson and Gayle Pergamit
      (Quill 1991) provides a non-technical discussion of what nanotechnology should
      let us do, using technically feasible scenarios to clearly illustrate the
      possibilities. Now available on the web!
      Nano! by Ed Regis (Little, Brown 1995) is an engaging and entertaining book
      that describes the researchers involved in this area, particularly Drexler, and
      the reactions of different members of the scientific community to the concept.
      Foresight's suggestions for further reading.
      Journals, publications and newsgroups
      The Foresight Update is a
    • Gość: ;((( In the Name of SLAM IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 08.12.03, 01:57
      The Leader of Muslims: Iraqi Muslims Should Not Cooperate with Foreign Rule



      The Leader of Muslims, His Eminence Ayatullah al-Uzma Hajj Seyed Ali Khamene'i
      (d.) has asked Iraqi Muslims not to cooperate with foreign rule and
      said: "Today, if anyone assists foreign forces to consolidate their rule in
      Iraq, this will be recorded in the history of Iraq as a shameful stain for any
      individual or any group that does it.” Addressing Iraqi Muslims in Arabic in
      the second khutbah of Friday-prayers on 11 April, Ayatollah Khamene'i
      said: "The American and British claim that they are giving freedom to the Iraqi
      people is a travesty. In reality, they are acting to secure control of Iraq,
      its oil and the Middle East and they are trying to suppress the Palestinian
      intifada. They are also trying to bury the Islamic revival. The appointment of
      a foreign ruler in Iraq is a humiliation for freedom and popular sovereignty in
      Iraq. They are scheming to obliterate Iraq's Islamic identity and nationalism
      and to turn it into a springboard for American domination of all the Middle
      East and its valuable human and material resources."
      Ayatollah Khamene'i delineated Islamic Republic's policy as follows: "As far
      as the war between Saddam on the one hand, and America and Britain on the
      other, is concerned, we believed that both sides were wrong.
      We have not given any help to any of them, and we declared our neutrality
      towards both of them. However, we will not be neutral in the confrontation
      between the occupiers and the Iraqi people."

      www.wilayah.org/Eng/Default.htm
    • Gość: DEUTSH NEUE DEUTSHE DEZIGNE ? IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 08.12.03, 02:18
      AUS TEHERAN ?

      duBist ajn SMOCK !-)
      • sanatorium_psychiatryczne DEUTSHLAND 09.12.03, 19:46
        www.deutschland.de/
        • Gość: !________! !!!!!!!!!!!!!____Jewphobia___!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 09.12.03, 20:19
          www.damianpenny.com/archives/001366.html
          Hoaxes > Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion


          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


          Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
          Intellectual cornerstone of the white power movement, The Protocols of the
          Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion serves a crucial role in the personal
          growth of any heartfelt anti-semite. The book is a long diatribe, exposing the
          nefarious tactics and goals of a clandestine multinational Jewish cabal that
          secretly rules the world (in partnership with the Freemasons). It's a must-read
          for any self-respecting opponent of Zionism.
          The document purports to be the collected notes from an 1897 conference in
          Switzerland, surreptitiously convened by this shadowy Hebrew organization. So a
          better translation of the title would be Minutes from the Meetings of the
          Zionist Chieftains. The book outlines an insidious Jewish plot for global
          conquest, which involves subverting whole cultures, manipulating world economic
          markets, instigating wars... pretty much your run-of-the-mill supervillainy.
          Precisely why we should believe that a group unable to control the distribution
          of their own meeting minutes would be capable of controlling international
          affairs, simply defies reason.

          But who cares? It isn't like The Protocols is going to convert anyone. Its
          function is to provide a plausible excuse for a bigot to trade in his existing
          Jewphobia for overt racism. Most screwballs only tackle this monster after
          they've already plodded their way through The Turner Diaries and a few dozen
          photocopied hate tracts. For this reason, it doesn't matter that The Protocols
          was and is a pathetic hoax. Once a nutjob decides to believe the book is
          genuine, nothing you can say will ever change his mind. He wants to believe.

          For the record, The Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion was
          proven to be a fake as far back as 1921. That year, a newspaper article in the
          London Times traced the meat of the book back to a plagiarization of a
          plagiarization of a work whose original target was Napoleon Bonaparte. The
          ultimate source, published in 1864, was titled Dialogue aux enfers entre
          Machiavelli et Montesquieu ("Discussions Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu in
          Hell"). The book was a satirical commentary on Napoleon's insatiable lust for
          world domination. No Jews whatsoever appear in the story.

          That work was just plain ripped off in 1868 by German novelist Hermann
          Goedsche, who took out all of the Napoleon references and replaced him with the
          Jews. His book, To Sedan, contains a chapter called "The Jewish Cemetery in
          Prague and the Council of Representatives of the Twelve Tribes of Israel." It
          describes a centennial meeting between the Devil and the upper echelons of
          world Jewry. This section was extracted in 1891 and repackaged as a nonfiction
          essay titled "The Rabbi's Speech," which became the primary source for The
          Protocols.

          The end product was cobbled together in 1895 by an officer of the Russian
          secret police, Pytor Ivanovich Rachovsky. The book was conceived as propaganda,
          calculated to rally the Russian citizenry behind the Czar as he took whatever
          steps would be necessary to fend off the ubiquitous Jewish-Masonic threat.

          Which is why, even when amongst only each other, the Zionists cannot help but
          compare themselves disfavorably to their enemy:


          The people under our guidance have annihilated the aristocracy, who were their
          one and only defence and foster-mother for the sake of their own advantage,
          which is inseparably bound up with the well-being of the people.
          Or how about:


          The aristocracy, which enjoyed by law the labour of the workers, was interested
          in seeing that the workers were well fed, healthy and strong. We are interested
          in just the opposite
          • slonidarnosc !!!!!!!!!!!!!____XstusNarodow___!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 11.12.03, 19:59
            "Nie jestesmy Absurdem Narodow"

            www.dziennik.com/www/dziennik/kult/archiwum/od07do12-00/pp-09-22-05.html
            Jaka jest ta nasza nowa codziennosc? Absurdalna - odpowie kazdy, kto uczyl sie
            analizy realnego socjalizmu z pism Mrozka. Ale pisarz - moze wlasnie dlatego,
            ze kojarzony z tym pojeciem w sposob automatyczny - zastrzega: "[...] nie ma
            zadnego absurdu, bywa tylko nieudolnosc, glupota, zla wola, niedostatki
            infrastruktury albo po prostu przypadek. Nie opisze wiec 'polskiego absurdu',
            gdyz uwazam, ze nie ma takiego. Nie wierze, ze teraz jestesmy 'Absurdem
            Narodow', jak kiedys bylismy 'Chrystusem Narodow', 'Sumieniem Europy'
            i 'Przedmurzem Chrzescijanstwa'. Nie badzmy megalomanami, tym razem w
            negatywie, jesli w pozytywie sie nie da" (s. 85). Mam wrazenie, ze Mrozek
            probuje tutaj - bardzo szlachetnie - zaklinac polska rzeczywistosc, probuje
            wepchnac ja w koleiny normalnosci, czyli w rejony, gdzie swiat zalezy od
            kompetencji, wiedzy, dobrej woli. Latwo byloby mu przeciez odpowiedziec: z
            pomieszania dobrych checi i glupoty, skrzyzowania troski i bezwzglednosci,
            splotu poczucia misji i chamstwa rodzi sie czesto w Polsce nienormalnosc i
            absurd. Byc moze jednak Mrozkowi chodzi o to samo - o prawo do nazywania rzeczy
            po imieniu, bez powolywania sie na wymyslne kategorie estetyczne, ktore zaczna
            pelnic role usprawiedliwien.

            Stad tez pisarz wybiera za przedmiot swojej felietonowej obserwacji polska
            codziennosc. Pisze nie o tym, co nowe, lecz o polskich rzeczach niezmiennych -
            tych, ktore przetrwaly i przetrwaja kazda zmiane (nawet tak blaha, jak zmiana
            ustroju): o politykach, ktorzy plota bzdury stylem wysokim, o chamstwie
            szerzacym sie na ulicach, o zyciu publicznym, ktorym miotaja nasze humory, o
            kruchosci i plytkosci polskiej stabilizacji, o rodzimym niedorobstwie i braku
            profesjonalizmu, o polskiej niecheci do Polski. Juz po kilku felietonach
            Dziennika powrotu czujemy, ze autor jest bardziej stad niz z oddali, bardziej
            swoj niz obcy, bardziej nasz niz miedzynarodowy. Juz chloszcze nas jak inni
            felietonisci, juz przynudza po naszemu i jak my zamienia szczegolowe w ogolne,
            a ogolne w ogolnikowe. Troche smiesznie, troche madrze, troche melancholijnie.
            Czyli tak, jak powinno byc w felietonie.

            Nie nalezy przeciez oczekiwac od tego gatunku, ze polaczy glebie filozofii,
            przekrojowosc socjologii i panoramicznosc historii. Innymi slowy: felietonista
            jest tylko felietonista, a nie skrzyzowaniem Kolakowskiego, Baumana i Daviesa.
            Kiedy wiec przeczytamy ksiazke Mrozka na prawach przez niego zaproponowanych,
            odsloni sie przed nami frapujace oblicze autora. Przede wszystkim widac, ze
            tkwi w nim bardzo cenna nadwyzka obywatelskiej troski, dla ktorej znajduje
            formy zroznicowane (od monologu i skeczu, poprzez scenke az do eseju), za to
            nieagresywne. Przybyl nam zatem felietonista z klasa: ironiczny, ale nie tak
            zlosliwy jak Marek Gronski z Polityki, wyrafinowany, ale nie tak literacki jak
            Jerzy Pilch, a nade wszystko wyrazisty w swoich sadach o rzeczywistosci. Nie
            calej, bo dzieki ostremu wykresleniu tematow, ktorymi nie bedzie sie zajmowal,
            Mrozek obsadzil role obserwatora tych zachowan polskiego spoleczenstwa, ktore
            zmieniaja sie wolniej niz ustroje i rzadzace partie. Tropi skamieliny rodzimego
            charakteru i rodzimej mentalnosci, sprawdzajac, czy nie stoja na drodze do
            normalnego zycia. Oczywiscie zalezy mu na normalnosci o podwyzszonym
            standardzie, strzezonym przez przyzwoitosc i poczucie humoru. Bo jesli dobrze
            rozumiem intencje autora, w takim wlasnie - normalnym - kraju chce zyc. I to
            juz ostatni powod, dla ktorego jeszcze do Polski nie powrocil. My tez.

            www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=polska+chrystusem+narodow
            • Gość: <©> KRAV MAGA contact combat IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 16.01.04, 09:31
              kravmaga.com/Home/History/history.html

              www.kravmaga.com/interactive/
              krav-ma•ga pronounced (kräv) (megä´) n. [Heb.] for “contact combat”, is the
              Official Self-Defense System of Israel. Krav Maga is a very modern and
              practical style of Self-Defense. This system has been continually refined and
              developed in light of actual modern combat and Self-Defense experiences.
              We encourage the practitioner to adapt techniques for himself or herself and
              their special abilities. It is a complete system anyone can utilize, regardless
              of size, strength, or fitness. Krav Maga was developed for use in the street,
              therefore there are no rules.

              Shalom!
              • zupagrzybowa Combating Intolerance ??? Sweden 17.01.04, 15:05
                www.intelligence.org.il/sp/sib_12_03/img/lan.wmv
                www.motfolkmord.com/default_eng.asp
                • Gość: JoDa Zvi Mazel MAZEL TOV! IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 17.01.04, 20:41

                  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                  MAZEL TOV! TELL US WHAT'S GOOD ABOUT ISRAEL
                  Zvi Mazel Takes Up Post Of Israel’s Ambassador To Egypt
                  by Samir Raafat
                  Middle East Times, November 9, 1996


                  On October 29, Israel appointed Zvi Mazel as its new ambassador to Egypt. If
                  his foreign postings are anything to go by, Egypt had better brace itself. In
                  two out of Mazel's four overseas postings the president of his host nation died
                  brutally in front of TV cameras. In the third, the leader was outsted and had
                  to flee the country. Only in France, did the Israeli diplomat spend a quite
                  uneventful tour of duty.

                  Mazel replaces Egyptian-born David Sultan who was named his country's
                  ambassador to Canada earlier this year. The post of ambassador to Egypt had
                  been vacant since September. A career diplomat, Mazel is Israel's sixth envoy
                  to Egypt since the signing of the Peace Treaty in March 1979. Of his six
                  predecessors, two were political appointees. Knesset Member Eliahu Ben-Elissar,
                  Israel's first ambassador to Egypt, was a hard-line Likud hawk. He was recently
                  appointed ambassador to Washington. The other political appointee was Professor
                  Shimon Shamir, who founded and headed Tel Aviv University's Institute for Peace
                  Studies. Regarded a Labor dove, he was Israel's third ambassador to Egypt
                  before resigning in 1990 over policy differences with Yitzhak Shamir's Likud
                  government. In 1995, Shamir was appointed Israel's first envoy to Jordan. The
                  other three ambassadors to Egypt were Moshe Sasson, Ephraim Dowek and David
                  Sultan, all three, professional diplomats.

                  Mazel's action-packed career started with a military coup in Tananarive,
                  capital of the island Republic of Madagascar where Zvi was posted between 1969-
                  72. The diplomat and his wife were there long enough to give birth to their
                  third child and to see President Philibert Tsiranana huddle off into exile.
                  Shortly after, the Mazels and their children
                  • alef1 CIA 1944 18.01.04, 01:53
                    www.mazal.org/Auschwitz%20Aerial/06-26-44%20001.htm
                    • datsh ARTYTERRORYZM 19.01.04, 01:50
                      formaDiagonalnejPOLIfonicznejPROVOka©ji

                      community.webshots.com/user/datsh
                      • Gość: dajczgewand USBL:ARTterrorISm:PostModernShit:drOR IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 20.01.04, 13:51
                        community.webshots.com/user/dajcz
                        PoLiTiCS-aRT-MoneyNiSM

                        :-indifferent_|:^surprised R
                        • sanatorium_psychiatryczne ISLAM=JEWISH RELIGION !!! dr ALLAH 21.01.04, 02:31
                          forum.gazeta.pl/forum/72,2.html?f=50&w=10288201
        • drf DEUTSHLAND ERWAHE? 19.10.04, 23:57
          www.svd.se/dynamiskt/kultur/did_8306519.asp
          • Gość: ??? Re: DEUTSHLAND ERWAHE? IP: *.acn.waw.pl 20.10.04, 00:06
            pytanie o slowo erwahe.
            od
            erwähnen ?
            czy
            erwachen?

            • drf DEUTSHLAND HAHAM BA LAJLA 20.10.04, 00:18
              to po zydowsku
              wink

              paulino ?
              • Gość: :((((((((((((((((( Re: DEUTSHLAND HAHAM BA LAJLA IP: *.acn.waw.pl 20.10.04, 00:23
                szeli szem ?
                sad((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
                • drf :))))))))))))))))))))))) 20.10.04, 00:41
                  szeli lo szem?
                  szem ha miszpaha ?
                  miszpaha ha adama?
                  sze lo ose ha sejhel... ose ha zman...wink
                  laila tow

                  www.kcmetro.cc.mo.us/pennvalley/biology/lewis/gestapo.htm
                  • Gość: :))))))))) sza..... IP: *.acn.waw.pl 20.10.04, 00:51
                    szem miszpacha.....
                    bilti niszkach???
                    smile

                    erew tow Dr Freudsmile
                    • Gość: dr FrÖid a teraz po prostoPolskim... IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 20.10.04, 01:04
                      taKamata hari jestes?

                      znamy sie od paru lat ,nie prawdazTo?

                      co u ciebie slychac?

                      smile
                      • Gość: MataKalahari Re: a teraz po prostoPolskim... IP: *.acn.waw.pl 20.10.04, 01:13
                        przejdzmy na arabski ok ? smile
                        albo na priF

                        bo Mi Cus too zawadza....
      • Gość: DEUTSH Re: NEUE DEUTSHE DEZIGNE ? IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 27.01.04, 00:53
        community.webshots.com/scripts/show.fcgi?t=slideshow&ID=112989569&key=TxOCiN
        • deutshland dEUtsHittLaNd 04.02.04, 18:32
          kody: 3100chowa,777P,9PLeNUM,TLMX
          operacje: 1leviPrawi,2OswieceNieOswiecImia 3teRRRoTeRRRaPia ,3TemPLe
          "?iCH BiN AjN BeRLiNaRe? /in iDDish"
          =========================================================================

          HHeLiBeB CNOF NeNaMgAl SiPSClArK CaScTiVCrMnFe
          CoNiCu ZnGaGe AsSeBr KrRbSrYZr NbMoTcRuRhPdAg CdInSnSb
          TeIXeCs BaLaCePr NdPmSmEuGdTb DyHoEr TmYbLuHfTa WReOsIr
          PtAuHg TlPbBiPoAtRnFrRaAc ThPaNpPuUAm CmBkCfEsFmMd
          NoLrRfDb SgBhHsMtUunUuu
          • zupagrzybowa U RUN !!! 08.02.04, 04:38
            www.mindat.org/lsearch.php?loc=uran
    • Gość: "|||" ZION-ID-ART IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 08.12.03, 19:02
      www.google.se/search?q=ZIONIDARITY&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&btnG=Google+Search


      ©!©


      www.google.se/search?num=100&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=ZIONIDART+&btnG=Google+Search
      • zupagrzybowa ¸.& middot;´& macr;)(& macr;`& middot;.¸:ZionCentral¸.& 08.12.03, 19:58
        www.zioncentre.org.uk/services.html
        Zion Community Resource was set up by local people in 1991 and has been working
        since that time with and for the people in this area, offering support &
        resources, encouraging self-help and helping to develop new services wherever
        they are needed.

        zion.radio365.net/
        "For the sake of Zion I will not be silent..."

        www.artfromzion.com/
        ¯`·.¸¸.)·´¯wink·´¯wink·_.¯crying¯`·.¸((¯`·¸¸.¸¸.·´.¸.·´¯wink(¯`
    • Gość: *©*©* zION PROPULSION IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 08.12.03, 23:10
      nmp.jpl.nasa.gov/ds1/tech/ionpropfaq.html
      nmp.jpl.nasa.gov/ds1/tech/autonav.html
      nmp.jpl.nasa.gov/ds1/tech/scarlet.html
      nmp.jpl.nasa.gov/ds1/tech/autora.html
    • Gość: dana33 [...] IP: *.bchsia.telus.net 09.12.03, 00:02
      Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.
      • Gość: datsh PRAWDA ARAFUCKA !!! IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 09.12.03, 17:30
        WLADZOmana
        pedofila
        zlodzieja
        dobr swego narodu
        sowieckiego agenta
        mordercy
        tego co najdrozsze

        POKOJU






        • sanatorium_psychiatryczne X-KOMUNIKAT 1.1.3 09.12.03, 20:44

          www.rotten.com/library/conspiracy/freemasonry/
    • Gość: michal Cos do przeczytania na odprezenie IP: *.bchsia.telus.net 09.12.03, 21:48
      forum.gazeta.pl/forum/72,2.html?f=13&w=3836579
      • sanatorium_psychiatryczne ======================Judeophobia 09.12.03, 22:26
        www.changethatsrightnow.com/phobia_list_of_all_phobias.asp?PhobiaID=1944&SDID=6540


        The human nervous system is capable of developing irrational fears of anything
        at all. Some fears, such as flying or public speaking are clearly more
        widespread, but there are now formally named phobias.

        A phobia is defined as an unwwarranted and irrational fear, and at The Phobia
        Clinic we assist individuals in overcoming fears and phobias of all kinds.

        The Phobia List includes unwarranted and irrational phobias of a number of
        nationalities:

        Anglophobia
        Dutchphobia
        Francophobia
        Germanophobia
        Japanophobia
        Judeophobia
        Sinophobia
        In reality irrational fears exist towards all races and nationalities, it is
        simply that these are the ones which have been formally named and listed.

        The Phobia Clinic is dedicated to helping all individuals overcome all
        inappropriate fears and phobias


        www.changethatsrightnow.com/problem_detail_nationals.asp
        • Gość: *©*©* Judeophobia Chrzescijanstwa IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 10.12.03, 18:20
          Zdrada Jezusa Chrystusa

          Książęta żydowscy poznali Chrystusa, a jeśli czegoś o Nim nie wiedzieli, była
          to nieświadomość umyślna, więc nie zwalniająca od winy. Grzech ich był przeto
          grzechem najcięższym, zarówno ze względu na rodzaj grzesznego czynu, jak i ze
          względu na złą wolę. Lud żydowski zgrzeszył bardzo ciężko z uwagi na obiektywny
          charakter czynu, wszakże winę jego pomniejsza nieświadomość... Nieświadomość
          umyślna nie zwalnia od winy, lecz raczej ją powiększa. Dowodzi bowiem tego, iż
          człowiek tak bardzo lgnie do grzechu, że chce trwać w nieświadomości, aby z
          grzechem nie zrywać. Żydzi przeto zgrzeszyli nie tylko jako sprawcy
          ukrzyżowania Chrystusa-Człowieka, lecz poniekąd także jako sprawcy ukrzyżowania
          Boga.

          Św. Tomasz z Akwinu,
          Suma teologiczna III, 45 a. 5 ad 3; 46 a. 6 corpus

          ´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´
          Przypominanie, że ten sam Bóg Żywy mówił do wszystkich zarówno w Starym, jak i
          Nowym Testamencie.
          Przypominanie, że Jezus narodził się z matki Żydówki, z pokolenia Dawida i ludu
          izraelskiego. Jego wieczna miłość i Jego przebaczenie obejmuje własny naród i
          cały świat.
          Przypominanie, że apostołowie, pierwsi uczniowie i męczennicy byli Żydami.
          Przypominanie, że fundamentalne przykazanie chrystianizmu, przykazanie miłości
          Boga i bliźniego ogłoszone już w Starym Testamencie potwierdzone zostało przez
          Jezusa. Zobowiązuje ono chrześcijan i Żydów we wszystkich relacjach
          międzyludzkich, bez żadnego wyjątku.
          Unikanie pomniejszania wartości judaizmu pobiblijnego w celach wywyższania
          chrystianizmu.
          Unikanie słowa «Żydzi» w znaczeniu wyłącznym «nieprzyjaciół Jezusa» lub
          wyrażenia «nieprzyjaciele Jezusa» jako określenie całego narodu żydowskiego.
          Unikanie przedstawiania Męki Chrystusa w taki sposób, jakoby ohydne skazanie Go
          na śmierć ciążyło na wszystkich Żydach. W rzeczywistości to nie wszyscy Żydzi
          domagali się śmierci Jezusa i nie oni sami są za nią odpowiedzialni. Krzyż,
          który zbawia nas wszystkich, objawia, że również za nasze grzechy umarł
          Chrystus. Przypominać należy wszystkim rodzicom i wychowawcom chrześcijańskim o
          odpowiedzialności, jaką ponoszą, przedstawiając Ewangelię, a przede wszystkim
          opowiadanie o Męce, w sposób nadmiernie uproszczony. Inspirują bowiem przez to,
          czy tego chcą, czy też nie, świadomość lub podświadomość swoich dzieci i
          słuchaczy. Z punktu widzenia psychologii w duszach prostych, poruszonych gorącą
          miłością i żywym współczuciem dla ukrzyżowanego Zbawiciela, nienawiść, jaką
          odczuwają ? w sposób zupełnie naturalny ? w stosunku do prześladowców Jezusa,
          zmienia się łatwo w niechęć rozszerzaną na Żydów wszystkich czasów, również
          tych współczesnych.
          Unikanie przekleństwa zawartego w Piśmie świętym i cytowania okrzyku
          podburzonego tłumu «Krew Jego na nas i na nasze dzieci», bez przypomnienia, że
          ten okrzyk nie może mieć w żadnym wypadku przewagi nad nieskończenie
          potężniejszą modlitwą Jezusa: «Ojcze przebacz im, bo nie wiedzą, co czynią».
          Unikanie uwierzytelniania niegodziwych opinii, że naród żydowski jest
          potępiony, wyklęty i skazany na ciągłe cierpienia.
          Unikane mówienia o Żydach tak, jak gdyby by nie byli pierwszymi członkami
          Kościoła5.
          ´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´
          www.piusx.org.pl/zw/29/29zjc.html

          Zapowiedź Antychrysta
          W świetle tego, co tu napisaliśmy, można z łatwością zauważyć, że żydzi,
          zaangażowani w dialog z katolikami, nie chcą w żadnym wypadku zaakceptować
          chrześcijaństwa, a kontynuacja tego dialogu za wszelką cenę prowadzi do
          zakwestionowania źródeł Boskiego Objawienia, Depozytu Wiary i Pisma świętego.
          ?Owoce" tego dialogu widoczne są później w nauczaniu katolickim (katechizmy,
          programy duszpasterskie itd.). W ten sposób posoborowy dialog z judaizmem jest
          zamachem na sam fundament Kościoła i niszczy Wiarę katolików. Trzeba też
          wyraźnie powiedzieć, że jeśli prowadzi się dialog z tymi, który wyraźnie
          oczekują mesjasza innego aniżeli Chrystus; mesjasza, który zapewni Żydom
          panowanie nad światem i unicestwi Kościół katolicki, to będzie on w
          rzeczywistości Antychrystem (z greckiego: antichristos; zob.: J 2,18).

          ???
          =================================================================

          crying(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

    • Gość: drf [...] IP: *.bchsia.telus.net 10.12.03, 04:08
      Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.
      • drf Ingvar Carlsson ....Tadeusz Mazowiecki rok 1989 10.12.03, 17:08
        Polen bäddade för Berlinmurens fall

        www.palmecenter.se/article.asp?Article_Id=651
        Tadeusz Mazowiecki var först ut på banan under den märkliga hösten 1989. Han
        utnämndes till det kommunistiska östblockets första icke-kommunistiska
        premiärminister sommaren 1989. Några månader senare fanns inget kommunistiskt
        Östeuropa. I ett samtal med Ingvar Carlsson, ingående i Palmecentrets
        seminarieserie ”Betraktelser efter murens fall”, blickar han nu tillbaka på de
        tio år som gått. Han önskar bland annat att man tagit större sociala hänsyn i
        övergången till marknadsekonomi.

        Under de senaste åren har kommunistpartierna ökat i popularitet i Central- och
        Östeuropa. Men det skrämmer inte Tadeusz Mazowiecki, Polens förste icke-
        kommunistiske premiärminister efter kalla kriget, i dag ordförande i
        parlamentets EU-integrationsutskott.

        – De kommunistpartier som idag är aktiva på den demokratiska arenan kan inte
        jämföras med dem som fanns i det gamla systemet, hävdar han.

        Ingvar Carlsson och Tadeusz Mazowiecki möttes första gången hösten 1989. Som
        förste utländske regeringschef besökte Ingvar Carlsson det nya demokratiska
        Polen. Tadeusz Mazowiecki hade nyligen valts till premiärminister. Båda har
        starka minnen från mötet, som resulterade i vänskap och som tio år senare har
        fört dem samman igen för att tala om den tid som gått. Denna gång äger mötet
        rum inom ramen för Palmecentrets seminarieserie ”Betraktelser efter murens
        fall”.

        Tadeusz Mazowiecki minns särskilt ett råd han fick av Ingvar Carlsson: att
        komma ihåg den sociala komponenten i samband med marknadsorienteringen av
        ekonomin. I efterhand konstaterar Tadeusz Mazowiecki att han kanske inte
        lyssnade tillräckligt noga till detta råd.

        – I dag kan man självklart fråga sig om chockterapin som genomfördes inte var
        för liberal. Jag förespråkade från början en rätt hård linje, men i dag måste
        jag medge att de sociala frågorna blev kraftigt försenade.

        Problemet var att man inte hade någon förebild i modern historia, konstaterar
        Tadeusz Mazowiecki. Polen var först ut. Aldrig tidigare hade någon försökt att
        förvandla en planekonomisk enpartistat till en demokratisk marknadsekonomi.
        Kostnaderna blev mycket större än man hade väntat sig.

        – Vi hade inte räknat med östmarknadens sammanbrott. Det förde med sig stora
        samhällskostnader som i sin tur minskade stödet för reformerna.

        För Tadeusz Mazowiecki var det särskilt svårt att tvingas fatta beslut om
        nedläggning av industrier som utgjort kärnan i fackföreningsrörelsen
        Solidaritet. Han har själv sin bakgrund i Solidaritet och det var på dess
        mandat han kom till makten. Men det fanns inget alternativ, det handlade om
        industrier som var svårt eftersatta och inte hade en chans att klara sig i en
        marknadsekonomi.

        Under 80-talet var Solidaritet en massrörelse som samlade hundratusentals
        människor till demonstrationer. I dag tycks den polska fackföreningsrörelsen ha
        tappat initiativet och har svårt att locka folk. Tadeusz Mazowiecki ser flera
        förklaringar till detta. Den främsta orsaken är kanske förvirring vad gäller
        identitet inom rörelsen: ska man vara en politisk kraft eller en renodlad
        fackföreningsrörelse? Därtill kommer det faktum att arbetsmarknadens parter
        fortfarande är svaga.

        – Triangeln ”arbetsgivare-arbetstagare-stat” är inte färdig i Polen. Vår
        ekonomi befinner sig fortfarande i en övergångsfas, konstaterar Tadeusz
        Mazowiecki.

        En annan organisation som istället haft oväntade framgångar de senaste åren är
        det polska kommunistpartiet. Tadeusz Mazowiecki medger att han är förvånad.

        – Vi gjorde misstaget att döma ut kommunistpartiet. Själv trodde jag aldrig att
        de skulle kunna komma tillbaka. Idag gör de comeback som kritiker av reformerna.

        Trots att dagens kommunister inte reformerat sina åsikter nämnvärt är det fel
        att likställa dem med det parti som styrde landet före 1989, anser Mazowiecki.
        I dag är utgångspunkten en helt annan: de kommunistiska partierna är aktiva på
        den demokratiska arenan.

        – Däremot tycker jag att omvärlden allt för lättvindigt accepterat de
        kommunister som över en natt förvandlats till socialdemokrater.

        Tadeusz Mazowiecki satt med som rådgivare vid runda bordssamtalen våren 1989,
        som resulterade i att den polska kommunistiska regeringen slutgiltigt gav upp
        makten. Maktöverlämningen skedde fredligt: allmänna fria val kunde hållas redan
        samma år.

        I efterhand är det Berlinmurens fall som står som den främsta symbolen för
        omvandlingen i Central- och Östeuropa. Utvecklingen i Polen har fått mindre
        uppmärksamhet, den är inte lika lättgripbar och tydlig, men minst lika viktig.
        Redan 1980 tvingades det regerande kommunistpartiet till eftergifter och tillät
        massorganisationer. På så sätt kunde Solidaritet och andra organisationer
        fortsätta sitt arbete ovan jord, med stöd av den katolska kyrkan.

        – Polen står mer för en process än en enstaka spektakulär händelse. Det kanske
        viktigaste av allt är att förloppet blev fredligt och banade vägen för det som
        sedan hände i Tjeckoslovakien och Tyskland, framhåller Tadeusz Mazowiecki.

        Agneta Söderberg


    • Gość: JEWHATER Precz z faszystowsim rezimem SSharona i Busha IP: *.bchsia.telus.net 10.12.03, 20:31
      www.antiwar.com/
      • Gość: TZARON a ty komunislamista czy tylko glupi ? grigorij ? IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 11.12.03, 01:23
        www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=03/12/09/162219#transcript
        na kolyme by ich poslac...

        ...teraz dupy dajesz sodomitom z iraku

        leczenie nie pomoze

        KOMUNISTA CZY FASZYSTA
        TY W TYM GOWNIE
        JAKO GLISDA

        (¯`·.¸¸.·´
        crying(((((((((((

        ...laska semtexu i rozrywka!!!
    • zupagrzybowa US denies Gaza inspired new tactics/PIISSpropAgit 11.12.03, 01:46


      US denies Gaza inspired new tactics
      By Charles Aldinger
      Washington
      December 10, 2003



      The US military has adopted tough new tactics against guerillas in Iraq,
      arresting relatives of insurgents and destroying houses used to plan attacks
      against American troops.

      But US defence officials denied the move was modelled on tactics used by
      Israeli forces in Gaza and the West Bank, despite visits by US military
      officers to Israel this year to discuss urban combat with the Israel Defence
      Forces (IDF).

      One US official, who asked not to be identified, said: "In recent weeks, we
      have begun using a much-increased tempo of taking the fight to remnants of the
      former regime to prevent them from planning and carrying out attacks on our
      people."

      "This is new in that we are engaging (attacking) buildings for two reasons: if
      we find they were used to plan or launch strikes against our forces; or if we
      have information that arms were being made or kept there for attacks."

      Another confirmed a New York Times report that some family members of guerillas
      wanted by the military were being arrested. But he said it was not a pressure
      tactic to coerce insurgents to surrender.



      "We don't do kidnapping. We are arresting relatives if it becomes known that
      they are co-ordinating with those high-value targets that we are seeking, or if
      they have information where fugitives are holding out," he said.

      The Times reported from Iraq that at least one Iraqi village had been
      surrounded by razor wire as part of the crackdown, forcing residents to enter
      and leave through a US checkpoint. This was similar to Israeli tactics.

      Brigadier General Michael Vane, from US Army's Doctrine and Training Command,
      said in a letter to Army magazine in July that American officers had gone to
      Israel to discuss urban combat and intelligence with the IDF.

      Training command spokesman Harvey Perritt said: "There is a fair amount of
      military intellectual discussion that goes on between the US Army and the IDF."
      He said General Vane was referring to a visit to Israel last January. Pentagon
      officials cautioned against drawing any direct parallel between Israeli tactics
      on the West Bank and the new US moves in Iraq.

      In one recent incident, the US used a bulldozer to knock down the front wall of
      a small compound owned by an elderly couple in the Iraqi village of Hawija,
      after troops found explosives in the house.


      www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/12/09/1070732210797.html
    • Gość: LONG_LIVE_PALESTYN Link do Listy Morderstw Popelnionych przez zydow IP: *.bchsia.telus.net 11.12.03, 02:45
      forum.gazeta.pl/forum/72,2.html?f=13&w=3836579
    • slonidarnosc MARZEC 1968 - CENTRUM WYPEDZONYCH !!! 11.12.03, 20:07
      juz niedlugo na internecie !

      slonidarnosc4ever !-)
    • Gość: DEATH TO ISRAEL The Fraud of Zionism IP: *.bchsia.telus.net 11.12.03, 21:03
      The Fraud of Zionism
      by Wilbur Sensor
      Most people have been trained to think of Zionism in positive terms. This is
      understandable. Decades of propaganda have misrepresented Zionism as a
      progressive, modern force bringing civilization to an arid, uninhabited
      wasteland. Such an image is an illusion. This essay will uncover the true
      history of Zionism. It will reveal the facts and make clear the real nature of
      the movement.

      A MOVEMENT WHICH ASSUMES THE INCOMPATIBILITY OF JEW AND GENTILE
      Zionism is an apartheid philosophy. Its founder, Theodore Herzl, was dismayed
      by the mass anti-semitism in France aroused by the Dreyfuss affair. He became
      convinced that the separation of the Jews from the Gentiles by ingathering all
      Jews in a separate Jewish nation was the only solution to the age old "Jewish
      problem". Herzl spelled out his program in his book Der Judenstaat (The Jewish
      State):

      "The Jewish question exists. It would be foolish to deny it... The Jewish
      problem exists wherever Jews live in noticeable numbers. Where it does not
      exist, it is introduced by Jews who move in... I believe I can understand anti-
      semitism, which is in many ways a complicated movement. I look on this
      movement from the standpoint of a Jew - but without hatred or fear. I believe
      I recognize in anti-semitism what is crude humor, ordinary economic envy,
      inherited prejudice, religious intolerance - but also what is deemed to be
      self defense."

      "Anti-semitism grows daily, hourly, among the peoples, and must continue to
      grow since its causes continue to exist, and cannot be alienated."

      "The causa remota is the loss, in the Middle Ages, of the ability to
      assimilate; the cause proxima is our overproduction of middling intelligences,
      that can neither be drained off, nor rise higher-hence, no healthy draining
      off, and no healthy rising to a higher level. Downward, we are being
      proletarianized into revolutionaries; we are the subalterns of every
      revolutionary party, while at the same time our terrible financial might grows
      upward."

      "Will it not be said that I am putting weapons into the hands of the anti-
      semites? Why? Because I acknowledge the truth? Because I do not assert that
      there are none but excellent people among us?"

      "It is a national question; to resolve it we must, above all, first make it
      into a world political question... We are a people, a people..."

      "The Jewish State is a world necessity, hence, it will arise..."

      Herzl demands:

      "We be given sovereignty over a part of the earth's surface sufficient for the
      rightful requirements of our people; we shall take care of everything else
      ourselves."

      "No one is strong enough, or rich enough, to move a people from one dwelling
      place to another. Only an idea can do that. The idea of a state may well have
      such force."

      "No economic disruptions, no crises, nor persecutions will follow after the
      departing Jews, but rather a period of prosperity will begin for the lands
      left behind. An internal migration of Christian citizens into the positions
      surrendered by the Jews takes place. The outlook is gradual, without any jolt,
      and its very beginning is the end of anti-semitism."

      "The Jews leave as respected friends. If individual Jews then return,
      civilized countries will receive and treat them just as they would treat the
      citizens of any other foreign country."

      "This emigration is no flight, but an orderly withdrawal, under the
      observation of public opinion. The movement is not only to be organized by
      completely legal means, it can, in any case, be accomplished only with the
      friendly collaboration of the participating government, which derives
      substantial benefit therefrom."

      As these paragraphs make clear, to be a Zionist one must believe there is a
      Jewish problem. No Zionist since Herzl has ever repudiated this basic
      philosophical premise:

      "If we do not admit the rightfulness of anti-semitism, we deny the
      rightfulness of our own nationalism. If our people is deserving and willing to
      live its own national life, then it is an alien body that insists on its own
      distinctive identity, reducing the domain of their life. It is right,
      therefore, that they should fight against us for their national integrity....
      Instead of establishing societies for defense against the anti-semites who
      want to reduce our rights, we should establish societies for defense against
      our friends who desire to defend our rights." (Jacob Klatzkin, co-editor of
      the Encylopaedia Judaica)
      A MOVEMENT WHICH NEVER TOOK ANY CONGNIZANCE OF THE POPULATION OF THE LAND IT
      COVETED

      The Zionists have long maintained the myth, especially in the United States,
      that Palestine was uninhabited before the arrival of the Zionists. This
      deception is easily refuted. The British Foreign Secretary, Lord Curzon,
      writing on October 26, 1917:

      "Now what is the capacity as regards population of Palestine within any
      reasonable period of time?...What is to become of the people of this country,
      assuming the Turk to be expelled, and the inhabitants not to have been
      exterminated by the war? There are over a half a million of these, Syrian
      Arabs- a mixed community with Arab, Hebrew, Canaaite, Greek, Egyptian, and
      possibly Crusaders' blood. They own the soil, which belongs either to
      individual landowners or to village communities. They profess the Mohammedan
      faith. They will not be content either to be expropriated for Jewish
      immigrants, or to act merely as hewers of wood and drawers of water to the
      latter."

      Palestine at the beginning of the Zionist movement was part of the Ottoman
      Turkish Empire. Herzl, when he decided to champion a Jewish state in
      Palestine, necessarily made overtures to the Sultan on behalf of Zionism.
      These negotiations establish that the Zionists were well aware of the
      existence of the Palestinian Arabs.

      "'When Herzl had spoken of a Charter (from the Sultan) he had not, needless to
      say, contemplated any eviction of the Arabs of Palestine in favor of the Jews.
      He was, to judge from his Congress addresses, hardly aware that Palestine had
      settled inhabitants, and he had, in perfect good faith, omitted the Arabs from
      his calculations.'"( Zionism, Leonard Stein.)


      "Was there ever anything more extraordinary than this? Vast plans are made
      engaging the destinies of a multitude of people, yet the man who engenders
      these plans never takes the essential first step of surveying the land where
      he purposes to carry them out. Nor apparently do any of his associates suggest
      it to him. There might be no Arabs in the world for all the difference it
      makes to him or to his associates."

      "Year by year Zionist congresses are summoned... Was a single day's session of
      a single Congress devoted to the discussion of the understanding which must be
      reached with the people of Palestine? Not one."

      "There were nineteen Jewish colonies established in Palestine before the year
      1900... All these trusts and colonies and the people who inhabited them were
      in regular continuous communication with Jewish bodies and persons throughout
      Europe and America..."

      "In a hundred ways the conditions prevailing in Palestine and the existence of
      the Arabs and the varying ways in which the Arabs reacted to existing colonies
      and to the promise of more colonies must have been known to all active
      Zionists."

      "The only conclusion then, and it is a conclusion forced upon the observer, is
      that if Zionism was unaware of the Arabs it was because most Zionists
      perceived an obstacle in the Arabs and did not want to be aware to them.
      (Palestine: The Reality, J.M.N. Jeffries, pp. 40-42.)
      A MOVEMENT WHICH DISREGARDED PRIOR OBLIGATIONS

      Zionism, in addition to coveting someone else's land, has always ignored the
      issue of prior obligations. The Arabs fought as Great Britain's ally
      • drf The Freudyzm of Zionism 11.12.03, 23:59
        www.fh-augsburg.de/~harsch/germanica/Chronologie/20Jh/Herzl/her_ju00.html
        V o r r e d e .



        Der Gedanke, den ich in dieser Schrift ausführe, ist ein uralter. Es ist die
        Herstellung des Judenstaates.

        Die Welt widerhallt vom Geschrei gegen die Juden, und das weckt den
        eingeschlummerten Gedanken auf.

        Ich erfinde nichts, das wolle man sich vor allem und auf jedem Punkte meiner
        Ausführungen deutlich vor Augen halten. Ich erfinde weder die geschichtlich
        gewordenen Zustände der Juden noch die Mittel zur Abhilfe. Die materiellen
        Bestandteile des Baues, den ich entwerfe, sind in der Wirklichkeit vorhanden,
        sind mit Händen zu greifen; jeder kann sich davon überzeugen. Will man also
        diesen Versuch einer Lösung der Judenfrage mit einem Worte kennzeichnen, so
        darf man ihn nicht «Phantasie», sondern höchstens «Kombination» nennen.

        Gegen die Behandlung als Utopie muß ich meinen Entwurf zuerst verteidigen.
        Eigentlich bewahre ich damit nur die oberflächlichen Beurteiler vor einer
        Albernheit, die sie begehen könnten. Es wäre ja keine Schande, eine
        menschenfreundliche Utopie geschrieben zu haben. Ich könnte mir auch einen
        leichteren literarischen Erfolg bereiten, wenn ich für Leser, die sich
        unterhalten wollen, diesen Plan in den gleichsam unverantwortlichen Vortrag
        eines Romans brächte. Aber das ist keine solche liebenswürdige Utopie, wie man
        sie vor und nach Thomas Morus so häufig produziert hat. Und ich glaube, die
        Lage der Juden in verschiedenen Ländern ist arg genug, um einleitende
        Tändeleien überflüssig zu machen.

        Um den Unterschied zwischen meiner Konstruktion und einer Utopie erkennbar
        zu machen, wähle ich ein interessantes Buch der letzten Jahre: «Freiland» von
        Dr. Theodor Hertzka. Das ist eine sinnreiche Phantasterei, von einem durchaus
        modernen, national-ökonomisch gebildeten Geist erdacht, und so lebensfern wie
        der Äquatorberg, auf dem dieser Traumstaat liegt. «Freiland» ist eine
        komplizierte Maschinerie mit vielen Zähnen und Rädern, die sogar ineinander
        greifen; aber nichts beweist mir, daß sie in Betrieb gesetzt werden könne. Und
        selbst wenn ich Freilandsvereine entstehen sehe, werde ich es für einen Scherz
        halten.

    • Gość: DEATH TO ISRAEL HAMAS -- LINK IP: 5.5.* / 80.58.34.* 12.12.03, 00:27
      www.hamasonline.com/
      • zupagrzybowa Re: HAMAS -- LINK 12.12.03, 01:09
        (!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
        Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd")

        (html)
        (head)
        (title)HAMASONLINE(/title)(p align="center")(img
        src="http://www.hamasonline.com/hamas.gif" width="600" height="90")

        (!
        • alef1 HAMAS -- LINKS --/material do analizy 12.12.03, 01:26
          www.rantisi.net/
          www.ezzedeen.net/
          www.b-alshohda.com/
          www.almoltaqa.org/vb/index.php?s
          www.khayma.com/islamic_block/
          www.alsakifah.org/
          =========================================================


          MOSAD RULEZ !
      • Gość: LONG LIVE HAMAS [...] IP: 5.5.* / 80.58.34.* 12.12.03, 02:10
        Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.
      • Gość: DEATH TO ISRAEL Re: HAMAS -- LINK IP: *.bchsia.telus.net 12.12.03, 14:53
        forum.gazeta.pl/forum/72,2.html?f=13&w=3836579
        • drf MAHDI GAZA TAW /y RO BTJHA //ZELIG 20.01.04, 19:58
          ZYDOWSKI HAMAS = ZELIG SYNDROM

          JEWISH MENTAL HOSPITAL
    • alef1 Germany-------Kalifatstaat------------------ 12.12.03, 01:41
      Der 'Kalifatstaat' habe beabsichtigt, notfalls mit Gewalt eine staatliche
      Herschaftsordnung durchzusetzen, die mit den Grundsätzen von Demokratie und
      Rechtsstaat unvereinbar sei, heißt es in dem Beschluss.

      www.dw-world.de/german/0,3367,2975_W_1002108,00.html
      Militantly anti-Semitic and anti-democratically:
      The Cologne Kalifatstaat forbade

      In Germany for the first time after the notices in the USA Islamic
      organizations were forbidden. Federal Minister of the Interior Otto Schily
      (SPD) explained the Islamic combination "Kalifatsstaat" today for illegal and
      introduced a large-scale search action. Also the donation "servant Islam" as
      well as 19 partial organizations with altogether over thousand members was
      forbidden.

      "the Kalifatsstaat is directed in aggressive kaempferischer way against the
      constitutional order. Its goal is the world domination of the Islam on basis of
      the Scharia ", like that Schily. The God state has priority before all
      democratic institutions from view of the "Kalifatsstaats". The adjustment of
      the Kalifatsstaates is clearly anti-Semitic, anti-Israeli and against the
      condition of Turkey directed. Its political activity endangers internal
      security.

      The "Kalifatsstaat" is led according to instructions Schilys of Metin Kaplan,
      which sits to time in detention. He had been condemned because of call to the
      murder to four years prison. Schily said, before a classification Kaplans into
      its homeland Turkey had to assure the Turkish government that the death penalty
      at Kaplan is not executed.

      The prohibition became legally possible by the cancellation of the religion
      privilege from the law on societies. This was part of the aggravation of the
      safety precautions after the notices in the USA. Schily did not explain
      however, it gives realizations over connections of the organization to the
      Muslim extremist Osama is shop and its network.

      He requested those approximately 3.2 million Muslims in Germany to take part
      actively in the argument with the "Islamic terrorism". The measures against
      the "Kalifatsstaat" are not generally directed against Muslims.

      The Green genuine expert Volker Beck welcomed the prohibition. It turned
      however to forbid also the 27,000 members counting organization milli Goerues.
      Milli Goerues did not clarify its relationship to the free democratic
      constitutional structure according to protection of the constitution data
      clearly.

      • Gość: <©> NaziSlamKalifatstaat IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 12.12.03, 02:35
        http://www.faz.com/IN/INtemplates/eFAZ/docmain.asp?rub=%7BB1311FCC-FBFB-11D2-
        B228-00105A9CAF88%7D&doc=%7B65AA6BF2-EA71-4B7A-A8DE-B7E7BFFF9908%7D

        http://www.turkishpress.com/turkishpress/news.asp?ID=15767

        The Bombing of Synagogues in Istanbul:
        An al-Qaida Operation or a Revival of Turkish Islamist Terrorism?


        Ely Karmon
        ICT Senior Researcher

        Background
        On November 15, 2003, two nearly simultaneous carbomb attacks targeted Istanbul
        synagogues, killing at least 24 people and wounding more than 255. The Neve
        Shalom synagogue, where most of the deaths reportedly occurred, was the scene
        of an earlier attack in 1986, when Palestinian terrorists members of the Fatah –
        Revolutionary Command (better known as the Abu Nidal organization, or ANO)
        killed 22 worshippers and wounded six others during a Sabbath service. On March
        1, 1992 Neve Shalom was the target of another attack when terrorists linked to
        the Turkish Hizballah group threw two grenades at the synagogue, injuring a
        Jewish passer-by.[1] The Turkish Hizballah is a Sunni terrorist organization
        not connected with the Lebanese Shi’a Hizballah, but has been supported in the
        1990’s by Iran.
        A caller claiming to be from a radical Turkish group, Great Eastern Islamic
        Raiders' Front—also known as IBDA/C—said it carried out the attack, the Turkish
        Anatolia news agency reported. The caller was quoted as saying: “The reason
        [for the attacks] is to stop the oppression of the Muslims... Our acts will
        continue.” The IBDA/C carried out a series of attacks around Istanbul in the
        1990’s’, but has since been largely dismantled by Turkish security forces.
        Turkish officials are skeptical about the claim and are examining whether
        foreign groups were behind the attack. “An incident of such a scale might not
        be just the work of a domestic organization,” said Turkish Interior Minister
        Abdulkadir Aksu.[2]


        The al-Qaida Track
        There are good reasons for al-Qaida to attack Turkey and its interests, and at
        this stage it seems that the target and the modus operandi point to bin Ladin’s
        global Islamist network as the main suspect. The primary motivation for
        targeting Turkish sites is its historical significance as the last survivor of
        the Muslim Caliphate.

        Abdallah Azzam, the Palestinian ideologue of al-Qaida and Bin Ladin’s mentor in
        Afghanistan, wrote in his book “Al-Qa’idah Al-Sulbah” (or “The Solid Base” from
        which comes the name Al-Qaida): “So many people sold their country, their
        religion, and their people for a cheap price. For example Mustafa Kemal Ataturk
        who concluded an agreement with the British, allowing them to beat the four
        Turkish armies in Palestine, who abolished the Caliphate and fought Islam for
        the sake of a presidential chair. There are so many Kemalists in our nation who
        sold it for a piece of bread or a word of recognition or a glass or a
        prostitute.”[3]
        Bin Ladin sees the beginning of Islam’s degradation and humiliation as result
        of Ataturk’s secular and republican revolution in Turkey and the disappearance
        of the Ottoman Empire: “Our nation has been tasting this humiliation and
        contempt for more than 80 years,” he stated, and compared the US humiliation
        after the September 11 attacks with Islam’s humiliation.[4]

        Another reason for al-Qaida’s enmity towards Turkey is the essence of Turkish
        regime itself; Turkey is practically the only example of a successful Muslim
        democratic and secular nation.

        Turkey is also a very close and important ally of the United States in the
        Middle East—a member of NATO and an active participant in the international
        military forces sent to stabilize the situation in Afghanistan.

        Moreover, Turkey is an ally of Israel and has a strategic cooperation agreement
        with the Jewish state, considered one of the main enemies and targets of al-
        Qaida.

        Last but not least, Turkey is the first Muslim country to agree—at the request
        of the United States—to send peacekeepers to Iraq after a vote of the Turkish
        parliament in October.

        On October 14, a suicide bomber died in an attempted attack on the Turkish
        embassy in central Baghdad. The car bomb, which exploded close to the building,
        wounded a couple of people, but killed no one. The Turkish Prime Minister,
        Recep Tayyip Erdogan, dismissed suggestions that the bomb was a warning, saying
        that Ankara would not be deterred from sending troops.[5] However, the plan to
        send Turkish soldiers to Iraq has not materialized because of fierce opposition
        from the Kurds and the Governing Council of Iraq.


        The Jews as targets
        Bin Ladin and his deputy Ayaman al-Zawahiri have lumped the Jews in with
        the “Crusaders” (i.e. the US and all Western Christian nations) as the main
        enemies of Islam. This categorization was first set forth in February 1998 at
        the foundation of the World Islamic Front for the Struggle Against Jews and
        Crusaders in. However, it was only after the debacle of al-Qaida’s forces in
        Afghanistan in the autumn of 2001 that they began to target directly Jewish
        communities and interests.
        The first successful al-Qaida attack after the defeat in Afghanistan was the
        suicide bombing using a fuel tanker on 11 April 2003, outside the ancient
        synagogue on the island of Djerba, Tunisia. The attack killed 14 German
        tourists, a French citizen, and four Tunisians. Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, al-Qaida’s
        spokesman, claimed the attack was carried out by a “youth [who] could not see
        his brothers in Palestine butchered and murdered...[while] he saw Jews
        cavorting in Djerba”.[6]

        On 16 May 2003, an old Jewish cemetery at the heart of Casablanca’s ancient
        medina and a luxury hotel frequented by Israelis were targeted. The Belgian
        consulate was damaged in a simultaneous attack apparently aimed at a Jewish-
        owned Italian restaurant. Five explosions occurred within 30 minutes of each
        other, all triggered by 13 suicide bombers carrying explosives, killing more
        than 40 people. Local Islamists, including Salafiya Jihadiya, an extremist
        group linked ideologically to al-Qaida and groups in Algeria, were responsible
        for the bombings.


        A Turkish connection?[7]
        Islamic terrorist organizations active in Turkey during the 1990’s sought to
        establish an Islamic Sharia’-based state on the Iranian example. They profited
        from deeper social and political trends in Turkish society, and at the same
        time strengthened these trends by their violence. These groups enjoyed wide
        Iranian support and often acted on behalf of Iranian local and regional
        political and strategic interests.[8] However, despite the existence of some
        infrastructure in Europe, the Turkish Islamic groups have not attacked Western
        targets or acted abroad, unlike other Islamic groups and the PKK.

        The Great East Islamic Raiders Front (IBDA/C)
        IBDA/C is a terrorist organization that adopted the ideology of the “Great
        East” of Necip Fazil Kisakürek, which calls for a federal state based on the
        Ottoman principles. Active since the middle of the 1970’s it has become more
        extremist and aggressive since the beginning of the 1990’s. Although an Islamic
        movement struggling for the constitution of an Islamic state, it uses leftist
        slogans in its publications and accepts ex-Marxists into its ranks. It is also
        extremely anti-Semitic and anti-Christian in its propaganda and terrorist
        activity. IBDA/C generally opposes all the other Islamic Movements and rejects
        Iranian Shiism. Its leader is Salih Izzet Erdis known by the name Salih
        Mirzabeyoglu. Erdis was arrested in December 1998.
        The organizational structure is not hierarchic and is based on quite
        independen
        • Gość: *©*©* : NaziSlamKalifatSStaat : IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se 12.12.03, 02:41
          www.ict.org.il/articles/articledet.cfm?articleid=502
          news.google.com/news?num=100&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=Metin+Kaplan&sa=N&tab=wn

          Suspected Islamists targeted in 13 states
          Frankfurter Allgemeine, Germany - 4 hours ago
          COLOGNE. A coordinated series of police raids described as possibly
          the biggest in the history of the Federal Republic of Germany ...

          Police mount raids of Islamic group
          Expatica, Netherlands - 10 hours ago
          KARLSRUHE - In a massive sweep, more than 5,000 police around Germany carried
          out
          early-morning raids against suspected backers of the banned Islamic
          extremist ...


          Massive German anti-militant raid
          CNN International, Asia - 10 hours ago
          BERLIN, Germany (Reuters)
          • zupagrzybowa ARAfatSStat 14.12.03, 19:23
            http://www.intelligence.org.il/eng/sib/mpa_11_03/alein_1203_d.htm

            Anti-American propaganda interwoven with anti-Semitic material

            Anti-American propaganda interwoven with anti-Semitic material was found in
            al-'Ein mosque. Following is the translation of a manifesto found on the
            mosque's notice board. It contains virulent propaganda against the United
            States and its leaders and explicitly calls for the murder of American troops
            stationed in Iraq . It is written in vulgar language and contains anti-Semitic
            references as well.


            Manifesto translation
            In the name of Allah, the all-merciful
            [Verse from the Qur'an]: “Many were the tales of the history [of peoples] who
            passed away before you [came into being]; [to be convinced for yourselves]
            travel through the earth and see [with your own eyes] the end of those who
            rejected Truth” [Surah 3 (Aal Imran) Verse 137]

            America will leave Iraq in total defeat, as Israel was forced to leave South
            Lebanon!
            Indeed, the American government is the embodiment of everything Allah
            forbade all people in the past to become ! That is because the United States
            provides an asylum for every obscene conception [imaginable] and even finds an
            article in its Constitution to protect it, from sexual perversion to abortion --
            indeed every manifestation of its questionable morality, which is actually of
            a government ruled by Satanic immorality . For proof, it is sufficient to
            mention the Jews who have reached the top ranks of the present American
            government, represented by the Jewish [Holy] Trinity :
            Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense [who is not Jewish] ;
            Paul Wolfowitz, Assistant Secretary of Defense ;
            Richard Perle, Pentagon advisor on matters of national security .

            In addition to the Jewish Trinity, who hold posts [of the highest
            importance] in the White House [sic], there are more than 500 other members of
            the Senate and the House of Representatives who “sold their souls” [sic] for
            Jewish gold [as can be seen] in the cult of the Golden Calf (a symbol of
            venality)! Two of them are Condoleezza [Rice] and Colin [Powell]: two black
            foundlings picked up out of the gutters of Harlem by the Jews [especially] to
            serve as their stooges .

            [As noted] the leaflet's headline [claims that] America will leave Iraq in
            total defeat, as Israel was forced to leave South Lebanon. The claim is based
            on the following data: [Ariel] Sharon [the current Prime Minister of Israel]
            reached the palace at Ba'badah [the seat of the Lebanese president], just as
            [General] Meyers reached Saddam [Hussein]'s palace. However, did Sharon stay
            there?! How did the Jews and the soldiers of [General] Antoine Lahad leave
            South Lebanon?!

            [Remember that] evil arises suddenly and not according to [previous]
            decision. Indeed, the American government knows that it began the war against
            Iraq as an evil act of aggression. All the reasons it gave for starting the war
            were lies , and proof of that is the reception prepared for the American army,
            against which the entire Iraqi nation stood firm, and the acts of theft and
            looting which [the American army] permitted throughout Iraq as revenge upon
            [its] ancient civilization .

            Indeed, the United States is a country without roots which has existed for
            only 200 years [sic] . In fact, what occurred in Iraq reveals to the entire
            world what American democracy [the words “American democracy” printed in large,
            bold type] really is. In any case , [the United States] declared war [on Iraq
            to achieve] the following goals :

            To increase America's international hegemony by taking over all the
            world's natural resources, especially its oil.
            To destroy the religion of Islam as an enemy which has the ability of
            providing, in the future, an integrated way of life for all mankind, based on
            the Qur'an and the Sunnah ([the basis for] the sole rule of Allah) [parentheses
            in the original text].
            The creating of conditions leading to the establishment of a “greater
            Israel” by means of Jewish deceit through the exploitation of American might.
            Actually, the Zionists and American capital share mutual interests, incarnated
            in their ownership of the giant corporations which rule the United States (the
            rule of Satan) [parentheses in the original text].

            The aforementioned goals spring from one source: lack of the fear of heaven,
            since America does not believe in Allah's truth, despite its false claims to
            the contrary.

            Through [understanding] the verse from the Qur'an mentioned at the beginning
            of this leaflet, we [can only] come to the conclusion that the United States,
            having lied to Allah and his emissary [that is, the prophet Mohammed], will
            have the following fate: it will be completely defeated in Iraq and will
            retreat in disgrace, the ground burning under its feet. That will be
            accomplished by the many spectacular suicide bombing attacks which will speed
            up the process of sending the Yankees home in black plastic body bags .
            Incidentally, the cartoon most suited to the present situation – and one which
            [previously] harmed the Jews [when they retreated] from South Lebanon

Nie masz jeszcze konta? Zarejestruj się


Nakarm Pajacyka