Kretyni w Senacie USA :)

[nopes]

Poziom polityków amerykańskich nie jest zbyt wysoki.
Nie tylko Bush, ale i senator Pat Roberts ( szef Senate Intelligence Committee ) mówia "nukiular", zamiast "nuclear".

Teraz nastepny moron sie odezwał na temat internetu.
Ted Stevens’ (R-Alaska) (szef Senate Commerce Committee) opowiada swoje wizje na temat internetu. I ten gość odpowiada za ustawodastwo...

www.crooksandliars.com/posts/2006/07/03/how-the-internet-works-by-ted-stevens/

Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Stevens’ (R-Alaska) explanation for his opposition to net neutrality, you’re missing out on a deeply disconcerting perspective. He asked, for example, "what happens to your own personal internet" when someone else tried to download 10 movies at the same time.

"I just the other day got, an internet was sent by my staff at 10 o’clock in the morning on Friday and I just got it yesterday. Why? Because it got tangled up with all these things going on the internet commercially. […]

[1ja]

Dobrze,ze ty ich wspomagasz.

[axx61]

Ale chwileczke/ Kretynow i debili jest wiecej w ...Polsce.
Prosze Polska 38 mln ludnosci 100 plus 460
USA 280 mln ludnosci 100 plus 435

Kretyn kretynowi nierówny

[felusiak1]

Na przykład ty jesteś stuprocentowym kretynem i do tego nieudacznikiem.
Inni kretyni zostali senatorami i prezydentami a ty?

Eisenhower, Truman, Johnson i Carter mówili nucular, a Carter był nucular
engineer. Nie tylko Roberts mówi nucular w senacie. Robert Byrd, prominentny
krytyk Busha mówi nucular.

falusiak najlepszy kretyn

[nopes]

> nieudacznikiem.
> Inni kretyni zostali senatorami i prezydentami a ty?

Ja mam czas. A ponadto, ponieważ kretynem nie jestem, to i chyba bym szans nie miał w wyborach.
Ale ty fallusiak (t0g) jestes słabym kretynem nieudacznikiem. Dla ciebie już za pózno, a nawet na sołtysa w swoim rodzinnym kibucu cie nie stac.

[felusiak1]

Trudno jest traktować poważnie twoje oświadczenie, że nie jesteś kretynem.
Postawiłeś sie w sytuacji bez wyjścia gdyz nie jesteś w stanie tego w zaden
sposób udowodnić. Jak udowodnisz, że kazdy twój wpis nie jest kretyński skoro
gołym okiem, bez stetoskopu widac, że jest.
Trzeba być kretynem aby pomyśleć, że t0g to felusiak.
Ale jeśli wierzysz i dobrze ci z tym to dlaczego miałbym odbierac ci siano. Jedz
na zdrowie.

[w_ojciech]

felusiak1 napisała:
> Eisenhower, Truman, Johnson i Carter mówili nucular, a Carter był nucular
> engineer. Nie tylko Roberts mówi nucular w senacie. Robert Byrd, prominentny
> krytyk Busha mówi nucular.
==================================================
Znalazłem rozwiązanie. Wzbogacić język angielski o nowe słowo
"nucular" i wsio budiet OK.

Co Ty na to?

[felusiak1]

Południe wymawia nucular. Na window mówią tam winder a na soda, soder.
Senator Kerry zamiast idea mówi idear co słychać jako ajdier.
Cała masa ludzi, wykształconych wymawia nucular i na dobra sprawę aż do tego
Busha nikt nie robił z tego problemu.

[w_ojciech]

Absolwenci Oxfordu i Cambridge rozpoznają się po sposobie
artykulacji. Jakie to szkoły rozpoznajesz w tym przypadku?

Jednak nie powinni tak mówić.
Nie uważasz?

Tak, studiowalem w USA, oni tam na studiach

[grzegorzlubomirski]

inzynierskich maja wstep do matematyki i zaczynaja od ulamkow, dzielenia
dodawania itp.

[stary_z_lichenia]

Ekspert angielskiego się znalazł.

[kingfish]

Najwyraźniej jesteś znacznie za głupi żeby zrozumiec dlaczego są rożne wymowy
słowa nuclear i zresztą prawie wszystkich słów.

Zgroza na tym forum, poziom basmanowy:-(

Znowu trol w postaci "eksperta" :)

[nopes]

Jak te trole odnajdują ciągle inne pseuda.
Zgadnijmy kto to jest? :)

> Najwyraźniej jesteś znacznie za głupi żeby zrozumiec dlaczego są rożne wymowy
> słowa nuclear i zresztą prawie wszystkich słów.

Co za kretyn - "ekspert" :)
Tego nawet komentować nie można, bo co mu powiedzieć? Może po prostu do szkoły wysłac...

Kretynie, zakuty młocie

[felusiak1]

idź sobie dac siana i przeżuwaj.
Sprowadzasz to forum każdym swoim wypotem na samo dno, prosto do rynsztoka.
Jesli lubisz wraz z odchodami pluskac sie w rynsztoku to pluskaj sie na zdrowie
ale odstosunkuj sie ze swoimi wypotami od reszty.
Moze daj zbadać sobie łepek. Zobacz czy kościa nie zarósł?

no to juz wiemy czyja pacynka. :)

[nopes]

Oczywiscie wiadomo było od początku, ale zawsze lepiej poczekać, aż sam wyskoczy i zaszczeka. :)

A strasznie to narzeka że przegrywa na forum. Oczywiscie niedouczeone , wiec swoim wpisem tylko potwierdza to, co chce zwalczać
Np tutaj
forum.gazeta.pl/forum/72,2.html?f=50&w=44615119&a=44673771


Albo od razu wprowadza swoją bryndze, czyli bełkot jak tutaj

forum.gazeta.pl/forum/72,2.html?f=50&w=44581543&a=44581985

[felusiak1]

ja przegrywam z tobą, upsiak?
Chłopaku, ja ciebie traktuję jak półgłówka do zabawy w ciuciubabkę.
Nie mogę przecież przegrac jeśli nie gram.
A jak mogę grać z upośledzonym. Zarzuconoby mi wykorzystywanie niepełnosprawnej
osoby w celu osobistych korzysci a to byłoby niemoralne

Tresowane pudle

[zbalansowany]

Silence Of The Poodles
By Former Rep. Paul Findley
7-6-6


Words spoken years ago by George W. Ball, a distinguished diplomat, author and
champion of human rights, have vivid, new currency: "When Israel's interests
are being considered, Members of Congress act like trained poodles. They jump
dutifully through hoops held by Israel's lobby." In the same interview, Ball
said, "The lobby's most powerful instrument of intimidation is the reckless
charge of anti-Semitism." Sadly, his words ring true today, verified by my own
experiences and those of many of my colleagues in the U.S. legislature.

Ball could have added that, except for exuberant praise of Israel, the poodles
remain mute as they jump through the hoops, lest they lapse into free speech
and say something that will spoil their chances for re-election.

The fear of being charged with anti-Semitism outranks all other worries that
bedevil politicians, and the lobby has marketed it so efficiently that a wall
of silence shields the American people from awareness of the lobby's activities
and U.S. complicity in Israel's longstanding abuse of international law and
Arab human rights, violations that the rest of the world follows with dismay
and anger. Fear of the anti-Semitism stain is intensified these days, because
the lobby has succeeded in redefining anti-Semitism to include any criticism of
Israeli behavior, an inferred threat that prompts all major media to ignore or
sanitize reports of Israeli violations.

My authority for making these statements comes from having been a close student
of the lobby for over 30 years, the first 22 as a member of Congress. The lobby
leaders chose me as their number one target because I met unashamedly with PLO
leader Yasser Arafat and later demanded the suspension of U.S. aid to Israel
for its unlawful use of U.S.-donated military supplies. In 1982, when the
American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the main center of Israeli
lobbying in Washington, claimed credit for keeping me from election to a 12th
term in the House of Representatives, I became the lobby's prize trophy.

Two years later, Sen. Charles Percy (R-IL), who was also guilty of failing to
toe the AIPAC line, joined me on the trophy shelf. Our fate has tended to focus
the minds of other members of Congress, discouraging them from the temptation
to speak out about Israel's misbehavior.

Israel's U.S. lobby is peerless among the hundreds of lobbies in our nation's
capital for one main reason: it alone is armed with the ultimate persuader, an
ample supply of indictments for anti-Semitism.

The supply promotes automatic cooperation when legislation on behalf of Israel
moves forward. It is the modern-day Sword of Damocles, a fearsome instrument
that hangs over almost every head in our government. Until recently, it seemed
to cow all of the nation's prestigious scholars, except for a few hardy ones
like Prof. Noam Chomsky of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Juan
Cole of the University of Michigan.

"When Israel's interests are being considered, Members of Congress act like
trained poodles."

In February, in a rare burst of academic candor, two other distinguished
professors, John J. Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago and Stephen M.
Walt of Harvard's Kennedy School, broke the silence with the publication of
their 81-page, heavily footnoted study titled, The Israel Lobby and U.S.
Foreign Policy.

In the study, they conclude that the flagrant, longstanding pro-Israel bias in
U.S. Middle East policy has enabled Israel to tilt U.S. policy in ways that
benefit Israel to the disadvantage of U.S. national interests, luring America
even into costly wars and a rising tide of ill fame worldwide. They pin much of
the blame on the influence of Israel's U.S. lobby. One of their most
significant conclusions: "The U.S. has a terrorism problem in good part because
it is so closely allied with Israel."

Mearsheimer and Walt quickly discovered why most of their academic colleagues
behave much like the political poodles on Capitol Hill. Their study instantly
became controversial, the subject of a vigorous U.S. discussion over Israel's
role in U.S. foreign policy for the first time since the Jewish state came into
being in 1948. A shorter version edited by the authors was published in the
respected London Review of Books because no U.S. periodical was brave enough to
give it a public audience.

The study provoked such strong trans-Atlantic shock waves, thanks mainly to the
Internet, that the wielders of the modern Sword of Damocles have gone public
with a barrage of full-throated epithets, charging Mearsheimer and Walt
with "ignorant propaganda, academic garbage, anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist
drivel."

The Harvard Crimson quoted Harvard Prof. Alan Dershowitz as labeling the
authors "liars" and "bigots." Two other academics, in a letter to the London
Review of Books, wrote ominously: "Accusations of powerful Jews behind the
scenes are part of the most dangerous traditions of modern anti-Semitism." They
overlooked the fact that the lobby also includes powerful Christians.

In the New York Daily News, a less strident critic, Harvard Prof. David Gergen,
rebuked the authors by declaring that "over the course of four tours in the
White House I never once saw a decision in the Oval Office to tilt U.S. foreign
policy in favor of Israel at the expense of America's interest." An experienced
politician himself, Gergen must know that such tilts would never be recorded
for anyone to see, even in the privacy of the Oval Office. In the column,
Gergen mistakenly credited President Ronald Reagan with stopping Israel's 1982
bloody assault on Lebanon.

To the contrary, as George W. Ball recorded in his book Error and Betrayal in
Lebanon (p. 45), Israeli Prime Minister Begin was defiant, conveying his
refusal in these words: "Nobody, nobody is going to bring Israel to her knees.
You must have forgotten that the Jews kneel but to God."

No matter what lies ahead, Mearsheimer and Walt have already well served the
American public. Their initiative has broken through a dangerous wall of
silence. Thanks to publicity arising from their study, many thousands of U.S.
citizens are aware for the first time that a domestic lobby on behalf of Israel
ex erts a significant role in forming U.S. Middle East policy, even on
decisions of war. They are also now aware that religious communities-minority
elements of both Christianity and Judaism-are the main pillars of the lobby.

This knowledge maybe stir enough public curiosity for a civilized and edifying
public debate to ensue. It is difficult to conceive of a topic more urgently
worthy of public examination.

Paul Findley (R-IL), who served in the U.S. Congress from 1961 to 1983, is the
author of the bestseller, They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions
Confront Israel's Lobby, available from the AET Book Club. He and Mrs. Findley
reside in Jacksonville, IL, where he can be reached via e-mail at <
[e-mail]>.

[nopes]

Człowieczku. Przeciez nawet na tym wątku widać, co o tobie pisałem: "swoim wpisem tylko potwierdza to, co chce zwalczać".
Mam z takim zabawe jak z tresowana małpka.

A onanizuj sie upsiak do woli...................

[felusiak1]

[kingfish]

Ty masz zdrowie Felusiak.
Ja tylko mam nadzieje ze to tylko jakis nastolatek a nie dorosla osoba.

pzdr

tyle umie...

[nopes]

Kto nauczył małpke odszczekiwac sie?