Zajrzałem sobie do Ynetnews, bo mnie zainteresował artykuł o znaleziskach archeologicznych w Jerozolimie i zaraz znalazłem, w dziale Opinie, artykuł niejakiego Yarona Londona "On elections and fences". O polityce rządu ILa wobec Autonomii Palestyńskiej i kwestii ewentualnego uczestnictwa Hamasu w przyszłym rządzie Autonomii. Ciekawe, bo mowi się tam otwarcie o sprawie, za której poruszenie na niejednego tutaj wylano kubeł pomyj pt. "zwierzęcy antysemityzm". Itd.
<<Abbas may or may not be right, but we would be wise to accept his argument.
We are strong, whereas the tiny Palestinian Authority, even were it to be ruled by Hamas, would be no more threatening to Israel than the other armed gangs currently found on the Palestinian street.
We frequently hear the argument that Israel "should not legitimize ay country that can't bring it to crack down on terrorist organizations."
But I will remind the reader that when the United Nations voted to partition the western Land of Israel, no demand was made for the Jewish State to disarm groups such as Lehi and Menachem Begin's Irgun.
These "rebels" soon integrated into the Israel Defense Force, but the Irgun continued insist on its right to act independently in Jerusalem.
The organization's logo - a gun held over both western and eastern Eretz Yisrael (including the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan) – was the symbol of the official Israeli opposition. And before the group disbanded, Lehi managed to assassinate UN mediator Count Folke Bernadotte.>>
Łebski facet z tego Londona.
Całość pod:
www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3153541,00.html
