Znowu cenzura i znowu Zydzi ,...

[explicit]

Specjalisci od politycznej poprawnosci i zatykania ludziom pyskow - Z
prezentacja Arabow w jak nagorszym swietle nie maja problemow ,...

============================================================================

'Anti-Jewish' Turkish film pulled from US theater
=================================================
TOM TUGEND, THE JERUSALEM POST Nov. 26, 2006

A Turkish film featuring a venal, bloodstained Jewish doctor has been
withdrawn from screening in the United States.

In Valley of the Wolves: Iraq, American actor Gary Busey portrays a Jewish
doctor in the American army who cuts out the organs of Iraqis at the Abu
Ghraib prison and sells them to wealthy clients in New York, London and Tel
Aviv.

The film, a blockbuster hit in its native country, had been scheduled to open
Friday at two theaters in Los Angeles and one in San Francisco.

In early November, however, Valley of the Wolves was quietly dropped from the
theaters' advance schedules.

Gregory Gardner of Luminous Velocity Releasing, a company involved in
distributing the film in the United States, said that the Turkish producer,
Pana Films, had withdrawn the movie without explanation.

Attempts to obtain further information from American or Turkish sources were
unsuccessful, but a protest filed by the Anti-Defamation League may have
played a role in the cancellation.

In an October 19 letter to Nabi Sensoy, Turkey's ambassador to the US, ADL
leaders expressed concern at "the incendiary anti-Jewish and anti-American
themes and characters in the film" and pointed to previous inquiries about
the wide availability of anti-Semitic publications in Turkey.

www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1162378487170&pagename=JPost%
2FJPArticle%2FPrinter

[dana33]

mowisz, rozlupaniec, ze jak nie idzie z przekazami finansowymi, to moze pojdzie
z filmem? hm.... napewno ci warto sprobowac... :))))

[explicit]

Cos ci powiem ciucius - Gdyby Zydzi byli pewna siebie nacja to nie zawracali
by se d#py takimi pie..mi , a ze jestescie przeczuleni na pukncie wlasnego
image , swiadczy tylko o tym , ze jestescie pelni kompleksow ,...
=============================================================================
mowisz, rozlupaniec, ze jak nie idzie z przekazami finansowymi, to moze pojdzie
z filmem? hm.... napewno ci warto sprobowac... :))))

[dana33]

zdaje mi sie, ze to ty sobie d zawracasz, bo gdyby nie ty, to bym o tym nie
widziala... u nas sie o takich duperelach nie pisze.... :))))

[explicit]

Heheh , spojrzyj na link a J Post , najpoczytniejszy dziennik w zio-raju ,
nu tego , zaden szmatlawiec - Ooo , ciucius , te wszystkie sondaze , Jew
organizacji , ile wy na ten crap wydajecie , zeby miec palec na pulsie ???
==============================================================================
zdaje mi sie, ze to ty sobie d zawracasz, bo gdyby nie ty, to bym o tym nie
widziala... u nas sie o takich duperelach nie pisze.... :))))

[dana33]

najpoczytniejszy????? nu, nu, ale ty masz informacje...

Gary Busey passes for a Jew?

[felusiak1]

Doktor, nawet niezły, ale Żyd wycina organy i sprzedaje w Nowym Jorku na czarnym
rynku, róg Piatej i 72-giej. Ci Żydzi to muszą być bardzo źli ludzie. Sami
krętacze i spekulanci. A czy ten doktor nie przekazuje uzyskanych z procederu
pieniedzy Izraelowi? I pewnie odpisuje od podatku. Rozbój w biały dzień.
A jak było naprawdę. Amerykański komitet radia i telewizji, prasy, filmu i
publikacji wydał dekret zabraniajacy dystrybucji filmu na terenie USA, Puerto
Rico i American Virgin Islands a także Guam i Samoa. Air Canada przyjmuje
rezerwacje na loty do Montrealu na projekcje filmu. Dobrze, ze te neokońskie
macki nie siegają Quebecu.

[explicit]

Felusiak nie pie#dol , odpowiedz krotko ,... Popierasz ban , czy nie ? ,...
==============================================================================

Jaki ban?

[felusiak1]

Kto zabronił dystrybucji? A, juz wiem, Żydzi.
Czy to taki sam ban jak Fahrenheit 911 miał nałozony przez Disney?
A co powiesz o banie Fahrenhype 911?

[explicit]

Zionists seek to silence critics of US policy toward Israel
===========================================================

These organizations devote themselves to the defense of Israel and its
diplomatic and political interests

Their attempts to silence their critics and smear their opponents as anti-
Semites demonstrate their reactionary character

Prominent Zionist groups and individuals in the US are conducting a campaign of
intimidation against liberal and left-wing critics of the Israeli regime and
Washington’s policy toward Israel.

Tony Judt, a noted historian and the director of New York University’s Remarque
Institute, was to have spoken in New York earlier this month at a meeting
called by a nonprofit organization that had rented space from the Polish
Consulate.

After telephone calls from the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the American
Jewish Committee, his lecture on “The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy” was
cancelled barely an hour before it was scheduled to begin.

Judt, a liberal academic who writes frequently for the New York Review of
Books, was born and raised in Britain.

He lost many members of his own family in the Holocaust, but has aroused the
ire of the Zionist public relations machine because of his sharp criticisms of
Israeli policies and his charge that the Israel lobby has stifled debate on the
Middle East in the US.

The modus operandi of Zionist organizations such as the ADL and the American
Jewish Committee is by now a familiar one. “Inquiries” are made by one or
another of these groups. The message is clear.

As the Polish Consul General said in connection with the contacts made in
regard to Judt’s scheduled appearance, “The phone calls were very elegant but
may be interpreted as exercising a delicate pressure. That’s obvious—we are
adults and our IQs are high enough to understand that.”

Abraham Foxman of the ADL cynically insisted that he hadn’t requested that the
event be shut down, but added, “I think they made the right decision.”

He then spelled out the brazenly anti-democratic and thuggish attitude of
himself and his organization toward anyone who criticizes Israel’s policies and
Washington’s support for those policies.

“He’s taken the position that Israel shouldn’t exist,” Foxman said of
Judt. “That puts him on our radar.”

To clarify his position toward Israel, Judt remarked, “The only thing I have
ever said is that Israel as it is currently constituted, as a Jewish state with
different rights for different groups, is an anachronism in the modern age of
democracies.”

The cancellation of Judt’s lecture is only one in a series of similar
incidents. Judt was also forced to cancel another speech, at Manhattan College
in the Bronx, on the topic “War and Genocide in European Memory Today,” after
he was asked by the event’s sponsors to censor himself by avoiding direct
references to Israel.

Less than a week after the episode at the Polish Consulate, an almost identical
incident took place, this time at the French Embassy.

British-based author Carmen Callil had been scheduled to attend a reception on
October 10 in honor of her forthcoming book, Bad Faith, an account of the Vichy
official who arranged the deportation of thousands of French Jews to their
deaths in the Holocaust.

This event was also canceled at the last moment, apparently because of
complaints over a sentence written by the author in the postscript to the book.

She wrote of becoming anxious, while researching the “helpless terror of the
Jews of France,” to see “what the Jews of Israel were passing on to the
Palestinian people.” She continued, “Like the rest of humanity, the Jews of
Israel ‘forget’ the Palestinians. Everyone forgets.”

Zionist attempts at censorship have a long and distasteful history, especially
in New York City. They are not always successful, but not for lack of trying.

Just a few months ago the New York Theatre Workshop cancelled its production of
My Name is Rachel Corrie, the play about the American student killed by an
Israeli military bulldozer in 2001 as she attempted to stop the destruction of
the home of a Palestinian family.

The production was halted after similar “inquiries” from Zionist circles. My
Name is Rachel Corrie finally opened in Manhattan this month and was met with
warm responses from critics and the public.

The ADL, the American Jewish Committee and other Zionist organizations
disingenuously claim they are not part of a “lobby.”

That is supposedly limited to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the
organization whose specific aim is to influence the US government on behalf of
Israel.

In reality, all of these organizations devote themselves to the defense of
Israel and its diplomatic and political interests.

They are free to do so, but their attempts to silence their critics and smear
their opponents as anti-Semites demonstrate their reactionary character.

The censorship attempts have extended onto university campuses. Campus Watch, a
right-wing web site established by Daniel Pipes several years ago, has drawn up
a blacklist that targets professors of Middle Eastern studies for
alleged “bias” because they have dared to criticize Israel and defend the
Palestinians.

Supporters of Campus Watch have encouraged the sending of hate mail and threats
to these professors, along with calls for their removal from their academic
positions.

The Anti-Defamation League, founded in 1913 to fight against anti-Semitism, has
long since betrayed any commitment to civil liberties and academic freedom when
it comes to critics—including Jewish critics—of the policies and foreign policy
interests of the state of Israel.

Even limited opinion polling reveals the growing opposition among American Jews
to the decades-long Israeli occupation of Palestinian land, but this doesn’t
stop the ADL and similar groups from speaking in the name of all Jews.

The power of these unelected spokesmen is magnified many times by their wealthy
sponsors and their long-established ties to dominant sections of the corporate,
financial and political establishment in New York and Washington.

They have succeeded over many years in propagating the myth that Judaism and
Zionism are identical, and that anti-Zionism is therefore anti-Semitism.

It should be noted that the kind of criticism that Foxman of the ADL says
cannot be voiced in New York City is frequently expressed within Israel itself.

Israeli newspaper columnists, writers, academics and others spoke out during
the recent Israeli aggression in Lebanon. Are they also to be branded anti-
Semites and silenced?

As Judt himself declared, “This is serious and frightening, and only in America—
not in Israel—is this a problem. These are Jewish organizations that believe
they should keep people who disagree with them on the Middle East away from
anyone else who might listen.”

The Zionist organizations involved in such witch-hunting and censorship utilize
the issue of anti-Semitism as a red herring.

They are really concerned with the foreign policy interests of the Israeli
government, and specifically the maintenance of the longstanding alliance
between Israel and Washington.

The alliance between American imperialism and Zionism was fully cemented some
40 years ago, in the wake of the Six Day War of 1967.

Over the past several decades American defenders of the Israeli state have
secured the ironclad support of both major capitalist parties,

[explicit]

Over the past several decades American defenders of the Israeli state have
secured the ironclad support of both major capitalist parties, from the most
liberal Democrats to the neo-conservatives in the Republican Party and the Bush
Administration.

Big business politicians have vied to demonstrate their loyalty to Israeli
policies, and the occasional maverick who deviates from pro-Zionist orthodoxy,
like Republican Congressman Paul Findley some years ago, is usually purged at
the next election with the help of millions of dollars in campaign funds from
the Zionist lobby.

In the recent period, however, public criticism of the existing US policy
toward Israel has begun to emerge within American foreign policy and academic
circles.

To some extent, the feverish campaign to silence all critics of Israel is an
expression of the nervousness within American Zionist circles over this
emerging policy debate.

While the US-Israel alliance has never been closer than during the
administration of George W. Bush, there are signs of a possible shift.

The disaster facing the US ruling elite in Iraq, along with the deepening
external and internal crisis facing Israel, exemplified by its recent debacle
in Lebanon, is emboldening those within the American foreign policy
establishment who argue that US policy is tied too closely to that of Israel.

American Zionist organizations are acutely sensitive to these tremors, hence
their attacks on John Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago and Stephen Walt
of Harvard University.

Mearsheimer and Walt authored a paper earlier this year which charged that the
Israel lobby had distorted US foreign policy and sought to intimidate its
critics.

An article by Mearsheimer and Walt in the London Review of Books was
entitled, “The Israel Lobby: Does it Have too Much Influence on US Foreign
Policy?”

The lobby was defined as “the loose coalition of individuals and organizations
who actively work to steer US foreign policy in a pro-Israel direction.”

Mearsheimer and Walt articulate the views of a section of the American ruling
elite which has concluded that Washington’s virtually uncritical support for
Israeli foreign policy has produced a diplomatic and political disaster for US
interests in the Middle East and elsewhere in the world.

The publication of these views was followed by hysterical charges of anti-
Semitism against the authors, who were accused of stoking up anti-Semitic
notions of an international Jewish conspiracy.

Socialist opponents of Zionism and imperialism do not take sides politically
between Mearsheimer and Walt and their Zionist critics.

The policy shift they propose, while it enrages the Zionists, has nothing to do
with the interests of the international working class or the democratic rights
of the Palestinians, and they are opposed to a struggle against both the
Israeli and Arab bourgeois elites to unite Jewish and Arab workers on the basis
of a democratic and socialist program.

We have no hesitation, however, in denouncing the crude charges of anti-
Semitism leveled against Mearsheimer, Walt, Judt and similar critics of Israel.

There are, of course, anti-Semites among the opponents of the Israeli state,
and they repeat the old anti-Semitic slanders.

There are also a large number of anti-Semites among Israel’s supporters.
Richard Nixon, whose virulent anti-Semitism was exposed on White House tapes in
the wake of the Watergate scandal, had no difficulty aligning himself with
Israel.

Today the Zionists welcome the support of Christian fundamentalists who would
like nothing more than the establishment of a right-wing theocracy in the US.

As far as the Zionist establishment is concerned, the main enemy is not anti-
Semitism, but anti-Zionism.

When it suits its purposes, it is perfectly prepared to recognize this vital
distinction and “overlook” the anti-Semitism among its own supporters.

Hence the warm accolades from the Israel lobby to such figures as Silvio
Berlusconi, the former Italian prime minister, who received an award from the
Anti-Defamation League in 2003 just days after expressing nostalgic sympathy
for the fascist dictator Benito Mussolini.

To the extent that anti-Semitism has gained a new lease on life in the Middle
East and elsewhere, this is largely the responsibility of Zionism itself.

The anti-Semitic pronouncements of such figures as Iranian President
Ahmadinejad are essentially the mirror image of Zionist propaganda, accepting
the claim of the Israeli state to speak for all Jews and the interests of the
Jewish people.

In fact, for the first half-century of its existence, Zionism was a distinct
minority opinion within world Jewry. Its main opposition historically came from
the left—from the socialist and internationalist opponents of all forms of
nationalism and chauvinism.

The attempt to smear left-wing critics as anti-Semites is one of the most
despicable techniques of the Zionist propaganda machine.

The current attacks on even relatively mild critics of Israel are a sign of
weakness. Longstanding Zionist myths are being increasingly exposed to the
light of day. The fraudulent charge of anti-Semitism is beginning to backfire
against those who level it.

The flagrant character of the Zionist intimidation campaign is such that even
some committed Zionists have been forced to question it. The current issue of
the New York Review of Books contains a letter entitled, “The Case of Tony
Judt: An Open Letter to the ADL.”

The letter, signed by more than 100 writers, journalists and academics,
criticizes the ADL’s actions in connection with the planned meeting at the
Polish Consulate, declaring that:

“We are united in believing that a climate of intimidation is inconsistent with
fundamental principles of debate in a democracy . . .

The rules of the game in America oblige citizens to encourage rather than
stifle public debate. We who have signed this letter are dismayed that the ADL
did not choose to play a more constructive role in promoting liberty.”

Among the signers are Peter Beinart, Franklin Foer and Leon Wieseltier, all of
the New Republic, one of the most vociferous defenders of the Zionist state.

The intimidation campaign raises the obvious question of why the Zionists fear
open debate.

An open debate would provide the opportunity to expose the false promise of
Zionism to provide a haven for the Jewish people, as well as to demonstrate the
necessity of the struggle for the unity of Jewish and Arab workers in the fight
for a democratic and socialist Middle East.

[felusiak1]

To zioniści zabanowali turecki film? To co ma do tego wypot zatytułowany
"Syjoniści dążą do uciszenia krytyków amerykańskiej polityki wobec Izraela.
To ten film jest amerykańska polityką. To dlaczego był w Turcji zrobiony.

Masz tu, znalazłem rabina co pewnie napiłby sie z tobą gdybyś mu pozwolił.
Florida Rabbi Says: 'Israel Lobby' bad for Israel, the U.S.
BY RABBI BRUCE WARSHAL
www.shalomctr.org/node/1121
Czytoj....