Dodaj do ulubionych

I Kurojedow poleciał...

04.09.05, 20:00
Wedle PAP został zdymisjonowany i jednocześnie zwolniony z wojska. A niektórzy przewidywali raczej wersję soft - wysłanie na emeryturę ze względów zdrowotnych.
Obserwuj wątek
    • Gość: A.L. Jaka szkoda IP: *.c154.petrotel.pl 04.09.05, 21:20
      ... "nagroda" za całokształt, czy jakaś kolejna wpadka złotoustego admirała??
      • Gość: zwiadowca Re: Jaka szkoda IP: *.marwit.gliwice.pl 04.09.05, 21:40
        fakty.interia.pl/swiat/news?inf=663035
        Putin zdymisjonował dowódcę floty
        04.09.2005 19:02
        Prezydent Władimir Putin zdymisjonował w niedzielę naczelnego dowódcę
        rosyjskiej floty, admirała Władimira Kurojedowa zwalniając go też z wojska -
        poinformował Kreml.

        Dymisja nastąpiła po incydencie z sierpnia, kiedy to z miniokręt AS-28 "Priz"
        uwiązł na Morzu Beringa u wybrzeży Kamczatki zaplątany w liny podwodnej anteny
        radiolokacyjnej i sieci rybackie. Siedmioosobową załogę wydobyto na
        powierzchnię po czterech dniach, głównie dzięki brytyjskim ratownikom.

        Kurojedow przewodził marynarce wojennej i wówczas, gdy w 2000 r. doszło do
        tragedii okrętu podwodnego "Kursk", w której zginęło 118 marynarzy.

        W ubiegłym roku spore zamieszanie wywołała wypowiedź admirała Kurojedowa, który
        oświadczył, że rosyjski krążownik atomowy jest w tak złym stanie technicznym,
        że może "eksplodować w każdej chwili". Jeszcze tego samego dnia admirał
        zdementował informacje, jakoby krążownik stanowił potencjalne zagrożenie dla
        swej załogi i otoczenia.

        Nowym naczelnym dowódcą rosyjskiej marynarki wojennej został admirał Władimir
        Masorin - dotychczasowy pierwszy zastępca naczelnego dowódcy


        Jak dla to bardzo dziwna logika - nie wylecial po katastrofie Kurska i
        mataczeniu z tym zwiazanym, wylatuje teraz, kiedy flota zachowala sie w
        wzglednie przyzwoicie. A haslo o Piotrze Wielkim? Prawda w oczy kole...
        • michalgajzler Re: Jaka szkoda 05.09.05, 10:23
          W Kommersancie zwlekanie z dymisją Kurojedowa tłumaczą brakami kadrowymi - może
          to być jakieś wytłumaczenie... Choć prawde mówiąc powinien polecieć sporo wcześniej.
    • michalgajzler Re: I Kurojedow poleciał... 05.09.05, 10:15
      dreaded88 napisał:

      > Wedle PAP został zdymisjonowany i jednocześnie zwolniony z wojska. A niektórzy
      > przewidywali raczej wersję soft - wysłanie na emeryturę ze względów zdrowotnych
      > .

      Wersja oficjalna;-) Kommersanta brzmi tak:
      "Yesterday, Vladimir Putin terminated Vladimir Kuroedov from the position of
      Head Commander of Russian Navy and discharged him from the military service
      because of his age.(...)
      Nieoficjalna wiadomo;-), a wisiała nad nim podobno już od lipca:

      "As Kommersant sources in the Defense Ministry insist, the final decision to
      fire Kuroedov from the naval Head Commander position was made a month ago. On
      July 30, during the rehearsal of the parade in St. Petersburg’s Neva River
      commemorating the Day of the Navy, the sailors with the training mine almost
      sunk the flagship of the parade "Neukrotimy." The little sub AS-28, which sunk
      near Kamchatka in the beginning of the August gave the president additional
      reason for the termination decision."

      Cóż, jakikolwiek był powód bezpośredni (a sporo się ich pewnie uzbierało;-) to
      Kurojedow poleciał. Któż nas teraz będzie raczył takimi cudownymi wypowiedziami...
      A i jego następca zbyt długo stanowiska piastował nie będzie ze względu na
      wiek...Kommersant prorokuje mu 2-3 lata i już typuje następcę.

      • dreaded88 Re: I Kurojedow poleciał... 06.09.05, 20:19
        Najlepsze będzie, jak opublikuje pamiętniki albo coś takiego. Z tym, że ryzykowałby zanurzenie się równie głęboko jak AS-28.
        • michalgajzler Re: I Kurojedow poleciał... 06.09.05, 20:52
          dreaded88 napisał:

          > Najlepsze będzie, jak opublikuje pamiętniki albo coś takiego. Z tym, że ryzykow
          > ałby zanurzenie się równie głęboko jak AS-28.

          No coż... doświadczenie ze zbyt "rozmownymi" wysokimi rangą oficerami floty już
          mają;-). Mormuł trafił za kratki bez sądu - aczkolwiak to były lata 80-te. Teraz
          możnaby jakąś pokazówkę zrobić (co już ćwiczono, oskarżyć o szpiegowanie dla
          Bellony albo coś takiego;-))).
    • wujcio44 Rzucili go kurom na pożarcie. 06.09.05, 20:42
    • Gość: A.L. o planach, buławie, boreju, czerw. październiku .. IP: *.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl 09.09.05, 10:02
      MOSCOW. (Yuri Zaitsev for RIA Novosti.) Somewhere under the Atlantic, a Soviet
      sub commander has just made a fateful decision. The Red October is heading
      West. The Americans want her. The Russians want her back. And the most
      incredible chase in history is on...

      This synopsis of novelist Tom Clancy's first novel, written in 1984, "The Hunt
      for Red October," leads us into the super secret world of submarines and their
      lethal weapons. The nuclear tipped Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM).
      Submarine-launched ballistic missiles, once the Soviet Unions' most formidable
      cold war deterrent, date back to September 16, 1955, when the small diesel
      submarine B-67 (Project 611 Zulu) surface- launched the world-first R-11FM (SS-
      1 Scud) missile, designed by Sergei Korolev, the architect of the Soviet space
      program.

      Four years later, several torpedo submarines were upgraded for the missiles
      that soon gave way to the new R-13s (SS-N-4 Sark) - missiles that Western
      defense experts were quick to dismiss as hopelessly lagging behind the U.S.
      counterpart Polaris A1. At the same launch weight, they said, the Polaris was
      effective at 2,200 km, while the Soviet missile only at 650 km.

      Well, that is true. Except for two little things - that the Polaris A1 had two
      stages while the Sark had only one and its 1,598-kg (3,520-lb) yielded a 1-Mt
      (megaton) nuclear capability, while the Polaris, with its two stages, carried
      only a 326-kg (718-lbs) warhead (650 kiloton nuclear). Interestingly, the Sark
      was in fact always tipped with a warhead intended for the more powerful R-7, in
      effect the world's first ICBM - for cost and time saving reasons.

      As the Sark was poised for commissioning, the first Soviet nuclear-powered
      submarine (Project 658 Hotel 1) entered service, with eight such subs built
      between 1958 and 1964. The fate of the first one, the notorious K-19, is too
      well known to speculate about, but it explains why the other seven entered
      upgrade programs when they were still at the shipyard. The upgrades, though,
      have been successful, and the submarines survived the R-13 decommissioned in
      1973 and remained in service until the last days of the Soviet Navy.

      However, they were hardly the best and most powerful weapon the Soviets had. As
      far back as 1963, new submarines with 1,400-km missiles were launched, and 1968
      marked the advent of the first SSBN strategic nuclear-powered submarine the
      Delta Class. (Delta I/Delta III, "underwater cruiser" in the Russian Navalese).
      These new subs were armed first with G2 2,400-km RSM-25 (SSN-6 Sawfly)
      ballistic missiles whose range was increased to 3,000 km after an upgrade, then
      with more powerful RSM-40s (SSN-8 Sawfly, 7,800 km and 9,100 km before and
      after upgrade). Newer submarines, the Typhoons and Delta IVs, were armed with
      the RSM-50s (SSN-18 Stingray, 6,500 km and 8,000 km), RSM-52s (SSN-20 Sturgeon,
      8,300 km), and RSM-54s (SSN-23 Skiff, 8,300 km).

      Returning to "The Red October." American Patrick Thompson, resident scholar and
      critic said, "the Typhoon-class ballistic missile submarine is no ordinary
      Russian sub, it is equipped with an extremely silent drive system capable of
      fooling Soviet and American SONAR (a method for detecting and locating objects
      submerged in water by echolocation) detectors alike." This clearly gave the
      Soviets a strategic cold war advantage as the advanced stealth class Typhoons
      could engage targets across the United States without actually leaving their
      base and having to deal with enemy anti-submarine defenses - though they were
      indeed silent enough to penetrate wherever they wanted.

      Currently the Russian Navy operates 12 SSBNs armed with 672 nuclear warheads on
      192 ICBMs - nearly a third of the Russian nuclear triad which Sergei Ivanov,
      the Russian defense minister, promised would be updated soon.

      "In 2005, we are going to begin flight tests of the Bulava, a new solid fuel-
      propelled sea-launched missile," he said recently at the Plesetsk Space Center.

      Yuri Solomonov, head of the Moscow Institute of Thermal Technology, the Bulava
      designer, said the first submarine launch - provided the project was
      appropriately funded - "could be made in 2006."

      The missile will be used with G5 nuclear submarines to be commissioned within
      one or two years. Sevmashpredpriyatiye is currently making the first two
      Project 955 Borei subs (already christened Yuri Dolgoruky and Alexander
      Nevsky), with three to be ready by 2010. Each will carry 12 Bulava-Ms.

      The M in the missile index stands for "morskoy," or "naval," because the Bulava
      is, in effect, a derivative of the land-based missile Topol (SS-27). However,
      Solomonov argues, referring to the size and weight restrictions for sea-
      launched missiles, that "here there is no talk of unification because you get
      two basically different theoretical approaches."

      Nonetheless, he admits, the designers took as much as they could from the SS-27
      because in today's Russia - a far cry from the Soviet era - cost effectiveness
      also becomes a priority. So far, human resources have made up for scarce
      financing: people who can design, test, and deploy state-of-the-art missiles
      appropriately for the little money they receive are certainly worth their
      weight in gold. But what next?

      Older Typhoon Project 941 submarines are also expected to undergo an upgrade
      for the new Bulavas. One of them, the Dmitry Donskoy, already tested the new
      system, firing a dummy version in the White Sea last year. It did not cause any
      harm and fell into the sea within seconds: the actual missile is still far from
      flying.

      All of this brings us back to Clancy and his "The Hunt for Red October." His
      accurate use of military procedures and disclosure of highly classified
      military technical information was shocking at the time. Maybe he did an
      excellent job of researching specific procedures and terminology that the
      military uses to reduce confusion and ensure the highest probability of success
      in their mission. Rather than deriding military protocol as pompous and arcane,
      Clancy demonstrates its positive qualities and proves that it can be as
      fascinating as police procedure. Anyone with a military background can relate.
      Where did he really get all that information? I wonder....

      Yuri Zaitsev is an expert at the Space Research Institute of the Russian
      Academy of Sciences
      • Gość: Bartek Re: o planach, buławie, boreju, czerw. październi IP: *.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl 09.09.05, 10:15
        A o projekcie 885 coś słychać ??.Kiedy mają zwodować Sowierodwińska ??
Inne wątki na temat:

Nie masz jeszcze konta? Zarejestruj się


Nakarm Pajacyka