Dodaj do ulubionych

Jak powstaja pieniadze

13.10.08, 19:41
Znalazlam bardzo dobry link na temat sposobu kreowania pieniadza,ktorym sie
poslugujemy.Dlugi,ale bardzo pouczajacy:
www.bankier.pl/forum/temat_kartel-bankowy-fed-chory-system,5756504.html
Obserwuj wątek
    • kavoo Re: Jak powstaja pieniadze 13.10.08, 20:15
      tu masz wyklad ze stron NBP

      www.nbportal.pl/pl/cw/prezentacje/prezentacje/mechanizm-kreacji

    • zlotyrozbojnik Re: Jak powstaja pieniadze i.... kto je tworzy :) 13.10.08, 20:19
      Who is Henry Paulson?
      By Tom Eley
      23 September 2008

      Use this version to print | Send this link by email | Email the author

      The plan to rescue the US financial industry arrogates virtually unlimited money
      and power over the financial affairs of the state to the office of Treasury
      Secretary Henry Paulson. Paulson is a figure with a long history of intimate
      connections to the political and financial elite.

      In 1970, fresh from the Masters program of the Harvard Business School, Paulson
      entered the Nixon administration, working first as staff assistant to the
      assistant secretary of defense. In 1972-73, Paulson worked as office assistant
      to John Erlichman, assistant to the president for domestic affairs. Erlichman
      was one of the key figures involved in organizing President Richard Nixon’s
      notorious “plumbers” unit that carried out illegal covert operations against the
      president’s political opponents, including espionage, blackmail, and revenge.
      Ehlichman resigned in 1973, and in 1975 he was convicted of obstruction of
      justice, perjury, and conspiracy, and was imprisoned for 18 months.

      Utilizing his connections, Paulson went to work for Goldman Sachs in 1974. In a
      2007 feature, the British newspaper the Guardian wrote, “Not only was he well
      connected enough to get the job [in the Nixon White House], but well connected
      enough to resign in the thick of the Watergate scandal without ever getting
      caught up in the fallout. He went straight to Goldman back home in Illinois.”

      Paulson rose through the ranks of Goldman Sachs, becoming a partner in 1982,
      co-head of investment banking in 1990, chief operating officer in 1994. In 1998
      he forced out his co-chairman Jon Corzine “in what amounted to a coup,”
      according to New York Times economics correspondent Floyd Norris, and took over
      the post of CEO.

      Goldman Sachs is perhaps the single best-connected Wall Street firm. Its
      executives routinely go in and out of top government posts. Corzine went on to
      become US senator from New Jersey and is now the state’s governor. Corzine’s
      predecessor, Stephen Friedman, served in the Bush administration as assistant to
      the president for economic policy and as chairman of the National Economic
      Council (NEC). Friedman’s predecessor as Goldman Sachs CEO, Robert Rubin, served
      as chairman of the NEC and later treasury secretary under Bill Clinton.

      Agence France Press, in a 2006 article on Paulson’s appointment, “Has Goldman
      Sachs Taken Over the Bush Administration?” noted that, in addition to Paulson,
      “[t]he president’s chief of staff, Josh Bolten, and the chairman of the
      Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Jeffery Reuben, are Goldman alumni.”

      “But the flow goes both ways,” the article continued, “Goldman recently hired
      Robert Zoellick, who stepped down as the US deputy secretary of state, and
      Faryar Shirzad, who worked as one of Bush’s national security advisors.”

      Prior to being selected as treasury secretary, Paulson was a major individual
      campaign contributor to Republican candidates, giving over $336,000 of his own
      money between 1998 and 2006.

      Since taking office, Paulson has overseen the destruction of three of Goldman
      Sachs’ rivals. In March, Paulson helped arrange the fire sale of Bear Stearns to
      JPMorgan Chase. Then, a little more than a week ago, he allowed Lehman Brothers
      to collapse, while simultaneously organizing the absorption of Merrill Lynch by
      Bank of America. This left only Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley as major
      investment banks, both of which were converted on Sunday into bank holding
      companies, a move that effectively ended the existence of the investment bank as
      a distinct economic form.

      In the months leading up to his proposed $700 billion bailout of the financial
      industry, Paulson had already used his office to dole out hundreds of billions
      of dollars. After his July 2008 proposal for $70 billion to resolve the
      insolvency of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac failed, Paulson organized the
      government takeover of the two mortgage-lending giants for an immediate $200
      billion price tag, while making the government potentially liable for hundreds
      of billions more in bad debt. He then organized a federal purchase of an 80
      percent stake in the giant insurer American International Group (AIG) at a cost
      of $85 billion.

      These bailouts have been designed to prevent a chain reaction collapse of the
      world economy, but more importantly they aimed to insulate and even reward the
      wealthy shareholders, like Paulson, primarily responsible for the financial
      collapse.

      Paulson bears a considerable amount of personal responsibility for the crisis.

      Paulson, according to a celebratory 2006 BusinessWeek article entitled “Mr. Risk
      Goes to Washington,” was “one of the key architects of a more daring Wall
      Street, where securities firms are taking greater and greater chances in their
      pursuit of profits.” Under Paulson’s watch, that meant “taking on more debt:
      $100 billion in long-term debt in 2005, compared with about $20 billion in 1999.
      It means placing big bets on all sorts of exotic derivatives and other securities.”

      According to the International Herald Tribune, Paulson “was one of the first
      Wall Street leaders to recognize how drastically investment banks could enhance
      their profitability by betting with their own capital instead of acting as mere
      intermediaries.” Paulson “stubbornly assert[ed] Goldman’s right to invest in,
      advise on and finance deals, regardless of potential conflicts.”

      Paulson then handsomely benefited from the speculative boom. This wealth was
      based on financial manipulation and did nothing to create real value in the
      economy. On the contrary, the extraordinary enrichment of individuals like
      Paulson was the corollary to the dismantling of the real economy, the
      bankrupting of the government, and the impoverishment of masses the world over.

      Paulson was compensated to the tune of $30 million in 2004 and took home $37
      million in 2005. In his career at Goldman Sachs he built up a personal net worth
      of over $700 million, according to estimates.

      After Paulson’s ascension to the treasury, his colleagues at Goldman Sachs
      carried on the bonanza. At the end of 2006, Paulson’s successor Lloyd Blankfein
      was handed over a $53.4 million year-end bonus, while 11 other Goldman Sachs
      executives raked in $150 million in year-end bonuses combined. That year, the
      top investment firms Goldman Sacks, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Lehman
      Brothers, and Bear Stearns handed out $36 billion in bonuses. At the end of
      2007, the executives of the same firms, excepting Merrill, were handed another
      $30 billion.

    • salagan Re: Jak powstaja pieniadze - odpowiedź 13.10.08, 20:47
      Pouczający tekst. Ponieważ nie mam długów - już wiem, niestety jestem biedny, co
      wynika ze struktury współczesnego "pieniądza." Dobry i zarazem diaboliczny tekst...
    • damkon Re: Jak powstaja pieniadze 13.10.08, 21:51
      Artykul rzeczywiscie przydlugi, ale zarazem dosc interesujacy.
      Nasuwaja sie wiec nastepujace wnioski: trzeba zastapic system
      pieniadza papierowego standardem zlota, przy zalozeniu jego
      stuprocentowego pokrycia w kruszcu a takze zniesc tzw. system rezerw
      czastkowych i wprowadzic wolna bankowosc. No i (za co pewnie poleca
      na mnie cale kalumnie ze strony pozostalych uczestnikow tego forum)
      docelowo zlikwidowac instytucje banku centralnego.
      • salagan Re: do damkon 13.10.08, 22:12
        No nie przesadzaj z gromami - masz mój głos za likwidacją instytucji pt. bank
        centralny. Wolny obieg pieniędzy jest wolny bez wyjątków... w tym wypadku, jak
        się wydaje, wyjątek nie potwierdza reguły.

Nie masz jeszcze konta? Zarejestruj się


Nakarm Pajacyka