Gość: !!!
IP: 195.152.54.*
11.09.04, 11:01
Zionist Provocation
under False Flag
By George Pumphrey
The hoax perpetrated by Marie Leone, a French woman who claimed she was a
victim of an 'anti-Semitic attack' on a suburban train RER made a profound
impact in France. George Pumphrey followed the story and immediately after
publication of the first reports, he wrote:
I would be very careful about jumping to conclusions about this incident.
There are several things that make this entire story smack of a hoax.
In the article there is almost no information of WHAT happened. This reminds
me of the lynching/pogrom atmosphere that is usually created. ANYONE asking
for proof of the accused being the culprits immediately becomes an accomplice
or - in the current vernacular - a "holocaust denier". Blind faith is being
called for, and nothing less will be accepted.
There has been a campaign since some time to paint an image of France as
being an "anti-Semitic" (which in the current misuse of the term means anti-
Zionist) nation. Hence the image of 20 + French(wo)men who did not intervene
during the attack, nor came forward as witnesses.
Now to the culprit(s): They are said to be Beurs, North Africans. How does
one know? There are many who look like Beurs in France, including many Jews
from North Africa. I saw an advertisement in Le Monde that was a veiled
recruitment notice for Sepharadim to join the Mossad. I don't doubt that
these recruitments are still taking place. So there is the possibility that
IF the incident DID take place, that the culprits could have been Beurs but
could also have been people made to look and act the roles.
The combination of Beurs and Swastikas don't go together in today's context.
The Beurs - and others who criticize Israel - is not from the extreme right
(Nazi) tradition, but from the Arab tradition and a sense of violation of
Arab rights. And if they were fascists, they would not have made their
swastikas with magic markers when they were armed with knives. If this were a
hoax, the "young mother" could have come into the RER with the swastikas
marked on her stomach and no one would have noticed.
Another example: I don't know how many of you remember the bomb that blew up
in the early 80s in front of the synagogue on rue de Copernic. (Le Point 23
mars 1981 "Copernic: les tueurs étaient palestiniens") Also there the PCF and
MRAP jumped out in front beating their chests calling for a big demonstration
only later to learn that Zionist organizations had infiltrated the FANE. "On
m'a demandé d'infiltrer la FANE" declared Jean-Yves Pellay (Matin 28.11,1980)
a former légionnaire. Also there, when the news broke that Zionists had
sacrificed Jews - without having done anything to prevent the bomb from
exploding or to avoid human casualties the chest-beating did not even lead to
a self-critical "I'll be more careful next time."
Does the turning over of the stroller/baby carriage not bring to mind another
anti- Arab hoax: Think of the incubator babies on the floor of the Kuwait
City Hospital in 1991 which never took place. Was this meant to be the image
transmitted?
Think of the target group. The line goes: because she lives in the XVIeme
Arr. She is supposed to be Jewish, but she turns out not to be, so "just the
fact that you are living in the XVIeme makes you a target of the Beurs. So
you'd better do something about them before they get you." The MRAP calls for
new laws (to repress the Beurs or the fight chauvinism against the Arabs?) In
any case, not many people from the XVIeme will join the MRAP but they will
support laws to repress, maybe even suppress, the Beurs.
The article gives extremely little facts about the attack itself, and a
helluvalot about all the notables who have decided to stand shoulder to
shoulder with Israel in her Zionist against the Arabs. So each of the
politicians and political groups have to publicly come out and show that they
are part of the newly found consensus. That consensus is not there when a
gendarme summarily executes a young Beur on the sidewalk in Southern France,
after he had been subdued. Not to be underestimated is also the effect of the
World Court's verdict on the wall.
The bombing in Tel Aviv and elsewhere should also be seen in this context.
The headlines read today: "Sharon: We have the right to protect ourselves
against terror". At a time when the Palestinians won an essential public
victory, why would THEY spoil it with a suicide bombing, that can only
strengthen the hand of Israel?
This leaves only 2 questions: With everyone defending the young woman, who is
left to defend democracy and the Beurs, who are unjustly generalized as being
anti-Jewish because they are anti-Zionist and pro-Palestinian?
Case of Achille Lauro
Here is an example of a case of Zionist false flag terrorism. False Flag
terrorism means that the terrorists believe that they are following
orders "to help the cause" without realizing that their leadership has long
since been taken over by their enemy and it is (s)he who is calling the
shots, and they are all against the goals of "the cause".
A successful false flag terrorist attack that discredited the cause of the
terrorists is the case of the Palestinian hijacking of the Italian cruse
ship, "Achille Lauro" in 1985. This operation was ordered by the Israeli
secret service and organized by their Palestinian agents inside Palestinian
terrorist organizations. The details of the preparations are related by an
insider to the upper echelons of the Israeli secret services, Ari Ben-
Menashe, former special intelligence advisor to Israeli Prime Minister
Yitzhak Shamir -in his book, "Profits of War."
"Radi [a Jordanian military officer who was unaware that he, since some time
had already been smuggling arms for the Israeli secret service] went back to
his drinking and womanizing and the money he made selling arms for Pearson
all drained away. At that very vulnerable point, in 1978, Pearson stepped in
again and offered Radi a £200,000 loan. This time, Pearson made it quite
clear to him that the money was coming from an Israeli source. The desperate
Radi accepted the loan and was recruited to work for an antiterrorist group
in Israel run by Rafi Eitan. The group's methods were rather unconventional,
one could say heinous, but it had operated successfully for years. An example
is the case of the "Palestinian" attack on the cruise ship Achille Lauro in
1985. That was in fact, an Israeli "black" propaganda operation to show what
a deadly, cutthroat bunch the Palestinians were. The operation worked like
this: Eitan passed instructions to Radi that it was time for the Palestinians
to make an attack and do something cruel, though no specifics were laid out.
Radi passed orders on to Abu'l Abbas, who, to follow such orders, was
receiving millions from Israeli intelligence officers posing as Sicilian
dons. Abbas then gathered a team to attack the cruise ship. The team was told
to make it bad, to show the world what lay in store for other unsuspecting
citizens if Palestinian demands were not met. As the world knows, the group
picked on an elderly American Jewish man [Leon Klinghoffer] in a wheelchair,
killed him, and threw his body overboard. They made their point. But for
Israel it was the best kind of anti-Palestinian propaganda."
Interesting in this account is that in order to "show what a deadly,
cutthroat bunch the Palestinians were" Israelis activated their agents among
Palestinian terrorists to tell them to be particularly brutal to Jews, as
Jews. What Ben-Menashe does not mention in this anecdote is the second
objective sought by Israel: convince Jews of the merits of Zionism and Israel
as their sole "protector" on the planet.
Ben-Menashe mentions the "success" that Eitan's metho
